« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Why Do Over 90% of Blacks Still Support Obama?

Why do over 90% of blacks still support Obama? In a June 2010 article from Medhill Report out of Northwestern University in Chicago, we learn some interesting though not surprising opinions regarding this phenomena:

“For so long, we’ve heard ‘we black, we this, we can’t rise above, can’t get a job,’” said Thomas, who has worked to help black families in Garfield Park for the last 10 years. “But it can be done, it’s proven. Look at Obama. Look at what he did.”
“It’s about job security with me,” said Billy Avery, a letter carrier for 25 years. “I have a feeling that Obama, who came from nothing, will have my back when times get hard. So I bring that to work with me.”
Lang said an Obama administration is capable of the same types of social changes put forth by Presidents Franklin Delano Roosevelt, John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson.
“He doesn’t have to do anything for me,” she said. “He’s already done so much for African-Americans by just being elected. But he will do what he promised for the nation. He’s a hard worker and he’ll have help.”
“I work with kids who sometimes feel as though hope is lost or that things will not change in their communities,” said Lenore, who also coaches North Lawndale’s baseball and bowling teams. “Barack came from similar situations as these kids, not having his father around. My students can now say, ‘somebody that looks just like me can have the highest office.’”
“Any African-American can make it as long as they put their mind to it,” said Darrius Caston, an 18-year-old senior.
“If Obama can become the president, I can do my homework and I can handle school,” Stewart said.
To Lenore, an Obama presidency can change perceptions and realities in a struggling neighborhood like North Lawndale.

What these and other statements I’ve heard say to me is that Obama does not have to do anything at all to change things for the better and it does not matter if in actuality he changes things for the worse–the fact that he got elected–that he is a black figurehead is all he has to do for this population. If the black face on the television and in the news says inspiring things, looks and acts the part, it is enough of an incentive to garner black American support. Only 11% after almost two years of destruction of our constitution can see the danger in this man. Perception and impression are hard icons to break down it would seem. And, the belief that government must “do something for us” has deep roots in the community.

On the other hand, what would be some signs that the mystic is beginning to crack or fade? What would it take to shake the foundation on which this group stands?
Doug McAdam is a sociology professor and director of urban studies at Stanford University. He said the optimism created by Obama’s campaign could fall flat if his administration is unsuccessful in delivering policy change or economic improvement.

“There’s a real potential for disillusionment or renewed despair two years into his administration,” McAdam said. “And beyond this disillusionment, it’s possible down the road for many to call for the end to programs such as affirmative action because Obama’s in office.”

But the fact that the seeds of economic destruction have already been planted and in many cases born fruit and promulgated does not seem to have sunken in. For the past half century a Democratic presidential candidate has been guaranteed an automatic 85 to 90 percent of the black vote. This stands in stark contrast to rampant evidence that Democrats have sought for this same amount of time to keep minorities in poverty and in need purely for the sake of Democrat votes and power. The left, who has hijacked the Democrat party, seeks to do the same to the Hispanic population in this country. The destruction of the black family is a prelude to what will happen to the now strong and hard working Hispanic family institution. Case in point is the recent failure of the voucher system which sought to raise minority children out of failing public schools. It was the Democrat supported unions that kept this vote from going forward.

The Republican party has done more for the black population and family than the Democrat party has ever promised to do (and has not done). The lip-service and media hype for the left gives the “appearance” of helping the downtrodden but in actuality keeps minorities and the poor subjugated for its own gain. From Black-and-Right Blog:

“…this is what happens when blacks blindly give their support to a party that has to be reminded every two years not to take it for granted. Obama Democrats, too, believe they have the black vote locked and now can devote the rest of their time using the usual race-baiting tactics aimed at illegal Latinos.”

It is true that the GOP is FOR ALL Americans but you would never know it by listening to Michael Steele the supposed head of this party.
“You really don’t have a reason to {vote Republican}, to be honest — we haven’t done a very good job of really giving you one. True? True,” Republican National Chairman Michael Steele told 200 DePaul University students Tuesday night.
Duane Lester, the author of this April 2010 article in American Blogger, states quite plainly what Steele should have said but didn’t:
1. Black Americans should vote Republican because we know the economic policies of the Democratic party hurt your demographic especially hard. Consider the minimum wage. When it is raised, young black Americans face higher unemployment rates than other demographics.
2. Black Americans should vote for Republicans because the policies of the Democrat party have destroyed the black family. Look at what Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society has done to the black family. It’s in ruins. It wasn’t Republicans that did that. It was Democrats.
3. Black Americans should vote for Republicans not because of what Republicans will do for black Americans but because we stand for all Americans. We don’t differentiate between races or religions. We don’t believe in group or identity politics. To the Republican party, it’s about protecting the liberties of all Americans equally.

