« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Liberal Patent #2231134: Suing Somebody So You Can Break More Laws

Today in news, a rancher in Arizona is being sued for actually enforcing the law by illegals who, what else, are trying to across the border illegally.  The Mexican nationals are suing Roger Barnett for 32 million dollars, because they were held captive at gunpoint by Barnett with his big dog.  Barnett began to round up illegals trespassing on his property since 1998, shortly after they killed his calves, destroyed his property, and broke into his home.

This kind of story breaks my heart, because here is somebody who tried to obey law and actually did his part in enforcing law on his property.  The illegals should be thankful that this rancher did not shoot them on sight, he’s well within his right do that.  Though, I can only imagine the kind of outrage liberals and media would have if he did that, he would be immediately arrested on the charge of first degree murder and lose his property.

But what is truly outrageous is that there are some people who actually believe that suing somebody in court means it’s okay to break more laws.  I wouldn’t be surprised if the illegals in this case probably thought, “I’m doing the jobs no American wants to do, you should be thankful for me.  Just because I’m entering illegally doesn’t mean I’ll break every law in book.  Wake up and smell coffee!”  No kidding, Sherlock!  The point isn’t whether you’ll be following law once you cross the border, but that you broke law by illegally entering the United States.  I don’t care if you are indeed a hardworking person, you broke law and you should pay the price, not Barnett or any other rancher for that matter, period.

Liberals have this weird mentality that some laws are meant to be broken, and we should overlook some of moral flaws on part of people like…tax cheats in Daschle and Geithner, not to mention the husband of Hilda Solis (it’s impossible for her not to know about the tax liens).  You know, it’s funny that the liberals went after Joe the Plumber for his tax troubles, but all of a sudden, fell silent on Daschle, Geithner, and Solis.  I guess it’s just not only okay to sue so that you can break laws, but as long you’re a registered Democrat and a bona fide liberal, it’s okay not to pay taxes at all if you’re not being nominated for Cabinet positions.  But I digress.

In Washington Times article, Barnett acknowledged that over a span of ten years, he stopped over 12,000 illegals.  That’s an average of 3 or 4 per day, nonstop. 

It also said Mr. Barnett acknowledged that he had turned over 12,000 illegal immigrants to the Border Patrol since 1998.

Can you imagine walking out on patrol with a gun in your hand on Christmas Day or even Thanksgiving Day?  No rest for this guy, and really, he should get a medal or something like that.  He could simply moved out of there, but he choose to stay there.  What concerns me the most is the fact the border is increasingly getting more dangerous as Mexico starts to lose control of its government and law enforcement agencies with the rise of deadly drug cartels with highly trained grunts killing each other in power grab plays.

If the illegals win the case, $32 million could buy a lot of weapons and ammunitions, not to mention drugs.  Not all illegals enter the US in order to earn more money, some of them are here for illegal reasons: terrorists, drugs, arms smugglers, and perhaps even sex trafficking.  In addition, it could mean ranchers like Barnett will be stymied in doing something about the illegals.  With President Obama in power, it’s unlikely he or people in  his administration will be friendly toward guys like Barnett or border patrol agents doing their jobs too well.  It’s a wet dream come true for many illegals, which is disgusting to say at least.

It’s really amazing that Barnett hasn’t sued Mexico yet for the wanton desctruction left behind by illegals.  He pays out of his pockets to repair the damage done to his property, expecting nothing in return from “hardworking” illegals.  He’s the real victim here, and nobody at top level in government is doing anything about it. 

“This is my land. I´m the victim here,” Mr. Barnett said. “When someone´s home and loved ones are in jeopardy and the government seemingly can´t do anything about it, I feel justified in taking matters into my own hands. And I always watch my back.”

And it’s more unfortuante for victims, because let’s face it, criminals have more rights than them.  The criminals get due process to be determined guilty or innocent, on the other hand, victims don’t have this luxury when they face somebody violating their personal space and taking away the peace of mind from them.

Always remember this: liberals are only interested in you if you agree with their liberal philosophy or if you do so much as looking down on them, you’ll get the special treatment.  You get that when, God forbid, you actually follow law, and people so favored by liberals suffer mentally and physically by being forced to comply with (gasp!) law.  Only liberals and illegals get preferred treatment, while everybody else not in their camp get special treatment.  Always remember that!  Always.

Cross-posted at Deaf Conservative’s Domain blog.

