<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Civilian National Security Force</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/chromodynamic/2008/11/01/civilian-national-security-force/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/chromodynamic/2008/11/01/civilian-national-security-force/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 21:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Weasel53</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/chromodynamic/2008/11/01/civilian-national-security-force/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Weasel53</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 13:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Face it everyone, the only way Obama's CNSF (read: Waffen SS) issue will get the kind of traction it deserves is if one of the candidates drops a line about in a stump speech.  Sarah, please find a way to mention this today or tomorrow.  Sure the MSM will go berserk - but that's what we need.  Let the MSM carry this to the public.  Otherwise it will just be lost in the noise.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Face it everyone, the only way Obama&#8217;s CNSF (read: Waffen SS) issue will get the kind of traction it deserves is if one of the candidates drops a line about in a stump speech.  Sarah, please find a way to mention this today or tomorrow.  Sure the MSM will go berserk - but that&#8217;s what we need.  Let the MSM carry this to the public.  Otherwise it will just be lost in the noise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weasel53</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/chromodynamic/2008/11/01/civilian-national-security-force/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Weasel53</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 13:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Face it everyone, the only way Obama's CNSF (read: Waffen SS) issue will get the kind of traction it deserves is if one of the candidates drops a line about in a stump speech.  Sarah, please find a way to mention this today or tomorrow.  Sure the MSM will go berserk - but that's what we need.  Let the MSM carry this to the public.  Otherwise it will just be lost in the noise.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Face it everyone, the only way Obama&#8217;s CNSF (read: Waffen SS) issue will get the kind of traction it deserves is if one of the candidates drops a line about in a stump speech.  Sarah, please find a way to mention this today or tomorrow.  Sure the MSM will go berserk - but that&#8217;s what we need.  Let the MSM carry this to the public.  Otherwise it will just be lost in the noise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strelnikov</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/chromodynamic/2008/11/01/civilian-national-security-force/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Strelnikov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 13:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I just checked the one YouTube post with Big Brobama's threat to have a national police force equal to the military.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;At around 10:00 last night it broke 100,000, up from 30,000 just minutes.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Viralize this, along with his anti-coal mining nonsense and anything else, so any fence-sitters or anyone not really thinking  will start thinking about the implications of this moron!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just checked the one YouTube post with Big Brobama&#8217;s threat to have a national police force equal to the military.</p>
<p>At around 10:00 last night it broke 100,000, up from 30,000 just minutes.</p>
<p>Viralize this, along with his anti-coal mining nonsense and anything else, so any fence-sitters or anyone not really thinking  will start thinking about the implications of this moron!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeriousLaff</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/chromodynamic/2008/11/01/civilian-national-security-force/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>SeriousLaff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 08:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-17</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;McCain could have a two hour speech listing things that would NOT happen during his Presidency.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I will NOT have a civilian police force as big as the US Military.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I will NOT use the courts to redistribute your income.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I will NOT bankrupt the coal industry.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I will NOT be happy with $5 a gallon gasoline.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I will NOT cut the military budet by 25%.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I will NOT go after your 401K's&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I will NOT give illegals drivers licenses.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The list goes on and on. Should have said something like this during the debates. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain could have a two hour speech listing things that would NOT happen during his Presidency.</p>
<p>I will NOT have a civilian police force as big as the US Military.</p>
<p>I will NOT use the courts to redistribute your income.</p>
<p>I will NOT bankrupt the coal industry.</p>
<p>I will NOT be happy with $5 a gallon gasoline.</p>
<p>I will NOT cut the military budet by 25%.</p>
<p>I will NOT go after your 401K&#8217;s</p>
<p>I will NOT give illegals drivers licenses.</p>
<p>The list goes on and on. Should have said something like this during the debates. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StephC</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/chromodynamic/2008/11/01/civilian-national-security-force/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>StephC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 08:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-16</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;He won't cover it. Haven't you noticed how he's softening toward Obama lately? He's trying to cover himself just in case. He knows if Obama is elected, anybody in the press who outright opposes the new president is walking on thin ice for the future welfare of their careers... kinda like Joe the Plumber.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He won&#8217;t cover it. Haven&#8217;t you noticed how he&#8217;s softening toward Obama lately? He&#8217;s trying to cover himself just in case. He knows if Obama is elected, anybody in the press who outright opposes the new president is walking on thin ice for the future welfare of their careers&#8230; kinda like Joe the Plumber.