And this protection extends to Latinos, blacks and ALL Americans. But blacks and Latinos may find themselves in opposition to each other helped, in part, by the vote-getting maneuvering by the Democrat Party: From Black-and-Right:

Blacks are not impressed by the law-breaking, self-inflicted adversity suffered by illegal aliens, in fact some are downright hostile. All one need to and look at the make up of South Central Los Angeles, formerly the black community.

It is brown and the Latinos there have been quite public with their intent to drive blacks out. Peacefully by breeding, violent if necessary.
With the latest crisis that can’t go to waste, the Obama Administration is now using the Arizona immigration law to codify the Latino vote against Republicans in an attempt to save the Democrat majority. I guess one could say it’s ironic that the same party that excused its own segregationist past by revising the intent of the ‘Southern Strategy’, has now implemented its own.

It does so at its own peril.

More from Black-and-Right:
Obviously, the Republican position closely mirrors theirs {blacks} on principle (and self-preservation grounds), but after decades of using race to slander them for political gain, it’s going to be very hard to now have to side with them. They will need to.

And from Reginald Kaigler (Demcad’s Corner):
What has this guy actually done?

He hasn’t changed anything that really matters. If I had to listen to black people praise this clown, they’re going to have to listen to me point out the fact he hasn’t changed a DAMN THING!

I’m not mad at black people and I know that some of us see him for who he is. I just want my people to WAKE THE F&%# UP!

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • avgjo

    Look at Juan Williams on FNC – I used to respect him a lot even though he’s a lib. I always thought he was at least an honest lib. After Obama got elected, he has gone completely over the edge. If you haven’t seen him in say, the last year, check him out on O’Reilly or Hannity. The contortions he goes through to defend Obama are embarrassing; a man that intelligent knows better than that.

    I guess to some degree I understand it; blacks in this country have been exposed to the ‘whites don’t like blacks’ and ‘whites look down on blacks’ memes for so long, that probably most of them buy this claptrap to some extent. So they feel some obligation to support Obama and defend him. My experience bears this out; I have known many fine black people who are conservative as you and me, esp. on social issues; but sadly, when it comes to a situation where there is confrontation between black and white, far too many of them take the black side automatically. When I’ve asked them about it, they talk about such-and-such case where an idiot (white) cop or boss did something/said something stupid and really racist. (I’m of mixed heritage, dad’s white and mom’s mexican-american, and from an early age i noticed some differences, culturally between the both sides. I guess this made me sensitive to cultural differences.) I’ve pointed out to them that there is racism from certain black people towards whites, but that doesn’t mean that black people as a rule are racist. This often catches them off-guard. I even had one person tell me ‘black people can’t be racist’. Apparently, in the liberal narrative of racism it is implicit that racism is an institution peculiar to whites.

    Another thing from my experience is interesting; the older black folks who actually had to experience institutionalized race are the most balanced and least likely to defend wrong on any side. I really believe the fact that they saw racism first hand, and didn’t get an second hand account of it from a race baiter like sharpton or jackson, gives them a firm grip on reality; they know what real racism looks like when they see it. So they will not attribute racism where it doesn’t belong. that frees them up intellectually and emotionally to make a rational decision. And I’ve noticed that when a race baiter like Jesse Jackson comes up in conversation, these older black folks are the most strongly critical of him.

    It’s a shame that these people are not influencing the black community. If they were, you’d see a drastic drop in black crime, a dramatic increase in black education and a reverse of the break-up of the black family.

    maybe i opened a can of worms here. but it needed to be said. America’s single greatest problem right now is that part of the population thinks it has a right to not be offended (let me be clear; this extends to people of all races) and the other part doesn’t want to be the bad guy who speaks the truth. i’m tired of seeing my country go down the tubes because of this, so i won’t participate anymore. if it gets me banned, beaten or killed, so be it.

    • indyjohn

      believe that the federal government has historically been a force for good in their lives, despite substantial evidence to the contrary. Barack Obama is the chief spokesman for big, activist, centralized government. Ergo, Barack Obama is a force for good. The fact that he has cafe au lait-colored skin is just a bonus.

