« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Crowded Democrat Agenda Gets More Crowded?

Democrat Agenda Includes Cap-and-Tax, Health Care, Immigration, and Now... Gay Rights?

Just a few weeks ago, Barack Obama and Congressional Democrats seemed content to ignore the gay community. When Barack Obama’s DoJ began to sound much like George Bush’s, even Barney Frank told the gay community to shut up and like it. But it seems that Democrat leaders are afraid to lose an important source of campaign donations. So according to Roll Call, legislation to appease this constituency is back on the table. It’s unclear whether it will be partial repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act (to allow benefits for partners), employment non-discrimination, an end to Don’t Ask Don’t Tell – or some combination of the above:

Frank this week introduced the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, which provides workplace protections to gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender employees. The bill passed the House last year — without the transgender provision — but failed to advance in the Senate. This time around, Frank said, the bill has the votes to pass the House with the transgender protections and with the support of five Republicans…

Leaders may try to package workplace discrimination and federal health benefits together into one bill, according to one source who attended the leadership meeting. The source said that Pelosi is fine with that plan, and others want to do it as well but “they are always worried about people taking votes, whether we have enough…”

In addition to the Speaker’s under-the-Dome meeting, lawmakers have been stepping up efforts to advance bills affecting the gay community. In addition to Frank’s ENDA, Baldwin introduced legislation Wednesday to address health needs specific to gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people.

Other Democratic lawmakers have reached out to Obama to act first on certain fronts. On Monday, 77 House Members — including one Republican — sent a letter to the president urging him to use his authority to prevent military officials from enforcing “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.”

Polis said he planned to engage Armed Services Chairman Ike Skelton (D-Mo.), the original sponsor of the 1993 policy, on the issue during Wednesday’s debate on the defense authorization bill.

Where does this fit into the crowded Democrat agenda? Congress has to consider a Supreme Court nomination, Cap-and-Tax, health care reform, and potentially immigration reform and Card Check. It’s hard to imagine all those bills can get action this year. And with many first-term Democrats sitting in GOP-leaning seats, that’s a lot of tough votes.

Furthermore, it’s worth noting that Members of Congress are writing to Obama to ask him to stop enforcing Don’t Ask Don’t Tell. It’s much easier for them to ask the White House not to enforce it – which would probably be illegal – than it is to repeal the policy. This is a case of 77 Members of Congress passing the buck when they could instead cast a brave vote. Are they willing to put their money where their mouths are if the bill comes to the floor?

Lastly, by suddenly putting immigration reform and gay rights legislation back on the agenda, Democrat leaders are setting a precedent that may come back to haunt them: the squeaky wheel gets the grease. There are plenty of Democrat activists who may decide it’s time for their pet issues to be addressed.

COMMENTS

  • Swamp_Yankee

    They know they are losing public opinion on many issues.

    They can keep Blue Dogs and conservative Dems in line as long as Blue Dogs and conservative Dems are not getting pressure from their constituents. Most voters are not activists and dont know what’s going on unless it gets substantial media coverage. When so much is out there, its easier for issues to slip through the cracks.

    • http://www.ssce.net/Web-Articles/Web-articles-indexed-authors.html#authors-l JLenardDetroit

      after distraction to avoid focus on any single ObamAgenda item for them to get “ginned up” enough to call their Reps. Keep your glasses on (see: They Live for ref.).

      • DONTREADONME
        • izoneguy

          Obama & the dems are in a desperate race to pass as much legislation to pay out the favors to set-up 2010. These will be wounds but no mortal wounds. Conservatives will battle back, defeat what we can and repeal the rest once we gain control back.

          • http://www.ssce.net/Web-Articles/Web-articles-indexed-authors.html#authors-l JLenardDetroit

            The Democrats know very well the Baracklash (h/t: scarlos) may just happen despite their fast and furious attempts to buy 2010 and 2012 votes this far in advance…. However, they are hedging their bets by passing all this garbage (like they learned from TARP) to kick it down to the “Agency” level (CO2 to EPA, Nicotine to FDA, etc…) so that ultra-Liberal operatives that ALWAYS remain in place regardless of who is controlling the “Elective Offices” in DC.

            They need to ram it through now so that rules/regulations can/will be created and/or controlled at the Agency level making it harder for us to root it out. We are going to need some very courageous (which I’m not sure there will be enough of) Conservatives/Republicans to just plain SHUT-DOWN and/or really clean-out the Agencies as well as over-turning Legistlation… Democrats will “obstruct” any Legislative gains to roll the things back because they have their allies in the Agencies to continue the Liberal/Progressive harmful agenda. They want to push down the money and/or authority to the lower levels of Government where they can control it without the pesky bothersome restraints of “Votes” and all that BS (in their minds).