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StephC</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/chromodynamic/2008/11/01/civilian-national-security-force/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>StephC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 07:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-15</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The talk of the Fairness Doctrine could be a red herring to keep us from thinking about these other "unrelated" issues. Why would they need the Fairness Doctrine, if H.R.1955 could do the job better?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Say, for instance, some whacko, real or imagined committed some heinous crime and while explaining why he did it, he states he heard this or that from whatever source, including other people's blogs... guess what happens next?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But,no, that can't possibly happen in America, right? We have the constitution (which Obama has said is fundamentally flawed, btw), right? We have free speech, right? &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Just because we didn't swallow during Kruschev's lifetime doesn't mean his words that we would swallow communism without a shot being fired aren't prophetic since there have been forces in this country working for that very goal since before the words were uttered.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The talk of the Fairness Doctrine could be a red herring to keep us from thinking about these other &#8220;unrelated&#8221; issues. Why would they need the Fairness Doctrine, if H.R.1955 could do the job better?</p>
<p>Say, for instance, some whacko, real or imagined committed some heinous crime and while explaining why he did it, he states he heard this or that from whatever source, including other people&#8217;s blogs&#8230; guess what happens next?</p>
<p>But,no, that can&#8217;t possibly happen in America, right? We have the constitution (which Obama has said is fundamentally flawed, btw), right? We have free speech, right? </p>
<p>Just because we didn&#8217;t swallow during Kruschev&#8217;s lifetime doesn&#8217;t mean his words that we would swallow communism without a shot being fired aren&#8217;t prophetic since there have been forces in this country working for that very goal since before the words were uttered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StephC</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/chromodynamic/2008/11/01/civilian-national-security-force/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>StephC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 06:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;has been circulating longer than Joe the Plumber. What would be a good thing is to tie this to what happened to Joe the Plumber.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Think about it...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;He talks of this security force he wants to build so strong, then he talks to Joe, then Joe is "toast."&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On top of that, I've commented in a few places about a bill H.R.1955 that has gone through the House and is awaiting further Senate action that talks about hate crimes as an incitement to violence via a number of avenues including religious social commentary and politics among others.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And people are worried about the Fairness Doctrine, which is bad enough, but not nearly as bad as what is waiting.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Now, maybe I'm connecting the dots wrong but I'd rather connect them wrong and work to prevent these things happening than connect them right and do nothing.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A national security force, the hate crimes bill, and Joe the Plumber as the first example. How would you connect those dots?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>has been circulating longer than Joe the Plumber. What would be a good thing is to tie this to what happened to Joe the Plumber.</p>
<p>Think about it&#8230;</p>
<p>He talks of this security force he wants to build so strong, then he talks to Joe, then Joe is &#8220;toast.&#8221;</p>
<p>On top of that, I&#8217;ve commented in a few places about a bill H.R.1955 that has gone through the House and is awaiting further Senate action that talks about hate crimes as an incitement to violence via a number of avenues including religious social commentary and politics among others.</p>
<p>And people are worried about the Fairness Doctrine, which is bad enough, but not nearly as bad as what is waiting.</p>
<p>Now, maybe I&#8217;m connecting the dots wrong but I&#8217;d rather connect them wrong and work to prevent these things happening than connect them right and do nothing.</p>
<p>A national security force, the hate crimes bill, and Joe the Plumber as the first example. How would you connect those dots?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James_Reynolds</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/chromodynamic/2008/11/01/civilian-national-security-force/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>James_Reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 21:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-13</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;want topics they haven't covered that should be for their Monday night shows. Everyone needs to send this video to them so they can cover it&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>want topics they haven&#8217;t covered that should be for their Monday night shows. Everyone needs to send this video to them so they can cover it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James_Reynolds</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/chromodynamic/2008/11/01/civilian-national-security-force/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>James_Reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 21:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-12</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;want topics they haven't covered that should be for their Monday night shows. Everyone needs to send theis vieo to them so they can cover it&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>want topics they haven&#8217;t covered that should be for their Monday night shows. Everyone needs to send theis vieo to them so they can cover it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr_Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/chromodynamic/2008/11/01/civilian-national-security-force/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr_Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 21:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-11</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;A Civilian National Security Force...hum....a force to secure the nation?...or a force to secure civilians in the nation?