« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

President Rick Perry (2013-2021)

I have been waiting months for this day. Today, the next president of the United States entered the fray, Texas Governor Rick Perry. He is one of only two candidates actually running on the idea of Conservatism, and he is the only one with executive experience. He, unlike our Radical-In-Chief, Pres. BO, is an alpha male who will once again remind the world that they should fear us, and will make our enemies shake in their boots while emboldening our allies. He will once again put the word of God in our national debate, and he will stand resolute in the face of the liberal attack machine. aka the Mainstream media. He, as governor, has espoused Conservative values and run one of the most Conservative governments in a long time, proving that Conservatism works. I daresay that with todays announcement, Rick Perry just became the next POTUS.

His announcement, like his governance, was unmistakably Reaganesque. Reagan famously quipped “A recession is when your neighbor loses their job. A depression is when you lose yours. And recovery is when Jimmy Carter loses his.” Rick Perry similarly stated “Page one of any economic plan to get America working is to give a pink slip to the current resident of the White House.” Ronald Reagan repeatedly said that America’s best days didn’t have to be behind her. He proved to be correct. Rick Perry said  ”It’s time for America to believe again. It’s time to believe that the promise of our future is far greater than even our best days behind us.” Very similar. Ronald Reagan repeatedly said that America was filled with great people and that the Washington “geniuses” were the problem. Rick Perry said today “And I know something: America is not broken. Washington, D.C., is broken!” Rick Perry is incredibly Reaganesque. He will make an incredibly great president. As a side note, he will not be the “next Ronald Reagan”, just as Ronald Reagan was not the “next Calvin Coolidge”.

Addressing the Critics

 As with all Conservatives, there are two groups of critics of Governor Perry. The people to the left of him, and the other Coservatives who support other candidates. I’ll address the crtics on the left first.

Those on the the left and/or middle of the Republican Party criticize Rick Perry as looking and sounding like George W. Bush. This is a ridiculous argument. Bush never called himself a Conservative, but of course Perry has. Bush was born in New Hampshire and lived on a blue-collar gentlemans ranch. Perry was born in Paint Creek, Texas, the son of tenant farmers. The two men are quite a bit different, both in politics and in personality. They call Perry a “cowboy”. This is just proof of the left’s anti-americanism. Cowboys are the epitome of America and all she stands for. Whats wrong with our president being a Cowboy?

Now to address the concerns of Perry’s critics on the right. Most of these critics are Paulbots or Palinites, so dedicated to their candidates that anyone else must not be a real Conservative. I won’t even bother to deal with the first set of critics, seeing as their candidate is crazy as all get out. Now for the Palinites. They have been going around and around about his “weak immigration record”, the gardasil “mandate”, and the trans-texas corridor.  His immigration record, with the exception of his support for the DREAM act, has been incredibly strong. He has called on the feds to do their job and protect the border, and he even touched on the subject during his announcement speech. His views have evolved on immigration to where they are today as being fully supportive of legal immigration but firm on closing the border. And no, it was not so he could run for president. He evolved into these views over a year ago, long before he considered running for president. To quote, Rush Limbaugh “You’ll never see Rick Perry support amnesty. He used to be weak on that but now he’s not.”

The gardasil issue cannot be forgiven, but no candidate will ever be perfect. The trans-texas corridor has been blown competely out of proportion, seeing as when he first intorduced the bill, he paired it with a bill that would have protected people against abuse of eminent domain. Of course that was looked over by the paulbots when attacking Rick Perry. The fact of the matter is compared to cap and trade Pawlenty, medicaid part D/SCHIP Santorum, Green Newt, bats*#@t crazy Paul, liberal Huntsman, ObamneyCare Romney, unreliable Palin, and inexperienced Bachmann, I’d say he’s pretty close to being an ideal candidate, and honestly, more of a pure Conservative than our hero Ronald Reagan.

The VP Pick

Bachmann has been noted as a possible VP if/when Perry was nominated. However, she is fairly far right, and she could never deliver Minnesota to us anyway, so despite her principled Conservatism, I see no upside to her as the choice. Paul Ryan wouldn’t be bad if he could give us Wisconsin, and he would make a great President if Perry were to pass. Marco Rubio of course would be amazing, he would deliver us Florida and help us with hispanics. But in my opinion, the best choice politically would be the amazing new governor of New Mexico, Susanna Martinez. She would deliver us a blue state, help us with hispanics, and provide women with someone to support out of their own sex. Bob McDonnell would be a great choice as well. Any of the above and many more would make an excellent choice to round out a great Conservative ticket.

Rick Perry 2012!!! Let’s make Washington as inconsequential as possible!

COMMENTS

  • RealQuiet

    I am very much pumped up with Perry announcing his candidacy today. Your preference of Susanna Martinez as VP running mate is interesting and a good choice. I still prefer Marco Rubio as VP because he can get eight years of executive apprenticeship by learning from Perry so he could run after that. However, the stable of VP candidates that Perry would have to pick from are first rate. Ryan, Martinez, McDonnell, Daniels, etc. There are a lot of good choices.

