<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Harkin Seeks Card Check Compromise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/2009/03/27/harkin-seeks-card-check-compromise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/2009/03/27/harkin-seeks-card-check-compromise/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: 6eorge Jetson</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/2009/03/27/harkin-seeks-card-check-compromise/#comment-4244</link>
		<dc:creator>6eorge Jetson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 00:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/?p=980#comment-4244</guid>
		<description>&lt;object width="425" height="344"&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/KDwODbl3muE&#38;hl=en&#38;fs=1&#38;rel=0&#38;color1=0x5d1719&#38;color2=0xcd311b"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/KDwODbl3muE&#38;hl=en&#38;fs=1&#38;rel=0&#38;color1=0x5d1719&#38;color2=0xcd311b" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/KDwODbl3muE&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=0x5d1719&amp;color2=0xcd311b"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/KDwODbl3muE&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=0x5d1719&amp;color2=0xcd311b" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike gamecock DeVine</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/2009/03/27/harkin-seeks-card-check-compromise/#comment-4241</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike gamecock DeVine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 05:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/?p=980#comment-4241</guid>
		<description>Two days ago, Specter joined them.

It can't pass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two days ago, Specter joined them.</p>
<p>It can&#8217;t pass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IJB</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/2009/03/27/harkin-seeks-card-check-compromise/#comment-4238</link>
		<dc:creator>IJB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 00:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/?p=980#comment-4238</guid>
		<description>In a perfect world, you're right - Card Check would backfire on the Dems. 

But the Dems intend to use Card Check the way the Soviets used Commie Party membership - those in good standing will be "rewarded", and those not in 'good standing' will be hounded and punished by arbitration (which, in many cases, will lead to outright confiscation). 

In other words, the Dems have no intention of playing a "fair" game. 

Believe me, the Dems won't care if the economy goes into the tank as a result of this - those with union cards will be rewarded; and all the rest of us that don't will be sitting in a bread line (or worse). 

As to your contention that it won't pass - I was saying that right up until yesterday. 

But the passage of the Obama Youth bill shows that Senate Republicans aren't patriots - they're useful patsies who will go along with anything Obama's Stalinists throw at them. 

I'm not nearly so hopeful as I was even a week ago...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a perfect world, you&#8217;re right - Card Check would backfire on the Dems. </p>
<p>But the Dems intend to use Card Check the way the Soviets used Commie Party membership - those in good standing will be &#8220;rewarded&#8221;, and those not in &#8216;good standing&#8217; will be hounded and punished by arbitration (which, in many cases, will lead to outright confiscation). </p>
<p>In other words, the Dems have no intention of playing a &#8220;fair&#8221; game. </p>
<p>Believe me, the Dems won&#8217;t care if the economy goes into the tank as a result of this - those with union cards will be rewarded; and all the rest of us that don&#8217;t will be sitting in a bread line (or worse). </p>
<p>As to your contention that it won&#8217;t pass - I was saying that right up until yesterday. </p>
<p>But the passage of the Obama Youth bill shows that Senate Republicans aren&#8217;t patriots - they&#8217;re useful patsies who will go along with anything Obama&#8217;s Stalinists throw at them. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not nearly so hopeful as I was even a week ago&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike gamecock DeVine</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/2009/03/27/harkin-seeks-card-check-compromise/#comment-4236</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike gamecock DeVine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 23:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/?p=980#comment-4236</guid>
		<description>When unions are at 7% of private employees and then they see that that the businesses failing are unionized and then they see that Americans simply are not joiners but rather people defined by the man on a horse, they never had a chance for this

esp after I reported the NON blue dog dems weeks ago that had already declared their opposition.

