« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

U.N. Security Council fails to act on North Korean rocket launch

What a surprise.

The Sunday emergency meeting of the U.N. Security Council, called to consider North Korea’s launch of a ballistic missile, concluded without any official reaction to North Korea’s provocation.

The U.N. will dither on like it did with Saddam and North Korea’s development of nuclear weapons, and as the U.N. continues to do with Iran’s nuclear program.

The U.S. says the “launch constituted a clear-cut violation” of U.N. Security Council Resolution 1718 (2006). Unfortunately, as predicted, China and Russia said they were not convinced that Pyongyang had
violated any U.N. rules by trying to send a satellite into orbit.

China and Russia are grasping at straws to protect North Korea. Resolution 1718 states at paragraph numbered 2:

“2.  Demands that the DPRK not conduct any further nuclear test or launch of a ballistic missile;”

The North Korean rocket launch presents a critical test of President Obama’s leadership on a major foreign policy crisis, and of his new friendship with the leaders of China and Russia. Joe Biden warned us Obama would be tested.

Obama reacted with tough talk and insisted that North Korea face consequences for flagrantly violating Resolution 1718:

“Rules must be binding, violations must be punished. Words must mean something,” Obama said. “The world must stand together to prevent the spread of these weapons.”

Reaction to Obama’s tough talk was critical.

The Politico reports Obama’s naive, John Lenon Imagine-like, call for “a world without nuclear weapons” looks unrealistic: “Hard-line critics say North Korea’s move makes the president’s no-nukes aspirations all the more unrealistic, even dangerous.”

The Hill’s Jeremy P. Jacobs reports Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich called Obama’s nuclear weapons policy a “fantasy.”

Wall Street Journal editorialized, “Kim has every reason to expect that he will eventually get what he wants — more recognition, more money and energy supplies” and “his nukes and missiles too.”

The Obama critics have it right. The North Koreans couldn’t care less about world opinion. A fact the rogue state has made abundantly clear in the 60 years since it started the Korean War. Tough talk will not impress the North Koreans. To the contrary, if tough talk is not backed up by tough action it will be perceived as weakness and only encourage the North Koreans to see how much more they can get away with under President Obama. The American People understand this as evidenced by their support for a military response.

COMMENTS

  • daconia

    These are the “serious consequences” our tough Secretary of State promised.

    • 6eorge Jetson

      Just wait until they get the Daddy voice from Obama.

      That’s much more intimidating than a nuclear arsenal and a missile shield.

  • http://hillbillypolitics.com Steph C

    of why sovereignty has a greater role in world peace than rule by a committee of competing interests.

    • robmikpet

      to go around London and look for a statue of a committee.

  • Tbone

    out of the US should be a major plank in every Republican campaign. It is probably worth at least 5% of the vote.

    If someone questions the position the response should be “Name one thing, other than corruption, that the UN has done right in the last 30 years?”

    • Praveen

      The relation building exercise that President Obama launched (mostly by talking down ad trashing Americans, I will point out) with China and Russia obviously did not work. And it won’t work.

      If President Obama thinks he can talk China and Russia into busying his hope, change, better relations, climate change, nuclear free world he is living in a fantasy world. Putin and Hu Jintao must be glad. For them this is an opportunity of a lifetime. They don’t have to do anything but keep applauding this President for all his wonderful work.

      I will urge President Obama to get this world together and make it peaceful. Before his first Term completes. And implement all his brilliant ideas about foreign policy. PLEASE!!!!!

      • ss396

        The scary part is that Obama did.

    • itrytobenice

      And if our leaders aren’t able to articulate a reason for getting out of the UN, they have no business leading. Other than the ignorant lefties, it should be an easier sell than talking me into eating chocolate when I’m PMSy. And that’s easy.

  • yastepanov

    In my youth, I actually worked for a summer as an Intern at the UN. It’s mostly a large, harmless debating club. It isn’t even all that expensive when it comes down to it — the NY Fire Department has a larger budget,

    When “action” is taken — rarely — the Big 5 still each have a veto, Even then there are limits. They cannot send UN troops into the US to take away guns (sorry, conspiracy theorists) because they cannot act in that manner. (Moreover, if someone from the UN came to MY house to take MY guns, I’d shoot him for theft.)

    The UN has the authority to order coffee — if they can pay for it.

    The problem is the UN was designed by Roosevelt the way the League of Nations was designed by Wilson: To prevent the previous war. The likelihood of WWII happening again is small, wars generally don’t happen the same way twice.

    Of course, people like Obama want to believe that everyone will obey the treaties they sign. This is why “disarmanment treaties DO NOT WORK.”

    “If the opposition disarms, well and good. If it refuses to disarm, we shall disarm it ourselves,” was from Josef Stalin. This was a man who would happily sign a treaty, then break it. There was no way to “deal” with Stalin unless it was in Stalin’s interest to keep his word. Then he would keep it as long as it was in his interest. The moment it wasn’t the treaty became null and void.

    At the recent NATO summit, supposedly Obama took the leaders of Denmark and Turkey aside and “smoothed out their differences” behind closed doors. Does anyone want to bet in a few months Denmark and Turkey will be getting some new money, or guns, or something from the US?

    Obama cannot talk Russia OR China into doing anything that is not already in their own national interest.

  • red4ever

    Unless they are backed by action. Unfortunately, the UN lacks the collective will to do anything. The US is villified for acting to enforce UN resolutions (Iraq anyone?). Yet no one else acts to enforce the resolutions either. The US is the biggest supporter of the UN and the one most likely to follow its resolutions. Yet, it is also the second most castigated nation (Israel being the first).

    Unilateral action is still a possibility. But not with this President who thinks that just showing up is enough to get everyone to do what he wants. Leading means doing the unpopular thing sometimes, if it results in a safer world. So, Dear Leader, get the heck out there and LEAD.

  • djemi

    http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/general_current_events/57_want_military_response_to_north_korea_missile_launch

    Expect BO to react in a day or two, ha ha