    However, Perry has to win the nomination first so that must be the main focus. :)

    • Toby Calvert-Lee

      And I agree that Rubio is great, but I think that Rubio would benefit more from NOT being picked as the VP pick. But I also like that Martinez helps with women aswell. But yes, getting the nomination is the here and now.

      p.s.
      Just fyi, it’s Toby. No worries though! :)

      • RealQuiet

        n/t

      • GregInFla

        We need to keep all the conservative Senators in the Senate right now to get and retain the majority there. Get the VP from the House or a Governor’s Mansion. Why pull from an area where you are short and trying to grow? That’s my view, anyways. Anyone that Jim DeMint supports, including himself, is off-limits, as far as I’m concerned.

        • Toby Calvert-Lee

          the Conservative senators need to stick around and help out Mr. Perry when he reaches the white house.

          p.s. I completely agree with the the “A true evolutionist would let endangered species die off.” that you said in your signature. I’ve been saying that for years

          • GregInFla

            I made that evolution statement myself and thought was original. I guess we both think along the same lines.:-)

            As for strategies on selecting a VP:

            1. The VP must be someone that would be a good POTUS. Folks voted against McCain because they did not like Palin, and they then voted for Biden as VP? Makes no sense, I know. And when was last time a VP took over the reins?

            2. Another argument is that you are grooming the VP to be the next POTUS. Before Bush 41, who was last VP elected POTUS after being VP for 8 years under same POTUS? It does not happen too often. So this argument is not very logical.

            3. So if the VP is going to stay the VP (like Cheney, who was maybe the perfect VP), you get one who gives good advice, deals with social occasions well, and may get you another state or two in the election.

            While reason 3 is most logical, it does nothing to explain why Obama selected Biden. He fails in all three areas of reason 3, and fails the first two reasons as well. That brings us to reason 4.

            4. People will not challenge you as POTUS if you have Biden as your VP. Would you vote for impeachment and in so doing vote for President Biden? He’s a POTUS insurance policy, likely sold by Progressive.

          • tjones1917

            nt

          • GregInFla

            He was appointed VP for Agnew by Nixon. Would that make him the first person to be POTUS never on the ballot as P or VP? If any POTUS was selected not elected, it was Ford.

        • rightwingmom52

          I’m convinced we need every conservative we can get and more to move our agenda, keep the heat on the GOP moderates and pull Dem moderates our way. Without a super majority it’s going to be difficult to pass some of what we need passed.

          For example, Stenberg, who is running against cornhusker nelson, said he’d like to pass a clean bill that repeals everything that’s been passed since 2008.

        • BigRedConservative

          Reasonably conservative, leaving office in 2012 (so no need to remove him from Senate and leave a conservative-shaped hole), experienced in traversing the legislative waters. Seems like a nice guy too.

          • acat

            Does Kyl bring any States into play that aren’t going to be in play already?

            Does his presence help flip Nevada or New Mexico, for instance?

            Mew

          • GregInFla

            I’ve never been impressed by Newt, and not sure why not. But he was on Hannity radio Friday and laid out a good list of items that he wanted Congress to do now for the economy, which included repealing Dodd-Frank Finance Reform, which I have not heard from anyone else. He could definitely deal with the Congress well, and is an idea-guy.

          • Toby Calvert-Lee

            with Gingrich and Perry is it may create the bogus impression that Gingrich is not only smarter, but “controls” Perry.

          • californiagold

            If Perry defeats Romney and wins the nomination, the establishment will push for a neocon to balance the ticket. Forget about Bachmann, Ryan, or any other conservative. Ultimately, it would be Perry’s choice as to who he wants as his running mate, but the establishment would exert all kinds of pressure to get someone like Condi Rice on the ticket. Or perhaps even Romney.

          • Toby Calvert-Lee

            because her pro-choice views would be in stark contrast with Perry, but I could see Romney unfortunately, sort of a Reagan/Bush type ticket (conservative at the top, moderat second in line)

          • perry4prez

            Toby, it is great that you are behind Governor Perry, but we do NOT want Mitt Romney as VP. The great thing about Rick Perry is that he tells it like it is and as a Constitutional Conservative he needs to appoint another person who respects the Constitution to be VP. Someone like Paul Ryan would be great.

          • Toby Calvert-Lee

            We need more Perry Supporters seeing as he is the real deal, who can also deliver an ass-whupping win in the general, where as, as of today, Palin would end up like Goldwater.

          • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

            Washingtonian. I couldn’t be happier that he’s leaving the Senate, likely to be replaced by Jeff Flake.

          • Toby Calvert-Lee

            and his votes have been mainly good, but
            A. I think there will already be a Conservative, White, SW Male at the head of the ticket
            B. Perry is seen as anti-Washington. That means he couldn’t pick most washington incumbents

          • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

            He’s “OK” as a Senator, especially when the other one is McCain, but there’s no fight in him and he’s been in DC too long and in the Senate too long to do anything but retire. He’s a wus.

            I would prefer not to see a DC incumbent who’s been in office more than one term if it has to be somebody from DC. Honestly I’d much rather see Rudy. He’s very accomplished, governed NYC very conservatively for eight years and is not just a fighter, but he’s one who’s not afraid to throw the first punch.

          • Toby Calvert-Lee

            I don’t agree with him on everything, but I’ve always thought he’d be great in a national setting

    • Reg

      I can’t support this guy. He issued an executive order mandating STD vaccines for elementary school girls. That’s a line that shouldn’t be crossed. Its pretty despicable.

