« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Newt Gingrich will be the next President of the United States

I just heard Newt’s speech after Florida and I have come to realize that Newt is going to win the GOP nomination and be the next president.

 

I understand that most people think that Romney is most likely, but I do not agree.  First, Romney has never shown the ability to get the majority of the votes in any primary.  Second, Romney’s win in Florida took place with no actual consideration of Romney’s record or ideas — Romney’s entire campaign was based on the idea that Romney is the only person who can beat Obama.  His whole campaign in FL was on attacking Newt.  Third, the voting numbers showed Gingrich did very well in the Fl. panhandle, which votes like southern states.  This suggests that Gingrich will likely sweep the South.

Gingrich’s problems in FL were easy to fix.  Gingrich got off message.  Gingrich froze in the face of shock and awe from Romney’s attacks.  Finally, Gingrich faced the one state that only Romney had a strong campaign organization in.  The fact of the matter is that Romney had to compete in Iowa with almost everyone and lost.  Romney had to compete in NH with Huntsman and won.  Romney had to compete in SC with Santorum, Perry, and Gingrich and lost.  FL was always too big for anyone but Romney to have a strong organization and ad campaign in.  Gingrich had the momentum, but Romney had a uniquely large organization advantage for FL.

In future states Romney will continue to have an organization advantage, especially through Super Tuesday, but as the primary goes on, Romney’s advantage will drop as (1) later states even out since Romney is running a campaign like Clinton did in 2008 and his organization is strongest early, (2) as the race goes on voters will develop more solid opinions and organization will mater less, and (3) Gingrich will emerge as the alternative to Romney and will be better organized as people realize he is the only hope for conservatives in this race.

In terms of campaign focus, Gingrich is now developing a new contract with America and I expect he will use that to stay on message and contrast himself with Romney.  Gingrich held a vote on all items he promised to and did what he could to pass them for the original contract.  That was a promise kept for him.  He will have credibility for his new contract and this will contrast him with Romney who cannot be trusted and is not conservative.

In terms of Romney’s shock and awe attacks, it is hard to see Romney get much worse.  Romney’s negatives have already shot up, and it is almost impossible to think of what worse things Romney can attack Gingrich for.  Romney already used several lines of attack have had blow back, and if he picked those as ‘go,’ it is hard to think he has anything left to fire with.  The Romney smear campaign will need to let-up at some time or Romney will completely implode.  How long can a campaign be 99.9% negative?

What it comes down to is that Gingrich is a real candidate, and Romney is a pretender.  Gingrich has real conservative ideas to fix the problems we are in.  Romney has talking points.

COMMENTS

  • Juggernaut

    and a limited message with no vision for solving the problems we face. Every where he goes its the same message, fast paced and little substance just like Obama. I don’t see empty rhetoric translating into a win against Obama because Obama has the upper hand with money and media support. Only a real plan with solid solutions is going to win over voters. Slick talk is as cheap as it gets, people already see through Romney. That’s why the liberal media continue to tout him as does the MSM, they are setting the big fall which gives Obama 4 more years.

    • chadosborne

      I watched the same speech and concluded that Gingrich will never be president. It just goes to show that it’s not very wise to extrapolate your own personal opinions into the entire electorate.

      Newt is finished. Any attacks on Romney at this stage can be equated with providing aid and comfort to Obama.

      Four years ago McCain was in worse shape than Romney is a this juncture. McCain won FL by only 4% and then went on to lose Nevada, Colorado, Minnesota, etc.. Romney will sweep all these states in February, and then Super Tuesday in early March will be a slaughter. Newt spent all his money and won’t even be able to compete properly. But feel free to delude yourself and waste your time helping Obama.

      Romney is the only candidate with a detailed plan on how to cut spending and balance the budget. Newt lies about balancing the budget, lies about creating jobs during the Reagan administration and is generally dishonest about everything he says (just ask his previous wives). Newt has no plan and his big government solutions are bad ideas. Reagan knew that over 20 years ago, check his diary.

      Just remember that every time you attack Romney, somewhere inside the white house, a Kenyan will be smiling.

      • Juggernaut

        opinions are based on empty rhetoric coming from the Romneybots. You deluded robotic zombies have nothing to defend but plenty of room to lie while thinking anyone trusts poor judgement.

        Romney’s economic plan was scored poorly, you’d know that if you researched the facts and knew what it meant for the country…….he’ll manage the decay.

        You think like a BIRTHER BUFFOON, the Kenyan crap is so classless.

        Read up useless tool

        http://taxpolicycenter.org/taxtopics/romney-plan.cfm

        • chadosborne

          Newt is not going anywhere.

          All the February contests will be in states that Romney carried in 2008 when he was in a much weaker position than he is now.

          Newt just got his butt handed to him in his home turf. He is $1 million in debt and there’s only a couple more televised debates for him to get his message out.

          The establishment is firmly against him and the tea party won’t fully back him.. Palin won’t endorse, Rush is distancing himself, Beck and Levin are backing Santorum.

          People power will just come down to Newt and a few space enthusiasts who want to colonize the moon. Newt’s 15 minutes are almost up.

          • naharu89x7

            When a grand American tradition and ambition is mocked. Newt is the only one with ambition in this race. Romney represents the Establishment, and he is no friend to Conservatives.

            Newt as point by point plans to fix this country, which includes restoring NASA and creating a commercial space industry. Yet human progress and exploration is mocked?

            Sorry I just think it is sad when people mock progress and ambition.

          • avgjo

            Romney is part of the ruling class. The ruling class assumes, inter alia, two propositions: (a) the masses are a herd to be shepherded and (b) America’s decline. Romneycare is a perfect embodiment of this loser’s mentality.

            Newt still gives the people of this country credit. In his estimation, we are capable of overcoming our debt AND colonizing the moon.