          • The_Rebel

            of Washington Post fame. He was on CNBC within the last half hour saying that the Republicans won’t see the White House for a long time. He says that by September, October of 2010, the recession will be long over and the recovery will be in full bloom. Of course, he says the Democrats will get the credit from the electorate.

            I don’t want the Republicans to be the whipping boys of the MSM, who will say that we want the economic recovery to fail (a la Rush’s comments) to gain political advantage. This kind of crap talk by Milbank and others has to be met head-on and put down, even if it means the Republicans have to create their own war-room communications center to counter these attacks.

      • Swamp_Yankee

        Speaking of media distractions

        Some days I Iose faith in my country. It is Friday, we are stuck inthis news cycle and all I’m going to hear about all weekend are tributes to that freak Jackson and then maybe some more Farrah stories and Sanford pieces.

        God save us.

        • Alberta
          • Swamp_Yankee

            Your old.

        • DONTREADONME

          wow, did not see that coming? I hope he is at peace, I will pray for his familiy.

          • izoneguy

            Multiple sources now confirm.

            What a week.

          • DONTREADONME
          • Tbone

            It was a cost/ benefit analysis that did him in.

          • http://www.ssce.net/Web-Articles/Web-articles-indexed-authors.html#authors-l JLenardDetroit

            but your point is made. To spell it out for the blind, HC debate!

            Today will be known forever as the day the “crotch grab” and “hee hee” died

            but seriously… despite all his issues/problems, real and/or percieved, I hope he can Rest In Peace now.

          • http://impudent.blognation.us/blog kyle8

            Wonder what part of hell Dante put the pedophiles?

          • mom2oneson
          • http://www.ssce.net/Web-Articles/Web-articles-indexed-authors.html#authors-l JLenardDetroit

            As the saying about threes goes….

            Fawcett, MJ, and ????

          • mom2oneson
          • LibRick

            I posted before I saws yours.

          • mom2oneson
          • LibRick

            the three thing as I was reading your post. She said Farrah, MJ, and Ed McMahon.

          • http://www.ssce.net/Web-Articles/Web-articles-indexed-authors.html#authors-l JLenardDetroit

            and a reminder we need to move this to an open thread and end the thread-jack…. which I was a big part of spawning (sorry brian).

          • DONTREADONME

            that all of these events that have happened will serve the MSM cause to not discuss the legislation in Congress. Giving the Dems what they want, a ramrod through of awful legislation.

          • http://www.ssce.net/Web-Articles/Web-articles-indexed-authors.html#authors-l JLenardDetroit

            and we cannot allow them to get away with it…. but, we must show our concern and not come across as “cold/harsh” trying to insist people be focused on the Political issues. We know darn well that will become yet another MSM distraction/deflection point to try and pin us with that! Delicate balancing act. They will indeed have these front page and bury the ObamAgenda items in the later pages.

          • DerKrieger

            He went first

    • 6eorge Jetson

      Of course I have my conservative bias, but for contested districts, I see the slate of Democratic issues as “How To Lose in 2010 Playbook” for the Blue Dogs.

      The US can’t (or won’t at higher rates) fund our own staggering deficits, and then on top of that, Zer∅ & Co want to add the costs of Cap & Trade, Health Care, and perhaps a Stimulus II. ∅bama may have the cool factor going for him, but if the Donkey agenda passes in full, the Blue Dogs will be staring down an inability to fund our govt w/o inflation, a 10% unemployment rate w/ nothing to show for our increased indebtedness, the increased costs of Cap & Trade and Health Care, and the loss of international respect (not fondness for) as a superpower.

      IMO, it’s best for the country that we stop this agenda. IMO, it’s also best for the Blue Dog’s reelection prospects. Which is the only leverage we have right now to influence Congress along the path that’s IMO best for the country.

  • DerKrieger

    Year after year, decade after decade this country is under assault by the Left. We never get a break from manning the barricades. As a Conservative all I want is to be left alone but the statist demands control and won’t rest until we are al under their heavy hand.

  • momoxie

    Just sayin’.

    • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

      As is Republican in common use.

      • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

        Laker Gameplan
        Nazi attack
        Redstate policy
        Obama failure

        It’s a common construction, to use a noun as a modifier.

        • DONTREADONME
        • momoxie

          It’s far more common to use an adjective as a noun modifier. Democratic is an adjective. Is ‘Democratic Agenda’ not correct?

