Obama refuses to rule out investigation of the left’s alleged ‘crimes of the Bush administration’


President-elect Obama, in an interview with George Stephanopoulos on “This Week,” would not rule out political retribution dressed up as investigations of the looney left-wing’s fanciful allegations of Bush administration war-crimes:

STEPHANOPOULOS: The most popular question on your own website is related to this. On change.gov it comes from Bob Fertik of New York City and he asks, “Will you appoint a special prosecutor ideally Patrick Fitzgerald to independently investigate the greatest crimes of the Bush administration, including torture and warrantless wiretapping.”

OBAMA: We’re still evaluating how we’re going to approach the whole issue of interrogations, detentions, and so forth. And obviously we’re going to be looking at past practices and I don’t believe that anybody is above the law. On the other hand I also have a belief that we need to look forward as opposed to looking backwards. And part of my job is to make sure that for example at the CIA, you’ve got extraordinarily talented people who are working very hard to keep Americans safe. I don’t want them to suddenly feel like they’ve got to spend all their time looking over their shoulders and lawyering (ph).

STEPHANOPOULOS: So, no 9/11 commission with Independence subpoena power?

OBAMA: We have not made final decisions, but my instinct is for us to focus on how do we make sure that moving forward we are doing the right thing. That doesn’t mean that if somebody has blatantly broken the law, that they are above the law. But my orientation’s going to be to move forward.

STEPHANOPOULOS: So, let me just press that one more time. You’re not ruling out prosecution, but will you tell your Justice Department to investigate these cases and follow the evidence wherever it leads?

OBAMA: What I — I think my general view when it comes to my attorney general is he is the people’s lawyer. Eric Holder’s been nominated. His job is to uphold the Constitution and look after the interests of the American people, not to be swayed by my day-to-day politics. So, ultimately, he’s going to be making some calls, but my general belief is that when it comes to national security, what we have to focus on is getting things right in the future, as opposed looking at what we got wrong in the past.

During the campaign, Obama promised that one of his first acts as president would be to call on
his new Attorney General to investigate the Bush administration:

A transcript of the KJFK radio Obama interview is available at NewsBusters.

Attorney General-Designate Holder has already made his mind up on many of the issues the for which the left wants its political retribution:

Allegations of Torture: “The notion that the Department of Justice would in essence sanction the use of torture as part of the President’s plenary power over military operations is as wrong as it is shortsighted. This position flies in the face of the entire history of American law, helping to create a climate in which unnecessarily abusive conduct can somehow be considered legitimate.” [Remarks to ACS Conference, 6/19/04]

“We must declare without qualification that it is the law, policy, and practice of the United States government that we do not torture people and we do not subject people to cruel, inhumane, or degrading treatment.” [ACS Conference, 6/14/08]

Closing Guantanamo: “Guantanamo Bay is an international embarassment. Some of our closest allies see this prison as a symbol of what America has become. We should close Guantanamo Bay, transfer the remaining prisoners to military prisons in the United States.” [ACS Conference, 6/14/08]

Extraordinary Rendition: “We must end all U.S. government practice and programs, covert or otherwise, that transfer individuals involuntarily to other countries that are known to engage in torture.” [ACS Conference, 6/14/08]

Indefinite Detentions Of Non-U.S. Citizen Terror Suspects: “It seems to me you can think of these people as combatants and we are in the middle of a war, and it seems to me that you could probably say, looking at precedent, that you are going to detain these people until war is over, if that is ultimately what we wanted to do.” [CNN, 1/02 via Glen Greenwald]

Terrorist Surveillance Program:  “I never thought I would see that a President would act in direct defiance of Federal law by authorizing warentless NSA surveillance of American citizens. This disrespect for the rule of law is not only wrong it destructive in our struggle against terrorism.” [ACS Conference, 6/14/08]

If Obama is truly interested in governing in a bipartisan fashion he should withdraw the nomination Holder to be Attorney General, rule out the political investigation of the Bush administration and thank President Bush for not investigating Holder’s involvement in President Clinton’s last minute pardon of fugitive financier Marc Rich, whose wife, a Democratic fund-raiser, contributed $450,000 to Clinton’s presidential library foundation and more than $100,000 to Hillary Rodham Clinton’s U.S. Senate campaign.

Category: , , , , , , , , ,

RSS feed | Trackback URI

16 Comments Leave a comment

These Are Weasel Words - He'll Do Nothing

IJB Sunday, January 11th at 11:01AM EST (link)

That was actually a “No” on investigating the Bush Admin., but he’s afraid to come out and say that because, if he does, the nutroots will lose it and go man-ape on Obama & his Administration.