      • Doc Holliday

        the question is straightforward. You just have to answer. If you don’t start supporting someone here, the mods are going to notice this. Either way you are not fooling us, we know you are here to trash Repubs. The first rule of trolling is to not get caught, at least this is true if you want to take any pride in your efforts.

      • Toby Calvert-Lee

        First of all, there is no such thing as a perfect candidate. Ronald Reagan signed amnesty and a liberal abortion law, far worse than mandated vaccines, which happen everywhere.

        Second of all, as I have just learned, he has later said that was a mistake. See izineguy’s comment below.

    • bmabray

      Rubio is not a naturalized citizen. His father became a US citizen five years after Marco was born.
      Senator Marco Rubio

  • acat

    Well written diary, Toby.

    My concern on Martinez, though, is that she’s Southwest – and so’s Perry.

    Can she bring enough to the table to make a region-centric ticket work? (the last successful one was the double-Bubba ticket of Clinton/Gore)

    I’m thinking Pawlenty or another upper midwest governor…. someone who can make sure Minnesota, Wisconsin, and the rest of the union strongholds are in play. I’d say Scott Walker (R-WI) but I’m not sure he’d want it.

    Mew

    • RealQuiet

      The Rust and Coal Belt will likely decide the election.

      • gregorysstewart

        Pawlenty may not have had the star power to be the nominee, but he is right on the issues, a successful executive and he can deliver Minnesota as well as Iowa to the GOP. He is flexible enough to fall in line with a Perry nomination. Martinez is another South westerner and that will not resonate in the rest of the country. In addition, we have seen how much the politics of personal destruction have affected Ferarro, Hillary and Palin. In all likelihood, Martinez will face the same hurdles and that would shift the debate away from a referendum on Obama and make it Palin the sequel.

        The risk vs. reward of that coupling does not seem to work.

        Rubio would be terrific, great, wonderful and oh so helpful with Hispanics, but if I were Rubio, I would politely decline. Historically, it is hard to win the presidency from the VP spot unless the president dies in office. Rubio is a future president.

        • Toby Calvert-Lee

          But I think that Pawlenty really doesn’t help us nationally seeing as he is again a boring white male

    • Toby Calvert-Lee

      that the region part might be a problem, but overall I don’t think that would matter too much. I think Walker would be an excellent VP choice, I just worry about the hispanic vote, but clearly, the rust belt has supreme importance. There would be many great VP choices

      • acat

        good – not just “tolerable” but .. Good potential veep candidates, and agency head candidates etc. etc.

        We have a strong field to choose from. I hope Perry is given the opportunity to choose wisely.

        Mew

  • runner12

    I know they are both from the South, but I would rather have the best person for the job rather than settle for someone who may or may not deliver a state. That may not be living in political reality, but that is how I see it at this time.

    Martinez is an interesting suggestion, but I would prefer someone who has been somewhat vetted more.

    • RealQuiet

      Rubio is just a lights out VP pick with so much upside across the board for whomever wins the GOP nod. That is an awfully good looking ticket.

    • Toby Calvert-Lee

      will be served better if he serves the new presidency from the Senate and then he can serve full capacity as President. Matt Lewis had a great piece on this at the Daily caller

      http://dailycaller.com/2011/07/12/why-marco-rubio-might-turn-down-that-arranged-marriage/

      But Perry/Rubio would be ideal

      • runner12

        leave the Senate? He is its’ leader and the deciding vote in a deadlock. We need our A team to win and I think Perry/Rubio is it.

        • Toby Calvert-Lee

          Would only be in the case of a fifty-fifty vote, which is incredibly rare.

          • runner12

            NT

        • snowshooze

          And, he doesn’t need to hitch his wagon to anyone.
          If we are lucky, he will get used to the demands of executive level leadership, mature and eventually take his place.
          I see in him the same psychology I have…I don’t feel the need to follow anyone. I sure ain’t shopping for a boss.

  • Toby Calvert-Lee

    “enthusiastically” endorsed Rick Perry today, calling him a True conservative.

    http://dailycaller.com/2011/08/13/at-redstate-ted-cruz-endorses-rick-perry-for-president/

  • Finrod

    Mitt Romney: This is the traditional ‘pick the runner-up in the primaries’ VP pick; often done when the primaries have been hard-fought to make it easier for the supporters of the runner-up to join in the general election campaign. Ronald Reagan did this with his VP pick, George Bush (Sr.)

    Sarah Palin: Oddly, the motivation to pick her is similar to the motivation to pick Romney: she comes with a built-in supporter base that would contribute enthusiastically. In contrast to Romney, though, this would be a run-it-up-the-gut in-your-face type of pick, which one could make a reasonable argument for given the expected ugliness of the coming general election campaign.

    Rudy Giuliani: This would be a ‘broaden the ticket’ kind of pick, more commonly recently done by a moderate candidate choosing a conservative VP (Dole picking Kemp, McCain picking Palin) though one could argue that Reagan picking Bush is also an example. Picking Rudy wouldn’t put the Perry campaign within reach of making New York competitive, but it might in New Jersey. Rudy is a fighter and we’re definitely in for a fight.

    I’m sure there could be cases made for a score of others, but I’ll just throw these out there for now.

