« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

These are the words of a man who should be President

Yeah, yeah, I know.  Don’t worry about 2012 right now.  So sue me.

Rep. Paul Ryan is one of the most articulate, intelligent conservative voices in Washington, DC.  His voting record is impeccable.  His performance in the so-called “Health Care Summit” was superb.  And this past week, Congressman Ryan delivered an absolutely stunning speech to the Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs.  This is not your normal, run-of-the-mill talk.  This address made Barack Obama sound like a seventh-grade speech student.

I’d have to republish the entire thing to capture the highlights. So here are some choice snippets, starting with this:

It raises a subtle but real threat to self-government when the few are paying more and more of the bill for government services and subsidies to the majority: “He who pays the piper calls the tune.” The next chapter is the rule of “crony capitalism,” where those who pay most taxes get the privileges, and government by and for the people is replaced by government by and for the few. The end of this story is soft despotism.

At this point, I’m not sure I would have used the adjective “soft”.  But the point is well-made.

A government that expands beyond its high but limited mission of securing our natural rights is not progressive, it’s regressive. It privileges the powerful at the expense of the people. It establishes the rule of class over class. The American Revolution and the Constitution replaced class rule with a better idea: equal opportunity for all. The promise of keeping the earnings of your work is central to justice, freedom, and the hope to improve your life.

“keeping the earnings of your work” – The Democrats are all for that, only it’s them who wish to keep our earnings.

But wait – there is much, much more…

The Constitution and the consent of the people are all that stand between limited and unlimited government power. Zealous ideologues with the best of intentions brush aside the limits on power in order to get whatever they believe is good for the people … no matter what the people believe. Our system of freedom can survive an assault, but it won’t survive if the people are frightened, or angry, or asleep at the switch. A great Democrat, President Andrew Jackson, once said: “eternal vigilance by the people is the price of liberty.” We can thank our current leaders at least for this: they have awakened the nation to the danger of taking self-government for granted.

Congress is not only enacting a social welfare state agenda over the objections of the people. It is failing to address the problems that threaten to engulf our country, principally economic decline and entitlement-driven debt crisis. The coming election will be a referendum on the agenda of our current leadership. Either it will give them a mandate that says “more of the same,” or it will end the abuse of power and put America back on the path of growth and freedom.

Paul Ryan obviously understands what is wrong with the current regime.  These two paragraphs encapsulate my feelings about the Democrats in power better than just about anything I’ve read in the past year.  Read those paragraphs again.  And again.

Furthermore, Ryan understands the REAL issue behind the financial crisis we are faced with:

The problem in a nutshell is this: Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security, three giant entitlements, are out of control. Exploding costs will drive our federal government and national economy to collapse. And the recession plus this Congress’ spending spree have accelerated the day of reckoning.

Today, Medicare is $38 trillion short of its promised benefits. In five years, the hole will grow to $52 trillion. Your family’s share of this gap is $458,000. Medicaid will add trillions more in state and federal debt.

Social Security’s surplus is already gone, and its debt is mounting. Unless its finances are strengthened, the government will be forced to cut benefits nearly 25 percent or raise payroll taxes more than 30 percent.

Both Republicans and Democrats have failed to be candid about this. And we have only postponed the crisis by shaking a tin cup at China and Japan.

Amen, brother.

And Ryan finishes with a flourish:

My party challenges the whole basis of the Progressivist vision of this country’s future. We challenge their attack on American exceptionalism. We challenge their claim that bureaucratic centralization is the only way the US can meet the economic and social challenges of our time.

Those leaders have underestimated the good sense of the American people. They broke faith with independents, Republicans, and their own rank-and-file. They walked away from the foundational truths that made America the wonder and the envy of the world. The price of their infidelity will be high.

I pray that the price of their infidelity will be an overwhelming GOP victory in 2010.  That is indeed where we must be placing our emphasis for the rest of 2010.

But beyond 2010, we must think about how to re-take the White House from the primary culprit in this governmental hijacking of the Constitution: Barack Hussein Obama.  Congressman Ryan clearly understands the problem and the solution.

A speech like this is not the typical fare we hear from Congressional representatives.  Be sure to read the whole thing. Words like this are seldom heard today, in DC or anywhere else.  These are the kinds of words we hear from a statesman…the kind of words that come from a President.  Now I’ve heard the case from some of my friends and colleagues that we must elect someone with executive experience, or we’ll wind up with another disaster like Barack Obama.  But the problem with Obama has nothing to do with a lack of experience; it has everything to do with a neo-Communist ideology that has lurched this nation’s policy-making far, far to the left.  I am much more interested in a President who has the ideas that can move this country in the right direction.  And Congressman Ryan possesses these ideas.

But, you say, Ryan says he doesn’t want to run for President.  Well, maybe after another year or so of Barack Obama, he’ll be convinced.  I know I am.

COMMENTS

  • janis

    And 5′s across the board for you for doing it and for Paul Ryan for saying it. This is absolutely what I want to read and hear from our nation’s leaders for the rest of my life as an American.

