Doin’ What Comes Naturally!


(Apologies to Irving Berlin)… We knew that Barack Obama was turning DC into a mecca for sucking at the public teat, but it perhaps was not as obvious until recently as to what extent this is occurring.  RedState member Fred Maidment sent this blog entry from The American to me this morning. It illustrates the depth to which Obama is influenced on “governmentalization” of the private sector.  The graphic tells it all:

Unsurprisingly, the low points come during the Democrat(ic) Kennedy, Carter, Clinton and Obama administrations. But the dearth of private sector experience in the Obama cabinet is almost breathtaking. As Nick Schulz notes, “over 90 percent of its prior experience was in the public sector”. Wow.

It shouldn’t be a “wow” moment, though. The Obama administration is promoting exactly what we have suspected it would - elimination of private sector industry in favor of government control. From banking to automotive to health care to “net neutrality” - the government takeover is already well under way. And we shouldn’t be surprised - they’re just doin’ what comes naturally.

Category: , , ,

RSS feed | Trackback URI

16 Comments Leave a comment

The Obama appointees were busy

bk Thursday, November 26th at 11:43AM EST (link)

getting “community organizer” experience.

 

Well the proof is in People

Richard Mullins Thursday, November 26th at 11:54AM EST (link)

and it shows too much. Those that have only been in the Public sector,color their view when it comes to the way things run. Obama admin Private sector experience is lower than any other Progressive Admin.

 

This is the cause, bs. The effect

redneck_hippie Thursday, November 26th at 12:16PM EST (link)

is presented by breitbart tv in animated us map of unemployment from June ‘07:

http://www.breitbart.tv/animated-us-map-shows-startling-growth-of-unemployment/

ps You need to correct “dearth of public sector”, I know you mean “private”

“We must not lose our faculty to dare, especially in dark days.” - Churchill in March, 1942.

Remember NY-23; translation: RINOs Have No Base.

Thanks for the catch.

Bill S Thursday, November 26th at 1:36PM EST (link)

Corrected.

And you’re right … there’s a variety of cause/effect relationships at play.

Decorum is fo’ suckas - unless it’s one of the good guys

 
 

Saw a TV ad touting "reduced bureaucracy and...

6eorge Jetson Thursday, November 26th at 2:56PM EST (link)

the elimination of redundant tests”

From the same folks that brought you the recovery.org website.


    Click to see enlarged image

The ad referred to its website, Kowalski...

6eorge Jetson Thursday, November 26th at 2:58PM EST (link)

It was healthreform.org or something very similar.


    Click to see enlarged image

 
 

The Socialists prefer unelected, non-confirmed czars

Scope Thursday, November 26th at 5:04PM EST (link)

that answer to no one but the leader of the Marxist movement. They couldn’t get anywhere if they didn’t select and choose only those that are a part of their movement.

 

The Socialists prefer unelected, non-confirmed czars

Scope Thursday, November 26th at 5:04PM EST (link)

that answer to no one but the leader of the Marxist movement. They couldn’t get anywhere if they didn’t select and choose only those that are a part of their movement.

 

See 100 US Gov't Socialists in 60 seconds

commieblaster Friday, November 27th at 9:11AM EST (link)

See 100 Communists and Socialists in US Government in 60 seconds here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ye6fRx4gZV8

Then see the details on each at this reference site: http://www.commieblaster.com/progressives/index.html

 

Par for the course

red_refugee Sunday, November 29th at 9:56PM EST (link)

Exactly what I expected from the administration with the manufacturing czar (Ron Bloom) who said, “the free market is nonsense”.

I wish someone would ask Barry if he thinks the government or the private sector is the source of job growth in America. It’s too bad there are no journalists in the white house press corps to ask that question.

 

Question:

stevemoschetta Sunday, November 29th at 10:09PM EST (link)

From what point in the prior administrations was the data taken? Were they all surveyed at 10 months? More likely that the data was taken at the end of each administration. As you know many cabinet staff positions are unfilled at this point, so therefore the comparison is worthless at best,

Ah, another Obama apologist washes up on our shores.

janis Sunday, November 29th at 10:57PM EST (link)

We’re so lucky.

Ah, another Obama apologist washes up on our shores.

stevemoschetta Monday, November 30th at 4:04PM EST (link)

No, it is me that is the lucky one.

 
 

unfilled cabinet staff positions

red_refugee Sunday, November 29th at 11:12PM EST (link)

Read the link (http://blog.american.com/?p=7572) which says that this counts all cabinet secretaries. Your speculation that it includes unfilled cabinet staff positions is incorrect and makes no sense since an unfilled position wouldn’t have private or public sector experience.

 

G'bye (nt)

Neil Stevens Monday, November 30th at 4:10PM EST (link)

Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis

I’d rather everyone get along, but I’ll settle for everyone united in hating me for being a jerky moderator.

 
 

not a "wow" moment you say

cyncurl999 Monday, November 30th at 11:27AM EST (link)

I read that right after I said out loud “WOW” …. I guess I’m naive and predictable.

Well, the way a lot of businesses (aka private sector) are running these days they aren’t exactly the model. We used to say that government should be run more like a business but, unfortunately, many businesses are run like government. Anybody work for a large corporation lately? Political, beauracratic and wasteful.

 

Leave a Comment

 

Be respectful, or be banned. No Profanity.