    • tonydepalma

      perry is not a conservative and it is already being shown ,he’s weak at best. Sarah will win the nomination and it will not be much of a fight. You guys jump to quick conclusions at such an early stage. the field is far from settled. Perry tripled Texas debt he’s no savior. His record next too the mama Grizzly does not hold up

      • Toby Calvert-Lee

        And if she were too, she, not Perry, would be the thompson-esque candidate. she has done no organiztation and she is as undisciplined as gingrich. I love Sarah, but she is not going to be President, no way, no how.

      • gekster

        I just want to know all I can about Perry so I can make an informed decision abot him.

        • Toby Calvert-Lee

          is that Perry cut spending more than any other candidate since WW2….I have heard that from numerous sources, including his campaign

          • gekster

            I want to know where this guy got that info from, or, as I suspect,
            he’s just throwing a bomb out there.

          • Toby Calvert-Lee

            C4P Palinites took to twitter the other day and made this up about Perry, they didn’t even provide a link to back it up. This guy just got sucked into their lies. And, like I said, Perrys critics on the right are either Palinites or Paulbots.

          • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

            Or not. The braindead at C4P are capable of anything but rational thought.

          • Toby Calvert-Lee

            as those C4L paul nutjobs….Zo characterized them no well….liberals who haven’t turned their back on capitalism

          • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

            by a longshot. At least Luapnor has the ability to make an argument – albeit a very, very bad one – about domestic issues. P doesn’t even bother and her Shriners wouldn’t no one if they heard it. It’s all about her ability to be a bomb thrower. (And she’s good at that.)

          • Toby Calvert-Lee

            actually a Conservative. Paul is not. Big difference. But Palin should be used by the ultimate ticket as sort of an attack dog agaisnt Obama. Keep the actual candidates hands fairly clean, but still take down BO

          • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

            govern like one. Her little record in Alaska certainly wasn’t anything that looked like Conservative. And frankly, once the general gets rolling she will be an afterthought on the national level. She won’t engage with the media so all she does is talk to the fools at C4P.

          • acat

            I don’t care if she relocates to Belize in December of 2012 as long as she can deliver the votes.

            I don’t expect her to do that, I expect that she’d be offered a post in the Perry administration that will lend some credibility to her skill at getting to the roots of things. Whether she will accept, and whether she will thrive if she does accept, who knows?

            Mew

          • audax

            Lets see how fast she can get rid of her job!

          • acat

            The reaction was ..less positive.

            Mew

          • audax

            …LOL!

          • Toby Calvert-Lee

            For me is there shouldn’t be an energy secretary

          • acat

            “Donald, I want you to find every subordinate, walk up to them and say your trademark ‘You’re fired!’. When you’re done, come back and we’ll talk about the next agency you can run.”

            Mew

          • audax

            It was about how much time Sarah Palin would take to ABOLISH the Department! So in that regard we are on the same page!

          • Toby Calvert-Lee

            lol I ddn’t read the whole comment, but I agree wholeheartedly

          • Toby Calvert-Lee

            at all….however I think to win the presidency you really don’t have to deal with the full brunt of the MSM, you could win just being on CNN and Fox News

      • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

        ever cut and run from a political fight. Especially when he held the winning hand. And, as far as records go, Palin’s is pathetic even without the act of political cowardice she exhibited when she resigned.

        Actually, there are two governors with great conservative record. Pawlenty and Daniels. Oh well.

        • lineholder

          Bobby Jindal?

          • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

            It seems that if you don’t make an effort to see what he’s up to you can’t find anything. The guy seems to be the definition of “low profile”.

            That said, on paper he’s probably the strongest candidate around in terms of real qualifications and actual accomplishments. I don’t know much about what he’s doing in LA, but the guy seems to have all the right governing stuff. In today’s climate I doubt he’d even get a second look though. Conservatives seem focused on people who “say the right things” even though they’ve never actually done them. I don’t put Perry in that category BTW.

            With respect to Perry, I’m not too happy about his shots for girls thing, but that’s not even a dent for me. I’m distressed by his actions on illegal immigration, but I’m not sure a “liberal” position could get through a Republican House. And then there’s the “Algore” thing and I could care less about that. At the moment, he’s probably the best choice and he’s head and shoulders better than Romney, Bachmann or Palin, any one of whom would, IMO, very likely lose to Obama.

          • lineholder

            I think there’s a lot more to Jindal than meets the eye, but word is that he’s had a laser-like focus on the problems LA is facing, which isn’t a bad thing. The changes re: education under his time have been pretty positive so far, and I wish we’d hear more about that, because it’s just as strong if not stronger than what Risk Scott is doing in FL.

            As to Perry, I’m still waiting to see how things go.

            I’d like to see Cain stay in the mix somewhere, if Perry wins the nomination. My reasons are purely social, becker….there’s a shift going on behind the scenes in Black communities, and having a Black Repub at a higher level could make a difference.

          • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

            about Cain and Blacks. He seems to be a fighter, my only concern with him is his lack of rounds in big time politics which is why I really like Rudy. OTOH, it certainly would make things interesting with Cain, and he’s got more on the ball in terms of accomplishments than pretty much anybody else, but it’s private sector where the buck really stops and people actually take orders.

            Bottom line, Cain is hands down better than Bachmann, Palin or Romney and light years better than anybody else in the field now that TPaw is out. And I really hope he runs for Senate.

