« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Harvard Prof. Alan Dershowitz: Zimmerman Arrest Affidavit is ‘Irresponsible And Unethical’

Harvard Prof. Alan Dershowitz contends on MSNBC that the Arrest Affidavit that was filed against George Zimmerman is “Irresponsible and Unethical” because “everything in the affidavit is completely consistent with a defense of self-defense. Everything.”

He went on to make it very clear, that any objective observer should see that (Which excludes the vast majority of the mainstream media), this was political, not a sound common law decision by the  prosecutor Angela Corey , who just so happens to be up for reelection this year.  She kicked off her reelection campaign last December.

The heightened charge filed by Corey, murder two, has many legal analyst saying that no judge is going to let this pass on the evidence presented.

Richard Hornsby, who is a defense attorney in Florida, contends, “There’s a “high likelihood it could be dismissed by the judge even before the jury gets to hear the case,” and Karin Moore, who is one of the assistant professors of law at Florida A&M University, says that the law “puts a tremendous burden on the state to prove that it wasn’t self-defense.”  From the evidence that we have seen in the public, this is going to be next to impossible to do.

Even though Corey started off the news conference by trying to iterate that hey office does not make decisions based on politics or public pressure, if you listen to the speech she gave at the announcement of the charge, it sounded a lot like a campaign speech.  Whether or not she had meant to do this or not, no justice can be served when people are using the Martin family to advance a political agenda.

Prof. Alan Dershowitz commented on this very thing:

 “I think what you have here is an elected public official who made a campaign speech last night for reelection when she gave her presentation and overcharged. This case will not – if the evidence is no stronger than what appears in the probable cause affidavit – this case will result in an acquittal.”

One would hope that the prosecutor would not have charged Zimmerman with the full knowledge that the case would just be denied by the judge. But the media has not given the justice system the room is should have to decide whether charges should have been brought or not.  

Having said that, Prof. Dershowitz is right about including information that would have been favorable to the defendant in the affidavit “It’s irresponsible and unethical in not including material that favors the defendant” and “This affidavit does not even make it to probable cause.”

The whole situation has brought out the worst in some people.  We have members of the media who failed to ratiocinate in a way that would have avoided such a rush to judgment.  We are not yet sure of what other evidence the prosecution has that could possible refute what the evidence already points to, but judging by the constricted nature of the affidavit, one has to wonder if they really have anything but what has been advanced by those with the agenda.

The media was so quick to claim that Zimmerman was linked to this malefaction, that there is an overwhelming amount of pressure on this prosecutor to make something happen.  It is never good to judge a person in the media, and then allow private citizens with high emotional charged opinions to force something that the authorities originally thought was not provable.  It seems that manslaughter would have been the right charge to go for here, but as of now, it is still doubtful that charge would have stuck as well. 

The problem here is that it is going to be next to impossible to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Zimmerman did or did not engage Martin.  Even the eyewitnesses can only tell so much of the story, and on the original police report, eyewitnesses had placed Martin on top of Zimmerman, as well as the injuries that the shooter is said to have. If charges are not dismissed by the judge, it is hard to believe that a jury will find it without a doubt that Zimmerman was not in danger. The jury does not even have to believe Zimmerman, its whether they can say for sure that he was not in danger, the medical records will only exasperate this.

This is sad on so many levels; a young man who was looking forward to a life in college was killed.  The thing is, justice is not making someone pay for that death if they were indeed using self-defense.  Still no one knows for sure what happened, but every time new information comes out, the information starts to point towards Zimmerman telling the truth, at least about being attacked by Martin.

The country is going to have to hope those who are supporting each side in this can allow the justice to take hold, no matter which way the evidence points.  Prof. Dershowitz made it clear he does not see the prosecution having a lot more than what was released in the affidavit, because they would have never tried to pass off the flaccid document.  In addition, if there were talks of a plea bargain already, then that would indicate that the prosecution understands that they cannot win murder two.   

COMMENTS

  • westcoastpatriette

    Agree with everything Derschowitz said. And it is good to hear another attorney call out Corey on her unethical behavior. Since I am not an attorney, I would not have been able to discern the finer points that Dersch’ makes regarding the flimsy affidavit and the failure of Corey to include all the facts, but when Corey made her announcement, it sure seemed like grandstanding to me.

