« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

In Defense of Senator Santorum

Before the Romney attacks start, I want to provide some facts for why Sanotrum would be a good president and how he could beat Obama.

Conservative Credentials:

  • Santorum supports Paul Ryan’s plan to reform entitlements.  He supported Bush’s plan to reform social security.  Entitlement reform is the most important budget battle as Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are the main cause of our projected future deficits.  They are also the main cause of why we have this large debt.
  • Santorum supports lowering taxes, and has voted repeatedly to lower taxes in the Senate.  Santorum supported and voted for the Bush tax cuts that McCain opposed.  He supports cutting the business tax rate in 1/2, and setting up only two tax rates: 10% and 28%.  His plan would be a net tax cut.  He plans to limit spending to 18% of GDP, which is a substantial cut.
  • Santorum has been a leading fighter and supporter for welfare reform, and other initiatives designed to get people off government support and standing on their own 2 legs.
  • Santorum is consistently pro-life, and wrote the ban on partial birth abortions.  He is likewise pro-family and was a major player in fighting for the constitutional ban on same-sex marriage.
  • Santorum has a strong history opposing job-killing regulations.  From his support to drilling in ANWAR to his support of clean-coal technology, he has consistently been pro-business and pro-worker.
  • Santorum has been a consistent supporter of having a strong defense and defending the interests of America and its allies.
  • Santorum has fought on the conservative side of every major issue.
Santorum is electable:
  • He repeatedly won in the House in a blue district.  In every election he out performed.  In 1992, for example, he won his district when Bush lost it.
  • In the Senate, he won as a conservative pro-life, pro-family Republican; despite living in a blue state.
  • In 2000 Bush lost PA, but Santorum won.
  • In 2006, when Santorum did lose, he still outperformed.  He performed well above the GOP candidate for governor that year.  He also performed well above the GOP candidate that Casey defeated 2 years before running against Santorum.  Santorum in 2006 also outperformed Bush’s 2006 support in the state.
  • Santorum with very limited funds, limited staff, and being out-of-office for 5 years, essentially won Iowa against a number of candidates in better positions.  I do not believe in luck.  Whether it was skill or grace, Santorum has it.  Santorum outperformed in AMES, outperformed in the Caucus, and outperformed in every race he has been in for his life.  Even his 2006 loss, he outperformed the Governor’s race and the 2004 results of his opponent.
  • Santorum is an all-around conservative who can attract the support of a wide range of voters.  His consistent fiscal conservative record should attract tea partiers.  I do not no a single person in the tea party who would not vote for Santorum over Obama.  His strong national security positions and experiences win the backing of neocons; again, I do not know a single neocon who would pick Obama over Santorum.  Santorum also wins the support of social and religious conservatives.  Once again, I do not know of a single religious or social conservative who would support Obama over Santorum.  Santorum appeals to right-leaning independents, and appeals to those blue collar unionized social conservatives who are often called Reagan Democrats and who want a job to go with their gun and their Bible, and want to work hard to earn a living for themselves and their families.
  • Santorum puts PA into play.  He competes well for Iowa, Virginia, NC, and a number of key must-win states such as Ohio.
  • There are a few areas where Santorum will need to work.  He will need to be able to work hard to attract Paul voters in a general election.  He will need to work hard to gain the support of federal employees in Nothern Virginia.  He will need to work hard in Colorado, where religious conservatives are a very small, and Hispanics are large.  That said, Santorum remains a strong candidate.  Unlike Romney, Santorum will do well in the South, and will connect with voters in the rust belt.  These workers are the types that Romney laid off at Bain Capital, and that Santorum appeals to.
If the race comes down to Santorum v Romney, I would support Santorum.  Santorum is a conservative who could win in November.  Romney is a moderate who would lose.

COMMENTS

  • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

    This is a great summary of Santorum’s record and positions.

    Rick Santorum was a solid conservative in Congress and would make a good President.

    • mikeymike143

      Rick Santorum and Mitt Romney are tied in a very close race to win the Iowa Republican caucus. And the lesson that was learned in 2010, was once again on display in 2012. People constantly talked about how well financed and organized the Romney and Paul campaigns were, but us tea partiers turn out to vote!! And elections are decided by votes, not by who has the biggest staff or the largest war chest.

      Site polling showed that Santorum received the most tea party votes. Iowans that were seeking ?a candidate with high moral character? also made Rick their top choice.

      So what happens now? I see Mitt winning in New Hampshire and Newt or Rick taking down South Carolina. That leaves Florida as the key state in this race. My home state is Florida and I am active in politics as part of Tea Party Fort Lauderdale so I will give my opinion of who will win in Florida, and why.

