I pointed out yesterday that Democrats made a major mistake when they tied their credibility to porkulus, and then allowed Capitol Hill to debate health care rationing and cap-and-tax at the same time. Congress cannot both walk and chew gum - especially when they’re starting to worry about the 2010 political climate. The fights over which should be a top priority, and the uncertainty over the full cost of the Obama agenda, make it very difficult for Members of Congress to decide how to proceed.
As a result, it should be no surprise that Democrat leaders can’t rope a restive caucus together - even to debut the first draft of a health care rationing bill:
House Democrats’ health care bill has been delayed indefinitely as leaders continue negotiations with fiscally conservative Blue Dog Democrats.
Committee chairmen had planned to release their bill on Friday and begin marking it up on Monday, but notices were sent out this morning noting that both the release and markup would be delayed.
Rep. Mike Ross (D-Ark.), who chairs the Blue Dogs’ health care task force, warned leadership in a two-hour meeting Thursday night that his group would bolt unless a series of demands were met, including altering reimbursement rates under a proposed public option so that they are not based on Medicare rates.
Ross said he and other Blue Dogs will meet Friday with Ways and Means Chairman Charlie Rangel (D-N.Y.), Energy and Commerce Chairman Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) and Education and Labor Chairman George Miller (D-Calif.) in hopes of charting a path forward on the health care measure.
If Barack Obama and Rahm Emanuel are as smart as they’re cracked up to be, they’ll end the talk about a second stimulus promptly. Once a decision is made, Congress will know how to proceed. And the correct decision is ‘no.’

The Libs live by poll numbers
Scope Friday, July 10th at 12:09PM EDT (link)and Obama’s poll numbers are sinking like a lead weight. I wonder where they will be the end of September when the Healthcare and Cap and Trade debates pick up again. Even though the Obama media is trying to paint a much rosier picture of the Pres., the polls are telling us that more and more are getting the message that the Libs are srewwing up. So far I don’t believe that one job was ever created by the most massive spending spree in history with the Stimulus. The unemployment number continues to rise, and those are the people who will start screaming first, and loudly. I doubt that by September the above bills have any chance.
The Libs live by poll numbers
Scope Friday, July 10th at 12:09PM EDT (link)and Obama’s poll numbers are sinking like a lead weight. I wonder where they will be the end of September when the Healthcare and Cap and Trade debates pick up again. Even though the Obama media is trying to paint a much rosier picture of the Pres., the polls are telling us that more and more are getting the message that the Libs are srewwing up. So far I don’t believe that one job was ever created by the most massive spending spree in history with the Stimulus. The unemployment number continues to rise, and those are the people who will start screaming first, and loudly. I doubt that by September the above bills have any chance.
I'll tell you a secret....
antisocial Friday, July 10th at 12:51PM EDT (link)Economic policies of this radical administration are NOT working. shhhhhhh…… Keep this confidential……
No you can’t - Moe Lane
——————————
The Emperor has no clothes!!!
——————————
Republicans who lost the Crap-and-Raid fight in the House -
Mary Bomo Mac (CA-45)
Mike Castle (DE)
Mark Kirk (IL-10)
Frank A. LoBiondo (NJ-02)
Chris Smith (NJ-04)
Leonard Lance (NJ-07)
John M. McHugh (NY-23)
Dave Reichert (WA-08)
Yes
snewb098 Friday, July 10th at 2:50PM EDT (link)[Repeat Spam deleted - NS]
as far as I am concerned any delay is good
kyle8 Friday, July 10th at 12:43PM EDT (link)the more this or cap and tax is delayed the better the chances of defeating it or at least getting something very watered down.
Time is not on the democrats side because the economy is getting worse and people are waking up from their Obama drunk.
“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle
precisely kyle' - nt
Mike gamecock DeVine Friday, July 10th at 12:48PM EDT (link)Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” - Andrew Jackson
Stay of Execution
JHancock Friday, July 10th at 11:25PM EDT (link)I’m a Med student with 200K in student debt….
PLEASE no Social Health Care!!!!
Hold out until 2010, then lose the House so it will NEVER get done!!
Please!!! I want to actually own a house some day!!
Dems deciding to wait on this one is a stay of financial execution for me!
The Massachusetts Health Mess
izoneguy Sunday, July 12th at 4:22PM EDT (link)The Massachusetts Health Mess
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124726287099225209.html
In a rational world, the prognosis for ObamaCare would wait on the evidence in Massachusetts, given that the commonwealth’s 2006 program closely resembles what Democrats are trying to do in Washington. If the results were widely known, it might be dead on arrival.
The Massachusetts law, which was championed by former GOP Governor Mitt Romney, imposed an individual mandate, requiring nearly all residents to buy health insurance or else pay a penalty. (The exceptions are those who qualify for the state’s public program.) This was supposed to cover everybody and save money too. We’ve written before about how costs have exploded, but it also turns out that consumers have other ideas.
(snip)
Well, the returns are rolling in, and a useful case study comes from the community-based health plan Harvard-Pilgrim. CEO Charlie Baker reports that his company has seen an “astonishing” uptick in people buying coverage for a few months at a time, running up high medical bills, and then dumping the policy after treatment is completed and paid for. Harvard-Pilgrim estimates that between April 2008 and March 2009, about 40% of its new enrollees stayed with it for fewer than five months and on average incurred about $2,400 per person in monthly medical expenses. That’s about 600% higher than Harvard-Pilgrim would have otherwise expected.
The individual mandate penalty for not having coverage is only about $900, so people seem to be gaming the Massachusetts system. “This is a problem,” Mr. Baker writes on his blog, in the understatement of the year. “It is raising the prices paid by individuals and small businesses who are doing the right thing by purchasing twelve months of health insurance, and it’s turning the whole notion of shared responsibility on its ear.”
(snip)
For many Democrats, none of this is really a surprise, or even important. Their Rube Goldberg rules are meant to transfer the costs of health care away from individuals and onto someone else — private companies like Harvard-Pilgrim in the short term, and over time onto taxpayers. Why lobbyist Karen Ignagni is still putting the health-insurance industry’s head on the Washington chopping block is a mystery for the ages.
“When the government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny.”
Thomas Jefferson