  • renny

    That Republicans freed the slaves, went to war to keep the US united and stop slavery, passed amendments and legislation after the Civil War to try to keep the South from the segregation it turned to, and supported early civil rights legislation more than Dems. is NEVER mentioned or taught.

    Only recently has anyone started to note again that numrerous Dems. filibustered the 1964 Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts, while only Rep. participated. The Southern Dixiecrat Dems. were the racist wall against which civil rights fought for a century after the Civil War.

    Worst, 20th C. liberalism with its pursuit of drugs and sex as emblems of “liberation” have been disastrous for minority communities. Families have shattered, entire communities have lost parents to crack and methamphetamine, and now somewhere around 45% of all black women believe they’ll never marry.

    Pat Moynihan used to quote that in 1960 before the big civil righs acts while segregation and Jim Crowe were in full force in the South, 90% of black children were born in wedlock and black marriages had better longeivity and success rates than white marriages.

    Now, the CDC says 73% of black children are born outside marriage and many to un-educated high school (and younger) girls without diplomas or much oppotunity or motivation to get one.

    We know statistically that if someone wants to spend a life in poverty one near guarantee is to be a child of a single woman parent who lacks a high school diploma.

    • Diogenes314

      Worst, 20th C. liberalism with its pursuit of drugs and sex as emblems of ?liberation? have been disastrous for minority communities

      Wrong. 20th century Liberalism gave us the civil rights movement and the voting rights act. And a lot of older and knowledgeable African Americans remember that. Of course, if those on the center/right are going to insist on referring to Leftists (who were the ones embracing the counter-cultural malaise you speak of) as “Liberal” and giving them credit by default, that’s not exactly helping our case.

  • Leopard1996

    The basic premise, is that blacks need Obama to be successful, and see the justifyable tear down as a racist plot. The main feeling is that white america can’t stand the fact of a black president or a black in a leadership position. Just talking to folks in the barber shop about Obama, it’s like nothing is his fault, and he is just trying to deal with a bad situation. When you point to them the makers of the “bad situation” (Pelosi, Reid, et. al) they will agree that they are the problem, but then won’t concede that they need to be sent packing. I mean, here in Cincinnati, Driehaus has been a house b(*&h for Pelosi, but they will support him. Granted the alternative is a seminar douchebag as well in Steve Chabot, but in 2010, I will have to hold my nose and vote for him.

  • southernilpat

    ?;It?s about job security with me,’ said Billy Avery, a letter carrier for 25 years. ‘I have a feeling that Obama, who came from nothing, will have my back when times get hard. So I bring that to work with me.’?

    This man apparently thinks Obama was a typical poor, inner city black kid. Instead, he was born into a white family who, if not rich, certainly wasn’t poor and struggling. His grandmother was the vice president of a bank. Obama spent his young years in Indonesia and then in a prestigious prep school in Hawaii. Yes, his mother was on food stamps for a short while – while she continued her education. She had a PhD in anthropology.

    Yet, just because he “looks like them”, many black people think he “has their back.” And then they go call the Tea Party racist.

  • singingcactus

    Living in an inner-city majority African-American community (I’m white), I see two main reasons that blacks support Democrats. The fact that they support Obama is a matter of rallying behind an emblem they chose to represent them…really nothing we can do about that. But their votes for Democrats in general come from two main problems:

    1) Living in the city, they grow up with government involved in every aspect of their life. Down to the local level, government is far more intrusive in the city than in rural areas. It’s not that government programs are particularly popular. Contrary to what many rural conservatives think, there is a stigma within the black community if you are on welfare. The problem is city people have no experience with limited government; it’s not an idea that ever comes to them. Which leads me to reason two…

    2) Republicans don’t even try to articulate these policies to African-Americans! Some of the links in your diary are great, but Republican politicians, by and large, don’t even go into the cities and talk about these issues. A photo op here and there, for sure, but very few open forums. Non-union voters of all colors support voucher systems and charter schools, but very few people in the cities know that it is a Republican and free-market based idea.

    Why don’t Republicans go into the city? Demographically, they don’t need to win votes there, and the likelihood of turning any one voter accustomed to voting Democrat to a Republican vote is unlikely with just one or two forums. Especially when many of these young people have been told from day one that Republicans are rich, racist KKK-defending bigots who want black people to pay more taxes. I also think, sadly, that many of our elected Republican leaders actually believe the MSM narrative that their constituents are racists. It doesn’t help when some conservative voters throw around the word ‘pandering’ anytime they meet with an African-American organization. Since when is talking to constituents about issues that consern them pandering?

    I’ve said my part. Great diary!