« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

One Gallon – the Achilles’ Heel of Electric Cars

The Chevy Volt’s batteries hold the same amount of energy as one gallon of gasoline—one single gallon.


Would you buy a car that held only one gallon of gasoline? Neither would I. Yet, we’ve invested billions of dollars developing and promoting a car with an “electric gas tank” (the batteries) that only holds one gallon’s worth of energy.

I’ve heard that new super batteries are just around the corner. All we have to do is invest enough money and they’ll appear. Just like computers (in the 1950′s they were the size of rooms, today they can be held in the palm of your hand), battery development is whizzing along at a blurring pace. Unfortunately, that isn’t true. The development pace of batteries is nothing like that of computers.

A better analogy for battery development is radio. In the 1950′s most people listened to music on AM radio. In the 1970′s, FM radio became the standard for listening to music. Digital radio was introduced in the 2000′s. Each of these was a step up in quality, but they weren’t such a huge step that they made the old standards obsolete.

Alkaline batteries were commonly used in the 1950′s, and they still are today. Plug a C, D, or AA battery into any device; odds are it’s the same alkaline battery technology they were using back in the 1950′s. Nickel batteries appeared in the 1970′s. Lithium batteries appeared in the 1990′s, and have three times the capacity of 1950′s alkaline batteries. Truth is, the change in battery technology is slow, slow, slow.

The Chevy Volt battery pack weighs 435 pounds. That’s what’s required to store the energy found in one gallon of gasoline. If you wanted to create a Volt that had a “five gallon” energy tank, it would require at least 2,175 pounds of batteries—literally over a ton. Even if batteries suddenly became dirt cheap, the weight alone makes creating a car that holds more than a couple of gallons of energy unfeasible.

When Consumer Reports tested the Volt, they managed to get 28 miles on a full battery charge; which sounds about right for one gasoline gallon’s worth of energy.  The desingers at GM knew that also. That’s why then ended up putting an internal combustion engine in the car to burn gasoline to produce electricity to power the electric motors. The Volt was meant to be an all electric car, it was sold to the public and the government as an all electric car, so why did they include an internal combustion engine? Because, the best battery pack they could come up could only hold the energy equivalent of one gallon of gasoline.

When Poplular Mechanics tested the Volt, they found that even with the battery assist the Volt only got 32 mpg in the city, and 39 mpg on the highway.  This is not an improvement over conventional cars (in fact, it’s less than some conventional cars get). The truth is, when it comes to miles per gallon, the Volt is not as “green” as many conventional vehicles. And, the reason is the Volt has to carry 435 pounds of weight (the battery pack)–a battery pack that becomes dead weight after it expends its one gallon’s worth of energy. The battery pack made the car less green.

The Nissan Leaf did a little better. Consumer Reports got 68 miles out of a full charge (about two gallons worth of energy). Nissan didn’t use more advanced technology than the Volt. The Leaf has a larger battery than the Volt (660 lbs. Vs 435 lbs.) and the non-battery part of the car weighs less (2,694 lbs. Vs 3,346 lbs.). Nissan just put more batteries in the car, and made the rest of the car lighter.

This might still be workable, if you could refill the “electric gas tank” in just a few minutes. Unfortunately, it takes at least 8 hours to fully recharge the batteries in the all electric Leaf. A drive from Atlanta to Birmingham (about 150 miles) takes about three hours (I drive slow and like to make a couple of stops along the way). If I tried to make that trip in the Nissan Leaf, it would take at least 20 hours, because I would have to make two 8-hour stops to recharge the battery.

So, why isn’t just adding more batteries and making the car lighter a solution? Look at the Tesla Roadster. It gets 211 miles on a full battery charge (that’s what Tesla claimed in a lawsuit against the show Top Gear—who said they only got 55 miles per charge—so we’ll go with that over the 250 plus miles Tesla claims in their advertising). 211 miles is still a great range, but how did they achieve it? They increased the battery pack to 992 pounds (557 pounds more than the Volt) and decreased the non-battery weight to 1,731 pounds (2,053 pounds less than the Volt). The Tesla Roadster is a small, small car. I’m sure it’s fun as a sports car, but if ask it to do any of the mundane tasks in life (carry a family, or bring home a load groceries) it’s not anywhere near to being up to the task.

