Jan Schakowsky (D-IL9) Hates the Bill of Rights – First Ammendment


Jan Schakowsky is a liberal Democrat (some say she’s the most liberal member of Congress) from Evanston, IL who has been in congress since 1999. In that time, she’s attacked many of the first 10 amendments to the Constitution. Based on these attacks, I can only conclude that she hates the Bill of Rights.

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Liberals claim that they are fully in support of free speech. Turns out, not so much. When the Tea Parties started, Jan Schakowsky was the most vocal opponent of people assembling peaceably to express their political opinion. In fact she called the very idea of people demonstrating with an idea different than hers “despicable”. She has also voted to ban free speech rights by banning political issue ads.

Most recently, she and her supporters were trying to prevent people from expressing any opinion regarding healthcare that is not supportive of the “government option”.

Jan hates the first amendment.

This country needs to have Representatives that believe in the Bill of Rights and the individual liberties it protects.

Joel Pollak has just announced that he is running for congress in the Illinois 9th district. Let’s help him win and get someone who believes in the first
amendment in congress.

Next time: Jan hates the second amendment.


Illinois Conservative US Senate Candidates Forum - review


Yesterday, 8-AUG-09, I attended an event billed as a “Illinois Conservative US Senate Candidates Forum” at the Doubletree Hotel in Bloomington, IL. The event was poorly publicized and lightly attended with about 50 people showing up to hear from the 6 potential candidates that spoke. The main theme seemed to be “Find someone who is not Mark Kirk.” and was also the reason I attended. The event was being recorded by Illinois Review who said they would post the videos soon (but have not as of this writing).

The presentations were in a moderated format with each candidate being give 10 minutes to introduce himself and give an initial overview of his campaign. After the opening remarks, the moderator asked each person the same questions from a list with the number of questions asked depending upon the time the candidate took to answer each.

First up was Cisco Cotto who is a radio personality from the Chicago area. He was formerly a news anchor for WLS and WMAQ radio and now hosts his own talk show on WIND AM. As expected given his day job, he speaks very well and has a great voice. He’s a strong conservative and is able to articulate conservative principals well. One major advantage he has over the other candidates is name recognition. I think he would make an excellent candidate for Senate.

John Arrington was next. He started out with a bit of a shocker. He was a community organizer in his younger days and worked with Barak Obama. In fact he was next in line to replace Obama when he moved on to other thing. He says he quit the job after his father took him aside one day and said “Listen, I don’t know about these people. Truth to them means whatever it needs to be. If they need truth to be “Up” one day it’s up. If they need it to be “down” then next it’s down.” I liked the imagery. He’s converted from being a liberal Dem. He’s currently on the Harvey city council and said he learned first had how improving tax policy can attract new business to depressed areas. One advantage he has is he is schooled in the Alinksy tactics. He says he recognizes these tactics when everything is a crises and must be fixed now. I like this guy, but his presentation was rough (it better as he went) and he was a bit weak on some major policy issues. (”What would you do about energy?” was one of the standard questions and he hesitated far too much.) I don’t think he’s make a good US Senate candidate at this time, but with some polishing he’d have a chance. I think at this point I’d like him to run for a State Senate or Represntative slot and get some more experience. He’s a good man, but I don’t think he could beat Mark Kirk.

Don Lowery is a retired circuit judge from southern Illinois. He was probably the most passionate speaker there and knew the issues cold. I get the impression that he’s running because he’s angry at the direction of the country and genuinely wants to make changes. He mentioned several times that he thought Mark Kirk voted for Cap and Trade because of the influence of Excellon Energy (sp?) which donated heavily to the Kirk campaign. He also spoke well on other issues but seemed most motivated by the Cap and Trade bill. I think the Judge would make a great Senator, but I don’t think he’d win an election against a slick Democrat operator. I’d definitely want the judge on my side to fire up the base.

Pat Hughes is an attorney and real estate developer in Hinsdale Illinois. He recently organized a group called “Stop It” to fight Gov. Quinn’s 50% income tax increase. He’s a fiscal conservative and used the phrase “Mainstream Republican Values” multiple times. I think it’s going to be one of his catch phrases in the primary. He’s a very good speaker and gave the impression that he had in depth knowledge of most major issues. He was also pretty good at expressing conservative values. From the speech he gave and the Q&A time, I would have no problem supporting him as a Senator and believe he would make a great candidate. The only yellow flag is the real estate development business. Given the history of other politicians having trouble with real estate dealings, I hope that he gets a thorough vetting in the primary before becoming our general election candidate. With a good exam, I would gladly support him.

