My latest column for the American Issues Project focuses on a surprising phenomenon: while the mainstream media keeps asking how the GOP needs to change to survive, Republican candidates are leading in a host of races around the country. In fact, if you set aside for a moment the unified Democratic control in Washington (admittedly, a heavy lift) you might think it was the Democratic party that was on the ropes.
Senate races in Illinois and Delaware are likely to be watched especially closely, since those seats were formerly held by the President and Vice President. In Illinois, Congressman Mark Kirk is eyeing the race, and is seen as one of the GOP’s strongest statewide contenders in years. In Delaware, Republican Congressman Mike Castle has a significant lead in polls over Joe Biden’s son, Beau. If either of these challengers prevails, it will represent a stunning shift to the right for either state. The fact that both states seem prepared to reject the liberal legacies of Obama and Biden is shocking…
And in New York, Ohio, Colorado, Massachusetts, and Maryland, liberal incumbents face strong headwinds in their reelection bids. David Paterson in New York is unlikely to win re-nomination, which would actually make a liberal win more likely. Ohio Governor Ted Strickland is in a dead heat with challenger John Kasich in the most recent survey. Colorado Governor Bill Ritter trails potential challenger Scott McInnis by 48%-41%, and receives poor grades overall from residents of the state. Deval Patrick too, trails his likely GOP challenger, Christy Mihos, by 41%-40%. In Maryland, Governor O’Malley already has one announced conservative opponent, and could face a challenge from former Governor Bob Ehrlich. O’Malley’s record of tax increases and spending cuts may have left him vulnerable.
It seems to me that the proper question to ask is, if Barack Obama is so popular and Republicans are so unpopular, why are so many Democrat candidates in deep trouble? The answer is that voters in 2006 and 2008 rejected Republicans who had reneged on their promises to limit government, and to make it work more effectively for taxpayers. Barack Obama promised to make government more effective - and to reduce the overall level of spending. It’s clear that voters have already soured on Obama’s agenda (if not on him personally) and are prepared to dump Democrat candidates - as long as they believe Republicans are prepared to bring the sort of change they want.

I wouldn't exactly postulate a Castle win as a "stunning shift to the right".
Right Reason Friday, July 3rd at 12:54PM EDT (link)Aftetr all, he’s one of the 8 Cap and Traitors. He has a lifetime 52.28 from the ACU, but a 20 in 2007 and a 28 in 2008.
His being ahead is more a rejection of the creation of a Biden dynasty, IMHO.
Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.
- Winston Churchill
Or Kirk, For That Matter
IJB Friday, July 3rd at 1:05PM EDT (link)The election of either won’t mark a “shift to the Right”, as much as it would indicate a shift to “somewhat less Left”.
Now, if Toomey wins in PA, or Rubio wins in FL, *that* would be significant…
Well...
Brian Faughnan Friday, July 3rd at 1:09PM EDT (link)Mike Castle is clearly no one’s definition of a conservative. However, he would be replacing a Senator (in Biden) who has a lifetime ACU rating of 14. Further, the internals of the poll show 46% of Delaware voters now identifying themselves as conservatives (http://www.susquehannapolling.com/DE_poll_5-5-09.pdf). That sounds like a lot to me, but I have not heard anyone challenge the accuracy of it.
So it may not quite be a case of voters turning to a conservative in the Reagan mold, but to me it still looks like a case of voters suddenly wanting much more conservative representation in DC.
And that is the point.
bs Friday, July 3rd at 1:24PM EDT (link)Yeah, Castle screwed up on C&T. But someone with an ACU rating that is that much higher than Biden is undoubtedly a step up for the GOP. Now if there was someone who was more conservative than Castle and who was a viable candidate, sure, we support ‘em over Castle, at least in the primary. But to refuse to support a Republican who can take the seat of the freaking Vice President would be a textbook case of cutting off one’s nose to spite their face.
Decorum is fo’ suckas
The individual races are very exciting but...
realityunwound Friday, July 3rd at 2:26PM EDT (link)what makes a guy like Castle or Kirk palatable is a strong unifying leader that builds bridges between strengths and minimizes weaknesses. A strong ideologically conservative party leader (Jim DeMint’s, or insert your favorite “true” conservative) then the lefties appear to be a rounding out influence, rather than the dominating voice, or one equal voice in the cacophony. That’s the kind of Reagan-esque leadership that leads to 49 state electoral landslides.
That’s what Obama has done, only he’s so far left, I’m starting to think of Hillary as a moderating voice in the party.
http://www.realityunwound.com
Unifying Leaders Control the Squishes
ATLconservative Friday, July 3rd at 6:08PM EDT (link)I agree, RU. Though Castle and Kirk aren’t our preferred “ideologically pure” Repubs, they’re easily-led squishes who side with us on most issues when Dems are in control, and always side with us when we’re running things and have strong leadership.
Just take a look at the ACU ratings cited by Right Reason above. Castle has a 52 lifetime rating, but he’s in the 20s since the Dems took Congress.
Our goal is strong conservative leadership, at all levels. Those with compromised principles will follow. Just look at Colin Powell…
gop not dead yet
dingo Friday, July 3rd at 4:04PM EDT (link)The media has had a lot of fun with their “the GOP is dying” meme, but it was always a ridiculous argument. Not only does this country have a pretty strong two-party tradition, but the American people are also known for their preference for having checks and balances in government, and, most especially, for preferring politically divided government. Thus, with Dem super majorities obvious to all voters now, and with the Dems going crazy with their policies, a GOP resurrection was inevitable.
The GOP will most likely win both governorships up this year - NJ and VA. (Corzine is in especially bad shape - he can’t blame the GOP for NJ’s problems anymore, as they don’t control anything.) And they will likely pick up a large amount of House seats next year, and possibly some Senate seats as well. The more they campaign on checking Obama’s excesses - regardless of how personally popular Obama is - the more offices they will win.
Dingo