Shame on the Democrats and their community organizers


Thanks for organizing the financial crisis

This is just wrong.

The Washington Post reports voters spread the blame for the broader economic problems facing the country:

In an open-ended question, a quarter of all voters said George W. Bush is responsible for the economy’s relatively poor performance, more than any other single cause. About a quarter name Congress (8 percent), the federal government (8 percent) and Democrats and Republicans (5 percent each) together. Eighteen percent said Wall Street financial institutions and banks shoulder responsibility, 7 percent blame “everyone” and 5 percent highlighted the role of individuals who borrowed too much.

There is of course a partisan divide:

Nearly half of all Democrats blame Bush; that is just 4 percent among Republicans. Moreover, no Democrats blamed “Democrats” generally; no Republicans singled out “Republicans.”

It’s just so wrong, there is a strong historical record, which clearly demonstrates the current financial meltdown should be laid at the feet of President Clinton, Congressional Democrats and their community organizers.

Matt Lewis reminds us that in 1999, President Clinton set “standards” that forced Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to make bad loans.

As Lewis writes, in 1999, the Los Angeles Times noted:

Under Clinton, bank regulators have breathed the first real life into enforcement of the Community Reinvestment Act, a 20-year-old statute meant to combat “redlining” by requiring banks to serve their low-income communities. The administration also has sent a clear message by stiffening enforcement of the fair housing and fair lending laws.

The New York Times reported Fannie Mae came under “increasing pressure from the Clinton Administration to expand mortgage loans among low and moderate income people and felt pressure from stock holders to maintain its phenomenal growth in profits.”

The move to “subprime mortgages” was also pushed by banks, thrift institutions and mortgage companies, seemingly blind to the increased risk of a “government rescue similar to that of the savings and loan industry in the 1980’s.” Under Andrew Cuomo, HUD required that half of Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s portfolio be loans to low and moderate-income borrowers:

In July, the Department of Housing and Urban Development proposed that by the year 2001, 50 percent of Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s portfolio be made up of loans to low and moderate-income borrowers. Last year, 44 percent of the loans Fannie Mae purchased were from these groups.

Sadly, there are more folks to blame than just President Clinton and former HUD Secretary, and now New York State Attorney General, Andrew Cuomo.

At a 2004 Congressional hearing, Democrat after Democrat covered for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and railed against regulating Fannie and Freddie. Watch the following video and see Democrats fend off Republican calls for regulation:

Blame should also be heaped upon the community organizers. First there is ACORN. As explained by Mona Charen, ACORN stands for the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now. It is a left-wing “umbrella of ‘community organizing:’”

They agitate for higher minimum wages, attempt to thwart school reform, try to unionize welfare workers (that is, those welfare recipients who are obliged to work in exchange for benefits) and organize voter registration efforts (always for Democrats, of course). Because they are on the side of righteousness and justice, they aren’t especially fastidious about their methods. In 2006, for example, ACORN registered 1,800 new voters in Washington. The only trouble was, with the exception of six, all of the names submitted were fake.

Unfortunately that was not an “isolated” incident. Similar fraud has been reported in Missouri, Michigan, Ohio, and Colorado.

And don’t forget the wannabe Community Organizer in Chief Barack Obama:

ACORN attracted Barack Obama in his youthful community organizing days. Madeline Talbott hired him to train her staff — the very people who would later descend on Chicago’s banks as CRA shakedown artists. The Democratic nominee later funneled money to the group through the Woods Fund, on whose board he sat, and through the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, ditto. Obama was not just sympathetic — he was an ACORN fellow traveler.

Watch Stanly Kurtz explain Obama’s ties to ACORN, and thus the financial crisis that is destroying the economy:

The possibility of a financial meltdown was foreseen in advance. Senator McCain co-sponsored legislation to impose bank-like regulation on Freddie Mae and Freddie Mac. That legislation, which could have prevented the current crisis, was killed by the Democrats.

As I wrote over the weekend. The Democrats tried to reward ACORN by providing the organization a portion of whatever profits were to be made in the rejected big bailout. That giveaway to the community organizers was only removed after Senator McCain was able to get Republicans a seat at the negotiations for the big bailout.

And Finally, as the Democrats point blame fingers at others over the rejection of the big bailout, don’t forget that the Democrats control Congress. As my RedState colleague, Mark Impomeni, explained there are more than enough Democrats in the House to pass any bill Speaker Pelosi really wants to pass. But she can’t get it done if she orders her Whip not to do his job.

Category: , , , , , , , , ,

RSS feed | Trackback URI

9 Comments Leave a comment

One question -

liberalrepublican Tuesday, September 30th at 12:16PM EDT (link)

Why didn’t the Republicans in congress fix this in 2000?

For real - didn’t they control both the house and senate?

I’m curious why they didn’t fix this.

“Broadly speaking, liberalism emphasizes individual rights and equality of opportunity. … including extensive freedom of thought and speech, limitations on the power of governments, the rule of law, the free exchange of ideas, a market or mixed economy”

 

Eh, nothing new here... except McCain.

scottbomb Tuesday, September 30th at 12:17PM EDT (link)

President Bush gets blamed for everything. Fortunately, only 1/4 of the electorate buys it. I think that’s close to the same number of people who believe he actually orchestrated the 9/11 attacks. In fact, they’re probably the same people.

Now on to McCain. As Rush mentioned yesterday, when it comes to foreign policy, “he mopped the floor with Barack Obama”. Unfortunatly when it comes to the #1 issue on people’s minds, the economy, McCain had nothing to say except to lower taxes and cut spending.