Eric Wallace is one of us. He was a Fred! Thompson delegate in the last election for God’s sake! Unfortunately, his presentation skills did not come through well. He seemed like a nervous college kid giving his first speech in SPEECH 101. It’s unfortunate because of the bunch, when he DID manage to get his ideas across, he seemed to most match my ideology. I’m really puzzled by his problem with the presentation because he’s an ordained minister and I would expect him to have the skill to speak to an audience and get complex ideas across. I’m sorry to say I don’t think he’ll make it very far in this campaign unless he does some work. He’s the only candidate that handed out campaign literature with a web site. I think I’ll email him with some pointers to the Marco Rubio and Michael Williams speeches from the gathering. Frankly I want to support Mr. Wallace. I just can’t.

Last to speak was Robert Zadek. To make it short, I didn’t like him. It was a personality thing I think. For issues, he’s a flat taxer. According to him, take the US government spending including Socials Security and Medicare, divide it by gross reported income and you come up with an 11.2% tax rate. Everyone pays at that rate and all financial problems are solved. Our energy problems can be solved by burning garbage. Again problem solved. According to him, all the complex problems of society have very simple solutions and he knows the solution.

After the speakers, the organizers collected a straw poll from the attendees. I hope they give the candidates copies of all the ballots because they do have more than just the vote totals. The ballots had 3 sections. One was a critique of the candidates. One was “Which of THESE” candidates would you vote for? And the 3rd was would you vote for the candidate in section 2, Mark Kirk or Someone else? The totals were:
Pat Hughes 17
Cisco Cotto 12
Don Lowery 8
John Arrington 4
Robert Zadek 2
Eric Wallace 0

I voted for Cotto.

Mark Kirk got no votes.


Considering a run for office in Illinois? Precinct Committeemen TOO!


Now is the time to get busy.

One of the complaints my county chairman has is that people call him expressing interest in running for office after the deadlines. If you want to run for any office, you need to get on the ballot.

In order to get on the ballot in Illinois you need to follow some procedures and now is the time to start the process. There are several offices up for election this season including Precinct Committeemen. The list of offices that you can expect to be on the ballot next year follows. There may also be special elections to fill vacancies that are not included below. Your county clerk should have the full list for your area.

OFFICERS TO BE NOMINATED AT THE GENERAL PRIMARY AND ELECTED AT THE GENERAL ELECTION:

United States Senator
Governor
Lieutenant Governor
Attorney General
Secretary of State
Comptroller
Treasurer
Representatives in Congress – all 19 districts
State Senators-For two-year term:
Districts - 1,4,7,10,13,16,19,22,25,28,31,34,37,40,43,46,49,52,55,58.
District 51 - unexpired 2-year term
Representatives in the General Assembly – all 118 districts
Judges: Supreme Court Judges, vacancies will be filled if required
Appellate Court Judges, vacancies will be filled if required
Circuit Court Judges, vacancies will be filled if required
Resident Circuit Court Judges, vacancies/additional judgeships will be filled if required
Subcircuits vacancies/additional judgeships will be filled if required
All judges seeking retention will appear on the ballot at the General Election
County Clerks
County Treasurers
County Sheriffs
County Assessors
Members of Board of Review (in counties with elected Boards, including Cook County)
Regional Superintendents of Schools
County Commissioners (not under township organization)
County Board Members (under township organization)
Sanitary District Commissioners and Trustees

OFFICERS TO BE ELECTED AT THE GENERAL PRIMARY:

State Central Committeemen (Democratic and Green Parties only-one Committeemen and
one Committeewoman per district)
(Note: Republican State Central Committeemen are elected at The County Convention)
Township Committeemen (Cook County)
Precinct Committeemen

If you have ANY interest in ANY of these offices, download the 2010 Candidates Guide from which the above list was extracted. The candidates guide has specific information about the requirements for running for office. There is a wealth of other information on the State board of Elections site. that you should also review. Other resources are your local Republican party office and your county clerk or municipal election authorities (city hall).