A forgotten fact: most of the dems in congress elected in 2006 were conservatives...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When unions are at 7% of private employees and then they see that that the businesses failing are unionized and then they see that Americans simply are not joiners but rather people defined by the man on a horse, they never had a chance for this</p>
<p>esp after I reported the NON blue dog dems weeks ago that had already declared their opposition.</p>
<p>A forgotten fact: most of the dems in congress elected in 2006 were conservatives&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike gamecock DeVine</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/2009/03/27/harkin-seeks-card-check-compromise/#comment-4235</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike gamecock DeVine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 23:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/?p=980#comment-4235</guid>
		<description>of private business is unionized. Unions are anathema to American values and proven failures. The fact is that union leaders are now learning that even with huge dem majorities they can't get this bill passed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>of private business is unionized. Unions are anathema to American values and proven failures. The fact is that union leaders are now learning that even with huge dem majorities they can&#8217;t get this bill passed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike gamecock DeVine</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/2009/03/27/harkin-seeks-card-check-compromise/#comment-4234</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike gamecock DeVine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 23:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/?p=980#comment-4234</guid>
		<description>do cap and trade or the 90% tax on bonuses.

And they won't be able to do card check in 2011 either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>do cap and trade or the 90% tax on bonuses.</p>
<p>And they won&#8217;t be able to do card check in 2011 either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael DeWeese</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/2009/03/27/harkin-seeks-card-check-compromise/#comment-4233</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael DeWeese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 23:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/?p=980#comment-4233</guid>
		<description>It is test legislature to set precedence. Imagine political elections resolved in the same manner where the number of political party registrants determins the final person to win office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is test legislature to set precedence. Imagine political elections resolved in the same manner where the number of political party registrants determins the final person to win office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael DeWeese</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/2009/03/27/harkin-seeks-card-check-compromise/#comment-4232</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael DeWeese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 23:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/?p=980#comment-4232</guid>
		<description>Is only a way to start the ball rolling. As time goes by, and compromise that is passed will be ammended until Card Check is in full force. Even if it takes a couple years or more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is only a way to start the ball rolling. As time goes by, and compromise that is passed will be ammended until Card Check is in full force. Even if it takes a couple years or more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IJB</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/2009/03/27/harkin-seeks-card-check-compromise/#comment-4231</link>
		<dc:creator>IJB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 23:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/?p=980#comment-4231</guid>
		<description>They need to hit this now. The odds are great that they'll be in a much weaker position in 2011. 

The trick for the Dems is to craft a "compromise" that is, in the details, even worse and more egregious than the original bill, while publicly spinning it as a "sensible compromise", and then hoodwinking Senate Republicans to go along with it. 

Based on what we've seen lately from the current Senate GOP, I can easily imagine up to 20 morons crossing the aisle for something even worse (but publicly "softer") than the current bill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They need to hit this now. The odds are great that they&#8217;ll be in a much weaker position in 2011. </p>
<p>The trick for the Dems is to craft a &#8220;compromise&#8221; that is, in the details, even worse and more egregious than the original bill, while publicly spinning it as a &#8220;sensible compromise&#8221;, and then hoodwinking Senate Republicans to go along with it. </p>
<p>Based on what we&#8217;ve seen lately from the current Senate GOP, I can easily imagine up to 20 morons crossing the aisle for something even worse (but publicly &#8220;softer&#8221;) than the current bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert A. Hahn</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/2009/03/27/harkin-seeks-card-check-compromise/#comment-4226</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert A. Hahn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 20:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/?p=980#comment-4226</guid>
		<description>My guess is that the unions will now signal that they don't want a compromise. Instead they'll wait until 2011, hoping that more Democratic success at the ballot box will get them the whole enchilada.&lt;p&gt;
If they take what they can get now, the subject of "card check" will likely disappear from the legislative radar for a decade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess is that the unions will now signal that they don&#8217;t want a compromise. Instead they&#8217;ll wait until 2011, hoping that more Democratic success at the ballot box will get them the whole enchilada.
<p>
If they take what they can get now, the subject of &#8220;card check&#8221; will likely disappear from the legislative radar for a decade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larryp</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/2009/03/27/harkin-seeks-card-check-compromise/#comment-4225</link>
		<dc:creator>larryp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 20:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/?p=980#comment-4225</guid>
		<description>the squishes  that are GOP can't stand up to this "reach across the aise" bs.
Someone will cave. Too bad. The gOP should hang up the phone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the squishes  that are GOP can&#8217;t stand up to this &#8220;reach across the aise&#8221; bs.<br />
Someone will cave. Too bad. The gOP should hang up the phone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
