« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Obama ‘palling around’ with terrorists

What's a little terrorism among pals?

"Our opponent … is someone who sees America, it seems, as being so imperfect, imperfect enough, that he’s palling around with terrorists who would target their own country"

Republican vice presidential candidate Governor Sarah Palin on Saturday hit Obama for his longtime association with unrepentant domestic terrorist Bill Ayers:

The New York Times article mentioned by Governor Palin is available here. It is a typical example of the elite media’s efforts to minimize the connections between Obama and the terrorist turned teacher, Ayers.

One of the things that repels me most about Obama is his stubborn refusal to dissociate himself from American terrorists Bill Ayers and Ayers’ wife, Bernadine Dohrn.

When confronted with his friendship with the terrorist Ayers, Obama defends this association by saying he was only eight when Ayers was engaged in "detestable acts 40 years ago." You can watch Obama defend his relationship with Ayers in Obama’s recent interview with Bill O’Reilly.

Obama’s pathetic defense is "Ayers engaged in detestable acts 40 years ago when I was eight years old." Though that retort seems to satisfy the Obama worshiping liberal/progressive elite media, it fails to persuade me. Obama calls it guilt by association. Maybe. But, I was taught you are known by the company you keep.

Seven years ago, on September 11, 2001, in an article in the New York Times, entitled in part "No Regrets for a Love of Explosives," Ayers made it very clear he is not the least bit repentant about his terrorist activities:

I don’t regret setting bombs,” Bill Ayers said. ”I feel we didn’t do enough.” Mr. Ayers, who spent the 1970′s as a fugitive in the Weather Underground, was sitting in the kitchen of his big turn-of-the-19th-century stone house in the Hyde Park district of Chicago.

You can read more of what I have to say about "No Regrets for a Love of Explosives" article here.

In a recent article entitled, "Obama and Ayers Pushed Radicalism," Stanley Kurtz reveals the connections between Obama, Ayers, radical community organizers and education activists and the education foundation called the Chicago Annenberg Challenge (CAC).Obama led the CAC from 1995 to 1999 and remained on the board until 2001.

According to Kurtz, the CAC was the brainchild of Bill Ayers, a founder of the Weather Underground.

Documents in the CAC archives make clear that Mr. Ayers and Mr. Obama were partners in the CAC.

Instead of improving Chicago’s public schools, under the leadership of the Ayers/Obama team, the CAC set out to achieve the CAC’s agenda. That agenda flowed from Mr. Ayers’s educational philosophy, which called for infusing students and their parents with a radical political commitment, and which downplayed achievement tests in favor of activism.

Kurtz appeared on "The O’Reilly Factor" and discussed Obama’s radical connections with Ayers. You can watch the discussion in the following video:

A final point about the Obama-Ayers association — it is widely known that Obama’s first run for the Illinois State Senate was launched at a 1995 gathering at the Ayers’ home.

Obama continues to struggle to downplay his association with this unrepentant American terrorist. I thank Governor Palin bringing Obama’s association with Ayers to the attention of the American voters.

COMMENTS

  • Augustus

    Interesting to see how Obama is rallying the youth to his cause to change the world.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gH-2Fwx5RU0

    http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=188153

  • Rod_Patrick

    Because McCain is too honorable in saying bad things against his fellow Senators, democrat or republican.

    Tying up Obama with Ayers is a NO NO to McCain.

    Lady Palin has shown her TRUE GRIT in nailing this one, something that the Drive-by Media will NEVER INVESTIGATE for the sake of liberal media’s candidate…Lord Obama.

    • Jaded

      She is doing her job which is taking on the “dirty” items and leaving McCain to discuss policy….Cheney is the MASTER at taking the heat while the President takes care of policy. Sarah is doing a great job at it :-)

      • NightTwister

        He should bring Palin along with him and have her waiting in the wings. After Obama repeatedly harps on McCain for the things that Palin is saying on the campaign trail, he can say,

        Obviously you aren’t prepared to debate me. I brought Sarah along just in case. I can bring her out now if you’d feel more comfortable debating her instead.

  • Iloveobama

    IF Sarah Palin read the NY Times story about Obama’s non-association with Bill Ayers, she would realize how absurd her comments are about that relationship. But then again when one uses the word absurd…….for heaven’s sake, speak to the people about issues…don’t give us scripted lies. Is that all you have?