            Romney and Obama are of the same mindset. People are too stupid to take care of themselves and so they must be herded into massive entitlements, which although they ultimately crop the quality of life, give the masses a subsistence and some security. Q.V. Europe.

          • Juggernaut

            Are you a rino ? You people have no idea who this RINO is.

            http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/romneys-connection-to-saul-alinsky/
            Mitt Romney may have been influenced by the late 20th century, Chicago-based radical.

            Political commentator Dan Riehl wrote on BigGovernment.com that the ?toxic-to-conservatives? Alinsky effect has its roots in the former Massachusetts governor?s father, George Romney.

            ?The progressive Alinsky is infamous and actually toxic on the right,? Riehl wrote. ?George Romney?s endorsement of him, coupled with his acknowledged strong influence on son Mitt, will do little to assure suspicious conservatives concerned about Mitt Romney?s record as a progressive, including his introduction of Romneycare in Massachusetts.?

            Political journalist and analyst Andrew Kaczynski wrote in a recent edition of the Buzzfeed that the elder Romney met with Alinsky to find a way to deal with the problem of the urban poor.

            ?In the wake of the devastating Detroit riots of the summer of 1967, Michigan Gov. George Romney, a liberal Republican, met the radical organizer Saul Alinsky to discuss the grievances of the urban black poor,? he explained.

            Photos of the meeting can be found in the archives of the Library of Congress.

            Kaczynski noted that a book on George Romney quotes the former Michigan governor telling his allies, ?I think you ought to listen to Alinsky.?

            Political analyst and think-tank researcher Steve Baldwin believes that Mitt Romney was definitely impacted by his father?s association with Alinsky.

            ?Romney?s dad was a big leader of the RINO (Republican in name only) wing of the Republican Party and hated Goldwater,? Baldwin explained. ?George actually walked out of the 1964 GOP convention in protest of Goldwater?s views. He was an admirer of Alinsky.?

            Riehl emphasized that the younger Romney deeply admired his father and his father?s beliefs. Riehl also indicated that any switch to conservatism for the younger Romney would be equivalent to a denial of his father.

      • gfrgfr

        Call me old-fashioned but I don’t think the Republican nominee should be a LIAR! The difference between us and the democrats is that we tell the TRUTH.

        Lying is not going to help Willard the Rat win in the General election – If the public is asked to choose between a democrat and a democrat they will choose the democrat every time.

        There can be no doubt that if the Establishment Republicans had insisted on a level playing field Newt would be far ahead of Willard The Rat. If the contest had been fair and Willard The Rat had won I would have supported him.

        They didn?t, and I won?t.

        If Willard the Rat is our nominee I will vote a straight democrat ticket – the Republican establishment needs to fear offending the Conservative Republicans at least as much as they fear alienating the “independents” in the general election.

        • sandiegovoter

          It’s interesting to see that the mods have allowed some liberals to creep into the fold. This particular one has expressed an interest in voting for a straight democrat ticket.

          Isn’t there another site for people like this?

        • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

          Moderates like you who defect to the Dems, you’re all alike.

          You, Charlie Crist, and Arlen Specter: The GOP is better when you unprincipled opportunists get out.

          So just leave now, RiNO.

    • sandiegovoter

      Anyone quoting www.wnd.com should be banned. That site is for birthers and bigfoot-hunters.

      • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

        I’m not a cryptozoologist myself, but I’ve always thought that it was a harmless enough diversion.

        • sandiegovoter

          But if bigfoot-hunting takes you away from your family, it’s time to look into a 12-step program.

      • xymbaline

        and I might agree with you.

        Let’s see his transcripts from Occidental on up.

        Personally, I think, like the guys at Hillbuzz, that he was a D-student that registered under several different names and only graduated with help from Affirmative Action.

        Go ahead … prove me wrong. Show me what his gradepoint averages were and what names he registered under.

        I’ll wait.

  • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

    “Romney?s win in Florida took place with no actual consideration of Romney?s record or idea”

    Yes it did. Shallow and factually false analysis. GIGO.

    • texashistorian

      I would be interested in seeing what people think if you were to list the policy positions and records of both side by side, but leave them anonymous. Can we really believe that Mitt comes off looking better? Leave aside that Newt is Newt for a moment and grant that both have some issues when it comes to conservatism, and I don’t believe anywhere near a majority of GOP voters would select the Romney list. As Erick pointed out, 65-1 in ad buys plus a lot of help from the media and you have a Romney Florida juggernaut.

      Chrysostom might be wrong, and so might I here, but I think an honest evaluation (smears and personal issues put aside) would show that no way would most self-respecting Republicans decide that Mitt is stronger or more consistent on the issues that we care about (and I grant you here the Caveat that Newt is no conservative saint).

  • daveoconnor

    away for nothing. Sell it to the networks. This kind of closely-reasoned analysis is gold.

    • sandiegovoter

      I found this diary to be laugh-out-loud funny.

      Newt does nothing for me besides providing train-wreck comedy as Romney’s foil.

      If polygamists and swingers are looking for someone to represent them, Gingrich is about as close as they can get to having one of their own on the top of the ticket.

      But he doesn’t represent mainstream Republicans or conservatives.

      • xymbaline

        whose grasp of true conservatism has rarely been matched.

        Note the sneer and ad hominem attacks of sandiegovoter.

        They are the trademark of the mentally challenged.

        • http://lukos.com Ed54

          nt

  • texastaxpayer

    Let’s hope it proves accurate.

  • clowngirl

    Sounded more like a victory speech than a concession.

    Romney, with his vague platitudes and the self satisfied puffing up of his not that impressive record sounded like something pretty close to an empty suit.