The Chevy Volt was sold as an electric vehicle.  The early advertising for the car (including while GM was asking for money in the bailout) was all about the Volt being an electric car. GM put every engineering brain cell it had behind the Volt. There is no doubt the Chevy Volt is state of the art, best in class as far as electric vehicles go–and it has a gasoline engine as a crutch. It must have that crutch, because the batteries in the Volt only hold the energy equivalent of one gallon of gasoline—one single gallon.

Would we be calling a regular  car with a gas tank that only held one gallon of gasoline “the car America had to build?” Would we have spent billions of dollars developing that car? Would we be offering $7,500 tax credits to encourage consumers to purchase that car?

Yet, that is what we’ve done with the Chevy Volt. We’ve put all our money and efforts behind a car with an “electric gas tank” that holds the energy equivalent of one gallon of gasoline. The Chevy Volt, or any other electric car, will not be the answer to our energy problems until we can equip a car with a battery pack that can hold the same energy equivalent as the gas tanks in current cars. Given the history of battery development (tripling capacity every 40 years), that will be somewhere between 120 and 160 years from now.

Buying an electric car today is the same as buying a regular car that only holds one gallon of gasoline. Building one is, well…I’ll let you answer that one yourself.

 

COMMENTS

  • exitsfunnel

    How is it possible that you could have put all of that effort into writing this diary and not even understand at a basic, fundamental level how the Volt works? At the end of the day I guess that this diary is a real testament to just how poor a job, Chevrolet has done marketing the car.

    -exits

    • http://alt2p.org Brookhaven

      hence the name Volt, short for voltage.

      The government has held up the Volt as an example of the electric car of the future (and pumped billions of dollars into its development and promotion). The Volt was sold to the government (and American people) as an electric car.

      Given that, it’s fair to discuss how the Volt operates as a purely electric vehicle. And, as a purely electric vehicle, it’s a total failure (as is the Leaf). The reason is pretty simple: the batteries only store the energy of about one gallon of gasoline.

      That’s why they had to install a gasoline engine. Once the battery is depleted (after the first 28 miles), You’re running totally on old fashioned gasoline. How many MPG does the Volt get on gasoline: about 30. (The 50 MPG claim made by GM is completely bogus).

      http://gas2.org/2010/08/24/chevy-volt-achieves-less-than-30-mpg-after-battery-depleted/

      http://www.leftlanenews.com/chevrolet-volt-mileage-after-battery-depletion-finally-released.html

      With a 9.3 gallon gas tank, the Volts range is 307 miles (279 + 28). The electric part is only about 10% of the trip. The Volt MPG if you factor in the help from the batteries is 33 MPG (307 / 9.3).

      The Chevy Cruz (the regular internal combustion version of the Volt) gets 42 miles per gallon.

      If the Volt’s batteries held the equivalent of 8 or 9 gallons of gasoline, you might be able to make the argument that it’s a practical and green car. But, the fact is they don’t. They only hold the equivalent of one gallon of gasoline.

      The truth is, the Chevy Cruz is probably “greener” than the Chevy Volt. And, the reason comes down to the battery pack.

  • norris

    If you want clean energy go natural gas the technology is well developed clean and refueling is a 10 minute job. Electricity is compound inefficiency the generator ,battery and motor are each lucky to deliver 80% of the energy put in them.

    • Dave_A

      The ideal motor-vehicle fuel is still going to be something that exists as a liquid at standard temperature & pressure, and thus can be stored in simple unpressurized tanks.

      Natural gas as a fuel, means more expensive vehicles, as the requirements for fuel tank construction & placement are much more difficult than what is needed for gasoline….

      A better solution, would be to encourage the Northeast to get off of using diesel-oil for home-heat….

      Natural gas for home-heat and some power generation along with coal & nuke…. Electircity or tanked-propane for heat in areas where gas infastructure doesn’t go… Thus freeing up oil to be used for transportation fuel.

  • Common_Cents

  • lastgopinillinois

    formerly known as General Motors (GM) will sell 12,000 Chevy Volts to GE (General Electric), another 0bama crony-capitalist favorite.