    • NightTwister

      -nt-

  • drjecdo

    The NYT has no credibility among sentient beings. One must assume that whatever they say about Obama that the opposite is true. If they say there was only a passing connection, it must be a close relationship involving multiple frauds and felonies worth millions of dollars.

    Well looky there…I’m right!

    • Wubbies_World

      … That Obama launched his Senate campaign in Bill Ayers living room. Obama also had referred to Bill Ayers as his friend before people started noticing the article in the New York Times on Sept. 11th, 2001. The article where he regretted not doing enough in his weather underground days.

      I also specifically remember Obama denial of Bill Ayers influence during the Democratic primary as only stating the he (Obama) did not consult him “regularly”.

      However, in your world of make believe these things never happened. However, if he was a Republican, these associations would be covered wall to wall on the front page of the New York Times.

      • Fallon

        You need to read other sources besides the Obama, I mean, NY Times. In Chicago politics a key question has always been, who “sent” you?

        “So, who did ‘send’ Obama?”

        Google “Who sent Obama”. There is a great article written by Steve Diamond at http://globallabor.blogspot.com.

        It’s not shameful to be ignorant, it’s shameful to stay ignorant.

        • Moe_Lane

          I see no reason why I should bother handing one out to this particular person.

          • rbdwiggins

            How about the economy?

            I posted this here, but it’s equally relevant to any discussion regarding Obama’s only real economic experience.

            The most easily understandable and relative point:

            Community organizers intimidate banks into making high-risk loans to customers with poor credit.

            (emphasis mine)

            Making the connection from that point forward requires only a modicum of intelligence or rational thought.

          • Mary_Contrary

            From Webster.com

            Main Entry: 1 ad ho?mi?nem
            Pronunciation: (?)ad-?h?-m?-?nem, -n?m\
            Function: adjective
            Etymology: New Latin, literally, to the person
            Date: 1598

            1 : appealing to feelings or prejudices rather than intellect

            *2 : marked by or being an attack on an opponent’s character rather than by an answer to the contentions made *

            Instead of facing the truth that their candidate has a dark past, they attack the person. Rule by fear.

            I am not afraid.

  • wiseprince

    We are constantly told to take Obama at his judgement but his judgement keeps landing him in the company of people like Wright and Ayers. People who seem to have a disdain for the country Obama now wants to control

    Obama and Ayers

  • MichiganLibertarian

    McCain’s campaign seems to have given up. I know they have given up on Michigan. But this “tie Obama to everyone he has ever had coffee with” is simply silly. It isn’t going to help McCain.

    Is the problem McCain or is it his campaign? I cannot tell.

    If McCain really wanted to win, he would develop 3 key points for each big issue (economy, energy, national security) and just keep dropping those key points for the next 4 weeks. And those points should illustrate positions he has that are different from Bush. He doesn’t have to slam Bush, just differentiate himself.

    On a personal note, I’m about ready to give up. By pulling out of Michigan, McCain has given the signal he has given up here. I think he has not only lost votes by doing that, but has lost voters — those who won’t bother to show up because they don’t think their vote will matter. That will impact not only the Presidential race, but down ticket races as well. I think Michigan will go into the column of sending 2 more Dems to the Congress next year — partly as a result of McCain’s campaign strategy, or lack thereof.

    • David123

      Sarah might only be a heartbeat away – Obama and America should see if she can handle it.

  • MrSandman

    but I really don’t think people care about the Ayers issue.

    The folks that do care are already firmly in the GOP camp.

    The only thing folks care about right now is where the next mortgage payment is coming from.

    If the GOP doesn’t get serious about addressing those concerns it will be a very long election day.

  • izoneguy

    Shackles of Socialism

    Obama wants his Omericans to put on the yoke of Socialism. Once it is on – your mortgage won’t matter. You will have no future and your children and grandchilden will wear the “Shackles of Socialism”.

    That IS the message that needs to be put forth.

    A socialist Omerica that turns in on itself will only turn on itself.

    • magnum1

      in Ayers living room,that’s all it takes for me.this is only one of Obama’s acquaintances on a long list of radicals.
      if Obama wins it will be because 80% of the media is in the bag covering for him.