    Speaker Gingrich with his very specific plans (showing that he’s serious about getting results and has put a lot of thought into – not just what he wants to do- but HOW to achieve it) and obvious passion and determination was utterly compelling and came off as extremely Presidential. And — while I admit to being biased- it’s hard to imagine anyone being entirely immune to Newt’s infectious enthusiasm tonight.

    Romney, with all his advantages still sounded insecure, standing there giving examples of when (in his view) he’s displayed leadership. Apparently Romney is acutely aware that most of us need convincing…

    Newt, on the other hand, showed the character we need in a President – emerging undaunted after being outspent 8 to 1 and being shamefully smeared both by the Romney campaign and much of the press.

    Newt on the other hand didn’t have to list off examples of having led not only because everybody already knows his major accomplishments but because he was embodying leadership right then and there.

    While Romney spoke vaguely of repealing Obamacare (in a line that contradicts what his campaign previously said about not repealing the whole thing) Newt promised unequivocally that if he had a Republican Congress he would ask for repeal on day 1. While Romney talked vaguely about getting the economy going again and cited some (never explained) advantage he supposedly has gained by being so lousy at politics – Newt promised specifically to repeal Dodd-Frank and Sarbanes-Oxley.

    Romney sounded full of it, Newt spoke with the kind of conviction he showed in the SC debates. Conviction that will win out over the course of the next 46 states.

    • romansdaughter

      he can’t very well push his record cause his record is so unconservative and just flip flopping. So he has to smear and lie about the other candidates. All we are showing this election is he who has the most money can get nominated. I live here in Brazil and they have corrupt politicians and we sure aren’t far behind. But the problem I am seeing that Mittens gets to run against Obama and we are letting those who have the most money to pay to be elected then we don’t have a prayer cause Obama has a lot more money than even Mittens.

    • Common_Cents

      He needs to model his campaign after that speech.

      Feb could be a tough month for him but if he survives, he will make a big run in more southern/conservative states. That could be a great story as the comeback Newt.

      Gingrich is rightfully challenging FL. FL lost half their delegates for moving their primary up. But rules also state they should be proportional rather than winner take all. Some are saying that would be punishing FL twice. BS! How does that punish Florida? They still have their 50 delegates but they would be distributed according to the rules. Something stinks to high heaven there. Not following the rules punishes the VOTERS.

      Gingrich has to do well in every single debate, in order to combat Romney’s 65 to 1 ad assault.

      It sucks that Santorum is still in, and Santorum will get an empty moral victory in Missouri’s worthless straw poll. Watch the media pump up the rise of Santorum to keep him in and prevent Gingrich going head to head w/ Romney.

    • kegan05

      If you can watch this 1 hour and 3 minute YouTube Video of Newt Gingrich UNPLUGGED, it will set you back on your heels and you will never feel the same way about this guy, unless you are a Liberal Progressive. It starts getting really good about half way through and has a draw dropping ending.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?f…

      You can’t accuse anyone of taking things out of context…it is Newt in his own words over and over again.

      It will make you curse Sarah and Todd Palin and Sean Hannity and any poor, clueless Tea Partier who supports this clown. Guaranteed.

      • jakeofalltrades

        Where he praises FDR and Clinton and a whole bunch of other left-siders?

        • kegan05

          No that is only a small snippet. The one I have is one hour and 3 minutes long. The Video has also been cut up into 3 or 4 videos of a shorter time span.

          It’s best to watch the full length video from start to finish because you get a better feeling for Newt’s real ideology.

          Newt admits he is a Globalist. It?s really unbelievable that anyone who professes to be a Conservative can support this guy. Below is the full length Video.

          http://www.youtube.com/watch?f?

          You can?t accuse anyone of taking things out of context?it is Newt in his own words over and over again.

          The above Link works fine for me. If you have trouble, copy and paste it in your URL line. Hope it works!

          • xymbaline

            Newt has written 24 books, he’s given, literally, thousands of speeches, and he was Speaker of the House for 4 years.

            How much of his body of work are you actually familiar with?

            I suspect, next to none.

            Why, because you’re a Romneybot who never learned to do your own research.

            Now, of course, if you’ve spent years researching the Reagan years, if you’ve read all of Newt’s books and watched his documentaries, and if you actually created that video all on your own and can ‘show your work’, as they say, then I’ll reconsider my opinion of you.

            Somehow, I think it’s more likely that you pass off other people’s work as significant when you have no idea how it was created, or what was deliberately dropped from the video because it didn’t fit the preplanned agenda.

            Go ahead, show us your work.

  • Wayne

    candidates left on the stage, Newt is the best choice bar none!

    Romney’s ambition is and always has been the Presidency. Not for the good of the country as he claims but to reinforce his own self sense of importance and to achieve what his father couldn’t.

    Newt’s message will ring through with the sincerity it springs from. The only sincerity in Romney’s message is his blatant disregard for the truth.

    The media’s bias toward Romney reminds is so transparent that it should be obvious to a grade schooler. Thank God, for the Internet.

    Newt/Perry 2012

  • tngal

    Mitt or Newt? Its hard to tell sometimes. But given his support early on from the GOP ‘elites’ or ‘establishment’ and the ungodly amount of money he was willing to use. This was money not to endear or enlighten voters about himself, but to discredit someone else, I will have to give the award to Mitt.

    Somewhere Mephistopheles is ROFL.

    (Given the numerous ways this story has been told, I would have thought someone would have done a political version of it by now. This year would make the perfect backdrop.)

  • redmymind

    And the same ole viscious cycle attempts to self-perpetuate . . .

    1. The libs, the lib media, and the BHO folks do everything to secure Romney’s nomination–even using a bit of reverse psychology by leveling criticisms against Romney early on so that the dumb @sses in the establishment start to think, “Oh, gee, they’re attacking him. That means they don’t want to run against him.” Z-z-z-z-z-z-z . . .