    And I’m not at all leery of boosting this guy as POTUS. God knows he has a better grasp on the problems we face, the solutions to those problems, and the bedrock beliefs of the Founders than any of the other purported leaders of either party!

  • klondike

    I read this piece by Rep. Ryan first thing this morning. What a great way to start a day! I forwarded it to everyone in my address book, asking them to read the entire piece and if they agree, forward it to everyone they know; if they don’t (i.e., my liberal friends), delete it. One person had the same reaction as you, BillS – Ryan for President! I hope this piece goes viral.

  • LisaDe

    I, for one, do not think it too early to keep our eyes and ears open for the perfect candidate for 2012. I strongly believe the same old- same old tired names we hear being thrown around (mainly by the liberal media) will have no place on the ticket in 2012.

    After watching Paul Ryan at the Health Care summit and reading his words today, I am 99.9% convinced that this man is a star among the likes of Reagan.

  • http://www.veronicaestrada.com/ Veronica Estrada

    Perfect for Easter weekend – proof of the renewal of politics and the strength of the Conservative Movement.

    Thank you, Bill S.

    Happy Easter, everyone!

  • marshmom

    Paul Ryan is not just using teleprompter rhetoric. His ideas are concrete and unwavering and he believes what he says.
    This is evident in all of his debates, his stand against Obama in the Health Care dog and pony show a few months ago, and in every interview he gives.
    This man echoes what America is all about and I, for one, will support him however far he chooses to go. Hopefully he can inspire millions of Americans to get back to our founding principles.

  • KathW

    I respect him even more (if that’s possible) for honoring and protecting his family. However, I’m hoping that this country’s great need for him will convince him . We may have to draft him. I believe that my son, a newly-minted voter, would become a life-long conservative if he heard Paul Ryan explain our principles.

  • romans12n2

    I have liked Rep. Ryan’s willingness and ability to speak up on behalf of the people since I first saw him. (at the hc summit, I think). He is bold and articulate and in this day of elections being a popularity contest as well, it doesn’t hurt that he’s extremely handsome too. (Yes, I’m a man. No I’m not gay. I am just pointing out the obvious. ) Don’t tell the libs. They think I’m a racist homophobe.
    LOL

  • littlehouse18
  • izoneguy

    You beat me too it!!!
    Thanks so much for posting this.

    American deserves so much better than Obama.

    Rep. Ryan is that man.

  • Bill S

    May just have not been uploaded yet. Keep your eyes on YouTube over the next few days.

  • mbecker908

    Speaker of the House.

  • johnt

    of a man speaking both eloquently and learnedly , touching on history and real political theory, surviving the American Idol campaign our politics have become.
    As I type this the benighted creature that tragically is our president defames any conception of even rudimentary discussion, and somewhere right now is probably raving, and sounding like the gutter thug he is. But it works, Low and repulsive as it is, it works.

    Today I’m not sure decency and intelligence, principle and character matter.

  • http://www.800cart.com Ron Robinson

    As I blogged a couple of days ago about Obama being blindsided we must certainly fight for liberty, but opportunity is the real key today.

    It’s opportunity that is going make self-interest entice the marginal OFF the ‘entitlement’ roles because they see opportunity in the marketplace vast enough to work a little for $3000 as opposed to taking $1000 on the public dole. With enough opportunity, those who never were on the public dole will have opportunity anough to really make money.

    That’s how we will empty the welfare rolls and the safety net for those who need it can stay in place.

    But without our liberty, we cannot expand opportunity.

  • brumbow

    Paul Ryan says the things that I want the Conservatives to say when debating liberals. He says the things that I am screaming (metaphorically speaking) at the TV when watching interviews of conservatives vs. liberals. He believes what he says and cannot out debate everyone because:

    1) He can think of his feet
    2) Has ready command of the facts and figures
    3) Liberal policy initiatives do not stand up to substantive criticism
    4) He can do all of this in a persuasive, intelligent, civil way.

    We need to get the House back and make Paul Ryan Speaker of the House.

    Imagine unlocking the entrepreneurial economic power of the United States if we were able to pass his Roadmap for America’s Future.

    Thanks for writing this. I really want to check out the video if it surfaces.

  • klondike

    Now is not the time to give up. Now is the time to fight like we never have before. Your comment “Today I’m not sure decency and ingelligence, principle and character matter” is misplaced. It’s not just today – that has been in place for the last 20-30 years. We were just complacent. Today, it has reached levels we never thought it could. It stops now. Don’t surrender and be a defeatist. Fight. Fight now, fight hard. Get involved. Become a delegate or precinct committee chairman in your district. I tried for precinct committee person but missed the deadline, so I’m fighting to be a delegate. Don’t just stop there – start attending school board meetings. Get involved at the local level and pay attention to those who want to influence education of our youth. Pay attention to your local city council and attend their meetings.

    This is not just national – we have to protect this nation from the local level on up.

    I know you’re weary. We all are. That is no excuse. Our armed forces know weariness more than we can fathom.