Illinois Conservative US Senate Candidates Forum


To all my fellow RedStaters in Illinois. I received the following announcement from my local county board member and thought this is a good opportunity to meet candidates who are NOT Mark Kirk. I plan to attend and will be wearing my RedState name tag from the gathering (if management here doesn’t object).

If any of you can make it, please stop me an say HI!

Conservative US Senate Candidates Forum

August 8th, 9:30AM - 12:30PM
Please RSVP to gop@parrott-associates.com
Location: Doubletree Hotel & Conference Center, 10 Brickyard Drive, Bloomington

Schedule:
9:30 - 10:00 Coffee, Continental Breakfast, $5.00 per person
10:00 - 12:30 Candidates Speaking one at a time
O&A to follow. Come with prepared questions.

“This is one of the most important meetings of the Republican Party for US Senate Candidates. Our party needs to come together and support the most highly qualified conservative candidates to represent Illinois in the February 2, 2010 Primary Election.

Let’s help return the Illinois Republican Party to the Party of Reagan/Fitzgerald! 2010 is the year to return to Traditional Principles, Strong Values, Smaller Government, and Common Sense Ideas to protect Freedom and to keep our nation sovereign.”

Hosted by County Chairmen of the Illinois Republican Party.
County Host: John W. Parrott, Jr. (309) 663-6323

Since they have a Q&A session, I would like suggestions for good questions to ask. I assume they’ll address Cap & Trade and Obama Care in their allocated address time. What else should I ask about?


Obama’s Cash for Clunkers hurts poor people


The law of unintended consequences strikes again!

As is usual with big government programs, the “Cash for Clunkers” program has some unintended consequences. This one is a direct harm to the nation’s poorest people.

A woman who was in charge of a charity was on a radio interview this morning. The charity raises most of it’s money by getting people to donate their old cars and reselling them. You’ve probably seen ads for charities of this nature. “Give us your old car to feed the poor” or similar billboards are all over the country.

Since the Cash for Clunkers program has started, donations to her charity have dropped to zero. That’s right, all the good works her organization was doing have come to a halt because Obama tried to help the car companies sell more cars.

As always, bad things happen when the government meddles in markets.


A rain barrel full of government waste.


From the diaries by Erick.

One of the print papers I like to read is a little 8 page weekly that I pick up free at the bank. The Tazewell County News Bulletin* is a “paper of record” meaning that legal notices can be published there to meet the legal requirements for publishing actions before they become effective. You’d be surprised at the things that show up in legal notices, but I digress…

The July 22 edition had an article entitled “Study Examines Rain Barrel Adoption in Chicago”. My first thought was “why would you want to study that“. My second was “who’s paying for it”.

The answer to the first question is that rain barrels have some theoretical beneficial side effects. In areas that are prone to water damage problems from rain drainage, getting residents to use rain barrels can help mitigate the problem by reducing the runoff. They can also reduce the demand on city water supplies as the water from the rain barrels can be used for watering the lawn instead of using city water. I suspect the theoretical benefits are far greater than the benefits from actual usage, but at least the proponents of rain barrels are using a logical argument. Unfortunately, residents aren’t buying and using rain barrels to as great an extent as the proponents, city and rain barrel manufacturers would like. Thus the study.

Read More →


Pat Toomey has raised over $1M so far.


From the diaries. More like this, please! — Erick

Toomey’s campaign announced that they have raised more than $1million in 60 days. That’s a great accomplishment and should show the party leadership that conservatives can raise significant money and can win elections!

Now we have to help other conservatives throughout the country raise money to defeat the Dems next year. Give what you can to the candidates of your choice. Some of my other preferences:

Adam Kinzinger for Illinois Congressional District 11. Adam will try to win the seat back from Debbie Halvorson. He is the Air Force Reserves member who saved a woman from a knife wielding attacker with his bare hands. He’s also a good young gun conservative who will make us proud.

Marco Rubio is of course running for Senate in Florida and will be battling the NRSC’s pick Charlie Crist. Marco will need all the help you can spare to get through the primary.

Texas Railroad Commissioner Michael Williams is a good conservative who has proven that he can take on a big job and do great work. Please support his run for US Senate.

Please find other deserving conservative Republicans who need your assistance and do what you can to get them elected. If you don’t know any of your own, pick one of mine and toss them some cash. 8*)


Fundraiser for Adam Kinzinger. Help win back IL11


Adam Kinzinger is the young gun conservative who saved the woman from a knife wielding attacker. He’s also a former Bloomington IL city councilman who resigned to council to join the Air Force shortly after 9-11.