    2. The establishment and its surrogates (i.e., Fox Noise and the usual air-headed pundits) actually fall for the liberal bate and go for Romney . . . as the most “electable.”

    3. The moment Romney is nominated, the tables are turned just like they were when McCain was nominated. All of a sudden, those in the lib media who built him up just enough to get him nominated are bent on demolishing him to secure BHO’s second term.

    “Those who do not learn from history are condemned to repeat it.”

    –George Santayana

    • sandiegovoter

      Mitt Romney is a businessman-turned statesman.

      John McCain is a war hero turned senator.

      Romney comes from outside Washington.

      McCain has spent most of his life inside the beltway.

      McCain campaigned hard in 2000 for the votes of pro-choice Republicans.

      Romney offered Republicans a conservative alternative to Giuliani and McCain in 2008 and Gingrich in 2012.

      McCain’s age was a huge issue against him in 2008.

      Romney’s age is just right for a president.

      The two are like night and day.

      You see similarities where no one else does.

      • xymbaline

        Mitt Romney is not a statesman and never has been one and will never will be one. A ‘Statesman’ is a senior political personage, a veteran whose long experience shows a time-tested point of view, a political survivor whose words stand out over the average politician.

        Mitt is a one-term Governor. 4 years experience. He is no more a ‘statesman’ than any other person who held a Governorship once and then decided not to run again. Mitt’s ‘statesman’ credentials are eclipsed by Jesse Ventura.

        Romney and McCain are both political persons with no consistent point of view and no noteworthy intelligence, whose claim to fame comes from media attention from their willingness to turn their backs against the Republican Party and side with Democrats. Other than their ability to be a turncoat against their own Party, they have no outstanding characteristics.

        We all see these similarities. As to why you do not, it’s certainly not from … well, let’s just say that in our world, the sky is blue.

  • mikeymike143

    well done chrysostom15!!!

  • J. Leg

    But I am not so sure. Newt is struggling with cash at the moment. And he has little to no organization in the upcoming states. Romney paid almost $20 million to kill Newt’s momentum and it looks like it has worked.

    Romney is scumbag. But if I had to lean one way or the other, I’d say he’s probably got a 60-75% chance of being the nominee. Now, I hope I’m dead wrong. I hope Newt can pull another miracle. But it’s going to be very difficult.

  • Viet71

    which says volumes about them and, who knows, may spell doom for Newt.

    Palin backed Newt, which IMO is a powerful recommendation.

    The R-power brokers don’t like her either.

    • sandiegovoter

      The core of the Republican Party for the last 30 years or so has been the evangelical right. They are opposing Romney based on the farcical argument that he is not a Christian.

      They will support anyone, literally anyone who is not a Mormon to beat Romney. In Virginia, they will probably tell their bot-like followers to back Ron Paul. And it is all about religion with them. They don’t care about winning general elections.

      As long as a Mormon doesn’t get to the top of the ticket or worse, the White House.

      • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

        And I’m going to call you out on it every time I see it.

        I don’t support Romney because he is a moderate, the author of Romneycare, he has a lousy record of appointing moderate judges, I don’t believe he will lead the fight against Obamacare, and I’m not convinced he’s a full-fledged pro life convert. Doesn’t have anything to do with his religion or mine.

        • sandiegovoter

          But I am sick and tired of the tactics that are being used against Romney. They are cheap, bigoted, and mean-spirited.

          I’ve seen Gingrich, Perry, Santorum, and Huckabee use them. Only Huckabee was dumb enough to make the remarks himself. All of the others used surrogates.

          Most of my close friends are also Christian. They are not bigoted and they realize full well what is going on in this primary election.

          I expect more from this site than open hostility toward the presumptive Republican nominee.

          I can’t believe that the Romney-haters are still in control here.

          • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

            So your Christian friends who support Romney are not bigoted and all others are? You really should get out more.

            By the way, how do you explain the Mormons who on this very site have stated that they don’t support Romney?

          • snowshooze

            He is off to a great start.

          • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

            Figuratively speaking, of course. We wouldn’t want to offend the Rombots now, would we?

          • Bill S

            Understood?

            Failure to comply will jeopardize your ability to blather further here.

      • tonotisto

        Some Romney supporrters use “bigot” like many Obama supporters use “racist”.

        Disagree with thier candidate and you are doing so for some nefarious reason. A tried and true tactic of the Left.

        By your reasoning, since you are not voting for Newt, you must a “hater” of Catholics?/

        • circlegranch

          www.gazette.com
          The Colorado Springs Gazette is reporting that Romney’s campaign stop today is hosted by a company that rec’d Stimulus funding, over $2 million. Romney is reportedly (as printed in the Gazette) on record as saying, “I have never supported the president’s Recovery Act or the stimulus. No time, no where, no how.”(It is useful to follow newspapers in the various states as candidates travel. Local reporting often reveals information that does not gain national exposure but is sometimes helpful in deciding on a candidate.)

          This is the type of thing that hobbles Romney’s attempts to sell a true conservative message. The Republican primary and caucus voter must assess this type of information for themselves and make a conscious decision for themselves. Vetting, discussion, revealing facts and candidate’s statements of the past and present are not bigotry. Trying to stifle same, is, however, a form of bigotry.

          The name-calling toward anyone that does not support Gov. Romney in the primary is getting more intense. Long ago, the establishment of the GOP hand-picked him and immediately, anyone that didn’t walk in lockstep was stupid, unpatriotic and now bigoted. The primary process exists for the purpose of vetting and culling. Romney supporters are frustrated this week because some of his comments, taken out of context, are hurting him and are filling lots of airtime with the Left media. This is the way the game is played. George Allen’s campaign was destroyed with one word. Misstatements and inarticulation helped send Gov. Perry back to Texas prematurely. Cain, Pawlenty and Bachmann all suffered for a one-liner or a comment that turned people off. Why should Gov. Romney be exempt from any criticism?