    • http://www.timothy-bladel.com/ center77

      because of fear of the racist charge. Even if the evidence points to Zimmerman being guilty, it does not exonerate the media for Pushing the race issue when the known facts said otherwise. Sharpton calling for civil disobedience was a bridge to nowhere, and he should have gotten the full blunted pushback from truth lovers.

  • Viet71

    Typical prosecutorial misconduct. Dershowitz is usually out to lunch, but he gets it right here. Probable cause, a very low bar, gets you an indictment. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt, a much higher bar, is needed for conviction.

    Zimmerman likely would win in court. The real questions are (a) how willing is he to stand up for himself and fight, and (b) how zealous and competent is his attorney?

    • http://www.timothy-bladel.com/ center77

      against him. From what I’ve seen so far, this was a self defense case that the media turned into murder two. This is bad news for society as a whole when Sharpton is so feared he gets his agitated way.

      • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

        http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/295997/martin-case-affidavit-andrew-c-mccarthy

        …and thx for posting this center’

        • demsaresatanic

          that must have been some party;
          http://www.redstate.com/uplateagain/2012/03/30/why-zimmerman-has-not-been-arrested/#comment-263
          These are trumped-up charges by a political hack designed to appease the mob.

    • edintexas

      And that is does Zimmerman have the money, or assets, to fund a decent defense? Recent estimates of the cost for a competent defense in a criminal trial (much less a homicide case?) come out at about $50,000.00 USD. Absent having cash, or the ability to sell assets, Zimmerman will need either a pro bono legal team, or a lot of contributions.

      And finally, I don’t see the possibility of finding a jury which doesn’t already have a pre-determined outcome in mind. The media has had far too much to do with this case for Zimmerman to receive a completely objective and fair jury trial.

  • norris

    Charged Zimmerman because she believed the grand jury would not. The rioters would have burned the town,if he was not charged.

  • Scope

    along with Police Chief Lee wanted a grand jury to decide if there was enough evidence to decide if Zimmerman should be indicted?

    Here is information put out by the City Manager of Sanford, in attempting to answer some questions with this case. Chief Lee said that they were PROHIBITED by Fla statute from arresting Zimmermen at the time of the incident because, on the scene he gave them a statement of self defense, which physical evidence and testimony supported.

    Isn’t it more than a little odd that the Martin’s lawyer, Benjamin Crump preferred that prosecutor Corey make the decision rather than going before a grand jury. Could it be that he/they knew there wasn’t enough evidence to convince a grand jury of probable cause?

    It may very well wind up with Angela Corey, in her zeal for re-election, to have Nifonged herself.

    • http://www.timothy-bladel.com/ center77

      It is extremely sad, our justice system was designed to stop this kind of thing, but Sharpton and his liberal cohorts scream racism until they get their way.

    • demsaresatanic

      because a grand jury would have told her to go to h. She deserves what Nifong got, but probably has better connections and will skate. Time will tell.

      • Scope

        Today there was an article on RCP by the race baiter Roland Martin. He literally is calling for the younger generation of blacks to stop being so selfish, and thinking only of themselves, and he puts out a call to the brothers to go back to the race riots, destruction and mayhem of the 1960′s. If his article wasn’t a call to arms for riots, I don’t know what else it could have been.

        Right below Roland Martin’s article was another one written by Victor Davis Hanson, where he talks about the intentional racial divide being promote by the black president, the black attorney general, and many many more on down the line. He rightfully suggests that as much anger as the black leaders have incited between the black and white racists, it has to a large degree also incited the white population into a state of anger at being called racists over and over, and they have also caused much anger within the white community.

        It is so very sad that the right is unwilling to take this issue on in a way as to disabuse the disgusting rhetoric which has no other purpose than to overload the race divide that has been so widely propagandized by the race baiters, all the way up to the presidency.

        Nothing will ever change until someone some where gets some guts to take on the black intimidation tactics being promoted by the president that never ever meant in the slightest to heal the divide. The divide has grown much deeper than the period before the first black president.

        • Scope

          the Trayvon Martin has nothing to do with “justice” “social justice” or “legal justice” it has everything to do with pushing an entitlement mentality for the blacks.

          I never owned a slave in my life. My grandparents never owned a slave, as they immigrated to the US from an Eastern European country, long after slavery was abolished.