      • MrSandman

        The sham bailout bill has taken away what little cred the GOP had left.

        The GOP didn’t even show the testicular fortitude to support the statement in their own party plank.

        This bill has/will do FAR more damage than it will ever “fix”. The GOP has now effectively gotten down in the mud with the pigs. Very sad.

  • pithnvinegar

    . . number 5, the AP.
    I went online this morning and the main story on my provider’s homepage talks about how Palin’s statements were “unsubstantiated and carried a racially tinged subtext.” Obama’s connection with Ayers is “exaggerated at best if not outright false.” And with a flourish, the race card gets dealt once again. “Palin’s words avoid repulsing voters with overt racism. But is there another subtext for creating the false image of a black presidential nominee “palling around” with terrorists while assuring a predominantly white audience that he doesn’t see their America?”

    The Obama campaign must be saving a ton of money by having the MSM publish their press releases for them.

  • pithnvinegar

    . . number 5, the AP.
    I went online this morning and the main story on my provider’s homepage talks about how Palin’s statements were “unsubstantiated and carried a racially tinged subtext.” Obama’s connection with Ayers is “exaggerated at best if not outright false.” And with a flourish, the race card gets dealt once again. “Palin’s words avoid repulsing voters with overt racism. But is there another subtext for creating the false image of a black presidential nominee “palling around” with terrorists while assuring a predominantly white audience that he doesn’t see their America?”

    The Obama campaign must be saving a ton of money by having the MSM publish their press releases for them.

    • MrSandman

      when they are facing the prospect of losing their own living room.

      If McCain/Palin don’t attempt to address the economic fear they will lose….and lose badly.

      They’ve got a tough enough row to how with a president who could hardly get less popular.

      Now the economy is cratering….and they are still talking about Ayers? Yes. It’s a valid campaign issue. But to try to make it a central campaign issue will only piss off people who are hurting financially.

      Folks vote with their wallet. That’s been proven time and again.

      McCain better figure that out very soon.
      He’s got one month left.

  • Jumpedship

    **John! When Barack says he was 8 years old when Ayers was bombing the Pentagon, JUMP IN HIS FACE and ask him who said anything about what he was doing when he was eight!!!! We’re talking about things Obama did when he was in his 30s!

    My focus would be on Obama’s outright lies. How I would love to have the national microphone for 30 seconds to ask, “How do you detest a man’s actions, loathe his associations, call his bombings despicable, then CHOOSE to let him host the launch of your campaign, CHOOSE to accept money from him, and CHOOSE to work with him. It is a LIE when Obama says Ayers was not a friend in order to overlook his past and choose to do so much with him.

  • JohnRJ

    Sarah Palin looks at an adoring crowd in California and, *smilin’ and winkin’, announces that the first African-American candidate for president of the United States consorts with terrorists. The crowd, without knowing any of the facts, roars approval. Palin would have fit right in, between Roy Cohn and Joe McCarthy, during the infamous HUAC hearings in the 1950′s. Using ‘guilt by association’ and the ‘big lie’, the tools of tyrants and demagogues, she glibly assassinates the character of a presidential nominee, questioning his patriotism and his ethics. I would ask Palin this: Are you now or have you ever been a genuine American? Have you no sense of decency? John McCain has inflicted an utterly disgraceful candidate for vice president on this country.

    • IJB

      Oh, and:

      Ow! Ow! Quit It!!

      P.S. The people who say we shouldn’t bring this up are dead wrong. McCain’s campaign needs to accomplish two goals:

      1. Promote their own policy prescriptions (esp. re: the economy and the credit crunch). And,

      2. Plant as many doubts about Obama as possible in voters’ minds.

      They can’t do one, or the other – they must do both.

      • Martin_A_Knight

        Talk about the soft bigotry of low expectations. So it’s okay to consort with a terrorist if one is black? It’s okay to attend a church where the pastor regales his flock with “God Damn America!” if you’re black?

        Is that what you’re saying?

        Are you sure you’re not a racist? Because, as a black man, I do believe you sound like one.

        • stang

          Still peddling that old shibboleth?

          Not that facts will make any difference to you.

