« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Doug Wilder: Reid’s Apology Not Sufficient

If America's First Elected African American Governor Doesn't Have Moral Authority Here, Who Does?

It seems that the further you get from the elites in Washington DC, who have a stake in Harry Reid remaining in power, the more likely you are to find African Americans who have a problem with Harry Reid’s comments about Barack Obama. And while I don’t agree with Doug Wilder on much, he makes a point that Reid and his defenders have attempted to gloss over: just because Barack Obama has (unsurprisingly) forgiven Reid, that’s not the end of the matter. Harry Reid’s surprising use of a term that is at best, antiquated and at worst, racist, is not a concern just for the president. It speaks to the way Reid views the African-American community as a whole. Wilder thinks Reid needs to apologize more broadly to the American people:

So it saddened me to read the words of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid when he ostensibly was trying to bolster the bid of Barack Obama for the White House. Mr. Reid suggested that as a “light-skinned” black man, Mr. Obama would be more palatable to the electorate as a potential president. The Nevada senator “praised” Mr. Obama’s ability to turn off what Mr. Reid must perceive as a widespread “Negro dialect” when speaking to audiences who are not amenable to such a speaking style.

Voters certainly deserve more credit than some of the people they elect to high office give them.

Whether those words and the sentiment they represent were spoken in the U.S. Senate to praise Mr. Obama or used to sanitize deep-seated hatred at a White Citizens’ Council meeting in the 1950s, they are reprehensible and indefensible. No ifs ands or buts about it. Our leaders need to acknowledge that fact.

Mr. Reid, indeed, has apologized to President Obama for what has to be one of the most dreadful compliments in American political history. But I have to ask why he stopped there. His words were, as a matter of fact, an offense against the president, but they also were a slap in the face of the American people – especially the millions of younger Americans who have worked diligently to extend the American dream to every person in every corner of this nation. And they didn’t do it just at the ballot box – they did it on school buses, in classrooms, in cafeterias and in basement rec rooms around the country. They did it by just refusing to hate and by merely living with their neighbors as friends and people of common good cheer. Where was Mr. Reid’s apology to those everyday Americans he underestimated and dismissed as yesteryear’s market-variety haters?

The people of this country have earned more respect from Mr. Reid than that, and he should not let too much time go by before he tells them he regrets what he assumed about America.

How will Harry Reid answer?

COMMENTS

  • sharonmcp

    “If Michael Steele or any other conservative had said anything like it, the remarks would be labeled racist and plastered over every available news outlet,” Alveda King said in a statement released Tuesday.

    “What would my uncle and my father think, to hear such things from one of the most powerful leaders in the country? Their ‘beloved community’ is sorely threatened when racism rears its ugly head once again.”

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/01/12/coalition-supporting-reid-negro-remark-starts-crack/

    • JadedByPolitics

      the darker slaves with a more African dialect stayed out in the fields while the lighter slaves who adopted their slavemasters dialect worked in the house and Reid to her is calling Obama a house slave…..and I think she is correct. This whole “it’s a compliment” is BS. I have been saying just because the master didn’t whip the slave before making him work each day didn’t make him a nicer master and the same holds true for Reid’s RACIST COMMENT.

      • http://impudent.blognation.us/blog kyle8

        I whip my slaves every single day.

      • voxoreason

        This is praise? The inescapable implication is that Obama can turn his negro accent on and off, presumably to pander to different groups, or more simply put, be a phony.

        Surprisingly, NBC’s Matt Lauer backed into the truth by asking, Doesn’t this imply that a darker skinned black with a more stereotypical dialect isn’t electable?

        Surely even Matt can answer his own question, having formulated it.

  • http://beaglescout.wordpress.com Beaglescout

    Blacks are voting 95:5 Democrat:Republican. She points out that Republicans need to sell small government and self-reliance as the solution for what ails those of little achievement, including those in the black and minority communties.

    Republicans need to wake up that the conservative message that supposedly defines their party is a message that blacks badly need. But they aren?t going to sell it to them as long as blacks do not feel comfortable pulling the lever for Republicans.

    Republicans leaders should be using air time to be talking about why limited government, low taxes, school choice, private social security accounts, market driven health care paradigms, and traditional values that are friendly to family integrity are crucial for low income Americans.

    These truths need to be delivered with conviction and credibility.

    If Republicans looked at blacks as potential customers like any business looks at potential new markets, they would try to understand their unique mentality and learn how to market their product to them. A product that this community badly needs.

    • Warrior

      see my expanded response at:

      redstate.com/warrior/

  • sarge324

    the democrates are the biggest racist in government.there was one black man killed for voting in a democrate primary in 1946.also in 1946 theodore bilbo a three term democrate in the senate’called on every red-blooded white man to use any means to keep the n word away from the polls’.with reids statement shows you that the acorn dont fall far from the tree.people should be up in arms over that statement,but their not.so you would have to say its party over race.

  • http://www.BTWsociety.org racvt

    understandable… but entirely unacceptable…. when one realizes that Liberals see the world as made up of groups or blocks of people, rather than individuals with individual lives, values and aspirations of their own. To Liberals and most Democrats, people are valuable only in the aggregate as a voting bloc.
    Reid’s (and liberals’) mindset is hopelessly out-of-synch with where America is going on race… the direction that MLK stated so clearly long ago: to judge a person on character, not color.
    Liberals resist seeing individuals in that light because their agenda/ methods simply cannot allow it.
    When they begin to see black-Americans, Latino-Americans (or any other hyphen-) simply as AMERICANS, they lose all power and influence.

    • sharonmcp

      This past weekend I watched a Glenn Beck program where he had an audience of mostly Black Conservatives. The majority of them objected to being referred to as Black-Americans or African-Americans. As they said, they are AMERICANS!

      And as someone either in the audience or on the panel, I don’t remember which, stated, South Africa has a large population of whites.

      Do we label them as White-African-Americans when they migrate to the U.S.?

  • greyhairandgreymatter

    For whatever political reason(s), I realistically and respectfully believe former president George W. Bush and Karl Rove wanted to nudge Trent Lott out of his Senate Majority leadership position in the U.S. Senate. Trent’s extemporaneous effusive praise of U.S. Senate icon and centenarian, Strom Thurmond, obviously allowed them to benignly [or not so benignly depending upon your political persuasion] to extricate Trent from the U.S. Senate Majority leadership.

    As a tyke I can still recall my parents being “Dixiecrat’s,” and avid supporters of Strom Thurmond even though at the time they resided in CT. Thus, during the late forties there was a groundswell of political support around the country for Strom Thurmond and his political philosophy/racial sentiments and in many sectors of the country Strom Thurmond’s political philosophy/racial sentiments and even his regrettable epithets permeated the tenor of the times.

    Despite the fact that I’ve been a registered Republican for almost a half-century, I don’t agree with many leading Republicans concerning these brouhahas and especially calling for Harry Reid’s political scalp. Why? I respectfully believe that for one of the few times in his life, Harry Reid actually told the unvarnished truth about president Obama despite the fact that millions of Americans and I may take issue with his specific vernacular. Similarly, Trent Lott also told [to his ultimate political and career detriment] the unvarnished truth about Strom Thurmond.

    Both Republicans and Democrats need to get over these unfortunate imbroglios and to move on with far more important matters currently facing our country! It was wrong to make Trent Lott step down as Majority Leader of the Senate just as it would also be wrong to make Harry Reid step down now too. Trying to unjustifiably and Draconically redress two perceived wrongs that aren’t even wrong, but merely racially insensitive doesn’t make it right.

    All the best,

    Fred III

    16529 Calle Pulido
    San Diego, CA 92128