Just a few weeks ago, current White House press secretary Robert Gibbs promised ‘a one word answer’ when it came to repealing the ban on gays openly serving in the military. Apparently the one word is ‘overpromising’ — which seems to be fast becoming the watchword of the new administration:
The Obama administration is telling the Pentagon and gay-rights advocates that it will have to study the implications for national security and enlist more support in Congress before trying to overturn the so-called “don’t ask, don’t tell” law and allow gays to serve openly in the military, according to people involved in the discussions.
They said Obama, who pledged during the campaign to overturn the law, does not want to ask lawmakers to do so until the military has completed a comprehensive assessment of the impact that such a move would have on military discipline. Then, the president hopes to be able to make a case to members of both parties that overturning the 1993 law would be in the best interest of national security.
So if I read this right, the Obama administration may or may not be backing off its ‘one-word’ answer. And if they’re sticking by the pledge — which certainly seems to be in question — the appearance they’ve created is that they’ve already decided to kowtow to the gay rights groups that form a part of the Democratic base, and now they just need to cook up a study to demonstrate that it won’t hurt military effectiveness.
A competent administration would pick a position and stick to it. The best position would probably be to commit to doing nothing that compromises the security of the American people, but Gibbs ruled that one out when he promised that Obama would repeal the policy. Now they seem to have realized that it might be a political liability, so they’re trying to backtrack — but have only succeeded in clouding the issue.
It seems that the Obama team has learned nothing from studying the mistakes of the Clinton administration. They too, took a stand on repealing the policy, only to realize it was too big a lift. Now the Obama team too, has set themselves up to make someone angry, no matter how they ultimately square the circle.
Neil Stevens
Steve Maley
Bold colors, not pastels
tankertodd (Diary) Monday, February 2nd at 3:20PM EST (link)This is another argument that supports the conservative belief that what our party needs now are principles and bold colors instead of pastels. The notion that we can be for clear principles at all becomes, in and of itself, a differentiator.
People will join us in 2012 not necessarily for our positions, but for the fact that we have positions and principles. Let’s differentiate ourselves from this Clintonian triangulation. Let’s keep it up!
———————————
The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race – Chief Justice Roberts
[CoJCS] Mullen told reporters...
furious (Diary) Monday, February 2nd at 3:46PM EST (link)… earlier this month that he is aware of the president’s “intent to do this,” but “there are no more specifics with respect to when.” When the time comes, he said, he will give the president “my best military advice” on “the impact of what a potential change could be.”
…seems like more than a “one-word answer”.
Unless that answer is “nevermind”.
–furious
“I find your lack of faith disturbing.” — Darth Vader
Adm Mullen is not known for his spine.
Old_Crow (Diary) Monday, February 2nd at 6:56PM EST (link)Top notch administrator and team player. He’s been in DC too long to be a leader though (after a few years most get ‘spine removal surgery’) and just build resumes for follow-on employment.
Most of the warfighters avoid DC as much as possible and are cranky around politicians. You get that way after seeing the mess (and horror) that politicians make around the world.
“Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm.” — James Madison
Is there anyone among his supporters that 'The One' is not going to shaft in the next four years? nt
Xasteius (Diary) Monday, February 2nd at 4:10PM EST (link)Or does he simply not care since the events will undergo an Orwellian rewrite?
(/sarcasm)
Don’t leave the party, hijack it back!
The only poll that counts is the one at the ballot box.
I don’t want to be Reagan. I want to be a Chance/Soros hybrid.
Same group Clinton didn't backstab
aesthete (Diary) Monday, February 2nd at 5:32PM EST (link)The pro-abortionists.
The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice – G.K. Chesterton
Easy way to Deliver
Ron Robinson (Diary) Monday, February 2nd at 5:14PM EST (link)He can easily do away with Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell – simply make it…
Don’t Tell, Don’t Ask!
Promise kept!
________________________________________

Ron Robinson
Chair, AD 49 Republican Central Committee
California Republican Central Committee
PROCINCT Author/ Founder
The Precinct Project
Unified Patriots – How-To: Activists Taking Action!
Well...
DCTrav (Diary) Monday, February 2nd at 7:42PM EST (link)I can’t really fault him for this. I mean I for one am glad to hear that he is checking into the actual effects rather than just pushing forward (Guantanamo).
I don’t think we should be piling on him too much about breaking campaign promises, lest he may actually try to keep all of them.
We should bring out the issues
antisocial (Diary) Monday, February 2nd at 7:54PM EST (link)and expose the democrats for what they are. Bunch of Liars and cheats.
Let him try to keep his campaign promises. That’s a fight we should be willing to fight.
Obama Doctrine – Boot On The Throat
—————————–
What is to be done?
——————————
No. You can’t – Moe Lane
——————————
The Emperor has no clothes!!!
Danger, danger Will Robinson
DerKrieger (Diary) Monday, February 2nd at 9:39PM EST (link)“and enlist more support in Congress”
To me that’s code for, “I don’t think I can get GOP support”
“In questions of power, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.” – Thomas Jefferson
“I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents.” – James Madison
Whenever the legislators endeavor to take away and destroy the property of the people, or to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power, they put themselves into a state of war with the people, who are thereupon absolved from any further obedience.” — John Locke, 1690