    GE is forcing employees who have company cars to use the Volt as their replacements. Employees who decide to opt-out, will not be re-imbursed for their expenses. GE will offer estimates for electric vehicle charging stations and will be re-imbursed for home charging costs, and retain original gas re-imbursement costs.
    GE manufactures electric vehicle charging stations. So, they could sell as many as 12,000 EV chargers. GE officials claim that the changeover to Chevy Volts will save the company money in the long run.
    The current subsidy is $7,500 per car.
    That comes to a total cost to the taxpayers of $90,000,000.
    Whoa! Guess we need to start working longer hours to pay this off.

  • Pingback: Scottie Coursey

  • Pingback: Heriberto Woolwine

  • Pingback: Automotive Forum

  • Pingback: Welcome to My Blog

  • Pingback: Reverse Number Lookup

  • Pingback: randka

  • Pingback: alcohol

  • Pingback: μουσικη

  • Pingback: znajdz milosc

  • Pingback: wielu ludzi w jednym miejscu

  • Pingback: znajdz milosc

  • Pingback: steel strapping

  • Pingback: darmowa strona z randkami

  • Pingback: surrealismart

  • Pingback: PC

  • Pingback: Pop Over To This Website

  • Pingback: look what I found

  • Pingback: web design barrow

  • Pingback: breast active program

  • Pingback: high investment return

  • Pingback: madam lux

  • Pingback: desain interior rumah

  • Pingback: biaya bangun rumah

  • Pingback: Ronni Newbold

  • Pingback: Karon Swarat

  • Pingback: Becki Dufrane

  • Pingback: Union Flooring Installations

  • Pingback: LoansAndBadCredit

  • Pingback: Automotive Forum

  • Pingback: Elvis Robbin

  • Pingback: growing aloe vera

  • Pingback: wzór cv

  • Pingback: Angla Dallam

  • Pingback: Annett Blowe

  • Pingback: Jamaal Arenburg

  • Pingback: Mario Lemp

  • Pingback: internet

  • Pingback: coffee green extract

  • Pingback: John Markin

  • Pingback: John Markin

  • Pingback: weight loss

  • Pingback: แทงบอล

  • Pingback: Repair and Troubleshoot PLC

  • Pingback: Teichfolie

  • Pingback: Car Forum

  • Pingback: approved in one hour

  • Pingback: kids bikes

  • Pingback: Welcome to My Blog

  • Pingback: najlepsza randka

  • acat

    Same solution I use for my cordless power tools .. I have several batteries and swap ‘em.

    There’s no technological reason that the battery packs couldn’t be swapped out by a certified technician at a “refilling” station .. or in my garage with the right hardware. (a “battery hoist”, a specialized charging station, etc.)

    I agree otherwise – the energy density of hydrocarbons is significantly higher than that of today’s batteries.

    It wouldn’t surprise me to see “batteries” replaced by some form of high-density capacitors in the future, the chemistry seems to indicate they’d do better .. but that’s just a guess, and the Leafs will all be rusting in scrapyards long before we get there.

    Mew

  • http://alt2p.org Brookhaven

    We’ve sunk billions of dollars into permanent battery packs, that take 8 hours to recharge, and that hold the energy equivalent of 1 gallon of gasoline.

  • papabear

    You think about all the downsides of swapping batteries:

    1. Every car would need to have a common battery package:

    a. Same capacity

    b. Same size

    c. Same type of cooling and capacity.

    2. Users would only be able to exchange for batteries with an equivalent life left:

    a. Can’t accept batteries that were discharged to far

    b. Can’t accept batteries that were overheated

    c. Can’t accept batteries that have had significantly greater kWh of use

    d. Can’t accept batteries that were fast charged

    3. OEMs would need to design a cheap, universal quick electrical and mechanical connection that is rated for 1000′s of connections and disconnections. Current state of the art design is neither cheap nor reusable.

    I could continue, but this is enough.

    Capacitors have a much lower energy density than batteries.

    Higher energy density batteries exist. The problem is that in general, a multi use rechargeable battery stores about 10 times the electrical energy in the chemistry of the battery. The higher the energy density of the battery, the more energetic the reaction in the case of “mistakes” or “accidents”. I have hopes that we can safely increase the energy density of batteries.

    I also have hopes that BO will concede the election in October…

  • Dave_A

    A ‘pack swap’ isn’t a quick & easy action…

    It would probably take at least an hour for a mechanic to swap them out, if you include all the safety-compliance rules for removing a 400-some-lb part from a car…

    Expensive, and impractical.