          After the nomination, all’s fair as far as putting pressure on Republicans to vote and to work to GOTV. In the meantime, we still have 4 candidates in the race and they all have passionate supporters that want to use this site to make their case. EE has allowed lively discourse and many viewpoints have been able to be expressed. Let’s not resort to tactics of the Left. We can disagree but do so with civility and respect for differences of opinion.

          Ensuring that from the field that’s left, we make the very best possible choice is not about mean-spiritedness, bigotry or cheapness. It is, in fact, all about love of country and a great fear about our future if Amerca does not get this election right.

      • lineholder

        Yeah, let’s get to down to brass tacks.

        I’m a Christian. I can give you a couple of reasons that I don’t support Mitt Romney and none of them have to do with his religion

        (1) He’s a moderate who likes the same kind of “progressive” ideas that liberals like

        (2) Rather than simply be honest with the American people about #(1) above, and make his case to the general public about why a moderate would be the way to go, he’s been trying to pass himself off as a Conservative

        (3) This fits in with his history of being inclined to go where the political winds blow him if it is to his advantage

        (4) I’m not much in the mood to have someone try to play games of this sort and my patience is completely and totally gone with the numb-skulls who do

        (6) The situation our nation is facing is dire and we need someone who will stick to their guns under heavy fire

        (5) I have absolutely NO confidence in the man that he will do #6

  • http://www.timothy-bladel.com/ center77

    because Romney will not need to get to the majority to win this thing, there will always be a Santorum or Paul in this race. Everyone assumes that if Santorum drops out that his supporters go to Newt, when it would likely be about 60%. Newt withers in every state that Romney runs an ad blitz in. I do not even feel like this is a nomination process anymore, only that Santorum and Newt are fighting for the right to be the next in line.

  • rarnst

    I truly only takes three lines to summarize the need for Newt and the Mitten folly!!

  • nepanyrush

    Call it the “Yard Sign” Test.

    I have always put a yard sign out for the GOP Presidential and Congressional Candidates. I could put one out proudly for Santorum, and reluctantly for Romney and even Paul, although I have problems with his foreign policy.

    I could not put out a yard sign for Newt. To me, the sign would be a signal to everyone in the neighborhood: “Here lives someone who has no moral values.”

    To me, Newts cheating for six years on his wife, and cheating on the wife before her, is a major problem. Call me old fashioned, but I do not want to be associated with someone who violates a vow so easily and for such an extended time. For a while, I did think he might have reformed, but then after Iowa I realized this is the same old Newt — eogtistical, scorched-earth Newt, who said one of the reasons he shut down the US government was because Clinton made him get off the back of Air Force ONe instead of the front. Newt has serious problems.

    Newt would not win the general election of course. No chance whatsoever of that. But he will also take down all the GOP candidates with him. No one will want to be seen with him. Even now, his former Congressional colleagues tell horrow stories about him and do not want to endorse him. When the public got to know him, his approval rate was about 13%. We couldn’t wait to get him out of office, so embarrasing was he.

    • http://opinionator.blogs.com/the_opinionator/ The_Opinionator

      Gingrich cannot win the general election. I say that as someone that lived in his district in Marietta and voted for him gladly. And while Romney may not be as Conservative as I would like, he certainly has lived a Conservative life (Free market success, strong marriage and family, etc). Newt? Not so much.

      • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

        has a strong marriage and family life, but he’s about as far from being a conservative as you can get.

        There’s a lot more to conservatism than family values, which, by the way, are at the top of my own personal beliefs. Family values are not conservative in and of themselves. They must be coupled with small government, fiscal restraint and a strong defense

        • sandiegovoter

          Romney is a businessman who understands the private sector.

          Both Obama and Gingrich are clueless on what private businesses need. They also want to regulate the free market.

          Romney is the most conservative of the remaining nominees. He wasn’t my first choice. But I’ll let him represent me if it means not having Obama drag the economy down to socialist hell.

          • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

            .
            .

          • xymbaline

            Romney is a Corporatist, not a Capitalist.

            You truly don’t know anything about Newt Gingrich and the actual workings of the Free Market, do you?

            Once you pass your 20th birthday, and create a business that lasts for more than two years, and which has employed more than 100 people, and which created a truly new, competitive product, you’ll sing a different tune about Romney and the world he comes from.

            But since you aren’t actually a capitalist yourself, your opinion doesn’t count for much.

            See how it works? Things get much clearer when you try them yourself than when you merely read talking points from troll book.

            In short, Junior, your opinion doesn’t count for much.

    • kegan05

      Newt is all but finished, especially when people see this 1 hour YouTube Video of Newt, being Newt. Progressive, Liberal, An Admirer of Woodrow Wilson and FDR and Teddy Roosevelt. He loved all their Liberal policies and especially loved FDR’s work on Globalism.

      Newt admits he is a Globalist. It’s really unbelievable that anyone who professes to be a Conservative can support this guy.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?f…

      You can’t accuse anyone of taking things out of context…it is Newt in his own words over and over again.

      Strangely enough, as much and he likes to wave the Ronald Reagan banner around on the campaign trail, he was asked who his favorite president was and he unhesitatingly answered, Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

      • jakeofalltrades

        Yours isn’t really working…

        • kegan05

          Sorry, Jake, I have never had so much trouble with a Video but I found out they are all in little 4 or 5 minute clips but someone ran them all together to make this long video. I THINK I have it straight now. It worked for me when I tried it from my email.

          Here it is:

          http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=eyeB36ctO5I

          Sorry for all the confusion. I was more confused than anyone! :(

          • jakeofalltrades

          • jakeofalltrades

            The captions are much stronger worded than what is actually supported by the video.

