Time for change – in both Washingtons


This year, Americans will have an historic opportunity to “break up” with the Washington insiders and career politicians who have wrested control of our government and hijacked our institutions and democratic processes.One such figure is Sen. Patty Murray, the fourth-ranking member of Democrat leadership in the Senate.

Sen. Murray was first elected to the Senate by the good people of my state, Washington, back in 1992.Somewhere between then and now, however, she stopped representing this Washington and became a power player in the other Washington, emerging as a key figure in Harry Reid’s senatorial posse.

In her role as Senate Majority Conference Secretary, Sen. Murray has the power to take steps every day to grow jobs, really bring down health care costs, put a stop to the mortgaging of our children’s future, and ensure that families aren’t hit by rising taxes they can’t afford.With the folks back home, she works to cultivate the image of a fighter for the people of Washington, a longtime neighbor and friend—“just a mom in tennis shoes” as she said when running for Senate back in 1992— who they can trust to stand up for them.

But who does all this?Not Patty.

Instead, what Sen. Murray spends her time advancing is big government, and the agenda of the special interests that profit from it.

Rated the Senate’s most liberal member by National Journal in 2009, she’s been a consistent proponent of big spending, big regulation and, of course, big taxation—the stuff that gradually impinges on the forward-looking, entrepreneurial spirit that has defined my state for much of its history but which is imperiled by too much government today.

She has been a longtime, ardent advocate for a full-on government takeover of health care and, as a member of Senate Democrat leadership, a prime mover and shaker behind the health insurance reform bill that is now the law of the land.

Tellingly, the industries that give the most to her, to the tune of about $1 million thus far this cycle, are lawyers and lobbyists— the mark of the consummate Washington insider.The fact that lobbyists give so much to her underlines the full extent to which she has become an open purveyor of corporate welfare.

She consistently carries water for special interests like the unions who, in my Washington, are empowered to extract dues and fees even from non-union workers and who, in her Washington, remain committed to instituting “card check” legislation nationwide.

The effect of this has been noticeable, too: Her approval rating in our state now hovers at just over 40 percent.

Here, it is clear, just as across the country, many people are tired of this nonsense.People have had enough with business and politics-as-usual, the typical, predictable inside-the-beltway shenanigans, and politics and policies that feel outmoded, last century, and wrong-headed.Quite frankly, they have had enough, and they are looking for something different this November.

For those of us here in the Evergreen State, represented by a three-term, do-nothing senator, it couldn’t be clearer: It’s time for change—in both Washingtons.


Chris Widener is a candidate for U.S. Senate in Washington, and an author, speaker, and columnist for SUCCESS Magazine. You can visit his website at www.chriswidener.org, find out why Not Patty at www.notpatty.com, follow him on Twitter (@ChrisWidener), or find him on Facebook (including via the Positively Republican page).

Category: , , , , , ,

RSS feed

8 Comments Leave a comment

Lived in WA 30 Years Ago...

Good_Captain Thursday, March 25th at 4:12PM EDT (link)

but moved away. Still I have a love for the beauty of the state as well as its climate. I have been saddened by the Letf lurch the state has taken over the past 10 years or so. While I would LOVE to see Ms. Murray retired, how likely is that reallly?

I truly hope you are right bt being a current native of the Great failed state of California, the uphill climb we face is quite daunting. Nevertheless, you may be sensing something that I have not yet noticed.

Good Captain

It's at least possible.

itsonlywords (Diary) Thursday, March 25th at 5:14PM EDT (link)

Murray’s current approval rating stands at 42%, which I believe is an all-time low, with 45% disapproval.

Tu ne cede malis sed contra audientor ito. ~Virgil
Do not give in to evil, but proceed evermore boldly against it.

 
 

Dino Rossi met with GOP Leaders This Week

Swamp_Yankee (Diary) Thursday, March 25th at 4:18PM EDT (link)

He’s planning and needs encouragement

http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/eyeon2010/2010/03/dino-rossi-stops-by-the-nrsc-t.html

If not him, it be a big undergdog.

Um...

itsonlywords (Diary) Thursday, March 25th at 4:35PM EDT (link)

In case you didn’t notice, the author of this post, Chris Widener, is running for Senate against Murray. I’m not saying he’s not an underdog, but it seems rather bad form to pimp another candidate in the comments.

Tu ne cede malis sed contra audientor ito. ~Virgil
Do not give in to evil, but proceed evermore boldly against it.

Jumped the Gun

Swamp_Yankee (Diary) Thursday, March 25th at 4:48PM EDT (link)

That is bad form. I happened to be reading a CQ at the same time. The name didnt ring a bell. He deserves to be heard.

 
 
 

I've always considered Murray...

swami7774 (Diary) Thursday, March 25th at 5:46PM EDT (link)

…perhaps the dimmest bulb in the Senate.
It’s a tough call between her and Boxer. Maybe they’re 1 and 1-A on the dim bulb chart.

Today, there is a name for the political doctrine that rejoices in scarcity of everything except government. The name is environmentalism.

I hate to pile on against my own gender, but....

chbroussard (Diary) Thursday, March 25th at 10:05PM EDT (link)

feel free to add a rep from my state of Texas–Sheila Jackson Lee–to that dim bulb chart.

Lee is the dumbest person in the House

JSobieski (Diary) Thursday, March 25th at 10:31PM EDT (link)

an impressive status given some of the “talent” that can be found there. The Senate looks absolutely brilliant by comparison.

Did you know that China has been losing manufacturing jobs since 1995? For the specific data, see Table 1 in the following link: http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2005/07/art2full.pdf