« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Trouble in Paradise

A Democrat Questions Obama's Grand Economic Plan

It looks like not all Congressional Democrats are prepared to march in lockstep with Barack Obama into a brighter future:

Rep. Paul Kanjorski (D-Pa.), who chairs the Financial Services subcommittee on Capital Markets, Insurance and Government Sponsored Enterprises, said on C-SPAN that Democrats have “lost our way” and “shouldn’t be pressed by silly deadlines” of getting the bill into law by the Presidents Day recess.

Noting that Congress has taken many legislative steps over the past year to fix the economy, Kanjorski said, “Quite frankly, we’re doing this in small stages and small bites. We need to take our time. I guarantee we’re going to come back and we are going to have another stimulus, we’re going to have another bailout for Wall Street because we are not doing these things properly…”

“I think we’ve lost our way in a way … We shouldn’t be pressed by these silly deadlines like, you know, what makes [the] Presidents Day holiday so important for us to get out of town?”

He added, “In order to get it right, we have to spend time and analyze how much is going to hit the street as fast as it can hit the street and I don’t think we’ve done that. I think, to a large extent, many of the parts of the stimulus are programs that are going to take years and years and years to accomplish …”

Reading this piece as well as an item from his local press, it’s clear that Kanjorski believes that the current TARP is not enough to get banks lending again, and the stimulus package won’t get the economy moving, either. On the latter point, he’s right. No Keynesian plan will work. So it’s both smart policy and smart politics to step back for a few weeks and reconsider.

But so far the strategy from Obama and Congressional Democrats has been to race ahead with something big, even if there’s not really much reason to hope that it will work. So rather than wait a few weeks, look at the big picture, and try to put together a comprehensive approach to the current problems, Democrats are left defending a terrible bill, while they talk of new stimuli and new TARPs down the road.

Credit Kanjorski with recognizing that this panicked approach is not only unlikely to work, it’s likely to prompt voters to question whether Obama, Pelosi, and Reid should really be trusted with the car keys. This will frighten Congressional Democrat leaders, who don’t want to be put on the spot by people that they can’t slander as supporters of George Bush. But they ought to welcome the chance to consider whether they’re about cut their own throats politically.

After all, Kanjorski could as easily have said this a week ago. Instead he waited until it became clear that most Republicans were going to wash their hands of the mess, and let the Democrats own the issue. It turns out that pushing a costly and pointless bill is do-able for Democrats, but only if Republicans shoulder the load as well.

COMMENTS

  • 10ksnooker

    Republicans don’t just lay down around the Democrats and give them cover.

    The ?Stimulus? Bills Your Family ? $825 Billion is equivalent to borrowing $10,520 from EVERY FAMILY IN AMERICA. This money has to be paid back.

    More here:

    The single word for all this is “STUPID”.

  • bobojake

    American Rape and Reaping Plan is not good for our culture, our nation nor the citizens of the United States. When obama said it was his plan today on the radio after he left the house of REP, I really think all he did was throw all the elcrapo against the wall to see if any of it would stick. If it takes till Sept 11, 2009 to get it right I don’t care. You shoved your first one TARP(Geithner) down our throat obama we won’t take another one.

    • Next93

      This is “crisis” that’s entirely the result of a series of government malinvestments and wrong-headed policiies. Now they’re going to save us by taking over huge swaths of the economy, and by planting the seeds for a massive round of inflation, making the boomer generation completely dependent on continued socialist program by erasing life savings.

      And we HAVE to rush this bill through without any real inspection, because it’s a CRISIS.

      Anyone else hear a train whistle? Cuz I think we’re getting railroaded.

  • owise1

    If the Republicans will continue to trumpet how bad a bill this is, and then show some backbone by voting against it, this bill won’t pass. Moderate and conservative Democrats may or may not outnumber the extreme left, but this thing won’t pass without them if the Republicans vote “No.” That’s a fact that more and more of them are beginning to consider. They know very well this is a stinkbomb that will explode on them just in time for the next election cycle. The possibility that it will provide any meaningful stimulus is so remote as to be nonexistent, and even these guys are smart enough to figure that out and what it would mean for them and their election chances.

    The Republicans will never get a good bill by compromise. They’ll just get a very bad bill with their fingerprints on it. There are only possible ways to get anything remotely worthwhile. The first is to let the Democrats fight it out among themselves. The second – and I haven’t seen or heard anyone suggest this before – would be for the Republicans to engage the blue dog Democrats and come up with their own “bipartisan” plan to counter the extreme plan of the far left. Actually, the more I think about that idea, the more appealing it is. It would show the Republicans to be a party that is trying to be constructive and is not just naysayers, and it would also show that they are willing and able to work with Democrats in good faith, in a bipartisan manner, for the good of the country. Isolate the extremists, including the President, and put themselves right into the mainstream of American opinion.

    • Thomas_Hauber

      You are naive if you think Pelosi would let the blue dogs run with the republicans. The minute she catches one whiff of some truly bipartisan bill she will be out with the hot pokers are tongs to go to work on them.

      The best we can hope for is that no republican votes for it and that they put forth a reasonable bill (that will be creamed). That way Republicans can point to the crap being offered now and say this is a Dem bill only. When employment hits double digits, and it will, then Republicans will be in an excellent position for 2010.

  • owise1

    Thomas,
    You’re no doubt correct that Ms. Pelosi would institute waterboarding of her own caucus if she caught wind of them working with Republicans. Sounds like a win – win for the Republicans if you ask me.

    Seriously, though, while you’re certainly right in her reaction, you’ve gotta think that a lot of those blue dogs got elected in some pretty conservative districts and if they stay on the bus she’s driving, they can bend over and kiss their collective political butts goodbye. As I see it, their chance of political survival requires that one of the following scenarios plays out:
    (1) That their stimulus bill as presently constituted and pushed by Pelosi/Reed/Obama works. That’s a very very risky proposition, and they know it very well.

    (2) That their stimulus bill is benign, but the economy comes roaring back on its own. Are they going going to stake their future on that likelihood?

    (3) That they are able to get the extreme left of their own party to compromise with them to fashion a bill that they can give grudging support to. This is only slightly better for the blue dogs if they think the compromises are enough to give it at least a snowball’s chance of working. Problem is, if it doesn’t and if the Republicans continue to stand firm, , they’re still holding the bag and the American people will be looking for blood come next election.

    (4) Or, they can blow off Pelosi/Reed/Obama and work with the Republicans to develop a plan that has bipartisan support. There is certainly some risk for them in this, particularly from Madame Speaker, but Pres. Obama is on record as saying that he wants a new tone, and to work in a bipartisan manner. If they take him at his word (admittedly, a dangerous thing for anyone to do) and work with the Republicans, Obama might find himself in a corner. I admit it’s not a bad corner for a politician with a backbone, but for a man whose voting record is primarily “Present” and who is reticent to take a stand, preferring to let others take the heat while he takes the credit… it just might work.

    Never underestimate the power of the will to survive.

    • Kyle-MI

      see http://www.redstate.com/kyleh/2009/01/27/on-republican-tactics/

      Blue dogs can vote against the bill if Obama can rope enough ‘bipartisan’ Republicans to vote for it.

  • Kayla

    This bill is just a bust. It will do what the other bail outs have done , NOTHING. Let the Dems vote for it and defend it in 2010.

  • DerKrieger

    to members of the Democrat party that don’t toe her party line? They don’t answer to her, they answer to their constituents. Why the heck any Dem not from the Left coast or New England would want to sign on to her San Francisco agenda is beyond me.