          • kegan05

            I am not tech savvy so I really appreciate this.

            Thanks!

          • demsaresatanic

            you try this garbage. You Romneybots are Sooo Romney.

          • jakeofalltrades

            Shilling for Obama

            [vomits]

          • quill67

            By your logic, the US must have believed in Communism because we fought against the Nazis with the Russians.

            Newt believes in party building. That means we cannot turn on ourselves over every issue. Candidates must know that if they run they can count on the party’s support. So the issue was not partial birth abortion. It was are we going to create a whole series of characteristics that a candidate must meet. First partial birth abortion, then immigration, then union policy, then education, then foreign policy, then etc. etc. etc.

            A good chess player can see many moves ahead. Gingrich was looking ahead and if you think about it, you will see he was right. Even if it means hating certain views of certain “Republicans” selected by the party.

          • Rudy

            Any politician that has been around more than 4 years.

            The reason Newt does so amazing in Debates is everything he says is in Context. You can take a 20 minute Newt speech and that everyone who hears is completely in agreement with and take 1 sentence out of context and create something everyone disagrees with. It’s crazy. Oh well such is the Gotcha culture we live in.

            Just wait to see what kind of videos are going to be put out against Obama. I can’t wait for those. :)

    • sandiegovoter

      Romney, yes. Gingrich, no.

      Gingrich has been too cozy with Nancy Pelosi and Bill Clinton. And he hasn’t practiced the values that he preaches to other people.

      • Eyeofnewt

        Let me understand this. So if Newt is the nominee following the convention – would u still not put out a sign or even vote for him? Because if that’s true then u only help Obama. Just something to think about.

        Also, earlier u mentioned that a radical pastor had something to do with Perry. If u have a reference to that I’m sure we’d all like to see it. Thanks.

        • sandiegovoter

          http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2011/10/why_robert_jeffress_is_endorsi.php

          Newt will not be the nominee assuming that he even shows up at the convention. So I don’t have to worry about your hypothetical.

          • sandiegovoter

            brain fart

    • circlegranch

      “Not my will, but Thine be done”?

      • sandiegovoter

        God is in control.

        • salj

          ignorant peoople are.

          • sandiegovoter

            Can you please go somewhere else? You’re a fan of Obama’s. We get that. Go to one of the sites where his fans hang out.

  • WillWong

    who said one of the reasons he shut down the US government was because Clinton made him get off the back of Air Force ONe instead of the front.

    • kegan05

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=eyeB36ctO5I

      It works for me when I cut and paste it in the address box. Sorry for all the confusion.

      The video’s were cut up into a lot of small bites but someone put them all together to make this hour long version.

  • http://opinionator.blogs.com/the_opinionator/ The_Opinionator

    Gingrich lacks an organization and is not even on the ballot in VA and he will be the POTUS? Perhaps he could impress me by putting together an organization. That would certainly increase my confidence in his ability to actually do the job and not just be an ideas man. In the end, execution is all that matters.

    • sandiegovoter

      Gingrich has no intention of winning this election. He talks a great game but doesn’t have the chops to raise money or campaign in states west of the Mississippi. And then he has to scramble at the last minute to try to find 10,000 registered voters who will support him in Virginia, only to come up empty-handed.

      I can’t imagine someone like Newt being in charge of our nuclear weapons. He’d probably leave the controller at his girlfriend’s house.

      • jimmyneutron

        I thought that this site was supposed to be one where a person could go and read and participate in a mature, realistic and serious discussion of current political issues.

        Our Republic is truely on the brink of ruin and the vast majority of what I read is like this post – mud slinging and name calling.

        How about a reasonable discussion of why you feel X is better prepared to turn this ship around than Y or X? Or perhaps we could even talk about what actually needs to be done to turn the ship around by whoever is elected.

        Lay out conservative principles and solutions to our current state of affiars and lets see which candidates seems most likely to implement these.

      • Bill S

        It is not used to award delegates. The actual, meaningful event is the March caucuses. He is eligible to gain delegates in the caucuses. The primary is a non-event.

        • sandiegovoter

          Not only that, he failed to turn in enough signatures to get on the ballot in Virginia. Then he claimed an endorsement by Donald Trump which never existed (not for him at least). Then he missed his appointment with Governor Sandoval. Top that off with his insistence on taking a cruise of the Greek Isles last June in the middle of his campaign. Serious candidates don’t do things like that.

          He is running an inept campaign. He just sent an email to reporters about a press conference tonight. I’m hoping that this is the one where he calls it.

      • rankandfileconservative

        the primary is non-binding aka meaningless, so your point is not exactly spot-on.

        In my view Gingrich is trying as hard as he can to keep from running a corrupt, traditional campaign. That wins points with many of us who are sick of seeing candidates being nukes out of races by well connected operators who can’t seem to articulate a positive message of their own.

        I wonder how this campaign would have turned out if Romney would have stuck to a debate on ideas pre-Iowa, rather than personal attacks. It’s really a shame that we, as a nation, still reward candidates who can sling mud most effectively, rather than those who can make the best case for their views.

        • sandiegovoter

          We’d all love to see a campaign about ideas and not personal attacks. Let me know if you live to see one.

          Every Republican this year has engaged in attacking other candidates. We can whine about this or we can just accept it as part of the process. If people didn’t care about the personal character of their elected officials, then character would not be an issue.

          Because character is relevant, it will always come up in presidential elections. Sorry, Newt.

          • rankandfileconservative

            And what does it say about a candidate’s character when he effectively bases his campaign on untruthful personal attacks? I’ll answer it for you…not much better than Newt’s.

            Seems to me you should switch from Romney to Santorum if you are simply voting on purity of character. Fact remains, some of us would like to see more emphasis on issues and the ability to articulate a clear distinction with Obama and less about someone’s past personal issues, let alone lies about their history.