He needs our help to win the seat back from Debbie Halvorson.

If you can make it to the Lake Bloomington Illinois area next Thursday night, please try to attend his first fund raiser. If you can’t make it to Hudson, Il he could still use your help. Go to his campaign web site and throw him a few dollars and/or volunteer to help in some other way. This is one seat we can win back.


Fighting for the soul of the party


A strategic plan for playing the long game

reposted due to problems linking to my original article
Most of the people who hang out at RedState are conservatives of one form or another (I don’t really care to break us into sub groupings because that is both simplistic and counter productive). Since we are conservatives, the Republican Party is our natural home. No other party has a hope of getting any significant number of conservatives elected. That means that most of us want to get conservative Republicans elected to public office. Lately, we’ve been doing a terrible job of reaching that goal for various reasons some of which I will cover here.

One of the major problems we see is that the party is supporting more moderates and even liberal Republicans. Frankly the party is moving too far to the left in its chosen candidates. And the more elections we lose the farther it seems to move to the left. So how do we stop this trend and hopefully reverse it? We have to take a number of actions some of which many of my friends here disagree with.

We must remember that we are playing a long game. We aren’t likely to be able to turn the party around in just 1 or even 2 election cycles. If the situation changes we need to be ready to play a short term game and move all in, but we have to get the framework in place for the long run in order to take advantage of any opportunities that arise. So let’s talk about building the framework.

The most important action we can take is to get involved! Become a precinct committeeman. Get active at your local county party’s level. Work local campaigns. Recruit good conservatives for local offices. Get conservatives selected in local primaries and get them elected to local city councils, county boards, school boards, road commissions, etc. No office is too menial to consider important. Hold your elected officials accountable to the conservative values they claimed when you recruited them. These are the farm team for people who are going to run for higher office. This isn’t too controversial, but it’s hard and important work. And no one’s going to do it if you don’t. Martin A. Knight has written on the precinct committeeman project. Look for those posts for ideas or just call your county party headquarters and get started. If you don’t have an active party in your county, guess what. You’re the cavalry. You’ll have to build the party yourself (and yes you can do it).

Get active in the primary process. Find a candidate that is a good conservative in your area. Donate time and money to this person and get him or her to win in the primary. Promote your candidate, but try to remember the 11th commandment. Send money to conservative candidates in other districts to help them win their primary. Marco Rubio, Pat Toomey, or Adam Kinzinger could use your help, even if it’s only a token $10. It costs a LOT to run a campaign and many small donations work as well as a few large ones.

Now the hard part: Party unity. If our candidate doesn’t win the primary, we must support the victor. Staying home or voting 3rd party or otherwise punishing the party is guaranteed to do 2 things. It will give the seat to the Democrat and it will move the party farther to the left in selecting future candidates. Even good conservatives like Cornyn are laboring under the false belief that we need to put up squishes in order to save Republican seats.

Party unity requires the cooperation of all the people involved and this is where all factions of the party have been deficient of late (including ours). We must stop this trend and the only way we can do it is to be the adults in the room and forgive the moderates and liberal wings and provide support to them IF they win the primary. In exchange we must remind them that we are loyal when they win and we expect the same from them when WE win (and yes we will start winning). After all, what help can you expect from them when you win if you refuse to help when they win. Split electorates always lose and we can’t afford to keep splitting the party.

Go to party events and talk to people. If there are any national level party officials present, let them know that party unity requires cooperation on both sides and that you are doing your part, but expect them to also work for unity. Tell them that favoring people in party primaries is a divisive action and that they need to stop if they want to maintain unity. My local party has an RNC town hall meeting tomorrow and I intend to bring this up. If you happen to be in the Peoria Illinois area, stop in and lend me a hand. Just remember that loyal people who hammer on the party leadership are more likely to get their way than fair weather friends.

Finally, we need to bring back conservative leaning people who have already left the party. Talk to Libertarian Party, Conservative Party, etc members and try to convince them that you need their help to take back the Republican Party. Most of them left due to the party not living up to its conservative base. We need to convince them that the only way to get conservative people elected is within this party. Chances are they won’t come completely back to the party, but maybe you can get them to commit to voting with the Republicans when they don’t have a candidate in the race. We have to start building coalitions with other conservative leaning groups.