    No excuses, JohnT. Fight now, fight tomorrow, and never stop. We have to learn from our complacency, and it starts now.

  • Common_Cents

    We need a few thousand Paul Ryans in government, but:

    Are we ready to deal with reality?

    We don’t like to be told to eat healthy, exercise, manage our finances, etc…even though we know what’s good for us.

    We aren’t going to react to runaway government until it hits us directly, personally, obviously. I do see America starting to wake up and realize something is wrong but it’ll take much more pain for real, concerted efforts for the average person to take action in addition to some rah rah lip service.

    No wonder why we govern by crisis, nothing is done until we have a crisis.

  • zekke

    Paul Ryan is Clark Kent. He has the persona and the appearance of an ordinary Joe….but is Superman when it comes to understanding and articulating what is going on in DC these days. If Chairman Obama’s health care summit did anything, it introduced the entire country to Superman Paul Ryan.

  • maisy

    Three weeks ago I texted my brother,
    “Paul Ryan for President”
    This guy appears to be the real deal.
    He has been front and center in the fight against tyranny.

  • earlgrey

    when I take an objective look at the Dems vs. the Reps. We win in the looks department hands down. Honestly I think that is why some of them hate us so much.

  • texasgalt
  • jmadisonfan

    Hannity way over uses the “Ronald Reagan Conservative” line, but I believe it appropriately describes Congressman Ryan. Your comment about lack of executive experience is spot on as well – true leaders are born, not made, and it is clear to me that Ryan posseses that quality. I only wish we could clone him as there are way too many squishes in congress presently.

  • Hugh

    committee. He is sharp enough to successfully defund “IT”. (HCR bill) This can start in Jan. 2011.

  • archer52

    http://truthandcommonsense.com/2010/04/01/paul-ryan-makes-my-heart-sing-yep-it-could-be-love/

    This guy would be comfortable wearing green paint and carrying a Thompson as he is b-slapping Obama with facts and Obama’s own lies.

    I’d follow him over the trench any day.

  • penguin2

    statesman…from a president.” I’ll throw in this thought, these are the kind of words we want and expect to hear from a leader. Rep. Ryan’s speech had strength because the words came from his principles, with the force of his heart behind them. Obama’s words are empty because others have pasted them into his mouth, and there is nothing to back them up.

    Now, because I know you are a realist and quite down to earth in your assessments and predictions, I am going to take heart with your perspective of Rep. Ryan. He could be the George Washington I am looking for; they said Washington was a reluctant hero…

  • http://www.libertytreehugger.com reverelth

    is one of conceding seemingly benign chunks of Obamanation in the quest of appearing to be civil or belonging to something other than a party of “no.” When Democrats see blood in the water, they play it like a fiddle.

    This is the biggest, if self imposed, obstacle Republicans face in 2010 and 2012.

  • http://www.viewfromstonewater.blogspot.com hrh40

    of a good legislator and perhaps, a Speaker of the House.

    Paul Ryan has great ideas, we need great legislators writing good conservative bills.

    He’s perfect where he is. Give him more leadership.

    It’s not all about the presidency. And he has no executive experience.

    We need good people in the House.

  • johnt

    Don’t worry, there’s no white flags flying over my house.
    The fight continues,

  • Swamp_Yankee

    Ryan has been on my radar for a while. I think he is the type of person we need. I agree with all the praise written here.

    But I will remind people that Ryan voted for TARP and MEDICARE D. This is not to impugn Ryan, but to caution the base. We need the BEST people.

    We need Ryan. Its one thing to hold a politician accountable. Its another to eat our own with friendly fire because they are not perfect. The rhetoric about “real” conservatives is as idealistic as it is nauseating. They are politicians. Not philosophers. I think Ryan understands the financial collapse better than most armchair internet activists.

    I can find “real” conservatives everywhere. I can go down the to the local pub and find a great conservatives with political ambitions, but that doesnt mean they are suited for the job. We need the best people, the best talent. We need to encourage them to run for office and join our ranks. They should not be discouraged because they have a few votes or a a few positions that dont conform to a part of the base.

  • 6eorge Jetson

    Paul Ryan, adult Congressman, eschewing the Fairy Tales of Congressional budgeting.

  • Bill S

    you believe that TARP and Med-D vote disqualifies one as one of the “best people?”

    Like I have written many, many times in the past, there is nothing binary about being a conservative. There is a significant difference in opinion in the conservative community about TARP, for example. Some of the most dedicated conservatives I know believe that TARP was a good thing and accomplished precisely what it was intended for.

    There should be no litmus tests for conservatism. Ryan’s ACU rating is > 95%. There are few Senators or Congresspeople who exceed this number. He is far to the conservative end of the continuum. Expecting 100% perfection from a candidate is a near-absurd standard. There is not a single Republican or conservative out there that I cannot find something wrong with.

    I will take Paul Ryan with TARP and Med-D over any of the current GOP “candidates” that are currently being mentioned for 2012. Any of them. Hands-down.