          I love the politicians who cry about the financial position their children will be in with Obama’s financial policies. How about the generations to come that will still be held responsible for a slavery state that most living today had absolutely nothing to do with. How many more generations are going to be responsible for the reparations that the blacks continually seek, which no one alive today had anything to do with. Pigford was only the tip of the iceberg, I promise.

          • demsaresatanic

            as well.

        • demsaresatanic

          under Obama, Obama’s scapegoats are the rich Whites who only became rich on the backs of slaves. The Repub establishment’s stinging response is, naturally, to point out that Republicans freed the slaves, while ignoring completely the New Black Panther types.

          • Scope

            to bring the slave ownership of whites about a gazillion years ago into today’s discussion of what I have pointed out as “reparations” due to blacks that have never been any kind of slave in the last hundreds of years, that is other than the blacks that still have decided to live on the government plantation with government handouts, because they are going to collect their due, come hell or high water.

            What the hell is the problem with the current blacks anyway. It is the liberal/progrerssive agenda to keep them on the plantation. It will never stop, it will never stop, while we have a black president, a black Atty Gen who actually promotes that the blacks are still such horrible victims of the whites, and you know they “all” racially profile. Geez, I thought we are in a period of racial profilling of only those brown skinned hispanics. Holy crap, you mean to tell me we are still racially profiling the blacks?

            Something I read long ago, the blacks hate, detest, and abhor the hispanics because they were taking to many benefits away from the chosen race that were due their reparations.

            I am so sick of it all, and so should every citizen in this country. I swear that the race problems were minimal before Obama. Every society will never get rid of every racists. That will never happen.

          • APA Guy

            Voter intimidation…calls for bloodshed…death bounties…

            What we DON’T do is negotiate with terrorists…never have, never will.

  • Tbone

    May as well had Charlie Crist after all.

    • demsaresatanic

      if you want squish, why not go all out?

  • westcoastpatriette

    http://www.newsmax.com/US/NRA-TrayvonMartin-LaPierre-media/2012/04/14/id/435879?s=al&promo_code=EA80-1

    • snowshooze

      And I don’t think it is going to be pretty if he pulls that.

      • Scope

        There is a large majority that believe that Corey brought the charges she did, in order to stop the Fla. cities from burning, which Sharpton incited. Holder came out the other day with praising Sharpton for supporting the “cause” in the communities. Sharpton et al have been emboldened, as no one in the Obama administration has said the first peep against the Black Panther parties bounty on Zimmerman’s head. Do you really think that Sharpton will stop at the Martin incident. No way, no how. Sharpton’s job is to cross the nation, with his message that blacks have been treated so very badly, even after the civil rights act, and even after affirmative action programs. Sharpton’s message isn’t for “justice” his message is more along the lines of “just us.”

        This all will hurt Obama badly if it escalates. Last I heard the black population, which 97% support Obama, make up around 14% of the population.

        • snowshooze

          I hadn’t considered it in those terms.
          Work… meaning Obama getting elected?
          Well, Obama is attacking from several angles.
          It will work to further divide the Nation. The damage may never be undone.
          Would he try it? In many ways, I believe he already is.
          At present, as you say, he has said nothing to stop possible escallation, and he has only stuck a toe in so far as being involved.

          I think that is where he stops. Right at the line.
          Sit back and let others get their hands dirty after having hinted which direction to proceed.

          • littlehouse18

            of using a private citizen for their own ends, even to the point of ruining a young man’s life and depriving him of his freedom and peace of mind. He’s just a pawn to them, and a registered Democrat at that! Just think how easy it is for them to toy with our healthcare!

        • snowshooze

          This is what concerns me.
          He can play the game without getting his feet wet.
          This would really get Sharpton & Co. going.

        • littlehouse18

          and were thinking of just staying home, to take away a crucial 1-2 percent of The One’s vote. This whole episode is an attempt to enrage them enough to bring them back on board.

          • checkmate2012

            a real bone to pick with this prez. He has not even tried to pretend to empathize with the plight of those in inner-cities even in Chicago with massive crime by giving a speech or a visit. He’s above that even as a black leader that might make a difference or to ask for calm in Stanford. Just when he had a chance to lower the racial rhetoric he took a drive-by swipe like Snowshoe said and let others to his dirty work.

            His true color is he’s an elitist as seen by the rich, mostly white, Hollywood set he surrounds himself with and other millionaires. And look at his campaign staff.

            I for one think that many black Americans are onto his gimmicks and see he doesn’t come close to representing their interest but will use them as pawns in his political thuggery like he does with anyone that disagrees with him. What an ego he has!