Fighting for the soul of the party – a strategic plan


Playing the long game

Update: I had problems linking to this article (I think maybe the dashes in the title caused the problem) so I reposted is here: http://www.redstate.com/brianh/2009/06/08/fighting-for-the-soul-of-the-party/ Please use that link instead.

Most of the people who hang out at RedState are conservatives of one form or another (I don’t really care to break us into sub groupings because that is both simplistic and counter productive). Since we are conservatives, the Republican Party is our natural home. No other party has a hope of getting any significant number of conservatives elected. That means that most of us want to get conservative Republicans elected to public office. Lately, we’ve been doing a terrible job of reaching that goal for various reasons some of which I will cover here.

One of the major problems we see is that the party is supporting more moderates and even liberal Republicans. Frankly the party is moving too far to the left in its chosen candidates. And the more elections we lose the farther it seems to move to the left. So how do we stop this trend and hopefully reverse it? We have to take a number of actions some of which many of my friends here disagree with.

We must remember that we are playing a long game. We aren’t likely to be able to turn the party around in just 1 or even 2 election cycles. If the situation changes we need to be ready to play a short term game and move all in, but we have to get the framework in place for the long run in order to take advantage of any opportunities that arise. So let’s talk about building the framework.

The most important action we can take is to get involved! Become a precinct committeeman. Get active at your local county party’s level. Work local campaigns. Recruit good conservatives for local offices. Get conservatives selected in local primaries and get them elected to local city councils, county boards, school boards, road commissions, etc. No office is too menial to consider important. Hold your elected officials accountable to the conservative values they claimed when you recruited them. These are the farm team for people who are going to run for higher office. This isn’t too controversial, but it’s hard and important work. And no one’s going to do it if you don’t. Martin A. Knight has written on the precinct committeeman project. Look for those posts for ideas or just call your county party headquarters and get started. If you don’t have an active party in your county, guess what. You’re the cavalry. You’ll have to build the party yourself (and yes you can do it).

Get active in the primary process. Find a candidate that is a good conservative in your area. Donate time and money to this person and get him or her to win in the primary. Promote your candidate, but try to remember the 11th commandment. Send money to conservative candidates in other districts to help them win their primary. Marco Rubio, Pat Toomey, or Adam Kinzinger could use your help, even if it’s only a token $10. It costs a LOT to run a campaign and many small donations work as well as a few large ones.

Now the hard part: Party unity. If our candidate doesn’t win the primary, we must support the victor. Staying home or voting 3rd party or otherwise punishing the party is guaranteed to do 2 things. It will give the seat to the Democrat and it will move the party farther to the left in selecting future candidates. Even good conservatives like Cornyn are laboring under the false belief that we need to put up squishes in order to save Republican seats.

Party unity requires the cooperation of all the people involved and this is where all factions of the party have been deficient of late (including ours). We must stop this trend and the only way we can do it is to be the adults in the room and forgive the moderates and liberal wings and provide support to them IF they win the primary. In exchange we must remind them that we are loyal when they win and we expect the same from them when WE win (and yes we will start winning). After all, what help can you expect from them when you win if you refuse to help when they win. Split electorates always lose and we can’t afford to keep splitting the party.

Go to party events and talk to people. If there are any national level party officials present, let them know that party unity requires cooperation on both sides and that you are doing your part, but expect them to also work for unity. Tell them that favoring people in party primaries is a divisive action and that they need to stop if they want to maintain unity. My local party has an RNC town hall meeting tomorrow and I intend to bring this up. If you happen to be in the Peoria Illinois area, stop in and lend me a hand. Just remember that loyal people who hammer on the party leadership are more likely to get their way than fair weather friends.

Finally, we need to bring back conservative leaning people who have already left the party. Talk to Libertarian Party, Conservative Party, etc members and try to convince them that you need their help to take back the Republican Party. Most of them left due to the party not living up to its conservative base. We need to convince them that the only way to get conservative people elected is within this party. Chances are they won’t come completely back to the party, but maybe you can get them to commit to voting with the Republicans when they don’t have a candidate in the race. We have to start building coalitions with other conservative leaning groups.


Chuck Smith for Congress VA-02


I first heard of Chuck Smith today when I received notice that he was following me on twitter. That got my curiosity up and I started doing some research.

Chuck Smith is running for congress in the VA-02 district.