          Using new information obtained from studies of old Soviet files in Moscow and now the famous Venona Intercepts — FBI recordings of Soviet embassy communications between 1944-48 — the record is showing that McCarthy was essentially right. He had many weaknesses, but almost every case he charged has now been proven correct. Whether it was stealing atomic secrets or influencing U.S. foreign policy, communist victories in the 1940s were fed by an incredibly vast spy and influence network.

          See the whole article here.

          ?Communism is the opiate of the intellectuals [with] no cure except as a guillotine might be called a cure for dandruff.?

          Clare Boothe Luce

  • Husker

    Bill Ayers, a terrorist that bombs police stations, and leaves shrapnel ordinances at military installations is now a “respected” member of academia? Al-Quaeda in Iraq took a page right out of the book of the Weather Underground, bombing Iraqi police stations, and leaving IED’s for our soldiers to find. Maybe when the War on Terrorism is over, Bin Laden can get a “respected” position at the University of Illinois Chicago, and launch a future candidate for the U.S. Senate.

    Sol Alinski, Rashid Khalidi, Bernardine Dohrn, Louis Farrakan, Rev. Wright, and Rev. Pfleger. No, nothing to see here. Move along, move along.

    • Rod_Patrick

      That’s why you have been blindsided by his real color.

      He is the Manchurian Candidate of the Democratic Socialist of America and the Communist Party of the USA, both affiliates to Socialists International.

      Details?

      Here! here!

      www.discoverynetworks.org

      • Rod_Patrick

        even in bluish state of California.

        Sarah in SC

  • JohnRJ

    Bill Ayers did not “launch” anything. Obama was endorsed by the person who previously held the office he was running for. Ayers, who lived in that community, was a supporter of Obama because Obama had been a highly effective and greatly appreciated community organizer, so Ayers held a fund-raiser at his home. You demonize Ayers without knowing anything about him. Like hundreds of thousands of other people in the 1960′s Ayers was outraged by the Vietnam war. Admittedly, he took things too far, by setting off bombs in government buildings, but he never killed or injured anybody. As I recall, the people who protested the war turned out to be right, since more than 55,000 Americans died and over a million Vietnamese were killed in a war that could never have been won in the first place. Yes, Ayers was a radical. Maybe he still is. But to suggest that Obama shares any of his views, much less “pals around” with him is a patent lie. What we’re dealing with here is a Big Lie that would have made Josef Goebbels proud.

    • PaRep

      .

      • speciallist

        n/p

        • stang

          ?Communism is the death of the soul. It is the organization of total conformity – in short, of tyranny – and it is committed to making tyranny universal.?

          Adlai Ewing Stevenson

          • lonebeagle

            I emailed and phoned the McCain office repeatedly but I never got my ticket! It seems that they were flooded with requests for tickets.

            The NBC local news put the rally 4 or 5 stories into the broadcast and gave it lackluster coverage.

          • Moe_Lane

            Even if it had succeeded, they were only soldiers, after all: not worth caring over. At least to people like you.

            Get off of our website.

  • lonebeagle

    McCain and Palin must stick to an offensive game. Attack Obama where he’s WEAK! Obama is an empty suit who has not accomplished anything on his own.

    This is in sharp contrast to McCain and Palin. EMPHASIZE this difference since the average American admires and respects people who EARNED their place in society.

    Obama is a product of the Chicago political machine.

    McCain is the product of the Naval Academy and years of public service including his combat duty.

    Palin is the epitome of the self-made American success story.

    The people who Obama looks up to are Reverend Wright and Ayers–Americans need to be told this over and over again!!!!

    Keep up the attack!

  • Catsy

    After all, it worked so well for Hillary in the primary, didn’t it? Or not. On the one hand, I’d like to encourage this because it’s in Obama’s best interest, not McCain’s, that the McCain campaign go full negative and not engage on the issues. On the other hand, I was hoping to have a campaign that for once was actually about real issues rather than manufactured ones, so I’m a little sad–though not surprised–that it’s come to this.

    The game has changed. The risk/benefit calculus of going negative is different than it was in years past, largely because of the current state of the economy, but also because of a stronger anti-incumbency sentiment across the board than I’ve seen in my lifetime. People in general just don’t want to hear it right now, they want a positive agenda–they want substance, someone telling them what they’re going to do to help fix the mess the country is in. That doesn’t have to just come from one side. There’s things that both conservatives and liberals can offer in that regard.