        • http://www.timothy-bladel.com/ center77

          if he doesn’t handle it with delicacy. I suspect Sharpton wants to force Obama tortoise a side, between freedom lovers or social justice.

        • demsaresatanic

          it escalates, but the repub establishment is already running for the hills and it probably will not escalate much. The House should be holding hearings already on why the Obama admin is not investigating the New Black Panther Chess Club for incitement to kidnap/murder, for dismissing the voter intimidation case against them, and so on. This is what repubs should be going after instead of esoteric things like Buffet rules, which the average Joe probably thinks is a good idea anyway.

          Average Joe understands incitement to violence by the New Black Panthers; average Joe understands baseball bats outside polling places wielded by the New Black Panthers. But, of course, since when does the Washington establishment understand the average Joe.

  • Scope

    A 12 year old killed his younger brother. When the 12 year old called his mother to tell her what he did, the mother apparently didn’t get immediate medical attention for the 2 year old. Angela Corey decided to prosecute the 12 year old as an adult, including charges of pre-mediation and wants life in prison for the 12 year old. Is a 12 year old even at puberty yet?

    So a 12 year old who can’t vote, drink alcohol, serve in the military, or make the choice to quit school, is suddenly considered an adult who planned his brother’s murder, and is so evil that Corey sees no hope in any rehabilitation for the youngster. There is something wrong with putting a 12 year old in the adult prison population isn’t there?

    • snowshooze

      Gads.
      Glad I have nothing to do with any of that mess.

    • http://www.timothy-bladel.com/ center77

      I suspect it is not as simple as him being 12. I really don’t know about her, she has made it clear she cares about the election more than she does about the truth.

  • 6eorge Jetson

    Let me raise a highly unlikely scenario but one within the realm of possibility…

    Let’s say the case gets dismissed by the judge based on what we know today. Then let me imagine a wild scenario in which someone with a home in view of the scene comes back from a two month hike in the mountains away from civilization. Oh, and he/she happens to have a night vision monitoring system. Which shows Zimmerman to have killed Martin & manufactured his own injuries as a coverup.

    In this lotto-likelihood scenario, might Zimmerman be in the clear based on some form of double jeopardy? Because the special prosecution didn’t follow ethical practices?

    • Scope

      to weigh in on a wild arsed conspiracy theory that approaches that of the 911 truthers? Within the real of possibility? Probably not. Geez.

      • 6eorge Jetson

        My post is about the unintended consequences of playing Mike Nifong.

        At the beginning of the Duke lacrosse incident, did anyone foresee Nifong having the affair blow up so badly that he would be disbarred and bankrupt?

        Take the prosecutor’s disregard for due process in another direction if you will.

    • Viet71

      The Fifth Amendment prohibits double jeopardy.

      In the case of a jury trial, jeopardy attaches when the jury is empaneled. In the case of a bench trial, jeopardy attaches when the first witness is sworn.

      Given your set of facts, as I read them, Zimmerman could be tried — no double jeopardy — unless the judge started taking witness testimony before dismissing.

      Good law school exam type question.

      • 6eorge Jetson

        nt

      • edintexas

        I don’t know FL law, but under most circumstances if the Judge dismissed “with prejudice”, the charges can’t be brought again. I could be wrong, but I think the Holder US DoJ Civil Rights Division will bring charges against Zimmerman no matter what transpires in state courts.

    • http://www.timothy-bladel.com/ center77

      on thing, but I suspect if the video is like you say,then they can come with a new charge, such as Murder 1

      • Scope

        From my understanding, even if Casey Anthony comes out now and says that she in fact OD’d her daughter on drugs, and locked her in the trunk of her car, she cannot be tried again for the murder of her daughter. A jury of her peers already determined her to be innocent of everything except lying to the police.

        You had posted the Dershowitz argument about the Probable Cause Affidavit being “thin gruel” and I ask that you read another analysis which goes paragraph by paragraph in analyzing the document. I have no idea who the author is, but, it seems to be a reasonable analysis, which also backs up the Dershowitz claims against the document. If there is something amiss in the analysis, I’m sure the resident attorney’s will add their opinions.