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Civilian National Security Force&#8230;hum&#8230;.a force to secure the nation?&#8230;or a force to secure civilians in the nation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichaelBDR</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/chromodynamic/2008/11/01/civilian-national-security-force/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>MichaelBDR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 21:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-10</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.redstate.com/diaries/michaelbdr/2008/oct/19/junior-senator-barack-obamas-national-securi/"&gt;http://www.redstate.com/diaries/michaelbdr/2008/oct/19/junior-senator-barack-obamas-national-securi/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.redstate.com/diaries/michaelbdr/2008/oct/19/junior-senator-barack-obamas-national-securi/">http://www.redstate.com/diaries/michaelbdr/2008/oct/19/junior-senator-barack-obamas-national-securi/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strelnikov</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/chromodynamic/2008/11/01/civilian-national-security-force/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Strelnikov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 20:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-9</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;In 10 minutes, the "hits" recorded on YouTube for this went from 33,000 to 112,000!!!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This might be as big as "spread the wealth" to Joe the Plumber!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tt2yGzHfy7s"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tt2yGzHfy7s&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;November Surprise?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Today is All Saints' Day: a little miracle from our friends upstairs?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Note the comments on YouTube are not real happy!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 10 minutes, the &#8220;hits&#8221; recorded on YouTube for this went from 33,000 to 112,000!!!</p>
<p>This might be as big as &#8220;spread the wealth&#8221; to Joe the Plumber!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tt2yGzHfy7s">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tt2yGzHfy7s</a></p>
<p>November Surprise?</p>
<p>Today is All Saints&#8217; Day: a little miracle from our friends upstairs?</p>
<p>Note the comments on YouTube are not real happy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ETCartman</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/chromodynamic/2008/11/01/civilian-national-security-force/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>ETCartman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 20:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-8</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Mom, thanks for this !&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I dropped the link active here, so y'all go to the link and take a look at the comments below the article.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://bulletin.aarp.org/states/il/articles/obama_outlines_plan_for_national_service.html"&gt;AARP story on Obama's Civilian National Security Force&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Really impressed because I thought the bulk of the AARP was brainwashed to The One.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Cheers !&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mom, thanks for this !</p>
<p>I dropped the link active here, so y&#8217;all go to the link and take a look at the comments below the article.</p>
<p><a href="http://bulletin.aarp.org/states/il/articles/obama_outlines_plan_for_national_service.html">AARP story on Obama&#8217;s Civilian National Security Force</a></p>
<p>Really impressed because I thought the bulk of the AARP was brainwashed to The One.</p>
<p>Cheers !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc_Holliday</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/chromodynamic/2008/11/01/civilian-national-security-force/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc_Holliday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 20:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;to enforce the "farness doctrine"?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to enforce the &#8220;farness doctrine&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichaelBDR</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/chromodynamic/2008/11/01/civilian-national-security-force/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>MichaelBDR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 20:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-6</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It was supposed to be never said, never written. The handlers knew if it was explored, the implications would be devastating.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;object width="425" height="344"&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZEnNYN8sKbQ&#38;hl=en&#38;fs=1&#38;color1=0x402061&#38;color2=0x9461ca"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZEnNYN8sKbQ&#38;hl=en&#38;fs=1&#38;color1=0x402061&#38;color2=0x9461ca" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEnNYN8sKbQ"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEnNYN8sKbQ&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was supposed to be never said, never written. The handlers knew if it was explored, the implications would be devastating.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZEnNYN8sKbQ&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0x402061&amp;color2=0x9461ca"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZEnNYN8sKbQ&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0x402061&amp;color2=0x9461ca" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEnNYN8sKbQ">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEnNYN8sKbQ</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: securitymom</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/chromodynamic/2008/11/01/civilian-national-security-force/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>securitymom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 19:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;http://bulletin.aarp.org/states/il/articles/obama&lt;em&gt;outlines&lt;/em&gt;plan&lt;em&gt;for&lt;/em&gt;national_service.html&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://bulletin.aarp.org/states/il/articles/obama">http://bulletin.aarp.org/states/il/articles/obama</a><em>outlines</em>plan<em>for</em>national_service.html</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weasel53</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/chromodynamic/2008/11/01/civilian-national-security-force/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Weasel53</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 19:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-4</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Michael,