          • blooch
          • bs
          • DONTREADONME

            We make the lexicon, we call them Democrats not Democratics so we could say the Democrat’s Agenda which is possesive or the Democrat Agenda which describes the agenda as coming from party.

            Are you sure you are not ignorant? .

          • momoxie

            I just don’t understand why one would use Democrat as an adjective instead of Democratic. No one says ‘Diplomat Immunity’ or ‘Bureaucrat Hierarchy’…right?

          • DONTREADONME

            thought to figure this out or your understanding of the term “lexicon” is embarrassing and leads me to believe your intentions here are troll-like in nature. Again, public school has left you with an inability to do your own thinking. Now I have decided to invoke the Hinz Rule.

          • momoxie

            if you mean it as a dig against the Democrats. If that’s what you mean by ‘lexicon’. In your previous post, you were rationalizing it as if it were proper English, which is not the case.

          • George Claghorn

            This is such a pathetic threadjack.

          • Tbone

            It’s a proven fact. So far your only one.

          • momoxie

            mixing up your nouns and adjectives.

          • bs

            McMahon: O mighty Carnac, here’s your first answer: momoxie
            Carnac: Who is Neil Stevens’ next target for the gak?

          • 6eorge Jetson

            Yyyyyyeeessss!

          • DONTREADONME
          • momoxie

            question mark after grammar.

          • TNJim

            Why do I get the impression momoxie never looked at your, and Neil’s, explanation of what a noun modifier is? Oh, that’s right, because he DIDN”T!

          • DONTREADONME

            Jim that is what I thought, I guess we have another one that likes to be all literal. I feel sorry for this person’s father because I bet his child was a know-it-all. Pssst, do you think she is listening?

          • momoxie

            isn’t grammar fun!

          • DONTREADONME

            BTW, please read the rules of Redstate. Lastly, you have shown that you can be rattled easily, you have some work to do to prove you belong on a conservative website.

          • blooch
          • DONTREADONME
        • Gyorc Nacain

          It seems to me like the difference between your examples and the example involving the Democrats is that these words don’t have associated adjectives. There is no adjective form of ‘Obama’, like ‘Obamic’ or something. Same with Redstate, Nazi, and Laker. Take, for example, France. You would say ‘Redstate policy’, but I think most people would say ‘French policy’ and not ‘France policy’ (maybe ‘France’s policy’).

          Also, the name of the party is, I believe, “The Democratic Party”. ‘Democrat’ is derived from ‘Democratic’ and not the other way around, and refers to a single member of said party. So it would make sense to use ‘Democratic’. Same way the Army is the US Army, and a single member thereof is a soldier, but you say Army policy not soldier policy or anything like that.

          Finally, it seems like the only people who say ‘Democrat Party’ or its variations are people who dislike the Party, which strikes me as odd if nothing else.

          • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

            Are you a Democrat then?

            Is momoxie?

            Are you two here just to stir up trouble, that is to say, are you trolling?

          • Gyorc Nacain

            To your first question, yes I’m a Dem.

            To your second, I don’t know her.

            To you third, no…I originally signed up to to plug Yuengling on an open thread where people were talking about beer (though I didn’t because of the waiting period before commenting). I suppose I am here for the same reason anyone comments on a blog, I am not trying to be abrasive or combative. But I suppose I couldn’t say for momoxie, like I said I don’t know her (I am guessing she’s a ‘her’ because her screenname starts with ‘mom’…)

            Moral of the story…drink Yuengling!!

          • blooch

            I think that’s “Mo Moxie”, not “Mom Oxie”…could be wrong, though.

          • Uma Richie

            Plugging Yuengling – good.
            Failure to recognize Moxie – bad.

            On the balance, I’d say you’re okay.

          • DONTREADONME

            here. We make the lexicon around here you don’t. BTW, again you prove your inability to understand how writing and editing works. The audience here is we, the conservatives; therefore, it is not wrong to use Democrat in the following way “Democrat” politcy. You have shown your comprehension of the writing techniques as near sighted as your party’s politics. How do I know I am right, easy I write technical documentation for a living that are edited by real English Professors and Professional Editors. Go ahead, ask an editor wheter I am right or not.

            So next time you think you are the smartest twig in the wood pile, do not speak unless I speak to you. Demoncrat. Yeah, you irritated me by coming over here and acting like you know what you are talking about.

    • DONTREADONME

      sort of similar to training or a training regimen. Sometime we call a noun modifier as an adjective.