        I’ve been listening to the Fox legal contributors speaking about the Zimmerman case. Today there were two legal people, one from Fla. who said that the SYG law sounds good in theory, but it allows some murderers to walk free based on the law. They both agreed that the case will never be dismissed on a SYG basis because the entire case has been so “politicized.” The fact that the SYG law is still very much in effect in Fla. has nothing to do with the spin from a legal beagle saying that it only works in theory. It is the current law. So, the case has been so politicized, and that makes Zimmerman automatically guilty because of politics?

        There is another good article at Big Journalism today which highlights the fact that a black college professor, and obvious race hustler, has asked that Trayvon Martins mother to get off the stage. By her inadvertent statements, such as her believing that the whole thing was an accident, she is destroying the race baiters case that they have very successfully brought forward. The guy literally tells her to shut up and get off the stage, and just let him, Sharpton et all to move it forward. Obviously the guy has no care at all for Trayvon, or his mother, he just knows she is too damn dumb to let them move forward with the racial issues. Go over there and read it, it is fascinating.

        Another thing you can look up is the requirements for a Probable Cause Affidavit, according to the laws and previously passed SC cases pertaining what the document “must” include. The document is a sham. But, Angela Corey does say at the end that she has more evidence. From my reading- “An insufficient affidavit cannot be rehabilitated after issuance concerning information possessed by the affiant but not disclosed to the magistrate. Whitley v. Warden. 401 U.S. 560 (1971).

        Isn’t Corey withholding information from the defense?

        • http://www.timothy-bladel.com/ center77

          My father in law is a judge, and I asked him because I was not sure, and that’s what he said, that because a case is dismissed, most often that means if more evidence surfaces the prosecution can recharge.

          I think that makes sense, there seems to be a distinction.

          As for the affidavit, it does not Merion Zimmermann injuries, that’s what is unethical about it. A good judge will demand more, and if our court allows this, they are setting a scary precedent.

  • checkmate2012

    is the State knows they have no case, took it away from the grand jury, made an overstretch and unprovable charge, knowing it would lower the heat with an arrest, and knowing Zimmerman probably did react in self-defense and therefore will be found innocent.

    The political interests of the special prosecutor don’t work in this case except she was brave and tried her best for a strong conviction. I’d take a bench trial if I were Zimmerman as no jury will aquit even if the evidence is in his favor.

    • westcoastpatriette

      Overcharging was the only way to prevent massive riots and unrest. And if that is the case, all they have done is prolonged the inevitable because the same rabble-rowsers will explode when the charges are dropped anyway. Time for the race-baiters to accept that self-defense is legal when one’s life is in imminent danger.

      • avagreen

        I’m more than ready to have the rabble-rousing race-baiters fall on their collective faces.

        I have a deep and personal dislike of “Reverend” Sharpton who wouldn’t have a job unless he could push this hate mentality.

        • checkmate2012

          to the point of bounties and putting themselves back on the MSM map. Oops, correction, Sharpton has his own show and filmed himself being outraged! What a farce.

      • checkmate2012

        Glad I’m not the only one that has this view and although I posted it as a “conspiracy theory” vs. the far-fetched one from George Jetson, it is a likely theory after watching the special prosecutor in front of the cameras. Phew! Let’s pray for peace now and after a verdict and I do want justice to serve all in this case.

        • avagreen

          that a crook can think of.

          I’m sure as rain that he will try to use riots to obtain his desires. And, if we fight among ourselves, more power to him will be the result. We must unite to fight him

          And, prayers will go a long way to help us in this fight against this anti-Christian and power-hungry viewpoint that has American and D.C. in its present day grip. .

          We won several major battles during WWII on “flukes” or “good luck”……could have just as easily gone the other way. To this Christian, we had God on our side to help us win. We need that now.

          • snowshooze

            But balancing that, there is so much on the big Zero…hopefully if Romney is nominated he won’t play softball like McCain.
            McCain defeated himself.

        • 6eorge Jetson

          *The prosecutor doesn’t follow the evidence but rather manipulates the situation for the present political environment

          *An unexpected event reveals itself in future

          *Not following the evidence leads to an ironic outcome

          You’re a move behind, Checkmate.

    • http://www.timothy-bladel.com/ center77

      that’s why Sharpton and his friends cheered and started saying this was all about the arrest and that the first prosecutor wasn’t going to charge.

      • 6eorge Jetson

        and I have no reason not to believe him, then no matter what the special prosecutor intended, she has put some serious pressure on the judge to do the right thing.

        The judge won’t be sitting in a Harvard Law colloquium afterward.