  • E Pluribus Unum

    At this point I consider him worthy to sit at the table with Mike Pence, Jeb Hensarling, and Jim DeMint. And he may have mobility upward from there.

    To those who have ears to hear, you know what kind of praise that is.

  • redneck_hippie

    The polling for 2012 is somewhat moderated by the fact that most do not know or agree upon who should run and especially who should be the leader of the the Republican party.

    Ryan would be a great nominee in that he could counter effectually any and all lies the incumbent could spew. I am content to wish Ryan well in whatever role he chooses. If he runs in the primary in ’12, it would be a good thing for the party. Time will tell whether the condition of the country will be such that people see the need for a Ryan–will they have ears to hear and eyes to see. Will the first half of the first term of the Novelty President convince enough people that government can do wrong, and that lots and lots of government is a disaster. My view is we need a conservative leader of the Republican party, who has the backing of the nation to dismantle everything this administration is about to wreak.

    I do trust Ryan to be able to debunk the rhetoric that we want to starve children and take away benefits. He’s clearly a fighter and a fighter we must have.

  • thurman

    and was absolutely in awe

    I’ve emailed this to everyone I know

    He is an absolute shining star right now for not just our party, but America as a whole

    And I think he has the drive and passion to stick it out in this ugly business for the long haul and make a real difference, rather than burn out and get jaded and leave DC to make his fortune

    his performances in the HCR summit sham and on that video after humiliating Rep Slaughter in the House committee meeting were just stunning

    I see him as dedicated to reforming things from the inside in the House right now rather than all the BS needed to gear up for a POTUS campaign already for 2012

    I think he’s an obvious choice for VP for anyone for 2012, and obviously the heir apparent in the near future once he’s a household name

  • redneck_hippie

    I was noting the same thing. Spooky

  • Bill S

    “executive experience” is substantially overrated. The President is not a manager. He is a thought leader. He sets the strategy for the nation. He is not a hands-on manager. That is what the Cabinet and his myriad of advisors are for.

    Again – Barack Obama is not a problem because he isn’t a good executive. He is a problem because his ideas suck…and the Democrats have the control of Congress to make his sucky ideas into law.

  • jmadisonfan

    This line of thinking is exactly the sort of cr@p the libs sell (exhibit A, Sarah Palin). A good executive leads by example, and Congressman Ryan appears to be just the sort of common sense leader we need to help move us away from the the “government is the answer to every problem” line of thinking that has run rampant in D.C (on both sides of the aisle I might add).

  • mbecker908

    I want a complete shake up of the R leadership next year.

    And Mitch McConnell is a great candidate for Chairman of the Committee on Fisheries.

  • northernrockiesguy

    I hope and pray he will throw his hat in the ring. He is a numbers guy and that is what we really need in the WH now. It is going to take an adult to guide us through the coming ship wreck.

  • chbroussard

    He’s articulate, smart, conservative, and attractive. The Republican Party is going to have to stop running candidates who are has-beens. No more Dole’s, McCains, Gingriches. It doesn’t work. We need a young, fresh look with fresh new ideas. Paul Ryan is a perfect fit.

    P.S. It’s not too early to start grooming someone for 2012 and give him the exposure he needs to be a viable candidate.

  • jmimac351

    and then forwarded it to my friends saying the same thing – one day this guy is going to be President.

    If he runs for President he will win, period. I am quite certain liberals fear this guy.

  • davidabippus

    Ryan also made an outstanding delivery this past week with the Heritage Foundation in Dallas. The presentation is about 45 minutes long and is introduced by Jeb Hensarling. It is certainly worth watching:

    http://www.myheritage.org/media/?bcpid=18808669001&bclid=5304305001&bctid=75724595001

  • davidabippus

    The link above will take to the main media page at Heritage and then look under recently added and you will see the Ryan presentation. Sorry about the link being a little off, but please watch Ryan deliver a great performance. Thanks!

  • sta46

    I read the entire speech the other day and thought exactly the same thing!
    He ate Obimbo’s lunch at Blair House all the while managing to avoid sliding into what must have been very tempting sarcasm and without sounding like he was lecturing to an intellectual three year old!
    Any other “potential candidates” are a gigantic, cumulative snooze. this man is bright, articulate, knows his stuff and is young and appealing and certainly on the correct side of center!!!
    Let me know how to help sign him up!

  • davidabippus

    Another good item to share at this point is from Jeffrey H. Anderson at Pajamas Media on 3/29/10. He is discussing HC repeal and then describes the ideal POTUS candidate near the end of his report. Take a look:

    http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/a-three-year-plan-for-the-repeal-of-obamacare/

  • http://www.redstate.com/tnjim TNJim

    after Lori retweeted @allahpundit’s tweet of it. Then I promptly retweeted it myself. Rep. Ryan brings teh awesome.

  • Bill S

    Yeah, that paragraph pretty much pegs it.

  • Doc Holliday

    we don’t need any retreads from 2008. I know there are (unfortunately) factors other than knowledge, ability, and charisma, but this guy is the type we need leading.

    I would trade all the Brownbacks, Romneys, and Hucksters etc for one Paul Ryan.