  • Viet71

    his car, and I’ve read it gets something like 80 mpg. As I understand, he’s been trying show that an ordinary car’s mileage can be greatly improved. Also as I understand, carmakers haven’t taken him seriously.

  • Bill S

    The Leaf and the Volt are two entirely different vehicles. The Volt is basically a hybrid that functions as 100% electric while on battery, unlike the Prius that constantly switches from battery to gas to hybrid as you drive. On the other hand, the Leaf is a 100% electric vehicle. Nissan had to put more batteries in and give it more battery-mode range – because that’s the only thing that powers it! When the Volt runs out of electricity, it switches over to its combustion engine which both powers the car and charges the battery (but nowhere near as much as plugging it in).

    So the weight difference you’re referring to is due to the Leaf not even HAVING a combustion engine – it just has an electric motor and a lot more batteries. The Volt has to carry both.

    There are two things to consider in the electric/hybrid story: 1) A true comparison of mileage across all technologies – are cars with efficient gas or diesel engines a better choice for overall economy? and 2) There is a definite need for breakthrough battery technology, but that should be funded by consumer supply/demand and not by government intervention.

    Battery technology development has been far slower than that of the technologies that USE batteries, and this is true of consumer electronics as well as cars. The company that breaks the code on energy storage may well be very successful…but only if other technologies such as fuel cells don’t succeed first.

  • 1stRichard

    I started looking at this some time ago, found it absurdly impossible to go all

  • onemovoter

    Just like most of the other alternative energy solutions currently. Until we start thinking outside the box, we’ll be working inside the box with limited expensive boondoggles like the Volt and Leaf.

    For example, they are actually working on energy transference through the air of at least 10 feet or more. They believe that they could embed this into the highways and be able to power cars as they drive along. This would eliminate the need for huge battery packs while not needing a gasoline engine.

    I have also been reading that micro small reactors with Thorium instead of uranium could be built that would produce around 10kWh of electricity for decades. I’m betting that within the next decade we could start seeing these MSR’s cheap and safe enough to be built with new homes, which could not only power the home, but provide power back to the grid for other uses.

    Our current problem is with the government funneling money to tech that are dead ends. I’d rather see a hands off approach with a level playing field where all laws apply equally to all business, and let them all compete on their merits. That one one of the big reasons why I liked Rick Perry so much, because it was what he believed in.

  • funwithknives

    one of the cars he was experimenting with Burned Down his garage and at least part of his house,along with a bunch of his memorabilia.

    He should’a stuck to toy trains. {ALL ABOA–RD!!}

  • Dave_A

    Is that they are all based on a healthy dose of neo-urbanist social engineering…

    Yes, these are the same people who consider suburbs & exurbs to be ‘evil sprawl’, and claim the ‘proper’ life for a middle class family is to live in a condo or apartment, as if everywhere-USA was New York City…

    The Volt was originally advertised as having a 40-mile plug-in range.

    The logic behind it, for the O-admin & others, was that if you were a ‘Good’ American, who lived in the city within 20-30 city miles of their job, you could drive a Volt to work, charge it, and drive it home.

    The problem? Americans don’t like to live like that – the first thing one does when they get enough money, is move the hell out of any place with a 6-figure-plus population…. We fight the social-engineering of HOV lanes, freeway deconstruction, and highway-funds-to-mass-transit diversion, to live in a place where the skyline is trees & blue sky…

    For those of us who have more than a 30-miles-at-35mph commute, EVs are absurd.

  • texasref

    You drive a comparable gas-only car 100 miles and tell me how much you spent on gasoline to make that happen, then drive a Leaf 100 miles and tell me how much you spent on electricity (offpeak KwH rate) to make THAT happen, and you will find an exponential savings.

    Exponential!

    And your 8-hour charge time is if you use a standard 120. If you use the recommended 240 its much quicker.

  • Dave_A

    Compare the price of an electric car, to that of an equivalent conventional vehicle (equivalent means similar interior space, HP, etc)….

    In most cases, the purchase-price difference is enough to offset the supposed savings in fuel cost…

    Eg, if you buy a Chevy Aveo for $12k-ish, how much gasoline will you have to burn, to reach the price of a Volt at 40k-ish?

    I did the math once, but using the Prius and the Aveo – the result was that you would drive the Aveo into the ground, before you spent enough on gasoline to make a Prius economical.