          • Toby Calvert-Lee

            governor but he should not be the VP pick because he would give us nothing new….but he is really good on free market health care issues

          • lineholder

            I was just curious as to becker’s opinion of him.

            I don’t necessarily agree with your take that Jindal offers nothing new. He is a Constitutional lawyer, strong on free market principles, and the state of LA has faced its share of challenges and then some during his time in office.

            He does bring a certain degree of experience to the table that other governors just don’t have.

          • Toby Calvert-Lee

            just because he ias a male from a red state and the indian vote isn’t that big. Don’t get me wrong, he offers a lot as a potential president or as governor

          • acat

            in combination with his other skills used for some purpose…. and I think they’d be wasted as Veep. It’s the wrong role for him.

            I could, however, see him as either head or actual-head (behind a figurehead) on a blue-ribbon to figure out health care.

            While Obamacare must go, we do need to talk about Medicare and Medicaid, and Jindal has the skills needed…

            Mew

          • Menlo

            The man signed mandatory water fluoridation for the whole state into law. I don’t know where he is on insurance and health care funding, but that was bad for public health, and it’s unquestionably a waste of other people’s money.

          • acat

            One would imagine, given that most major cities have had fluoridated water for many decades now, that we’d see *some* action… even if it’s just quietly discontinuing it .. if there’s an actual health risk.

            Mew

          • Uma Richie

            Here’s an article from a medical journal about he renewed battle over fluoridation:
            http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3114922/

            I certainly don’t dispute the benefits of community water fluoridation; however, I see that there are some adjustments in fluoridation levels being made for safety reasons. I don’t agree with Menlo’s comment, but it certainly was not worthy of your kneejerk disdain.

          • Menlo

            Anyone who thinks it is not a waste of money has no business claiming to be conservative, or a proponent of small or even ethical government. It’s often imposed with no thought or debate or studies whatsoever. It’s obvious based on simple logic and facts that it is of no benefit today. Add that to the fact that a few people do have health problems from too much, some of which may not even be fully known or realized, and that’s reason enough! It should not have to be direct, widespread, and very obvious to stop it. What’s more, the chemical is derived from industrial waste from China and is actually a pollutant! It’s like forcing vitamin supplements or medication on people, and it’s not right, and it certainly is not ethical.

          • acat

            Given the number of trial lawyers looking for government pockets to extract cash from, it seems to this cat that if fluoride was a problem, we’d see advertisements for “If you or your parents were exposed to tap water…”

            And yet, we don’t.

            This tells me that, while there may be more refinement needed – and as Uma links above – in the process, but that it does not pose a threat.

            As for the origin of the fluoride used, I fail to see a threat in it’s source. Are you concerned that the gold fillings in your teeth may have been some pharaoh’s bauble at one point?

            Finally, have you ever looked at the contents of your milk, and your cereal, and your meat? You’re getting vitamins and minerals and antibiotics in your diet every day unless you’re growing your own. This isn’t just fluoride, and .. the results aren’t all bad, if you go back and compare life expectancies and disease rates in the 1920s to the 1950s.

            Mew

          • Menlo

            Few people think about it. However, the lawsuits have already been attempted, and in this country the elitists always win them. Most Europeans seem to know better, and they have had different outcomes. In fact their court system even restricts food containing fluoridated water.

            The analogies don’t work because this is being FORCED in the sense there are no competing sources of water. It’s not a private entity like a doctor or dentist. People choose their food to get what they need and avoid what they don’t; there are ample choices with and without additives and fortification. Fluoride is not used to make the water safe. This is an unethical and unjust imposition of government onto society that is indisputably doing nothing to improve public health.

          • acat

            the local WalMart doesn’t have cases of bottled water – with the ingredients and source in federally-mandated easy-to-read print right on the bottles?

            Seriously?

            You’re welcome to disagree with mandatory fluoridation, or vitamin D in milk, or iron shavings in Cheerios (from scrap metal, by the way – run a magnet over a bowl sometime) are a concern for some.

            I know from exotic food allergies, I have some, my SO has some, our child has some. Grocery shopping is an endless cycle of “read the ingredients, nope X can’t eat that, try the next brand”. Going out to eat often means asking to speak to the cook.

            You, however, are asserting a more general problem to be true, with no evidence, and worse, asserting there to be “no other option” … the lack of evidence you present and the inaccuracy of your secondary assertion lead me to conclude you’re talking out of your hat, repeating something you read, not something you live.

            I don’t question that fluoride is a problem for a small percentage of us. I do not think, especially based on the lack of evidence presented, that it’s a real problem. Unwise, perhaps.

            By the way, do you recall where and when fluoridation was discovered to help dental health? A little town in Texas where the water naturally contained fluoride, and where nobody needed a dentist.

            Mew

          • Menlo

            Municipal water supplies are provided by the government and end up in many other foods and beverages, and not everyone is able to buy properly purified water on top of that. No one has ever researched whether it is absorbed into the skin. The fact that there is insufficient information and research is itself a problem. Would you not err on the side of caution? Why should people be forced to pay for something that is both unnecessary and is a problem for some people? Why should the GOVERNMENT be ADDING it? It ONLY makes sense people should not have to be proactive if they don’t want it but rather if they do.

            I would never touch enriched or fortified foods, but I and everyone else has plenty of alternatives that do not require buying what we do not want. With fluoride, everyone pays. The problem certainly is not enough to warrant banning the substance, but why should municipal water in any way be “enhanced?”