  • dsmurf

    Darth Vader, while the left stammers to find answers to his arguments.

    More power to him, while leading the Nation from darkness.

  • E Pluribus Unum

    Great minds, all that, I’m sure :)

  • Bill S

    I abhor the GOP’s repeated “heir apparent” approach to putting up candidates. It may not be intentional, but it seems like every election, the party just backs the next guy in line, rather than looking for the right candidate. Now I’ve been the first one to say “the party doesn’t elect these guys, the people do” … so my conspiracy theory is probably misplaced. But jeez, can we not be a little more original for once?

  • eburke

    credibility, skill and intellectual heft than anyone in the GOP today. Anyone who doesn’t see that, beyond any one individual vote, that Ryan *gets* it deserves the shackles that are coming while they wait for the ‘perfect’ candidate.

  • Doc Holliday

    it may be less conspiracy and more the machinations of an old and creaky establishment. When I mentioned “other factors” I was thinking about the money and organizations several have had in place for a long time.

    It should be about the best man for the job, but if we are to pull this off we have to go up against people with less leadership ability and more ability to create large campaign organizations and funding powerhouses.

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    Lord knows we agree on just about everything, but there’s a reason people keep saying to forget about 2012 right now. We’re out here trying to deal with 2010, and thoughts of 2012 are just a distraction. I like Paul Ryan, I really do, but right now I’m concerned about who’s going to beat Michael Bennet and Betsy Markey. Paul Ryan isn’t going to help me there.

  • JadedByPolitics

    ……

  • Swamp_Yankee

    I dont know where you got that from my statement.

  • RedBeard

    It’s about time we had a president who didn’t want the job, but who would put his heart and soul into doing it right. I’m sick of people like Bill Clinton, who just craved the Big Chair because it was really, really COOL.

    As Penguin mentioned earlier, George Washington was most hesitant, and likened his trip to his inauguration to a trip to the gallows. Yet Washington can arguably be considered the best president we’ve ever had.

    Thomas Jefferson was another who took the job as a patriotic duty, not because he enjoyed it or thought it brought him fame. Notably, his self-authored epitaph didn’t even mention his being president.

    So yes, let’s draft and elect a reluctant leader, one with all the right tools and without egomania.

  • scarlos

    lets hope the “Next man in line” trend is one of them.

  • http://truthupfront.blogspot.com jsanzone

    He can wait till 2016, 2020, 2024, or even 2028, and still be only 58.

    In the meantime, he’d make a fine Speaker of the House.

  • scarlos
  • josephusmyer

    That great source of all that may or may not actually be true, Wikipedia, indicates that Ryan briefly did run his own consulting firm prior to election. It’s not governmental executive experience (Daniels, Romney, Palin) or massive business experience (Romney), but at least it means Ryan does have some experience in leadership and – most importantly – that leadership was in the private sector.

  • joayn

    Ryan in Ways and Means?

  • 6eorge Jetson

    but the message is, and Ryan is giving the best diagnosis of our nation’s problems.

    If a smoker came to a doctor with all the signs of emphysema, it would not be in the patient’s interest to be directed to the doctor’s favorite smoke store. But that’s what Obama has done, as the OP quotes above:

    The problem in a nutshell is this: Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security, three giant entitlements, are out of control. Exploding costs will drive our federal government and national economy to collapse. And the recession plus this Congress? spending spree have accelerated the day of reckoning.

    Paul Ryan’s message includes the acknowledgement of painful realities. But these realities will be addressed one way or the other, either Obama’s way, in which govt bureaucrats choose by fiat what gets cut from whom, or Ryan’s way, in which individuals pay a greater marginal cost, and are thus incentivized to choose what is really important to them.

    That’s a winning, long-term message that Americans need to hear today.

  • Scope

    “But I will remind people that Ryan voted for TARP and MEDICARE D. This is not to impugn Ryan, but to caution the base. We need the BEST people.”

    So, because you felt the need to bring up the “bad” points, and, caution people to look for the “best” people, that makes it sound as though you don’t consider Ryan to be among the “BEST” people.

    If I am not mistaken, were you the one that prompted and pushed everyone to Scott Brown? Oh, I guess, at this time, he was the best chance Mass. had to get someone with an R elected, but, he would never be the one to uphold the mantle for the R candidate in November. Brown types would only mimic McCain. I hope he is not the model you are hoping for in 2012.

  • Scope

    By 2016, if we don’t get it right in 2012, will no longer matter. Do you have another pony in the race?

  • Swamp_Yankee

    First, I wrote, and I quote,:

    “I think he (Ryan) is the type of person we need. I agree with all the praise written here.”

    Then I wrote:

    “But I will remind people that Ryan voted for TARP and MEDICARE D. This is not to impugn Ryan, but to caution the base. We need the BEST people.”

    “not to impugn Ryan” meaning not to criticize Ryan, but to caution the base.