I'm not sure what your point is?  Frankly the very fact his handlers took it out means they want to hide it!  But the idiot didn't have the self discipline to keep his mouth shut.  This needs to be highlighted and discussed constantly for the remaining hours of the campaign.  This could (should) be the defining issue, the slip, that brings him down.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,<br />
I&#8217;m not sure what your point is?  Frankly the very fact his handlers took it out means they want to hide it!  But the idiot didn&#8217;t have the self discipline to keep his mouth shut.  This needs to be highlighted and discussed constantly for the remaining hours of the campaign.  This could (should) be the defining issue, the slip, that brings him down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chromodynamic</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/chromodynamic/2008/11/01/civilian-national-security-force/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Chromodynamic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 19:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-3</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It's the kind of crazytalk Barack really thinks when he's not being carefully husbanded by his handlers.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;He's done a good job so far of selling people on his "Hope and Change" message, and so has David Axelrod, who doesn't particularly care if his political adversaries wind up in a ditch with their faces broken.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Neither does Rahm "...the Republicans can go f&lt;em&gt;*&lt;/em&gt; themselves" Emanuel.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I wonder what Cass Sunstein has to say about all this Barack talk about creating a new national police force that's just as powerful as our military?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Will they have nuclear weapons, too?  Fighter jets and tanks?  Automatic weapons and everything else the military has in its armementarium?  Since they're going to be "just as well funded" as our military, will they have aircraft carriers and humvees?  Grenades?  What about M-60 machine guns? &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Will Barack Obama not weaponize space but weaponize his new cadre instead?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Is that what Barack is really talking about, in "civilian" form?  He seems pretty confident that it's needed in order to enforce what he wants.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is one of those moments where the true Barack Obama, the guy who pals around with Weather Underground members and unrepentant Communists and fraudulent power-brokers in Illinois, really talks about what he wants to see the United States become.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I take him at his word.  I believe he will do everything he says if he's elected.  He has always, always wanted radical change.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In the United States, that means using the power of the State to point guns at people's heads.  He's going to do that.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the kind of crazytalk Barack really thinks when he&#8217;s not being carefully husbanded by his handlers.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s done a good job so far of selling people on his &#8220;Hope and Change&#8221; message, and so has David Axelrod, who doesn&#8217;t particularly care if his political adversaries wind up in a ditch with their faces broken.</p>
<p>Neither does Rahm &#8220;&#8230;the Republicans can go f<em>*</em> themselves&#8221; Emanuel.</p>
<p>I wonder what Cass Sunstein has to say about all this Barack talk about creating a new national police force that&#8217;s just as powerful as our military?</p>
<p>Will they have nuclear weapons, too?  Fighter jets and tanks?  Automatic weapons and everything else the military has in its armementarium?  Since they&#8217;re going to be &#8220;just as well funded&#8221; as our military, will they have aircraft carriers and humvees?  Grenades?  What about M-60 machine guns? </p>
<p>Will Barack Obama not weaponize space but weaponize his new cadre instead?</p>
<p>Is that what Barack is really talking about, in &#8220;civilian&#8221; form?  He seems pretty confident that it&#8217;s needed in order to enforce what he wants.</p>
<p>This is one of those moments where the true Barack Obama, the guy who pals around with Weather Underground members and unrepentant Communists and fraudulent power-brokers in Illinois, really talks about what he wants to see the United States become.  </p>
<p>I take him at his word.  I believe he will do everything he says if he&#8217;s elected.  He has always, always wanted radical change.</p>
<p>In the United States, that means using the power of the State to point guns at people&#8217;s heads.  He&#8217;s going to do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichaelBDR</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/chromodynamic/2008/11/01/civilian-national-security-force/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>MichaelBDR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 19:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This was the only time he mentioned this. It was not in the printed version of the speech handed out. His handlers had told him not ti us it and had deleted it from the written speech.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was the only time he mentioned this. It was not in the printed version of the speech handed out. His handlers had told him not ti us it and had deleted it from the written speech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weasel53</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/chromodynamic/2008/11/01/civilian-national-security-force/#comment-1</link>
		<dc:creator>Weasel53</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 19:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This is scary.  More than scary, its insanity.  What could he be thinking?  In the past two weeks we have seen ample evidence of how Obama and the Democrats handle dissent.  Can there be doubt in anyones mind as to how he would employ his very own Security Force.  Funny, just yesterday I was noticing how much Rahm Emanuel looks like Goebbels&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is scary.  More than scary, its insanity.  What could he be thinking?  In the past two weeks we have seen ample evidence of how Obama and the Democrats handle dissent.  Can there be doubt in anyones mind as to how he would employ his very own Security Force.  Funny, just yesterday I was noticing how much Rahm Emanuel looks like Goebbels</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
