Sorry Rachel Maddow, Fox News is News


On October 23rd Rachel Maddow took to the air explaining why, according to her, Fox News isn’t news.  She steered clear of the stereotypical reasoning, the reasoning espoused by President Obama, that Fox News is right leaning.  Recall that President Obama quipped that Fox News was operating as “talk radio,” a thinly veiled swipe at conservative discourse. Ms. Maddow took the position that Fox News is not news because of it’s supposed promotion of the “Tea Parties.”

After hearing her argument, I searched through my memory of the events.  As someone who watches Fox News (the channel most of the cable news audience chooses), I didn’t recall Fox News “promoting” the Tea Parties.  What I do recall were the outlets that Maddow still considers news choosing not to cover the Tea Parties and when they did the reports were obviously biased and deragatory.  Let’s not forget Janeane Garafolo’s tasteful label of anyone who disagrees with the President as “Teabaggers.”CNN’s Anderson Cooper apparently thought teabagging references were appropriate terms to use while covering the event.  That’s just good objective journalism.

Media Matters and the Huffington Post were quick to accuse Fox News of promoting the protests.  Looking back at the coverage, it seems that Fox News promoted their coverage of the events, not the Tea Parties themselves.  Media Matters declared that Fox News Contributor’s were listed as sponsors on TaxDayTeaParty.com.  The operative word here is contributor.  Not Fox News as a network, Fox News contributor. The only misstep that I could see was Glenn Beck’s call for Fox News viewers to join in and celebrate with Fox News.  Considering that Glenn Beck is on Fox News, and Fox News cameras would be there, it seems like at best Beck, who never claims to be a journalist (unlike Keith Olbermann), committed a simple slip of the tongue. Of course though, that can’t be the case, this is an example of evil right wing Fox News.

By this standard, is MSNBC to be held accountable for the antics of Keith Olbermann? Are they to be held accountable for Janeane Garofalo’s deplorable comments? What about MSNBC’s deep connections to GE? That doesn’t bode very well for responsible journalism. Why doesn’t President Obama compare MSNBC to left wing talk radio? Considering both Fox News and right wing talk radio have stellar ratings, MSNBC and left wing talk radio is the next logical comparison.

The Tea Parties were major events and large scale examples of Americans exercising their first amendment rights.  Shouldn’t this be covered by American media outlets? I would think that even Columbia J-School grads would concede that their job is to cover the news, even if the people involved are, gasp, right leaning.  Then again Sean Hannity was involved, and as we’ve learned from Columbia J-school students, Hannity and Fox News are crazy.

It seems that Ms. Maddow almost had it right.  If she would have chosen better sources than the Huffington Post, or maybe if she had actually watched the Fox News promotions, as well as her own stations’ coverage, she would have found that Fox News is in fact news.  News stations cover major events.  News stations don’t allow “comedians” to so crudely mock people who exercise a fundemental American right. It looks like Fox News is standing alone in a sea of media outlets that no longer have the benefit of the false consensus effect. The MSM now has to compete with a news organization that covers news that center right America wants to see.  When the left couldn’t compete in talk radio, they cried to the government.  Now that the MSM can’t compete with Fox News, they cry to the government and attempt to discredit Fox News for doing what they should be doing, covering the news.

Category: , , , , , , , , ,

RSS feed | Trackback URI

5 Comments Leave a comment

question....

dave_in_atl Thursday, October 29th at 10:46AM EDT (link)

Polling has shown that FOX news viewers vote 87% for the R presidential candidate while for CNN and MSNBC 65% and 63% respectively.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections2/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/news_you_watch_says_a_lot_about_how_you_ll_vote

Now in my personal opinion the only way the numbers can diverge so much between different news organisations is due to bias. This does not mean that FOX is the only biased news station, as I suspect the biased label can be applied to all 3 stations, but I would also note that 87% is pretty huge as far as polling is concerned that’s higher than the 82% of Evangelical voters that voted for the R candidate back in 2000.

Bias

cdyer88 Thursday, October 29th at 10:51AM EDT (link)

The reason why you see this is because before Fox News, there was no alternative voice. Republicans/conservatives/anyone non-liberal, had to be subject to the MSM’s bias. As to the split on CNN/MSNBC, I would argue that right leaning individuals, if this poll is correct, are more likely to switch between networks than say left leaning individuals who steer clear of Fox News due to the stigma placed on it by the MSM.

 

that really isn't much of an argument

Streiff Thursday, October 29th at 11:21AM EDT (link)

all the networks have news programming and opinion programming, though on the broadcast side it is pretty anemic.

All the numbers mean is that 1) more Rs than Ds watch cable news and 2) Fox has built a brand loyalty probably based on its opinion programming so their viewers watch their 6pm and 7pm new programs rather than changing channels.

When even CNN’s aging cheerleader Campbell Brown doesn’t buy the “Fox isn’t news” meme it is pretty sad to see others repeat it.

“A man does what he can and endures what he must.”

 

When will it end

Jack_Savage Thursday, October 29th at 12:53PM EDT (link)

“This does not mean that FOX is the only biased news station, as I suspect the biased label can be applied to all 3 stations…”

He’s not a brain surgeon, he just stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night.

Every time you post I wonder why you are still here. Wait, I think I know.

 

Probably the reason why those numbers are the way there are

Leopard1996 Thursday, October 29th at 6:48PM EDT (link)

IS the fact that the other stations MSNBC, CNN, the alphabet networks are inane douches that people like me don’t want to listen to. Not necessarily the “evil bias” that the pot keeps accusing the kettle of having.

“The accumluated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the whores and politicians will look up and shout, “Save Us!”….and I’ll look down and whisper, “No”…The Watchmen

 
 

Leave a Comment

 

Be respectful, or be banned. No Profanity.