  • northeastred

    rally around Zimmerman as some GOP cause. This guy is a wife beater/cop assaulter and he’s going to blow up in our faces. He’s a thug who knows how to construct a story of Standing his Ground because he hunted down a suspicious black kid and got his ass kicked before turning the gun on the kid.

    This reminds me of Sean Penn and other Hollywood libs vouching for cop killers on death row. Great, you stopped a death sentence, but you are still talking about a cop killer. Let’s not make the same mistake. Freeing George Zimmerman is nothing to gloat about. Just look at his arrest record. Lets leave these guys to the liberals.

    • http://www.timothy-bladel.com/ center77

      at least I’m not. I’m rallying around the truth. Having an arrest record does not make a person bad. As a Christian, I believe people change. Heck, I’ve changed. In the last 3 years I’ve gone form being a young punk drug abuser to a full throated Christian /undergraduate. All through high school I just got by. After I didn’t even think college was necessary, but I got involved in politics and decided I had to go to school. Believe or not I’m holding a 4.0 after 2 1/2 years. Taking a double major, and working my butt off.

      Glenn Beck changed his life to become a successful Radeo/talk show personality. My god, how many other successful Christ centered transformations have happen.

      My point is that looking at an arrest record is a cheap way to judge someone, and this situation is much bigger than Zimmerman. The left is attempting to use this strategy to push big government, They want White guilt to kick in, and they want to rally the left.

      This is about the truth, and not allowing the media to define it for their own agenda.

      This is about stopping the mob the supporting agitator form dictating what our justice system does. The truth matters.

      • APA Guy

        The rule of law will decide this, not the New Black Panthers. That is the only cause I am rallying behind.

      • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

        says DeVine Law et al…smile

        • Dave_A

          Which brings me back to where I’ve been so far…

          The evidence released to the public so far is so limited that there are just as many ways Zim could be guilty of an unlawful killing of some sort (since we have so many different kinds of ‘you killed someone’ charges) as there are ways he’s guilty of nothing….

          I have enough faith in our system, to believe that Zim will get a fair trial.

          I also hope that the trial produces a clear verdic, one way or another – if not, we’ll be hearing about this forever….

  • Scope

    of Seminole State College, where he was a student. The college kicked him out even before the charges were brought against him, and the reason was “due to the highly charged nature and high profile controversy” surrounding the case. As everyone knows Zimmerman was in hiding for the last several weeks, and I doubt he was attending his classes, yet they still kicked him out of the school.

    I can only hope and pray that Zimmerman’s attorney is very aggressive in defending him. When/if Zimmerman is found not guilty, I hope he sues everyone who helped to add to the public lynching of a person who is supposed to be innocent until proven guilty.

    The Florida SYG laws are still very much on the books. The Gov. said they are “reviewing” the law, but Zimmerman has every right to due process of the law which includes the SYG Statute. That cannot be arbitrarily thrown out by those that have fallen on their knees, and licked the boots of the race baiters, Al Sharpton being only one of them.

    Every citizen in this country should be in fear of black intimidation, and the lack of any leadership among the elected public officials to stand up for every citizens rights. Last I checked, public lynchings and putting bounties on innocent until proven guilty citizens, is against the entire legal system in this country. There is no freedom or “justice” in what has taken place in Fla.

    • http://www.timothy-bladel.com/ center77

      and what more, its c,ear that the media on the right is scared to take this case head on. I stated that we know the media has pushed the narrative without evidence, or with evidence to prove the opposite. So whether he is found guilty or not,the media is still guilty of convicted him without dew process. Now lets say the evidence shows he is guilty, that does not change how the media has acted in this case. Everything as on now points to self defense. Zimmermann have to prove he acted in self defense to the world after this, and how does he do that.

      • Dave_A

        At least in the states without SYG, it’s an affirmative defense – eg, you have to prove you acted in self-defense in order to be found not guilty.

        Florida’s SYG changes that a little – but only if the case is clear-cut enough that the judge will dismiss on SYG grounds.

        Zimmerman’s case isn’t (due to conflicting witness statements, the phone call, and so on), and because the judge declined to dismiss due to SYG, he’s back where he would have been anywhere else – having to prove he acted in reasonable self defense.

        As for the affidavit being weak, given what we know about the evidence, that’s to be expected. We’ll see if the *case* is weak, when it goes to trial.