Virginia’s second congressional district was a recent pick up for the Democrats. Last year, Democrat Glenn Nye won against the incumbent Thelma Drake* 52.40% to 47.46%. This district had been a Republican district since 2000 and voted for George Bush twice.

Chuck Smith

Chuck is a veteran of the Marines and served as a Navy JAG. He also has a long history with the Virginia Republican party including serving as a country chair, and the most important office in the country, a precinct captain.

He has been referred to as a strong conservative by the local Republican party and his issues page backs up that statement.

I hope you’ll join me in wishing that Mr. Smith goes to Washington in 2010.

*Thelma Drake has announced that she will not seek this seat in 2010.

Category: ,

Adam Kinzinger for Congress IL-11


It’s time to start supporting our candidates for the 2010 congressional races. One great bright young Republican face on the scene for 2010 is Adam Kinzinger. He’s announced a run for congress in the Illinois 11th congressional district against the Democrat incumbent Debbie Halvorson.

You’ve all heard of him before. Adam Kinzinger is the man who saved a young woman from a knife wielding attacker. But he’s done more than just saving the life of a complete stranger.

Here’s the short bio he posted on his facebook profile.

“Adam Kinzinger was elected to the McLean County Board as a Sophomore at Illinois State University in 1998 beating a 12 year incumbent Democrat. He was re-elected four years later. Shortly after 9-11 he decided to join the Air Force. Since then he has completed Pilot training and participated in missions to Afghanistan and Iraq numerous times. When he has not been deployed overseas he has flown missions on our Southern borders in the War on Drugs. As of February 16th, 2009 Adam has returned to Iraq for another mission that will last till early May. Upon his return he will be hitting the trail, as a near full time candidate. He will retain his Air Force Reserve Status and when elected will be part of only a handful of Representatives in Washington DC that serve as Reservists.”

Now from everything I’ve heard about this young man, this is a completely understated biography. For example it doesn’t mention his selfless act of heroism. But this will do for now.

I’m really excited about this run because his district is right next to my home district of the Illinois 18th congressional and I think this man has a very good chance to take it back from the Democrats. I hope you’ll join me in supporting him.

Category: , ,

Support your party - even when it’s hard.


[promoted from the diaries by bs]

There’s a theme I notice quite often. It’s not just here, it’s a common in political discussions everywhere. It’s the “My idea/candidate/platform plank/you name it didn’t win my party’s support so I’m going to stay home/switch parties/form a new party for the next election” theme.

This theme is actually counterproductive to whatever cause you were supporting since the end result of your temper tantrum is that the one outcome you least desired was helped by whatever action you took against the party. IE: If you stay home from an election because the Republican party nominated a moderate instead of a conservative, you just helped hand the election to the Democrat who is most likely a socialist.

There are a couple of variations on the theme that are different enough that they deserve separate treatment.

Read More →


Tea Party 2.0 conference call tonight at 8:30 EDT


The Republican Governors Association is sponsoring what they call Tea Party 2.0 which is supposed to be a town hall format tea party style meeting. The featured speakers are Rick Perry and Mark Sanford.

You can sign up for this town meeting by going to the GOP Comeback web site and registering with your name, phone number, email address and ZIP code. The comments say they will call you.

I have signed up for this call, but have no additional information. It was something I heard in passing yesterday while flicking past Fox News when Sanford was on. I’ve seen no other announcements of it and I doubt that CNN, MSNBC or any other MSM news outlet will even report that it occurred.

Category:

On conservatism and “Right-Wing Extremists”


The recent DHS memo that warned our nation’s law enforcement officers to watch out for “Right-Wing Extremists” seems to have brought it’s share of trolls and Moby’s to RedState recently. The theme is always the same “Oh, the memo didn’t mean YOU. It meant those extreme conservatives who become neo-Nazi’s and white supremacists.”

And there lies the heart of the problem. The memo achieved it’s goal of tying conservatives to these hate groups. The progressives have over the years managed to convince people that somehow people who love liberty, equality of justice, and the constitution of this country can, when taken to an extreme level, suddenly turn into hate mongering statists.

In other words, the extreme end of conservatism is the exact opposite of conservatism. The leap in logic required to come to that conclusion is something I find curious. To me, an extreme conservative would become a small L libertarian. Someone who believes the state should just but out of our business altogether.

Conservatism is based on individual liberty at it’s core. Statism is anathema to anyone with conservative values.* We don’t hate people.

