Roland Burris may not have many friends, but he doesn’t have much to lose. He’s 71, so doesn’t have to consider how the fight over his place in the Senate might affect his electability down the road. His Senate appointment revived a moribund political career, so it’s not as if he’d be favored for some other office if he gave up the seat. He’s the only African-American in the Senate, and in Harry Reid he faces a leader who’s already backed down against him once, rather than alienating the African-American community. So according to a source close to Burris, he’s not going anywhere:
Embattled Sen. Roland Burris (D-Ill.) has not considered resigning — at least not yet — a source familiar with his situation said late Friday, as calls for Burris to consider such a move were being issued by high-ranking Democrats, including the administration of President Barack Obama.
“Resigning has not been an option discussed,” this source said. “Who knows what’s going to happen over the weekend? Anything can change.”
Burris, this source said, is currently behind closed doors considering his next move. The Senator believes he has been honest and above board, but feels he is suffering in part because of a faulty communications strategy in relation to how he has dealt with this latest scandal…
According to the source familiar with the situation, Burris did not purposely withhold the information that Blagojevich had asked him to raise campaign funds for him — the Senator said he tried to do so but was unsuccessful. Rather, Burris in good faith simply reported this information to the state as his own review of past events came to light.
“He filed the second affidavit voluntarily. He offered more information upon reviewing the situation,” this source said.
Burris’ account is nonsense. Is there anyone who thinks it remotely possible that Burris simply forgot he had tried to raise money for Blagojevich - and had promised to do so during a conversation about the Senate seat? If he were any other Member of the Senate, such an excuse would be insufficient to protect him from expulsion.
But Burris isn’t any Senator, he’s the body’s only African-American. And African-American leaders are pushing to make sure that Obama’s seat stays in the hands of an African-American. As Chicago Sun Times columnist Laura Washington says “I think there are many people who believe that this is all part of an attempt to make sure that the seat does not remain in black hands… Get Roland Burris out of the way, and then someone white will take it over.”
If Burris refuses to step aside - and as I point out, he has little to lose - then Senate Democrats will be loath to expel him without the solid backing of the African-American community. That means they’ll have to have a strong case against Burris, and they’ll probably need a commitment from Illinois Governor Quinn that he will appoint another African-American to the seat. Even the people of Illinois might get so disgusted with this farce as to give a Republican a chance to win the seat in 2010.
Right now Harry Reid is likely pursuing a two-part plan behind the scenes:
- identify all the carrots and sticks available to get Burris to resign (maybe there’s some lucrative SEIU job Burris is qualified to fill?); and,
- try to build support in the Congressional Black Caucus for expelling Burris.
If nothing else, it seems Reid might just have learned not to make absolute promises that he’s forced to renege on later. Baby steps.
Note - Illinicon makes an excellent point in the comments:
Gov. Quinn also reconfirmed his support for a special election to fill the seat and the Republicans have a bill to do just that, so I doubt the appointment of another african-american is going to work.
Pass the popcorn.

The CBC Will Never Back Getting Rid of Burris
IJB Saturday, February 21st at 3:43PM EST (link)So, I think Reid is hosed on this.
If I were Burris, I’d hold a public press conference on Monday stating flatly that “I [Burris] am not resigning and will never resign,” so “the only way to remove me [Burris] would be to expel me,” but that the Democrat Senate leadership better think twice about doing that because it will endanger their ability to defeat filibusters and that it would clearly be a “racist” move aimed at silencing black Americans.
Heck, Burris, like Blago, has nothing to lose - he might as well go b***s to the wall on this!!
Serves the Dems right! Couldn’t happen to a move deserving bunch!!
GREAT POINT!
Crippy Saturday, February 21st at 6:37PM EST (link)Burris should have started screaming RACISM for the very beginning! I’m not certain but didn’t the CBC back William Jefferson, D-LA when someone found $90 in is refrigerator?
-Crippy’s World
In his presser to ask for Burris to step down
Illinicon Saturday, February 21st at 4:22PM EST (link)Gov. Quinn also reconfirmed his support for a special election to fill the seat and the Republicans have a bill to do just that, so I doubt the appointment of another african-american is going to work.
Jindal/Thompson ‘12
Bringing clear Conservative change to America.
No downside for Burris at all
Adjoran Saturday, February 21st at 4:41PM EST (link)As noted, he has no further prospects if he resigns, so why would he NOT fight to the bitter end? And use every possible means, legally and politically, to keep his seat?
Considering Burris’ offense - the possibility of perjury - compared to those of, say, Charles Rangel and William Jefferson, why should he NOT demand to be treated at least as well as those gentlemen? Jefferson, remember, was caught on video accepting $100,000 cash bribe and later used the National Guard to rescue $90,000 from his freezer in the Katrina aftermath. Rangel hasn’t denied the allegations against him, either (merely attempted to blame the tax evasion on his wife and/or their accountants).
So if obviously guilty men are allowed to serve on, why shouldn’t Burris?
It really doesn't matter. They got his vote on the stimulus
Praying Saturday, February 21st at 5:46PM EST (link)At this point, he can stay or he can go - the damage is done, the generational theft bill has passed, Chicago politics is scum but it has always been scum, why should anyone care that there is a dishonest African American democrat in the senate? Why should anyone be racist about this?There are dishonest white democrats (Geithner), Hispanic democrats (Solis, but I guess she hasn’t been confirmed), African American (Holder)…(Well, I don’t know about dishonest, per se, but he has enough other strikes against him…) in Obama’s cabinet that what is or isn’t in the senate doesn’t even really matter anymore. I mean, it matters to ME, but not to the chattering classes out there who voted for Obama et al in the first place. I’m so disgusted I could just weep.
Join the RedState Strike Force
DON'T BE DISGUSTED: BE AMUSED.
papalee Saturday, February 21st at 6:51PM EST (link)Then get ready to do a lot of very serious political work to turn this around in ‘10.
Considering the general state of both Chicago and Illinois politics and pols, I, personally, am becoming quite fond of Burris. I suspects that he knows what every smart Black politician in this country knows which is that Democrats may love the Black vote, but have very little use for the individual Black person. Reference Obama’s revival of welfare slavery and all the damage it has done to Black families and especially the Black male. Barry doesn’t realize how very lucky he was to have a white grandmother who made substantial sacrifices for his future. Otherwise his juvenile excursions into the drug culture may have made things very different for him.
It's Amazing How the MSM Has Effectively Made Burris and Blago Non-Partisan
Swamp_Yankee Saturday, February 21st at 6:46PM EST (link)Outiside of Illinoism, the Deomcrat brand is barely damaged by all this. Larry Craig’s bathroom stall incident did more to harm the Republican brand than this this whole sordid, corrupt, egregious charade and all the clowns invovled.
Democrat Burris. Democratic Senator Burris. Use it early. Use it often
Not Dead Yet!
Attempting, unsuccessfully, to raise money for a dirty Dem makes him one of the LESS compromised Dems in Congress...
Crowe Saturday, February 21st at 8:59PM EST (link)Why the furor to oust this guy? He’s no worse, and possibly better, than most of his partisan colleagues. He, at the very least, was unsuccessful at raising dirty money for a dirty pol…
…which raises the question… how hard did he really try to raise that money for Blago? C’mon… no one was willing to donate money to Blago? In this day and age? In Chicago-land politics? please.
Of course, corruption of any level has no place in politics, but as far as Dems go, this one is darn-near material for canonization.
“We sleep soundly in our beds only because
rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence upon those who would do us harmDear Leader Obama gives us leave to do so.”