          • acat

            Nobody is forcing you to do anything. That’s an unbelievably large canard.

            Go live with the Amish if you want unfortified, unpreservatived, unaltered foods. Drill your own well if you want unfortified water.

            This is not “forced”. This is “making a choice”. Your solution is just as much a “choosing for others” as the solution you reject .. only with fewer proven health benefits.

            Mew

          • Menlo

            Why not slip other vitamins and minerals in the water while you’re at it? We’re dealing with a natural monopoly, and that does make a huge difference. It is controlled and owned by the government, not by a private business or corporation.

            Why is it so difficult for you to understand how the government should NOT have a right to do that? It’s certainly not making “as much” of a choice for others when people can EASILY get fluoride if they want it. It is much MORE difficult to avoid it.That is a simple fact that even you can see. Why would you choose the more difficult and expensive route?

            On a final note, one would have to be delusional to think there are any “proven health benefits” to water fluoridation or that its use by government would be IN ANY WAY justified if there were.

          • acat

            Good grief.

            I’m not saying the government-mandated fluoridation levels are “optimal”, but I am saying that you are seriously overreacting when you confuse me with someone who supports big government.

            You are also confusing something that’s under control of your city council, either as a department or as a managed monopoly, with a conspiracy.

            Mew

          • Menlo

            I don’t think it’s a conspiracy or that there is any intent to harm people. I think officials have been doing it for so long that they are not even thinking about it, and they are too quick to roll over to the dental lobby with no debate or consideration. It’s misguided and wasteful at best.

          • acat

            Besides calling people who disagree about where on the slope to pitch the tent statists, that is.

            Mew

          • Menlo

            My water comes not from a city but from a regional water district that serves multiple cities. They are not run by elected officials, and my city appoints only a tiny portion of its leaders. For now, I’m stuck petitioning the FDA and EPA to restrain them.

            My primary point initially was that Bobby Jindal hasn’t exercised good judgment in his state with such a mandate.

          • acat

            Unless every problem is a nail, which I dispute, then the right tool for a big percentage of all problems is not a hammer.

            For the remaining subset, though, the hammer is the right tool.

            You strike me as someone who rejects the idea that there are nails. That is, someone who would prefer anarchy to a constitutionally restricted government.

            I .. disagree with that conclusion.

            Mew

          • Menlo

            Anarchy? Where have I implied a preference for chaos and disorder? That makes no sense at all. I think you may be overgeneralizing. I’m not sure what your analogy intends to imply. I think fluoridation is an extremely unjustified and unethical act of government. I said nothing about any other policy area.

          • acat

            Fluoridation was one example. Vitamin enhancements another.

            Whether you are an anarchist or not, your position is sufficiently outside the mainstream to make one wonder.

            Mew

          • Doc Holliday

            people get hooked on various beliefs/causes, and can’t let them go. Actually the anti-flouride guys are numerous. A large percentage of Brits are against flouridation. And we have seen how that has made them much more free……to see the dentist.

          • Menlo

            That does not come even REMOTELY close to anything resembling anarchy or ANY form of government or lack thereof! Anarchy means supporting no government and chaos and disorder.

            I’m not sure what the “mainstream” is, but if it includes fluoridation support then people are wrong and need to come to their senses and examine the issue. I suppose that won’t happen though given most people support the systematic raping of people in airports.

          • acat

            then when you meet resistence, you need to reply with facts, not assertions.

            Mew

          • snowshooze

            About Flouridation. It is good for the teeth, bad for the bones. Also, poison.
            Anyway, get a filter. I know, you shouldn’t have to…but as you got what you got… you can get out of it.
            But I appreciate your concern.

          • acat

            that I drank as a kid than the fluoride.

            ‘s a reason the city finally shut down their wells… about ten years after I left…

            I’m reminded of those “All the stupid things we did when we were kids that no sane parent would ever allow” e-mails.

            Mew

          • snowshooze

            Yep. I agree 100%.
            Here in Anchorage a few years ago.. they buried, on the hillside… ALL the contaminated soils that were proceeds from the Indian oil-spill.
            I recognized immediately that they were trying to kill out all the private wells.. and force the holdouts onto city water.

          • acat

            Rain barrels?

            More than one way to turn my hide into your webbing, after all…

            If people want to stay off the grid, it’s possible, it’s just how much is worth it.

            Mew

          • Tbone

            Dude.

          • Doc Holliday

            or is that just on dollar bills? I think i heard something about prescriptions meds thrown down the toilet as well; and then there are the things that come from pets after a big rain, I don’t want to mention that that though.

          • acat

            they mostly affect river- and lake-based systems.

            The only thing wrong with the wells was that the aquifer was over igneous rock, so ..quite naturally .. the water ended up with traces of radium, barium, and a couple other negative-long-term-effects minerals.

            Mew

          • Doc Holliday

            my tap, and it said I was golden. Of course THEY could have infiltrated the testing kit business!

          • Menlo

            That’s one more reason its use should be stopped. It requires reverse osmosis or distillation. The installation, use, and maintenance of such systems would cost more than buying an equal amount of distilled water, which I do for drinking and cooking.