There are some historical facts that the progressives like to ignore. The Nazi’s were socialists. True, they allowed corporations to continue to run so long as they met state approval, and were quick to take over or replace the heads of any corporations that didn’t (sound familiar?). But they were primarily socialists. They appealed to populist messages and they required an unswerving devotion to the goals of the state. They directed the public towards hating a group of scapegoats who they claimed were responsible for all the ills of the country (traditional socialists used the bourgeoisie, the Nazi’s used the Jews).

The ultimate white supremacist group in this country is the KKK. Another convenient fact that the progressives like to ignore is that the KKK was a group that was born from a political party. Only it wasn’t the Republicans who were the basis of it’s membership. No, it was another party that spawned this evil. The conservatives in the Republican party were often targets of this groups wrath because our ideology was so offensive to them. After all, how DARE we say that “All men are created equal.”

It’s time we start fighting the lies that have been told about us and denounce this smear. NEVER let anyone get away with equating nazis, white supremacists, or other hate groups with anything do do with conservatism.

* I was banned from KOS after posting this exact phrase. Though I went out of my way to state that I didn’t think THEY were Nazis.


“Our American Cousin” - a review


Last night my wife and I attended a performance of the comedy play “Our American Cousin”. With the war winding down and the Easter season upon us, we had plenty of reason to celebrate and a light hearted play seemed in order. The evening started well with a quick dinner before the play. We were greeted at the theater by several soldiers newly returned from war and hopefully on their way home soon after mustering out.

To prelude the play, a band played a selection of wonderful music including tunes such as “The Battle Hymn of the Republic”, “When Johnny Comes Marching Home”, “Stonewall Jackson’s Way” and many others.

The play was a comedy melodrama set in England and was about an American who had inherited a fortune from a rich uncle and had arrived to claim his estate. The play includes comical characters, love interests and even a shady lawyer who was attempting to steal the estate.

Unfortunately, the light night out turned to tragedy as the 16th President of the United States was shot in the head. A dastardly man who I later learned was John Wilkes Booth had snuck up to the president’s box and in a cowardly act, shot the president from behind. He then had the gall to limp across the stage and shout “Sic semper tyrannus” and our dying president.

**********************************
As you might have guessed, we attended a performance of the play that Lincoln had been watching the night he was assassinated. It was held in the Union Mission Theater in Pekin, IL., an old theater with wooden floors and seats built in 1895. It wasn’t QUITE old enough to be Lincoln era, but it was close enough to give the effect. Even the presidential box in the balcony seemed realistic.

The play was cast well and included people who looked the parts. The play had many jokes and comical situations, most of which were still funny and understandable to a modern audience like a chubby girl who was “too delicate” to eat when her suitor was around, and English people who believed that all Americans hunt buffalo (even in Vermont).

Mr. Lincoln and Mary Todd Lincoln looked very much like the originals, though I’d guess Abe to have been a few inches shorter than the real Lincoln. John Wilkes Booth was recognizable as he entered the theater late and eased his way up the stairs to the balcony. There were many people in the audience in civil war era dress to help make the event seem authentic.

After the “assassination”, Mr. and Mrs. Lincoln took the stage and gave short talk and Mr. Lincoln took questions from the audience. One question was about what advise he had for current Illinois politicians. His answer was pretty good. He expressed that he had heard one Blago prosecutor say that Lincoln would be spinning his grave. He said that although Lincoln was always a reformer and fought corruption, it had been a rampant problem even in Lincoln’s time. That the current corruption scandal was unfortunately “not an original sin”.

A highlight to the evening was the band’s playing of the tune “Honor to Our Soldiers” which was to have debuted at Ford’s theater the night Lincoln was shot, but for obvious reasons didn’t get played that night.

One thing that struck me is that by all reports, Lincoln seemed truly happy that day, maybe for the first time in his life and definitely for the first time in many years. A terrible war was winding down with a Union victory. Although there were tough times expected ahead, everything looked to be getting better. He had finally become content with life just before he was struck down.

If any similar re-enactment of the play is being held near you, I highly recommend attending. This show was well worth the time.