But there was nothing in there that leads me to think he’ll actually investigate the Bush Admin.

Now Nancy P. & Conyers are another matter, but I doubt they’ll get far…

 

I find it difficult to believe that Obama has not yet made a final decision on this.

Moe Lane Sunday, January 11th at 11:02AM EST (link)

Actually, I find it impossible to believe. Why is he so afraid to go on the record about this?

He's still voting "present"

Brian Hibbert Sunday, January 11th at 11:06AM EST (link)

It hasn’t yet occurred to him that being “The Decider” means he’ll actually have to take a side on an issue.

Socialism doesn’t work. It looks nice on paper, but it’s been tried and it’s failed miserably every time (usually accompanied by widespread death and suffering).
Proud member of the V.R.W.C.

 

I believe publicly he'll say no investigations.

NightTwister Sunday, January 11th at 11:16AM EST (link)

But I also believe behind the scenes he’ll allow them, and only bring them out in the open if he thinks there’s enough evidence to get a conviction.

Everyone remotely involved in the Bush Administration will likely have to look over their shoulder for an impending investigation for the rest of their life.

I was previously opposed to Bush issuing a blanket pardon, but I now believe it’s the only way to keep this from dragging on for years. Unfortunately, I also believe that Bush thinks it will hurt his legacy, as if he could ever improve his image with this folks, and that will prevent him from doing it.

The problem with that, NightTwister...

Moe Lane Sunday, January 11th at 11:25AM EST (link)

…is that the GOP will go full-court ballistic the nanosecond it’s announced that Bush administration officials are going to be put on trial. For very good reason: it’s the first step towards creating proscription lists. The USA can survive four or eight years with a Democrat in the White House; it will not survive an atmosphere where one party dares not give up the executive branch once they’ve lost an election.

Lurkers, take note. Try this, and we will take back Congress in the next election. And we will impeach the President shortly thereafter.

 
 
 

So who

10ksnooker Sunday, January 11th at 11:09AM EST (link)

Will investigate Odummer and let us know if he is an American and not some Indonesian dupe.

Odummer badly needs a distraction for his kook voters about now. Jive talking only gets you so far.

Don't call him Odummer. He's our next President.

Rod_Patrick Sunday, January 11th at 11:16AM EST (link)

We should not stoop down to the low level of the Dems/Libs/MSM.

Let’s address him with respect. What about O-bum-mah?

 

Exactly!

cookcountyconservative Sunday, January 11th at 11:40AM EST (link)

Hasn’t he figured out yet what’s good for the goose is good for the gander. I can’t believe he would leave this up for speculation at all, especially given the fact that he has been getting full intel briefings. He must be at least mildly aware at this point what the Bush Admin has faced over the last 8 years.

I’ll stoop down to stooge, putz….

 
 

Barry...you need a napkin...you have Fudge all over your face..

$peciallist Sunday, January 11th at 11:50AM EST (link)

and you haven’t answered my question…..Do you support Israel?

being squishy in the Oval office won’t fly with we the people

 

grow a brain guys.,..

Jack Sunday, January 11th at 12:44PM EST (link)

He will keep this as a hole card. Whenever he needs to make the Left happy he will ask for an investigation. This is standard for democrats. This will be he his whipping boy. First time something big goes wrong they will announce forming a grand jury to investigate Bush.

Jack

“If at age 20 you are conservative you have no heart. It at age 30 you are liberal you have no brains.” Sir Winston Churchill

Sad but you're may be right.

Rod_Patrick Sunday, January 11th at 12:56PM EST (link)

Unless Bush and Cheney decide to fight back.

And when they do, he'll cave

ss396 Sunday, January 11th at 6:48PM EST (link)

n/t

If you pay people to sit on their duffs, you cannot be surprised when they do.

 
 
 

Slap Chop the Sham Wow

Scope Sunday, January 11th at 4:46PM EST (link)

Bush or the Republicans need to hire Vince to show them how to Slap Chop the Sham Wow’s Obama is trying to sell us.

You got that camera guy

Scope Sunday, January 11th at 4:47PM EST (link)

cause we don’t have all day. And, if you call right now we’ll double the order.

 

Their too busy ordering

cookcountyconservative Sunday, January 11th at 5:35PM EST (link)

2 snuggies and 2 booklights

 
 

Leave a Comment

 

Be respectful, or be banned. No Profanity.