  • http://alt2p.org Brookhaven

    The battery life goes in the toilet if you use 240. In fact, the faster you charge the battery, the shorter the battery life.

    The battery cost calculations put out by manufacturers always assume a battery life based on a slow (8-hour, 120) charge. If you are using the faster charge, then you need to rework your numbers based on a shorter batter life.

  • funwithknives

    65 to 75, max. Car and Driver had to use a flatbed twice, road testing one, and they watched the Gauge,like a hawk. Use the heater or the A/C and get out-a the way.Hills? FuhGetAboutIt.
    Utopia looks good from way-far-away, dud-n’t it?

  • 1stRichard

    Electric is not the way to go. Volkswagen 1L is 235 miles per gallon but will not pass emissions and regulations, check it out. It is stuck in concept car production…

  • DRW

    Anyone’s who’s had to swap out their car’s battery knows about all the “environmental cleanup/recycling” fees required. Can you imagine how much it will cost to recycle a 400 lb battery? Besides the fact that the Rare Earth elements needed are only mined in China because of the wide-scale pollution involved with their production… with current technology, pushing electric cars is just outsourcing pollution to the backyards of peasants ruled by dictators.

  • http://alt2p.org Brookhaven

    “then drive a Leaf 100 miles and tell me how much you spent on electricity (offpeak KwH rate) to make THAT happen, and you will find an exponential savings.”

    The Leaf only has a 68 mile range on a full charge.

    That means to drive 100 miles, you have to have at least an 8 hour break somewhere in the middle to recharge the battery.

    The cost of sitting around 8 hours outweighs any savings.

  • texasref

    not that abmonation hybrid volt

  • quill67

    Designers are working to create electrified roadways that do not require physical contact between car and road. These would only need to be spaced every few miles and would allow for recharging while driving at highway speeds. This technology is already being used to operate an amusement park vehicle train (the type that is used to pick up park patrons from distant parking lots) This vehicle is able to operate all day without having to stop for recharging. While the technology is just being developed, it makes a lot more sense than using current battery technology and subsidizing this wasteful approach.

    As an earlier poster showed, using wind power is not going to work. But it would not take very many nuclear power plants to supply the energy needed for electric car use and new nuclear designs are very safe (unlike older designs)

  • Viet71

    n/t

  • Dave_A

    Between a pure gas-powered subcompact (Aveo, for example) and a Leaf, Prius, or Volt.

    By costing 2x to 4x as much even after tax credits and govt subsidies, electrics are economically a bad idea…

    Even at $4/gal gas, you can drive for 100k+ miles before you ‘break even’ with the cost of that first mile in an electric car – due to the difference in purchase-price.

  • Dave_A

    You’d have to re-build every highway & city-street to support such a project….

    Electricity is great for powering things that don’t have to move anywhere…

    For transportation, hydrocarbons will remain the way-to-go for decades into the future.

  • funwithknives

    I was a roadway inspector for over 20 years {New-build and Re-construct} and one of the larger ways to cause failure is to force the technology where it does not belong ,given what is do-able.
    Where’s the Samolians/Dinero going to come from? A two lane road , built to Fed. specs is crazy money for most communities now, and in the future. Without this {Fed.} finance, it’s a no-go.
    In no way, shape, or form is your contention just point and shoot. Besides I’m still waiting on my Jetson-Type flying car and am sincerely disapointed I don’t have mine yet.
    We’re supposed to be Flyin’ by now!

  • funwithknives

    20 times/year, max peak load rates of $1.00 /KW Hour will be in force, from 3pm to 7 pm. Average that in to your yearly cost of ownership and know this is only the beginning. Just as you get used to that , a new round will start,and you are essentially trapped.
    Havin’ fun yet?

  • quill67

    I guess I should have been more clear. This technology is not ready yet, but I believe it is more likely to be successul than improving battery technology.

    One advantage is that it does not appear to require much roadspace to be converted. Let me also add that if the technology develops as I expect (big if), the people who use the electricity would be charged NOT the taxpayer.

  • texasref

    and besides, if youre driving more than 65 to 75 miles to work, get a closer job or move closer to your job for pete’s sake.

    And you can charge it while at work (for 8 hours).

    Ob

  • texasref

    and you can get more than that driving efficiently without air conditioning.

    The mpg equivalent when using today’s cost of gas per gallon vs the cost of electricity is like 150 to 200mpg.

