« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

It’s time to put on our primarying caps.

Primary adj. first in time or order or development; from which others are derived.

In Texas, our candidate filing deadline is January 1, 2012. Less than 8 months away. Can you imagine the look on some of our legislatures’ faces when they find out someone is running against them in the primary? I’m sure most of them will be incredulous.

But why not? You hired a contractor to paint the exterior of your house white; you come home from work and it’s bright red. Would you ask for your money back; fire them; or heaven forbid give them a referral? My assumption is probably not. Why would we treat our vote and choice of who will be representing us to a lesser standard?

Some questions being proposed, but we need to think about what we will be setting ourselves up for next legislative session. It will not improve the next go around if the same individuals are in office. This year might have been as good as we can get if we stay with the status quo. Let’s primary them.

The interesting benefit on the redistricting disaster is their overwhelming motivation to make “my district safer”. Well, to our currently sitting representatives, safer means redder. And redder means more conservative. We can run a candidate who is to your right! Good chance it’s to my left, but that’s another diary.

Is there someone who has been attending the Tea Party meetings consistently speaking out against the spending? Amnesty? Bigger government? Look at them through a different lens and not just as a fellow rallier. Maybe as a citizen candidate. Throw the idea out there and see if they can be called to serve. Or will you serve?

According to Heritage Alliance, 85% of districts are drawn to favor one party or the other. Essentially, the winner of the district is determined at the primary level; the general election is a non-issue. In North Texas, a long time representative was ousted in the 2010 primary by a Tea Party candidate by only a mere difference of 2000 votes. The challenger lacked funding, establishment endorsements, and campaign experience. BUT, he had the Tea Party message and a conservative movement behind him. This task is not impossible.

Time is of the essence and we need to start making our moves.

*As an added historical note, the republican who was ousted has since been the featured speaker/honoree at a LULAC banquet a few weeks ago. You just can’t make this stuff up.

COMMENTS

  • colonel85

    Why does the argument always come down to some millionaire, intellectual or dilettante as the candidate for President?
    Women the world over have served in responsible positions and not one has been accused of a crime or a failure to perform. Eleanor Roosevelt was a far more decent person then her philandering husband and she was one helluva lot more humane. Golda Meir led Israel during some of its darkest days, Even the Muslims put one of their own into power when Benanzir Bhutto was elected Prime Minister of Pakistan. Margaret Thatcher served long and well for Great Britain. Michele Bachmann and Sarah Palin have the real stuff to serve as President. Both have far more integrity that Obama. There is no doubt in this old man’s mind that a Bachmann/Palin ticket would be exactly what America has needed for years. Failure is not in their collective vocabulary, nor is deceit, arrogance or dishonesty. In addition they are better looking and a credit to America’s womanhood. I rest my case

  • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

    you need to watch. Explains the whole process for Texans.

    Hat tip to Ron at Unified Patriots and Redstate’s own LaborUnionReport.

    Thank you,

    ColdWarrior

  • burbmom

    I was watching them a few days ago and it really clicked with me. Between getting involved as precinct chairman and primarying candidates who are letting us down, we may be able to right this ship.

    Your mission to educate us on filling precinct positions has had an impact here in Austin. The position in my pct is filled, so I’ve been an election judge and poll watcher. Just trying to keep voting fair and honest can be a challenge.