    Then I wrote again:

    “We need Ryan. Its one thing to hold a politician accountable. Its another to eat our own with friendly fire because they are not perfect. The rhetoric about ?real? conservatives is as idealistic as it is nauseating. They are politicians. Not philosophers. I think Ryan understands the financial collapse better than most armchair internet activists.”

    That is not sophisticated reading comprehension. I praised Ryan throughout, but warned against the rhetoric about “real conservatives”. I cited Ryan as an example of one of our best.

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    Highlighting the message that Ryan is sending is important. Talking about how it affects 2012 isn’t.

  • pilgrim

    I understood where you were coming from, but I was surprised if you intended this warning for Bill. He is somebody who votes conservative in the primary and Republican in the general. I think that is a good rule for one to use.

  • mbecker908
  • KBDay

    Ryan is one reason I have great hope for the GOP. I’ve followed him through this healthcare fiasco and I am glad he is getting in the spotlight. I don’t care what kind of experience he’s got. I think he has integrity and I trust he is a real conservative rather than a lip service conserv.

    Pence is right up there too. And Jim DeMint–can’t say enough good things about him.

    I can tell you one thing we have to do. We have to talk to people. Until the 2008 elections I avoided political talk because I knew I would either lose business or have to walk away from it because the field I’ve worked in is overwhelmingly ‘progressive.’

    I don’t hold back anymore. I’ve learned to discreetly get the lay of the land and if the person I’m with is willing, I offer my opinions politely. Ironically, this week alone, 5 people told me they would never vote for a Dem again. One 20-something told me he felt completely ripped off by voting for BO.

    And on the ‘progressive’ label, I’ve pointed out many times in my columns the proper label for the clowns in charge right now is ‘regressive.’ or ‘retrogressive.’ There is nothing forward thinking in Democrat politics today, other than looting the middle and upper middle classes to benefit those at the very (extreme) top and bottom.

    Happy Easter to all. I have faith we will prevail because I believe a higher power has guided us through worse times than this.

  • qixlqatl

    way back in my Navy days. He was the kind of officer that could have armed his men with buckets of water, and they’d have followed him to charge he double hockey sticks.

  • Swamp_Yankee

    Comment is just a comment. To me, comments on front page posts aren’t always directed at the author, or anybody specific. Its just a general comment.

    I embrace Ryan. But I’m also aware of his votes. Its great that people are looking up to him, but its more than a little incongrous to attack others for casting similar votes.

    There is a trend here to support the most conservative candidate. I am of the position that we should support the best candidate. A big part of that criteria is their ideology and voting record, but not all.

    I evaluate, toughness, integrity, competence, leadership, intelligence, ability to communicate, fundraise, and inspire. The ability to govern and legislate. The ability to win. Along with conservative credentials.

    If someday Ryan runs for higher office, there will be someone who will try to outflank him on the Right. They will use his votes against him. Its easy to do when a new candidate with no legislative record runs. It all sounds good, but its just talk and promises. On paper, the other candidate may be the most conservative in the primary, but would he be the best choice? I wont buy the rhetoric of the self-designated “real” conservatives. I’ll pick the best man.

  • hickorystick

    becomes a material object. And how quickly they take that object when they fall behind in a poll, and use it to spear their contender for the nomination. No one would put up with a candidate claiming to be more of a Christian than their opponent, or a better dad than their opponent. If they are truly a good conservative, it should show up in the way they carry themselves, and what they do. These self-proclamations of greater conservatism remind me of Tanya Harding explaining why she is now a better Rep of the US in Ice Skating.

  • Bill S

    You’re 100% right about Pence and DeMint. To see leaders like that developing gives me hope for the GOP’s future.

  • littlehouse18

    politics were just humming along as it used to, and we had the luxury of waiting for a Ryan to rise to the top in due course.

    But we don’t have that time. By your reckoning, if he did time as VP, he wouldn’t become POTUS until at least 2020. This assumes someone else who can defeat Obama has risen to the fore. I don’t see any of the current crop achieving that.

    Can we really afford to wait 6-10 or more years for this kind of leadership? I wish we could, and probably he and his family would wish so too, but I think not. Our country is being destroyed now, and I am increasingly of the opinion that America needs Paul Ryan now.

  • littlehouse18
  • Adjoran

    But he sounds like the closest thing since the Great Man departed office.

    Still, if he would be President – and frankly I hope he doesn’t, a man who thinks as he does is worth several times his weight in gold in the House – he would have to leave Congress and prove his managerial ability by running a company or large organization, or serving as Governor of his state. We’ve seen what happens when a guy without executive experience is elected, and it isn’t good.

    Assuming he wouldn’t be eligible for a major committee chairmanship if we win the House, perhaps he could serve as RNC Chairman at the same time. The Party needs a spokesman like that.

  • scarlos

    And on top of that, he’s on the Ways and Means committee, so he’s in a very valuable spot in the house.

    Even if he doesn’t wind up as Speaker, chairing either of the 2 most important committees in the house is a very nice consolation prize.

  • RedBeard

    Worked in the family business, and ran a consulting firm for a time. That experience puts him light years ahead of the Alinsky-ite currently sitting in The Big Chair.