    The McCain campaign seemed to get this early on, when they co-opted the Obama campaign’s theme of change. Either McCain or his advisers either seem to have forgotten that, or–more likely–have judged that the only chance they have to turn the numbers around is to tear down Obama’s character.

    In any other year this would be an effective, if disappointing strategic shift. If this was 2004, I’d be worried. But I just don’t see it having the same effect this year. It’s only going to persuade the people who are already on board.

    You don’t have to like that. You don’t have to agree with me, and as one of the site’s longtime liberal residents, I sort of expect that. I certainly don’t think anything you or I say is going to have an effect on the McCain campaign. But the situation is what it is.

    Take that for whatever it’s worth to you.

    • rbdwiggins

      ACORN, Ayers, Blagojevich, Daley, Dodd, Frank, Jones, Johnson, Gorelick, Raines, Rezko, Schumer, Soros and Wright.

      Allies, enablers, funders, mentors and partners of Obama.

      Their corruption, greed, lust for power and radical social agenda are inexplicably intertwined, and they are the root-cause of the current financial crisis.

      This factual narrative must fill every living room until it’s well-understood by every thinking American, because:

      “If on Nov. 4th, they allow a majority of the American electorate to choose Barack Obama as the 44th President of the United States, they will get the government they deserve.”

      My children and grandchildren deserve better…. What about yours?

      • David123

        It seems like I pay high taxes whether there’s a Dem or an R in the White House. I read Blackhedd’s posts, but I don’t think most indie/undecided voters are going to study those enough to get their votes swayed.

        As for the bailout, some people here say it was good, others bad. Me, I don’t know, but at least it’s over. It is a big plus for McCain that he saw trouble at Fannie Mae in 2005 and tried to solve it before it got too bad.

        But the biggest threat to Wall Street is somebody crashing a plane into it – terrorism. And that is the most important issue for me.

        McCain wasn’t my guy in the primaries – but this general election is pretty easy. One guy is running who pals around with terrorists – I’m voting against that guy [I'm also voting for Palin], and I think most Americans will vote against Obama if they know the truth about him and Ayers and Wright.

        On another level, how can you trust a guy to fix the economy when he pals around with terrorists who tried to blow up the country?

        • David123

          and to President Clinton, and Governor Richardson, Governor Wilder [who is black], Governor Kaine, George McGovern, and a whole lot of other politicians. They disagree about some issues but they’re all Americans and they’re all politicians. And NONE of them launched their political careers from some terrorist’s living room.

          Barack Obama did launch his political career from the home of a terrorist. He is different from all those other politicians I just mentioned.

          Change we can believe in: Virginia missing the Pentagon and New Jersey missing Fort Dix – NO WAY!

          • GregInFla

            I suggested this weeks ago in a diary that no one read.. :^)

          • Catsy

            Admittedly, he took things too far, by setting off bombs in government buildings, but he never killed or injured anybody.

            I can’t decide whether this person is a real Obama supporter saying idiotic and unhelpful things, or a moby trying to make Obama supporters in general look bad.

            Either way, you can defend Obama and point out the silliness of trying to link him to Ayers without defending Ayers or making excuses for what he did.

          • Moe_Lane

            Mostly because there’s no defense: Ayers is an unrepentant domestic terrorist, he did work with Obama extensively for a decade, and Obama never gave a tinker’s dam about that until people started pointing it out.

            Not my fault if you don’t like it.

            Moe Lane

          • Catsy

            Moe, you spend a lot of your comments here telling people what they can and can’t do. While it’s within your rights as moderator to apply that to what people write here, you seem to think that you can hand-wave arguments about factual matters the same way, as if declaring a matter settled makes it so.

            The facts about the extent of Obama’s connection to Ayers are quite clear. Nobody except historically-challenged fools on the Internet disagree about what kind of person Ayers is. Every reputable organization that has examined this issue and the relevant data has concluded that there’s no “there” there. It’s no skin off my back if you don’t believe that; I’m not going to continue arguing it, and as I said below I’m really not worried that this attack will have any traction.