Category:

Illinois has a new pro-abortion bill HB2354


My wife just received a call from a push-poll trying to drum up support for a new pro-abortion bill in the Illinois General Assembly. The caller explained the bill as for Women’s Reproductive Health, improving contraception and preventing women from ever being forced into an abortion and asked her if she wanted to be connected with our state rep. Mike Smith (D) to express support for the bill. The “pollster” avoided using the word abortion until my wife asked her directly if it’s pro-abort. The pollster did answer that yes it included pro-abortion measures.

She did tell my wife the bill number which I found here.

The summary states several purposes of the bill, but included are:

Provides that the
“State or any municipality, political subdivision, or other governmental
unit or agency shall not:”
:
“(3) deny or interfere with a pregnant woman’s right to terminate a pregnancy”

and
“Provides that the State shall ensure that individuals
eligible for State medicaid assistance, or other State medical assistance,
receive financial assistance for reproductive healthcare at least to the
same extent as other comparable services.”

This bill is explicitly legalizing abortion in Illinois and providing that the state pay for abortions.

If you live in Illinois, I urge you call your representatives and senators and tells them to kill this bill!

Category: ,

The EU is calling the Obama plan “the road to hell”


The Czech finance minister made the statement at an EU conference.

It seems “the One” is still not doing a real good job of regaining the respect for the US around the world.

*** updated to point to a different article. The link to the EU business site didn’t work. Also, I know this diary is a bit short. It belongs in something like RedHot, but there isn’t such a thing for us lowly average posters.


Governor Quinn may have just handed Illinois back to us.


Yesterday, Governor Quinn submitted his new budget to the legislature. There are some surprises in it that may have handed this state back to the GOP! But it’s not a done deal. We need to USE this opportunity to get people behind the Republican cause.

Just some of the interesting things that we can use:
1. A 50% increase in the income tax rate! Yes, that’s right 50%!!!!!! That’s something that will be noticed by everyone who collects a check in Illinois and a 50% tax increase is a bit steep even by Democrat standards. Yes, they’re increasing the deduction per exemption, but that isn’t going to offset the increase for most people. I’m going to use this everywhere!

2. A $1.00/pack increase in the cigarette tax. I don’t smoke, but those who do are going to be livid. Let’s use that anger to recruit.

3. A Huge increase in infrastructure spending while at the same time cutting other government services. Why is he increasing capital spend if he has to raise taxes and cut other services to make it happen?

And that’s just the headline overview. I haven’t seen the detailed budget yet, but given that it’s a Democrat in office, it’s got to have tons of pay for play in it. People have just seen pay for play get blown with Blago. They aren’t real sympathetic to more of it.

Those of you in Illinois, let’s start USING this to change people from Dem leaning to Republican leaning! We might even get some permanent converts!

Update: I found the entire 482 page budget.
It’s going to take some time to get through this one.


Illinois SB600 - No longer what we wanted it to be.


Since I was plotting to corner a Senator this weekend and grill him over dropping support of SB600, I thought I’d better bone up on my facts first. I started poking around on the State legislature site and discovered something interesting. There were 2 amendments to the bill before it was passed out of the Elections committee.

Perhaps I should give a little background before getting into the specifics. The Illinois elections code provides for the structures of political parties in the State. There are 2 alternatives A (the Republican one) and B (the Democrat one). Alternative A currently allows for the election of precinct or ward (in Chicago) committeemen who in turn select the state central committee. Each congressional district gets 1 central committee member. These members then select the state chairman. I’ll get to alternative B in a minute.

Sen. Chris Lauzen didn’t like this arrangement. He thought that it would be better to allow a direct election system where the central committee person from each congressional district is elected directly by the primary voters. I think the current system is serviceable, but I’m willing to entertain a direct election alternative. As Warner has posted elsewhere, there are good reasons to change back to a direct election system.

Senator Lauzen’s bill was pretty straightforward and I don’t see anything objectionable in it.

Now the current Democrat system is a little more convoluted. They believe that each district should have both a man and a woman representing the district. Their alternative specifies that the primary voters vote for 1 candidate and both the male receiving the highest number of votes among the male candidates and the woman receiving the highest number of votes get to the state committee. If there are only members of 1 sex running, the party appoints a member of the opposite sex to be the representative of their sex from the district.

The problem arises with Lauzen’s bill because someone amended it to make Alternative A look identical to alternative B.

I don’t know about you, but I don’t think someone should get elected or appointed to anything simply based on their sex. This amendment to the bill allows just that. We aren’t the party of identity politics. This bill now requires that we become one.