      The tea party movement is very strong in Florida. And the 2010 election results will show that. Tea party favored candidates knocked off well funded establishment Republican candidates in every primary race from governor(Rick Scott) to senator(Marco Rubio). This is also the state that gave Herman Cain the big bump with his Orlando straw poll win.

      I think the race will be down to four candidates by then. Romney, Gingrich, Paul and Santorum. I will review all four candidates.

      Mitt Romney will do well with seniors, but being ?the establishment favorite? is normally the kiss of death in Florida. Just ask Charlie Crist.

      Newt is very bright and will hold his own here. And I see him and Mitt fighting it out for second place.

      A racist loon like Ron Paul will not win in Florida. Unless they change the primary rules to let Al-Qaeda members vote.

      That leaves Rick Santorum. Florida is the type of state where you want to be the ?three legged stool of conservatism? that Ronald Reagan talked about. The tea party in Florida tends to be really conservative about social and national defense issues . IT ALSO OVERWHELMINGLY VOTES REPUBLICAN!!!! And Rick Santorum is exactly the type of candidate that conservatives in Florida will support.

      With Perry and Bachmann dead I can see the majority of those conservative voters going over to Santorum. And with a Florida win, I think that Santorum will pick up all the financing and organizational staff that he needs to win the Republican primary.

      SANTORUM IN 2012!!!

      http://www.redstate.com/mikeymike143/2012/01/04/rick-santorum-surges-in-iowa-due-to-the-support-of-the-tea-party/

  • Tbone

    is that he has not hired anyone to bitch slap him when he starts to whine. Think of the necessity of that person as akin to Obama’s need for a teleprompter.

    • jakeofalltrades

       

    • acat

      I know I would.

      Am I allowed to use claws?

      Mew

  • nuclear139

    A president Santorum sounds much better than a president Romney. I am disappointed by all the conservatives who are now willing to accept a Romney nomination without so much as a fight or even a wimper. Please people to accept Mitt over Santorum is to say that he has stronger values and is more in line with conservative thought than Rick is. Can anyone honestly say to him/her self that Romney is more of a concervative than Santorum? If electability is the only reason to accept Mitt than we have set the bar terribly low to win the Republican nomination and any consequence of that will affect the nation as well as be to our shame. Come November I hope to vote for a conservative like Santorum rather than a moderate like Romney.

    • Tbone

      to compete against Romney for the next 5 months?

      • http://thethinkingvoter.blogspot.com abierubin

        and questioning. Haven’t you heard he raised one million in less than 24 hrs?

        Do you remember asking me a couple of weeks ago why I even bothered writing a diary about Santorum? I had answered you then, and responded in an additional diary this morning dedicated especially for you!

        http://www.redstate.com/abierubin/2012/01/04/less-than-a-month-ago-i-was-questioned-why-i-even-bothered-writing-about-santorum/

        • acat

          After Santorum crashes and burns in New Hampshire and Florida, we can talk.

          You know, in that gap between Florida and Super Tuesday.

          Mew

          • http://thethinkingvoter.blogspot.com abierubin

            He won (minus 8 votes) Iowa having only spent 30,000 in media ads despite the rest of the candidates having spent 5 million together.

            Yes, money means a lot. But not everything. Who said he needs 15 million to win? Just wanted to point out to tbone that just as no one would’ve predicted he will raise 1 million in a few hours so too can no one predict what will happen. I’m not saying he will win or lose – saying how silly to play fortune-teller.

          • acat

            Clearly, the money Santorum paid to Vander Pantaloons (sp?) was a better investment.

            That said, Santorum still stinks on ice as a candidate. Iowa have forgotten a simple principle – “vote for the most conservative who can win in the general.” – and, once again, voted for a loser.

            Mew

          • sunshinek67

            Irksome when that autocorrect kicks in huh?

        • windwaker24

          The buzz is on Twitter that 3 Liberal radio shows are asking their supporters to donate to Santorum in order to keep him viable to knock the others out. After he’s done, they said they will destroy him in a flood of attacks. So, it’s not just conservatives who are “loving” Santorum right now.

          • acat

            The story goes that Scott Savol, a contestant on American Idol, was kept in the competition by an Operation Chaos-style group with the slogan Vote For The Worst.

            It worked as Savol, week after week, stayed in while more talented singers went home… and fan frustration with the show kept climbing.

            Not surprised to see this.

            Mew

          • http://boldcolor.blogspot.com/ Paula

            No?

        • Tbone

          But you might share where you think a lightweight like Santorum can raise enough money to beat Obama? LOL

          Maybe he can win the new show “American Whiner” and finance his campaign that way.