            I don’t believe it is good for the teeth or bones. If it is, it certainly does not need to be ingested. Fluoridated water today provides no benefit for anyone except the chemical companies. I do think it’s important though that people know the wrongfulness of its use and seek to support ending it wherever possible. It is not in ANY way an ethical position to support.

            As acat said, there may be worse in water and elsewhere. However, it’s far different when a chemical cannot be removed, is needed for safety, or is simply a preference in a commercially competitive market. It’s also different when something is more easily added than removed.

          • Doc Holliday

            I mean, people have a right to those germs, shouldn’t they get a choice?

          • acat

            I can tell you, from personal experience, that the name brands taste better than bargain bleach.

            Mew

          • snowshooze

            But as I understand it.. good for teeth, but embrittles bones thusly making them better for the breaking. Especially in Seniors.

          • acat

            It’s just that reverse osmosis filters are expensive, and distillation units, while they can be built pretty cheap, require lots of maintenance.

            Mew

          • Menlo

            I’m only in my 20′s and already have osteoporosis! As for the teeth, one key symptom of mild fluorosis is splotchy teeth.

          • Doc Holliday

            some water has less, some has more. They say French water has enough natural flouride. So I guess if you buy bottled water, stay away from Evian.

          • snowshooze

            Varies by Locale…or it would not be introduced.

          • acat

            I have, as I mentioned, my own dietary restrictions, as do the rest of my family.

            None of us have the same long-term prognosis, but without the federal food labeling guidelines – a rather statist thing – grocery shopping would be very challenging. In this case, I’ll take the statist position.

            In fluoridation of water, I’ll agree that it’s become routine, and that maybe it shouldn’t be. I’m not familiar with early-onset osteo, does it have a statistically significant link to fluoride?

            Mew

          • Menlo

            I’m underweight and have difficulty keeping it up much with my functional digestive discomforts.

            My opposition to fluoride is more an ethical concern than a personal one, although the mineral build-up in my water and plumbing was enough to turn me onto distilled.

          • acat

            mostly calcium and iron around here.

            Better than it was a decade ago – zebra mussels started congregating on the water intakes for the whole Chicago area. The females would lay their eggs, the males would fertilize the entire Chicago metro water supply…

            Then there’s Milwaukee, where they lowered the level of chlorine, in response to a similar “it doesn’t need to be there in that concentration” campaign.. and found that it does, in fact, need to be in that concentration to kill cryptosporidum… and if crypto isn’t killed, it will kill anyone with a suppressed immune system.

            Mew

          • Doc Holliday

            Zebra Mussells hmm? I am surprised they did not declare the water system a protected wildlife marsh.

          • pookieamos

            I watched him in Carolina [ I think ] it was awhile back . It was honestly the first time my heart felt hope that all may be OK . After watching his announcement I felt even more hope. Truly , all I could do was sit and smile while he talked . I feel he is truly a good man , he sounds warm and sincere , he is Reganeque , he has my vote. I love Palin and Bachman , I even feel good about Cain, but I’m afraid they will lose against Obama .The most important thing to do is to rid our White House of the usurper. Romney will be a Obamneylight , he won’t suit me, but I’d vote for the neighbors dog if he were running against Obama.Come on Nov. 2012 . Perry is the one hope we have. Perry – Bachman? Perry- Christie ? Perry – Rubio ? Now that would be a blast.

          • Toby Calvert-Lee

            When I watch Perry give a speech it just kind of makes me feel like it is “Morning in America” again. He is the one, no doubt about it. And all those tickets sound great

          • Toby Calvert-Lee

            that the most likely VP choice is Jindal. I’m not saying I agree with it, and I don’t necessarily think of him as a huge political asset, but Perry mentions him constantly, in a ver positive manner. He’s really the only other Governor Perry mentions favorably on a regular basis.

          • Menlo

            But I wasn’t about to consume something that was eating my toilet and coating my dishes in white film. It took a hard scrubbing with citric acid to save the dishes.

          • acat

            What you’re describing sounds like lime and calcium, and is probably contra-indicated for you. Not sure.

            The fluoride, though .. unless it’s in its’ acidic form, won’t eat your toilet, and if it is in its’ acidic form, it won’t coat your dishes, it’ll eat them too. Assuming, of course, your toilet and dishes are both ceramic.

            All that said, there are proven benefits (and proven downsides) to fluoridation, especially to children of unattentive parents. There are also health problems associated with adult cavities. I think the trade-off is a tolerable one, but am open to hearing – with statistics proving causality – that I am in error.

            Mew

          • Menlo

            I never attributed those problems to fluoride.

            I haven’t seen any evidence of benefits and still don’t believe they exist. We do know it is not needed for survival, like real nutrients are. Regardless, it should not matter. Clear, direct, and widespread evidence of harm beyond the existing and growing cases of fluorosis should not be necessary to convince rational people to stop the practice. The public water supply should not be used in an attempt to enhance anyone’s health. To do so is unethical, and it’s that simple. No other reasoning should be needed.

          • acat

            Specifically their Linus Pauling Institute.

            Please pay extra attention to the presence of fluoride in non-fluoridated foods like .. chicken.

            Also, please note that fluoride is sometimes used in the treatment of osteoporosis as it encourages increases in bone density.

            Mew

          • Menlo

            Public water is NOT an appropriate vehicle for that purpose.