  • ehud

    The McLaughlin group was talking about him yesterday as a possible dark horse and they basically said it is too early, and it is too hard to run for president from the House.

    In an ideal world, he would be governor first, but we do not live in an ideal world. We need to win in 2012. No, not win, we need to destroy the democrats and have a leader who can really lead a major change in the direction of our country. If we can follow up 2010 with a major victory in 2012 (which can happen with the right nominee), the next president will have sizable congressional majorities. 60 seats in the Senate is not unreasonable, especially if we get hyper inflation in the next couple years.

    Ryan is the only person I can think of who has the charisma and communicative abilities to unify the Republicans and be a transformational president. I personally like Romney, but he sounds like a politician.

    I really think 2012 may be the most important election of our lifetimes. American is going to be faced with a choice between whether to be a an unexceptional European welfare state, or a country that returns to its roots.

    The typical rules aren’t going to apply in 2012. We need a real leader who can actually solve our big problems, and not the next guy in line.

  • ehud

    We need a real leader in 2012. If Obama wins our country is done for. And 2012 may be the only opportunity we have to really change the direction of our country. He is the man for the moment.

  • JSobieski

    We need an articulate spokesman. However, I don’t think he wants the job.

  • billybam

    Ryan is certainly no economist. He looks for the biggest numbers (except the Pentagon) and claims that if we could only reign in THIS spending, everything would be OK. He traffics in the current meme about the ?tyranny of the majority? (although the majority was constitutionally elected) and goes on to say that now the majority of Americans receive more from their government now than pay in. He?s probably right, but not because they want to. Not because they are lazy. No one really wants to just get by on Unemployment Insurance or other government run programs. There have been a couple of times in my life where I?ve had to (my employer?s small business folded, or I was ?downsized?) where I applied for and got UI. Once it was so bad that I was on food stamps for a month. But what was I to do, let my kids starve? I was looking for work, but to no avail. And have you ever had to pay the COBRA premium to keep your insurance? Who can afford that, especially when you are out of work? On both occasions, the COBRA premium was roughly four times the premium that I had been paying for my employer provided coverage. When you are out of work, you might as well forego the insurance. I?ll bet that most workers who have lost their jobs simply can?t pay for it. COBRA is a joke.

    If Rep. Ryan wants to understand the real reason that we now have more Americans receiving more from government than paying in, I suggest that he review the following graph.

    h ttp://farm2.static.flickr.com/1033/3174056432_0cb174fabf.jpg

    The graph represents the disparity between what we produce as a nation (wealth) and what the hourly worker gets from that. That space in-between the two lines shows the concentration of wealth into the hands of the few. And believe me it is a few. In 1998 the top 1% of households owned 37% of all non-home wealth. Today it?s approaching 50%. The great American middle class is vanishing.

    While I was growing up in the 60s and 70s, my Dad was the only wage earner. And that was not unusual. The majority of my friends came from single wage earner families as well. But as I came of age in the late 70s and early 80s we saw that more and more families had to send a second wage earner into the work place. Not because Mom could now work, but because she had to in order to keep living standards up, send junior to college, and save for retirement.
    In the 80s we saw the war on the workingman begin. A stealth war that was designed to pick his pocket yet keep his political support. ?Trickle-down economics? was sold as, by giving more to the wealthy, that wealth would ?trickle-down? to the average man. I bought into it to. It did seem to make a certain amount of sense, and I was duped into believing that John Galt would be generous. Since that time I have met John Galt, and he could care less about you and me. The graph dramatically shows that. He kept the money.
    The second front was opened up on labor when Reagan fired the Air Traffic Controllers. Say what you will about unions, but they are the only reason you have a 40 hour work week, health benefits, and vacation (if you are lucky). This act combined with a series of legislative efforts told corporate leadership that you can screw your workers. This war went to a new level with the Bush-Clinton ?Free Trade? agreements. These agreements, rather than accomplish the stated goals of environmental and worker protections had the opposite effect because those provisions were never enforced. What it did was put you in direct competition with workers in Bangladesh, Vietnam, Mexico, and China just to name a few. I?ll bet many of you know someone I some kind of manufacturing or tech job whose labor was shipped overseas. The Bush Tax cuts in 2003 only ramped up the offshore rush. A new provision allowed US corporations to keep profits earned offshore, offshore. That is for American corporations goods manufactured outside the USA, all those proceeds could be kept offshore, tax-free. Therefore, we have patriotic US corporations who are not paying taxes on their earnings.
    Privatizing Social Security is simply the hand of the wealthy in our last pocket. It?s handing over what we have worked for virtually our entire working lives to the bankers. You know, the ones who gambled big with our money and were bailed out by Bush and Obama, while we were told tough luck. Eliminating Medicare would be like all of us, after retirement, being put on COBRA. No one would ever retire, how could they? But your patriotic American company will retire you when they hire someone in India to do your job for a third of the cost. All the while, Republicans do this in the name of ?Freedom? and ?Liberty?. Those words are just props. They should really be saying ?Profits?, ?More for Me?. They don?t like small business. They like big business, because it donates to them ever so much more so then small business. Tax and regulatory breaks are routinely given to big business and not to small. Under Bush 43, the Small Business Administration doubled their loan origination fees.
    I?d gladly give more credence to Rep. Ryan?s plans, but he?s missing a key element. What?s he going to do top raise middle class wages and stop the murder of the American middle class?