            These tactics are also why 50% don’t bother to show up at the polls.
            The only reason these tactics are used is that there are too many who reward them, agreed on that point. However, with our votes, we can choose to reject this stuff when we see it, just as easily as we have (like lemmings) blindly gone along with it in the past.

  • http://opinionator.blogs.com/the_opinionator/ The_Opinionator

    The key to winning in November is every Republican heading to the polls with an independent under each arm.

    • sandiegovoter

      I’m already talking to my moderate co-workers about how Romney would be so much better for the economy than Obama. A lot of people are angry at Obama.

      Obama has tied the economy to an anvil and thrown it off the deck of the Titanic.

      Romney would have the guts to cut government spending and taxes to bring back the robust economy of the mid-eighties and late nineties.

  • kegan05

    Why would anyone who professes to be a Conservative support Newt Gingrich? Newt is on YouTube Video describing himself as a ?Wilsonian Progressive,? and a ?Progressive Republican.? Anyone who has done any reading on the Woodrow Wilson era knows that a ?Wilsonian Progressive? is NOT a Conservative.

    Furthermore, on the same Video, Newt declares that our sacred Constitution is OBSOLETE! What?? Really? This is not a Conservative idea. Comrade Obozo says the same thing!

    Newt criticizes Mitt Romney for being a flip-flopper but he has done some major flip-flops. Unbeliev able!

    Here is the link, if you can stand an hour of Newt:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?f?

    There are many Video?s with Newt bloviating and it proves what a conflicted, undisciplined person he is. No thank you. We need someone who is more stable to lead this nation. Newt is not the guy.

    • kegan05

      Here is a new URL. I had to do some back and forth work at YouTube but I think I finally have the correct one. It worked for me when I tried it a few minutes ago out of my email box.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=eyeB36ctO5I

      SORRY for all the confusion. :(

  • kegan05

    Newt Gingrich a Conservative? I don?t think so!

    In the 1990′s Newt Gingrich endorsed and wrote the Forward for a book by Alvin and Heidi Toffler entitled ?Creating a New Civilization.? The book called for our governing system to ?die and be replaced.?

    Newt thinks our Constitution is Obsolete! That sounds like Comrade Obozo who also called for the ?fundamental transformation of America.?

    No thank you! There are many, many video?s on YouTube of Newt Gingrich bloviating about being a ?Progressive and a ?Rockefeller Republican? as well as a ?Wilsonian Progressive.? Anyone thinking
    about supporting this character should read up on his background and what he truly believes. It is frightening.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06XLIPtCXy8

    This is just one link?.There are dozens.

    Please, PLEASE do your research on this guy. I did and I would vote for Harry Reid over Newt Gingrich! At least Reid is not smart enough to be dangerous. Newt is.

    • sandiegovoter

      He has described FDR as being one of the greatest presidents of the 20th century.

      FDR. Not Reagan.

      We can’t have Newt anywhere on the ticket. He wouldn’t even be good in Romney’s cabinet.

  • znjs

    His whole campaign was a book tour that became personal, and as seen from his history Newt will stop at nothing when his ego has been hurt.

    • david1313

      Obama is dangerous, Mitt is more so. Don’t have to restate it, either you get this or you don’t.

      • sandiegovoter

        You’ll find it more to your liking.

    • 10ab

      And his ego has taken over good sense….I believe it is called the “Sarah Palin” syndrome!

      • demsaresatanic

        now Newt has “Sarah Palin syndrome.” You are sooo Romney, throwing mud at conservatives in an attempt to put lipstick on a pig, as Sarah might say. How dare Sarah support Newt over Rino Romney, you have plenty of trash left over to throw some her way, don’t you.

        • sandiegovoter

          I’ve figured out what Palin, Perry, Gingrich, and Santorum all have in common, they all need the power-brokers within the top of the evangelical right to give them their blessing so that their most devout followers will vote for them without questioning.

          I was absolutely in love with Sarah Palin in 2008. I thought that McCain picked a real conservative woman to run with him. Now, I see the pettiness and the reflexiveness in Palin. I don’t think her skin is thick enough to be an elected official or even an appointed official at that.

          I’d love to see a conservative woman on the ticket like Nikki Haley. But Sarah Palin’s 20 minutes of fame are over. She couldn’t get Newt within 13 points of Romney in Florida. What makes anyone think that she will be influential this year?

    • sandiegovoter

      We now see exactly how thin-skinned Speaker Gingrich is.

      Clinton saw it. Marianne Gingrich saw it. It is now on full display for everyone to see.

      I can’t stand this guy. He should seriously step aside and fade into retirement while some of his dignity is still intact.

  • macphisto96

    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/04/us/politics/gingrichs-deep-ties-to-fannie-mae-and-freddie-mac.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss&pagewanted=all

    Newt deeper into Fannie & Freddie, including forcing fees they should have paid onto taxpayers.

    $4.8 Billion.

    Newt is such a mess. I can understand why people have an issue with Romney, but Newt remaining in the race has prevented Santorum from gaining any traction. He’s in it for his ego. I think the Romney and Santorum are both in it for the country. Newt just likes hearing people speak his name.

    Such a small man.

  • nepanyrush

    In the latest Rasmussen,he is the only GOP candidate beating Obama, while NEwt is WAY behind.

    http://m.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll

    Add the latest Fannnie/Freddie deep ties to Newt (see poster above) and you can see that Newt is an ethical mess, for whom Republicans would be running from in the General. Santorum is the only consistent, ethical conservative, and is actually brighter than NEwt, in that NEwt says so much that is nonsense and not thought out at all.

    Conservatives need to move away from the disaster that is Newt and fully support Santorum. He is the only one that conservatives will be energized about. How could we even think of being identified with Newt and his ethics?