          • Tbone

            Your bone condition has nothing to do with fluoride. As for your teeth, don’t drink so much beer that you fall down and knock them out.

            Honestly, I thought all the anti fluoride nutjobs from the 60s
            had died of old age by now.

          • acat

            Met a very pleasant (otherwise) young woman, would have been in the early ’90s, who refused to let her kids drink tap water. Juice boxes or milk only.

            “Do you know what they’re claiming is fluoride is actually aluminum?” …

            Mew

          • SoFiMil

            .

          • perry4prez

            The most important reason we need Governor Perry is that he is willing to TELL IT LIKE IT IS about libs and their love of socialism. I probably would of voted for Bachmann until Perry got in the race, and I like what she has to say, but Perry is so charismatic and reminds me of what Reagan must have been like.

            I cannot stand Mitt Romney, who wants to be compromiser-in-chief. He makes people like O’Bumbling and Kerry look like paragons of strength.

          • Toby Calvert-Lee

            No other candidate is quite so honest and forthright.

      • Scope

        for the nomination to begin with. In a 20 minute speech, Perry gave more information on his vision for the country, than Palin has done with her 3 years of soundbites. Granted she has been a great voice against Obama, but, does anyone even know where she stands on many of the serious issues facing the country. What is her position on immigration, what is her vision of foreign policy? The death panels was great, as well as some of her other soundbites, however, it is difficult to elect anyone on soundbites. Palin’s many facebook comments are great, but, after 3 years, what does she plan to do as president? I would love for someone to take all of her comments, and to put them all together to make a coherent policy on all that she has said. When Palin talks, it seems that everyone wants to analyze her statements, but those analyses always seem to be just the best guesses. Why won’t Palin just stop with the vagueness? Is there some ulterior motive to that vagueness? Palin has had at least three years to come forth with specific policy positions, yet her game seems to be to just keep everyone guessing. What is the attraction to that?

        • Toby Calvert-Lee

          Palin’s supporter’s claims that she will be a major force if she jumps in in 2012, but the fact of the matter is, she won’t. She has kind of become a little bit like Paul in that she would have a hard time energizing anyone but er core group of supporters, and I think if she jusmped in, she would probably poll at around 4%. On top of that, has anyone actually researched her governorship? How do we know she was a Conservative. We just for some reason accept that she is. I love her as a spokeswoman, and her endorsement will mean a lot, but she sure as h-e-double toothpicks ain’t gonna be President

          • rightwingmom52

            of laying out Palin’s record as governor.

            Here’s a link to a diary about the movie.

            here

            (I hope the link works. First attempt at making it html.)

        • snowshooze

          For what it is worth…

    • Toby Calvert-Lee

      Palin can’t be Vp. VP needs to be someone who is reliable and will tow the line of the top of the ticket. Palin can’t do that.

      • Finrod

        She did in 2008, despite McCain’s team stabbing her in the back.

        • Toby Calvert-Lee

          Palin refused to tow the line of mcCain, which for us Conservatives was a good thing due to our hatred of McCain, but in any normal ticket that would be potentially disastrous.

  • californiagold

    …the left continues to label Perry as a racist. If Rice was able to help the ticket gain a small percentage of the African American vote in places like North Carolina, Florida, etc…it could make the difference in winning or losing the election.

    • Toby Calvert-Lee

      A. Blacks are not the only race
      B. Obama is black

      The Hispanic vote is more obtainable than the black vote and we should make a play for that vote with someone like Rubio or martinez

      • mikeymike143

        go with allen west. or of course herman cain. both are much better choices than rice. and both have the added bonus of getting you much needed ”tea party suppport”. although i think the VP choice will be marco rubio if either perry or romney win. if bachmann wins i think she takes someone like perry to balance the ticket.

        • perry4prez

          Susana Martinez is an interesting choice for VP, what is her position on Immigration Reform?

          • Toby Calvert-Lee

            Actually it was her number one campaign theme, securing the border and being tough on illegal immigration.

        • perry4prez

          We need a VP who complements Governor Perry and is tight with the Tea Party. No Rice. She was an ally of Bush, who was a big government conservative, not a Constitutional conservative. I kind of like the idea of Bachman or Paul Ryan as VP.

          • Toby Calvert-Lee

            With them is that will be hated by the left, and we shouldn’t add someone else who is even more villifiedthan he is to the ticket….

  • izoneguy
  • Toby Calvert-Lee

    I think Perry is pretty good on everything. This is now another thing I can’t ding him on. He’s definately the greatest candidate out there

  • Toby Calvert-Lee

    this is the kind of answer that Romney needs to give on RomneyCare

  • Toby Calvert-Lee

    about Perry is he’s been against ethanol subsidies since before that was a “cool” position to take.

    http://blogs.desmoinesregister.com/dmr/index.php/2011/06/11/rick-perry-perfectly-clear-on-ethanol/

  • acat

    Good find, Toby.

    Mew

  • Scope

    that the only candidate that came out recently in support of ethanol subsidies is Romney, and he came in 7th in the straw poll, even behind Perry as a write-in. I wonder if the R Iowans are seeing the handwriting on the wall.

  • acat

    but of the realistic ones who are still in, yeah.

    Thing is, for the last couple decades – maybe since the Arab oil shocks of the ’70s – biofuels have been almost a given… but they haven’t proven economical.

    Time for them to end.

    Mew