COMMENTS

  • Pingback: Lane Reindeau

  • Pingback: Carletta Snaples

  • Pingback: Shandra Sago

  • Pingback: Automobile Forum

  • Pingback: Welcome to My Blog

  • Pingback: Reverse Number Lookup

  • Pingback: home water distillers

  • Pingback: odszukaj milosc swego zycia

  • Pingback: milosc w tarnowie

  • Pingback: serwis randkowy

  • Pingback: serwis randkowy

  • Pingback: darmowa strona z randkami

  • Pingback: steel strapping

  • Pingback: darmowa strona z randkami

  • Pingback: stencil art

  • Pingback: corporate events in italy

  • Pingback: Network

  • Pingback: Have A Peek At These Guys

  • Pingback: Hop Over To Here

  • Pingback: Try This Out

  • Pingback: Sink for sale

  • Pingback: property in delhi

  • Pingback: madam lux

  • Pingback: desain interior rumah

  • Pingback: jobs working from home uk

  • Pingback: biaya bangun rumah

  • Pingback: Ruben Vossen

  • Pingback: Rayna Milosevic

  • Pingback: Store Display Installations

  • Pingback: Amos Fraschilla

  • Pingback: aloe vera juice for hair

  • Pingback: cv

  • Pingback: cv wzór

  • Pingback: Annett Blowe

  • Pingback: webhosting

  • Pingback: sofy rozkładane

  • Pingback: John Markin

  • Pingback: John Markin

  • Pingback: green coffee extract for weight loss

  • Pingback: distilling vodka

  • Pingback: weight loss

  • Pingback: search by phone number

  • Pingback: John Markin

  • Pingback: home distilleries

  • Pingback: แทงบอล

  • Pingback: Teichfolie

  • Pingback: Automotive Forum

  • Pingback: kids bikes

  • Pingback: Mining Technology

  • Pingback: Welcome to My Blog

  • Pingback: randka

  • larueladue

    Don’t you have to be a citizen to sue someone in civil court? They have no legal status in this country.

  • woodsman

    “who accuse him of conspiring to violate their civil rights”.

    I read this article earlier in the day and it instantly caused a verbal reaction, which would get me banned from RedState.

    Illegal aliens who have civil rights? This is tantamount to the same thing as saying terrorists have the same rights as an American citizen!

    This is the result of PC thinking liberals who brought us Jimmy Carter and now Pres. Obama and the other tinfoil wearing moonbats.

    Were will the insanity end?

  • larueladue
  • Cheetah772

    And that is more than enough for me to type out an angry dairy on the illegals and unfortuante ranchers who have to enforce law by taking matters in their own hands.

    The illegals may have no legal standing, but what bothers me greatly is their mentality. In long term, their mentality is far more dangerous, as they view the land in southwestern USA as illegally seized by US after Mexico lost the war. Never mind the fact it was won fair and square, that’s hardly the issue to most illegals. They actually believe that they’re entitled to entering the US illegally simply because they’re doing the jobs no American wants to do.

    That kind of mentality needs to be countered somehow.

    By the way, thanks for the recommand, I appreciate it!

  • olsmithie

    ambulance chasing attorney will make. You don’t think these peasants went out and found and hired a lawyer on their own.

    Where do we send the defense fund money?

    Regards

  • larueladue
  • Skanderbeg

    Actually, this U.S. Patent is “Shoe Repair Finishing Machine” – filed May 18, 1938 by, and issued February 11, 1941 to, Lorenzo Marchetta and Thomas L. White of Youngstown, Ohio….

  • Cheetah772
  • woodsman

    the previous post should say ” burned my butt” to be perfectly clear.

  • gregm

    Is the pooch a co-defendant?

  • izoneguy

    A real war with flying bullets is already erupting among the Mexican drug gangs. I can see it already. The illegals win and millions come streaming across the border. I think I will renounce my American citizenship. Move to Mexico and then cross the border and sue for $50 Million.

  • http://www.phxgonline.com phxg

    But here is the rub, “because here is somebody who tried to obey law and actually did his part in enforcing law on his property.”

    Barnett who is well known in the anti-illegal circles here and is seen as having more radical ideals in enforcement. There is no doubt that this guy is living a life of hell, but legally, you can not pull guns out, even in AZ, for trespassing; illegal or not.

    He’s had a pass for many years by the local sheriff which has emboldened his activities. But private citizens, even protecting their property out literally in the middle of no where are still bound by the law.

    Don’t misunderstand, I am 100% against illegal immigration. However, it was just a matter of time before some pro-immigration group took up legal action on Barnett. And unfortunately, he is not likely on the winning side of this.

  • mbecker908
  • gregm

    It’s my understanding that this guy is wandering around his own ranch carrying a rifle, which is perfectly legal. Heck, I’ve done the same on my mother’s mini-ranch. He’s not wandering around town pulling a gun on suspected illegal immigrants.

    If carrying the rifle were illegal he’d be criminally prosecuted not sued in some silly civil action.

  • http://www.phxgonline.com phxg

    If, as Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF) asserts is fact that Mr. Barnett did point his weapon at the illegals, without provocation under immediate potential for bodily injury, then he has under ARS 13-401~419 violated the law.

    It of course is discretionary for the local sheriff to find he violated the law. Like I said, the sheriff there is lenient on “aggressive” use of personal protection. Something I agree with, as down in that part of AZ it really is the old west. It’s truly unfortunate that Mr. Barnett has been subjected to this asinine treatment and invasion of his private property, but like I said; it was just a matter of time.

    If you look at MALDEF, it is a group of Anti-America pro illegal immigration zealots. They use the 14th Amendment frequently to push their agenda, which is accepted by the liberal judges who accept their premise.