McCain is right, taxes and spending DO need to be cut. But he needs to do a much better job of selling this to the American people. NOT ONCE during the debate did he hammer home the fact that he, President Bush, and others in Congress have been trying - for the past several years - to warn of the impending real estate mortgage crisis. I was practically yelling at my TV for him to say SOMETHING about who’s really at fault here and what he can do, as president, to prevent it from happening again.

The Dems are quick to blame Republicans for anything and everything that goes wrong, justified or not. This works for them, too (see “change we can believe in”). Meanwhile, we have ample evidence of just who is at fault on this issue and the only people talking about it are us bloggers and talk radio. The majority of the American people will probably never hear it. The majority of the American people probably have no idea who ACORN is and how they are tied to Obama. John McCain can change all that if he wants to. Take off the gloves, Johnny Mac!!

http://www.HowObamaGotElected.com

“The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of ‘liberalism’, they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.” - Norman Thomas, U.S. Socialist Party presidential candidate 1940, 1944 and 1948

Rebublicans didn't control the Senate until 2002

Dave_in_Fla Tuesday, September 30th at 12:29PM EDT (link)

Jumpin Jim Jeffords

“If they were merely incompetent, then at least SOME of their actions would have been to the benefit of the country.” - Joe McCarthy

 
 

Some of the Democrats

Maggie_in_Indiana Tuesday, September 30th at 12:34PM EDT (link)

are defending their no vote much like the GOP. Same reasons-not good for the country-my constituents said no,too much money at too big a risk. Check their web sites.

Maggie in Indiana

Race Card

MikeO Tuesday, September 30th at 12:38PM EDT (link)

The democrats threw the race card any time anyone approached the idea of reining-in the CRA-inspired looting of the GSEs.

Chickens

scottbomb Tuesday, September 30th at 12:48PM EDT (link)

Seriously, the race card play is old. It only works when we capitulate. If I were there, I’d tell ‘em all to take a hike.

http://www.HowObamaGotElected.com

“The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of ‘liberalism’, they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.” - Norman Thomas, U.S. Socialist Party presidential candidate 1940, 1944 and 1948

Give it some more pain

MikeO Tuesday, September 30th at 1:05PM EDT (link)

Attempting to play the race card while the country faces a big enough disaster may neutralize the race card once and for all.

It is easier simply to cooperate and graduate by letting that garbage slide when we’re further up the needs hierarchy, but the closer we get to the point of defending more basic needs, the cost/benefit equation changes to favor tossing that race card garbage out the window along with its purveyors.

Anyone playing any victim card has been “the other” in my eyes for a while now, and I am not above piling-on to the extent that I can get away with it.

True, many of the dems and esp the blue dawgs

Mike gamecock DeVine Tuesday, September 30th at 1:09PM EDT (link)

opposed for honorable reasons

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” - Andrew Jackson

 
 
 
 
 

This is why I was so frustrated with McCain's debate performance.

Martin Knight Tuesday, September 30th at 3:36PM EDT (link)

He could have very easily tied this mess around the Democrats’ necks, from the CRA to their protection of Fannie and Freddie to the pork they were adding to the bill. But he chose instead to take the easy route - the “bipartisan” BS route and of course, the Democrats and their friends in the media are able to continue miseducating the American people about what is really going on.

McCain could have placed the blame exactly where it belonged, and sent his surrogates out to reinforce the message on the Sunday Morning Talk shows, cut and run ads to that effect, placing the onus on Pelosi and Reid to swiftly pass a clean, free-market oriented bill to fix “their” mistake.

But he did not. And some of us are now blaming Hank Paulson for handing a victory to Barack Obama.

One of the worst things about the Right-wing blogosphere is that we are well-nigh incapable of understanding that the average American is not a political junkie. We watch CBS, NBC, CNN, ABC, the NYT, AP, WaPo and every other major media house pump falsehoods and misleading and often strategically incomplete information out to the public every day and the typical response is to cite some guy’s debunking of it somewhere on the net.

The only problem with this? Little more than a hundred thousand people would see it at best … while tens of millions will see Couric, Brokaw and Blitzer cite Paul Krugman in placing the blame on “deregulation” and the Bush Administration.

Honestly? With all due respect, it’s beyond frustrating to read someone like gamecock assuring everyone that America would not vote for a liberal like Obama. Yes they would, GC. How many actual swing voters know of Obama’s extremist record on abortion, the crazy person he named his mentor, the near billion in pork barrel projects, etc.?

Trust me. Not many. The coverage of these issues in the Press is no more than a flash in the pan. Independents may say they distrust the Press, but after seeing one propagandistic hagiography after another day after day, on Election Day, the choice is in no doubt.

We keep failing to comprehend that knowledge and intelligence are two different things. A highly intelligent person is just as likely to make stupid decisions as anyone else if he makes them based on ignorance.

The average American voter is far from stupid - underestimating his intelligence is always a big mistake. But, let’s be honest, the average American voter is just as far from knowledgeable about even the stuff he claims are his top priority - underestimating the ignorance of the average American voter is just as big a mistake.

Once McCain, heck, the GOP as a whole recognizes that, we’ll be in much better shape.



 To me, “consensus” seems to be the process of abandoning all beliefs, principles, values and policies. So it is something in which no one believes and to which no one objects … There are still people in my party who believe in “consensus” politics. I regard them as Quislings, as traitors … I mean it.
      - Margaret Thatcher
NOTE: “consensus” = “Bipartisanship™”/”Centrism™”

 

Leave a Comment

 

Be respectful, or be banned. No Profanity.