    As for Michigan’s critical peak pricing, that’s only 20 times a year maximum, and anyway, on those special occasions you just plug it in after 8pm. Nobody here leaves for work before 4 in the morning.

  • http://alt2p.org Brookhaven

    “and besides, if youre driving more than 65 to 75 miles to work, get a closer job or move closer to your job for pete

  • funwithknives

    this really short missive?
    1)” …get a closer job or move…”: In this economy with home values the way they are? You prove by ypour own writing that reality for so many ,affects you not in the least.Do all that, just to be trendy?
    2) What if your workplace has no charging stations? There has to be more than a few of those ,agreed? I live in a large metropolitan area and I have not seen one yet, any ole’ where.
    3 you attempt to refute my real-world example with FTC estimates and NissaN

  • Dave_A

    Work is in the city…

    I don’t like living in places with more than 4-digit population…

    Why should I be socially-engineered into moving closer to work (generally in a not-so-nice area to live)?

    Most of middle-America lives the suburban/exurban life these days – we like to see trees, not skyscrapers on our skyline…

    The natural economic choice of the public, is for single-occupancy vehicles & freeway commuting, not urban living & EVs.

  • funwithknives

    3) you attempt, however feebly, to refute my real-world ,published experiences, with FTC estimates and Nissan’s claims, which do have a few qualifiers. Driving with no air in many areas of the US in summer time gets you dehydrated or worse .Heat in the winter? Per your response, it is not even considered and so it goes.
    If Electrics are so very valuable, Price them according to their cost,plus that evil devil, Profit, and eliminate any and all rebates and Governmental subsidies. Watch,as this artificial “Market”, vanishes like the DoDo Bird, *the pet rock, or *beanie babies. {* two other kinds of Fads}

    Ever driven behind someone Hyper-Mileing?{i e:”…driving efficiently…”}
    In my area (S/E Michigan) it is an accident just waiting to happen.
    I always get more defensive and go Condition Orange around hybrids as they ‘experiment with efficiency’ and impede traffic.
    Or worse.

  • texasref

    except I speed like everybody else…I engage in the techniques to time traffic lights primarily or if I’m in rush hour traffic I dont hurry up and tail the car ahead of me only to hit the brakes again.

    They don’t impede traffic, they help traffic. And they save everybody on their mileage costs without taking any more time to get there. Unless they are going below the speed limit in the passing lane. That’s not hypermiling. That’s suicide.

  • funwithknives

    1 of 5 points,and …”disregard the rest…”.
    By your non-responses , you give all the answers needed.

    But I’ll play along Re: HyperMiling: I continually see in the area I live in, Hybrid drivers turn right on red {Legal, here} and go slow, forcing otherwise law-abiding drivers to slow down, to prevent a rear ender. It goes without saying that most wear their Greenpeace, Obie/ Biden,et al, Bumper stickers proudly like a shield, preventing recognizance of traffic laws, couth, and decorum.Doubly maddening that everyone helped them buy these vehicles and indirectly support shi–y driving, up close and personal. Not everyone drives like ypou purportedly do and that is a fact.IN Fact, very few do, hereabouts.And That Is No Bull, My Southwesterly Friend.
    {Maybe it’s the water….}

  • Dave_A

    Further…

    None of these ‘equivalent milage’ ratings factor in THE COST OF THE CAR!

    Which is the real killer…

    Once again, you can buy almost 100k miles worth of cas before you make up the price-difference between an EV/HEV and a normal car.

  • Dave_A

    Given that small-ish bikes got 50mpg back in 1980….

    With streamlining, high milage is possible in a ’4-wheel-bike’ or ‘street-legal-gokart’ at the expense of cargo, passengers, frills & any sort of crashworthiness….

  • acat

    than there are in the city itself. Lots of mid-sized companies (and some big ones – Sears for example) moved their operations out of the city proper years ago .. too expensive to be downtown!

    One of the results of 9/11 is that a lot of the information technology work for NYC is now done in less-of-a-target New Jersey now…

    In short, the urban centers are not the job-magnets that they used to be .. and once one sees *that* reality, the engineering makes even more sense … for the Dems.

    (if nobody wants to live in the city, there goes their urban-voter-plantations!)

    Mew

  • texasref

    Here’s to liberty, my friend…pick your poison, and I agree, not on the government’s dime.

  • texasref

    nt