    • acat

      You’ve been here long enough to know better.

      If you want to support Santorum, that’s your choice, but this is a very thin way to go about it.

      Mew

      • Common_Cents

        geez, polls can swing 20 pts in a week and these idiots quote head to head polls several months(political eternity) out?

        Poll Troll.

      • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

        These polls are consistent and telling. Gingrich is uniquely UN-electable in ways other GOP candidates have not been. Santorum and Romney both poll better than Gingrich in head-to-head matchups.

        Also, surely if you had a poll that looked good for your candidate, you’d tout it.

        “Santorum is the only consistent, ethical conservative” is a good way to put it.

        • acat

          FIFY. HAND.

          Mew

    • WillWong

      It is hard to judge what exactly is Santorum’s motivation for being still in the race. He hasn’t exactly has a well thought out plan, no ground game, and his record in the senate had in no way prepared him for the office of the POTUS. Likewise, Romney seems like he is in this to fulfill his lifelong ambition to be the POTUS.

      Newt on the other hand is a visionary. He was one of Reagsn’s young lieutenants in the 80′s. He led the Republican Revolution in 1994. He made a bunch of mistakes and had to resign.

      A case can be made that America in 2000 to 2008 has no need for Newt Gingrich and he spent those years writing books, developing winning solutions, etc. History reminded Newt that the time will come when the nation will beckons to his leadership just as England beckoned to Churchill in 1940.

      True enough, 3 years of Obama has driven this country to the precipice and it will require a Herculean effort to turn this country around.

      Nothing that Romney or Santorum had ever done in their past gives any indication that they are up to the task.

      As the sons of Issachar understood the times, we must also understand what are the times we are living in. We need to do what is right, necessary, and essential for this country…elect the only person who, with God’s help might be able to turn this country around. Noticed that I said might because there is no guarantee that it can be done! But at least with Newt, we have a fighting chance!

  • Common_Cents

    He made it very clear he is in it til the end. He’ll do as well or better as McCain did in NV last time. And will go on to be competitive.

    The press still tried to ask him about his own negative ads, but they do not hound Romney about it. Romney should be hounded 24/7 about the 65 to 1 ads if any candidate questioned.

    The left is terrified of a Gingrich President. I’d think that is pretty obvious.

    • The_Rebel

      have gone to bed, and will be into Super Bowl hype all day tomorrow. Not good timing.

    • http://lukos.com Ed54

      Keep losing state primaries but follow each one with a brilliant press conference.

    • Common_Cents

      Basically saying he should drop out as he has no chance.

      they are scrambling all over each other seeing who can say he is angry multiple times. Desperation by the media is astonishing.

      Yet, NOT ONE word about Santorum dropping.

      Gee.

      Is America too far gone to wake up?

      Gingrich is going to get huge pressure to quit in Feb by the media and Gop DC establishment, saying “he is going to ruin romney’s chances against obama” Yet not one word about Santorum or Paul.

      Why does the media want Romney? Romney=McCain, the media and the left will go on full assault on Romney but they are terrified facing Gingrich.

      • demsaresatanic

        that was tried on Reagan in 76. Ford won the early primaries and the media kept beating the drum for Reagan to drop out and unite the party. That just teed off Reagan and he fought even harder, came within a hair of beating Ford.

    • macphisto96

      Boring, tedious, nasty, bitter.

      Gingrich is a small man and more of a narcissist than the President.

      He should drop out to allow Santorum to rise. I’ve supported Romney, but I think Santorum has grown more each week. I like the guy and think he’s the only real alternative to Romney. Gingrich has a name, but he’s a lame candidate.

      • Common_Cents

        Santorum has been crushed since then. He is excited because he might be in top 2 in the worthless MO?

        Santorum is a fantasy. Dead campaign walking or just doing McRomney’s dirty work.

  • krish

    Fox has been brutal on Newt! They have no shame in supporting Romney – they did not want to discuss what Romney said regarding liberal views on welfare & minimum wage!

    Krauthammer – this guy is considered conservative? He hated Palin last time & now Newt – when Newt quoted him about what he said about Romney, he was not happy!

    Cannot watch any TV without everyone drooling about Romney! Obama will not break a sweat, the media will finish Romney within a month after the primary!

    One good news – as Soros said – we do not have to waste our time following presidential elections – two people with almost similar positions going against each other – only difference being R or D behind!

    • WillWong

      Are now jumping onto Romney. Most of those million dollars donor to Romney’s Sper PACs are from Wall Street.

      What you you guys make of that? There is no way Newt can compete with Romney money wise. Even if all of us max out our contribution to Newt, he will still be outspent. Are we not allowed to say anything negative about these Wall Street Guys donating massively to Romney? Is that an attack on capitalism? Isn’t it possible that Romney will be beholden to these Bankers type who were bailed out with taxpayers’ money early on?

      • demsaresatanic

        everybody in 08 as well and couldn’t buy the election. The media backed McCain that time, that was part of it, but I think people also got tired of the constant Romney personal attacks. The race is nowhere near over, and given the large Mormon vote in NV Newt did reasonably well there. I do think that Newt may be a little shy on the Wall Street/Romney connection, but Newt got bashed pretty good when he went after Bain. As I said on another post, Ford started out winning all the early primaries, but Reagan stayed on message and started to resonate. There is still time.

        • WillWong

          No doubt about that! Just have to pray and hope that he stays on message and that Sheldon Adelson continues to bankroll his super PACs.

          • WillWong

            Romney and his top Jewish donors met with Adelson and tried to dissuade him from adding to the $10M he had given to Pro Gingrich PAC but Adelson hinted that he will continue to bankroll Gingrich as long as he wanted to stay in. Let’s pray and hope that Newt will continue to stay on message with his 21st century contract with America!

            Go Newt Go! Help is on the way!