            What I “don’t like”, as I think has been amply demonstrated by my other comments on this thread, are my party’s own share of idiots who reinforce liberal stereotypes by making stupid arguments, and the effect that negative campaigning has on political discourse. If you go back through my four-year posting history, you’ll see that when I’m moved to comment here, it’s more often than not to engage on points of logic and tone or to dispel blatant misconceptions, since I’m well aware that arguing about established “known facts” here is both unwelcome and pointless. I’m aware that this is a partisan site dedicated to electing Republicans, and out of respect for site rules I rarely go head-to-head on issues of ideology or major factual disagreement here. You know that.

            In all sincerity, I don’t envy you the candidates you have this year, the campaign they’re running, or the cognitive dissonance necessary to publicly support everything the ticket does. If I was in your shoes, I’d probably be grasping at anything to try to turn this campaign around and keep Obama out of the White House, and I’d be pretty grumpy whenever anyone challenged that. If you’d prefer, I’ll go away until after the election, or at least stick to correcting grammar and typos. :>

          • Shaggy_Dog

            After all, it worked so well for Hillary in the primary, didn’t it? Or not.

            You know that Hillary won more votes in the D primary than Obama after she brought Ayers up (and otherwise went hard negative after Obama). If you don’t believe me, you can easily look it up.

            Hillary’s problem with this line of attack was that she did it too late, Obama effectively locked up the nomination on Super Tuesday.

          • Catsy

            I don’t know, who’s the Democratic nominee for President?

            Hillary’s problem with this line of attack was that she did it too late, Obama effectively locked up the nomination on Super Tuesday.

            And if this is true, what does that say for the McCain campaign that they’re playing this card less than a month before the election, with all the polls trending against them?

            Like I said, I’m not worried that it’ll work.

          • Putter

            Why should he have ever been in the same room with the SOB? Ever? Ayers is a loathsome creature. That Obama thought it necessary to kiss his ring speaks volumes.

          • Shaggy_Dog

            You are cranking out some pretty lengthy spin posts on the subject here.

            If you want to ignore the fact that once Hillary went negative with the Ayers attack and other negative attacks on Obama, she won more D primary votes than he did, that’s your perogative.

          • NightTwister

            You ought to be worrying about your own candidates.

            You Presidential candidate has no real credible experience with anything. Certainly not executive experience. He voted present more often than not, especially on important issues. The only important legislation he voted on while a State senator was a bill that would require medical attention be given to unsuccessful abortions where the baby was born alive. Your Vice-Presidential candidate doesn’t even think he’s experience enough for the job.

            Speaking of your VP candidate, he believes minorities belong working in donut shops and convenience stores. To document all of his idiotic statements would require hundreds of pages. Add to this his lack of accomplishments in the Senate in the 35 years he’s been there, and you have nothing but a long-winded blowhard.

            We, on the other hand have a war hero that has a history of shaking up the status quo, and one of the most popular governors with a similar history.

            People are sick and tired of the same old thing. Yes, we want change. But what your party offers is the same old Chicago political machine that wants to limit freedom and redistribute wealth.

            Our party this time offers real change. Change the way Washington works. Challenge the idiots on both sides of the aisle.

            If the MSM wasn’t completely in the tank for Obama, the public would already know this and McCain would be leading by 30 points. As it is, Obama has an excellent chance of being elected. If he is, everyone that voted for him gets exactly what they deserve.

          • Moe_Lane

            At the end of the day, your guy took the outstretched hand of a known domestic terrorist, and I don’t need six paragraphs to tell you that this was and is a moral failure on his part. But not as much as his refusal to repudiate it.

            Again, not my fault.

            Moe Lane

          • NightTwister

            Now I gotta go read that diary.

          • Husker

            Douglass K. Daniel of the AP is just trying to out-Doug Herbert–Doug Herbert. NYT’s Herbert tried to race-bait McCain’s “Celebrity” ad with his stereotypical “black man with two white women” analogy. Just another attempt by the “Parrot Press” (they don’t report just repeat) to run Obama’s smears, so he doesn’t have to.

  • democrat4life

    Everyone needs to realize that Obama would make a better president than McCain ever will. McCain only picked Palin so he could get Hillary Clinton’s votes but she is a complete Idiot. McCain is old and God forbid something happens to him look who you will have as president.