        • sunshinek67

          nt

    • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

      Is Marx more liberal than Lennon?

      Please. Neither of these guys is anything approaching a conservative. They are working at talking the game but neither has EVER walked the walk.

      Santorum is a pro-life statist through and through. He has not only no executive experience, he’s never even held a real job. The guy is a permanent fixture in DC.

      • trevorb

        how volatile this race has been so far, I’m not sure Santorum will be able to keep his lead. The media attack is beginning to start and the other candidates are joining in. That kind of pressure destroyed Gingrich in less than 2 weeks.

        Right now, Santorum would be my third choice for the nomination. I don’t hold a whole lot of enthusiasm, but I could vote for him without having to cringe.

  • jakeofalltrades

    George Will claims Santorum is the “fun” candidate, better than Romney, here.

  • JSobieski

    nt

  • aesthete

    1) Santorum is rather late to the entitlement reform party — when he was in office, he voted for the largest expansion of same (Medicare Pt D), and was tasked by the Bush administration with cajoling reticent Republicans into falling in line. In the Bush administration, he was against Medicare reform, and only supported privatizing administration of the program. One will note that Paul Ryan has not said particularly kind words about Santorum, as he did for Mitch Daniels (an actual reformer with a record of same).

    2) 18% GDP budgets are never going to happen under a President Santorum — the guy hasn’t met a spending increase he didn’t like, has several pet projects of his own (domestic and foreign), prioritizes social issues far above spending, and didn’t make a peep about entitlement reform (other than SS reform) when he was working with the Bush administration. He was and is a huge fan of compassionate conservatism, and assuaging a pietist’s tortured conscience using government funds doesn’t ever come cheap. Santorum’s lying to you, or to himself.

    3) If by “leading fighter” you mean, “voted for Newt’s welfare reform like the rest of the scoundrels”, then you’re dead on the money. His rhetoric regarding welfare is a bit… problematic, in that it has little to do with liberty, and a lot to do with Those People*.

    4) Who gives a crap?

    5) No. The guy voted down the line for every major regulatory package proposed, from Sarb-Ox to environmental regulations on coal. He’s no friend of businesses — well, except maybe the ones that he worked to get earmarks for, specifically.

    6) Whatever that means.

    *Yeah, yeah, he’s probably not personally racist, but his rhetoric on that subject ain’t even close to wanting freedom or autonomy for folks, and that’s fair to mention.

    • JSobieski

      which is incredibly depressing.

      The odds of any spending being cut is no better with Santorum than it would be with Romney, and in fact—Santorum would likely be worse than Romney on spending given the history of throwing money to placate political opposition (unions, black colleges, etc).

      We really need a conservative Senate no matter who wins the presidency.

      • acat

        (nothing further)

        • JSobieski

          The candidates are either not up to snuff on communication skills or simply don’t embrace conservatism.

          So we need to use more of the Newt/Contact for America/1994 model.

    • quill67

      Since we are not going to get rid of Medicare and Ryan’s plan offers premium support, this makes part D. irrelevant. If you get premium support you can decide whether to buy a plan with lots of prescription coverage or little. Lots of protection for surgeries or more out of pocket money for small medical needs.

      In short, it never made sense to pay $40K for a surgery that could be prevented by spending $5K on prescription drugs. When the government paid for the 40K but people had to pay the 5K out of pocket, they decided for the surgery that cost the government 40K instead of only spending 5K. There should have been premiums to pay for this benefit, but it is now a moot point. Ryan’s premium support plan will allow retirees to decide what combination of drugs and prescription coverage they want.

      Rick Santorum supports Ryan’s plan.

      • JSobieski

        but they never talk about it voluntarily, they never invest the political capital to explain how it works, and the primary reason for their “support” is that they need to have some kind of plan—-so its easier to say “I support the Ryan plan” than to have any ideas of their own.

        There is nothing in Santorum’s record to suggest that he is particularly interested in any way in reforming Medicare.

      • JSobieski

        I would love to see it.

        The fact that DC may fix the problem that it created doesn’t get Santorum off the hook given that he invested virtually no political capital in fixing the problem.

    • http://boldcolor.blogspot.com/ Paula

      “Santorum is consistently pro-life, and wrote the ban on partial birth abortions. He is likewise pro-family and was a major player in fighting for the constitutional ban on same-sex marriage.”

      aesthete: “Who gives a crap?”

      Really? A lot of social conservatives, many of them outside of Iowa, believe it or not, ‘give a crap.’ Many of them even hang out at RS. It’s one of the major reasons we cannot abide Romney as our candidate.

  • burke

    I don’t support Senator Santorum, but this post shows that there are definitely some good reasons to consider him.