  • littlehouse18

    we need to help him more than we have ever helped a candidate before (and convince him). 2012 is the crucial year.

    Ryan doesn’t strike me as the Speaker type at all – he’s an ideas man, not a vote pusher. He will bring the inspiration that we need, and will draw the younger crowd away from their zombie-like liberal bent. Maybe they’ll finally see what America should be. The other folks will not inspire them. We need to turn the youth around, since our future depends on it.

  • mbecker908

    Don’t let the door hit you. On second thought, go ahead, let the door hit you.

  • billybam

    No independent thought? No rebuttal? No facts?

  • togaman

    I am eager to see a point by point rebuttal written by one of the many intelligent and articulate writers here.

  • billybam

    either way based on whether or not there is an “R” or a “D” in front of their title. Corporate Democrats are every bit as bad as Corporate Republicans. I was the product of a strong post war middle class. I went to public schools and got a great education. I went to a public school and worked my way through that as well. But then education costs were not near what they are today. Like I said there was only a single wage earner in my family, as was the case for many other families of the era.
    But those days are gone. It takes two earners now. Just a dramatic demonstration of how much the last 30 years have cost the middle class. And what does that do to “family values” when the family is simply trying to survive. I’ll bet you know people who have lost their jobs through no fault of their own. It’s just that John Galt has moved his production elsewhere. Places where labor will work for $2/day.

  • janis
  • mbecker908

    and leaves a big turd on the foyer floor, the first thing is to recognize that it’s a turd and not a Baby Ruth. You missed that part jerkoff.

    The second part would be to clean up the floor.

  • penguin2

    that you knew we wouldn’t have much agreement with. Now we do have incredible experts here, that can address your points, if they want to spend the time. There was a time a 100 years ago, when labor laws and unions were helpful to improving the workplace and life of the American worker. But as far as today, I believe they have outlived their usefulness. It is the unions that have done in their companies and the manufacturing base in this country. Greedy unions. They cost more than a company can manage to stay competitive. Why do you think the U.S. auto guys were so eager to have the government come in and pick up the tab?

    Why does the public sector have unions? They hold local communities hostage and bankrupt them. Just look at California. No the destruction of the middle class is happening because of unions and the government being in bed with them. And one last thought, someone has to pay for all of the Left’s political correctness that strangles society.

  • penguin2

    The corporate income tax we have on businesses in this country is one of the highest, if not the highest, in the world. That is not very conducive to businesses wanting to keep the U.S. as their base, patriotic or otherwise.

  • JadedByPolitics

    It is the ONE thing that OUR tax dollars should be spent on followed by infrastructure other then that everything is a just a wet dream by some liberal. So everything you said after that means absolutely NOTHING! Go play in traffic and let me know how the infrastructure portion of the Federal Government is working…mmmmky!

  • Bill S

    Sorry, but we don’t engage Kos Kidz here. Go back and play with your fellow lefties, billybam_2000.

  • texasgalt

    He merely withdraws his time, capital and talents from the slackers, looters and statists. They are left to their own ends to deal with the shortages and chaos. When the lights won’t come on any more, stike a match and look in the mirror.

    BTW, 20% of the people in SPAIN have lost their jobs “through no fault of their own.” Yep socialist Spain, the place where workers have 5 weeks minimum of paid vacation, guaranteed and lengthy paid family leave , “free” health care and all the goodies slackers want. They got something else too, a government on the verge of bankruptcy, running a deficit at 13%.

  • Bill S

    Ain’t happening. We ignore trolls.

  • texasgalt
  • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

    Neither of you were particularly worth it.

    Note tense.

  • mbecker908

    Thanks Moe.

  • http://MoneyedPoliticians.net jelohman

    Being a politician and taking money from the special interests!

    Ryan sez: “For those now under 55, Medicare will be like the health-care program we in Congress enjoy.” ???

    Ah yes, the cost of congresses health care is 35% higher than Medicare, but they need that for the added profits of the private insurers and the kickbacks to politicians.

    And, uh, what would have happened had Bush succeeded in getting social security under the privatized bankers?

    There is only one solution to our nation’s problems and that’s public funding of campaigns. If politicians are to be beholden to their funders I want those funders to be the taxpayers.

    Jack Lohman
    htp://MoneyedPoliticians.net

  • Achance
  • Richard Mullins

    This isn’t quite the place for you, leftist. In fact, this is a good way to get kicked around.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens
  • weatherford

    Having almost wandered into that catagory myself (be assured, it was strictly a case of misinterpretation). it seems this fellow ought maybe be put on the watch list.

    Other measures might be too extreme for the moment.