« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

What qualities should Romney look for in a VP?

In 2008, McCain faced a very difficult choice of who to have as his VP.  He wanted someone who would both gain the full support of conservatives, and who would also help McCain with women and moderates.  So he made a bold choice and picked Palin.  He aimed very high, and missed.  Bush had the support of moderates and the base and was able to make a safe choice in 2000 and 2004.  Dole made a mistake with Kemp and picked someone to try to reach fiscal conservatives with his pick of Kemp, but ended up losing soccer moms with that choice.  George H.W Bush needed to win social conservatives and picked Quayle, which may have helped in 1988, but did not in 1992.  Reagan wanted to win over moderates and picked Bush.

When we look over those past picks we find that candidates who used their pick to help sure up base support: McCain, Dole, Bush, all ended up losing some key swing voters segment.  The general idea is for a candidate to win the base prior to selecting a VP so he can focus on someone who will win moderates and swing voters.  Romney is despised by part of the base, and much of the rest of the base is luke-warm towards him.  That is not an unwinnable possition, but a hard one.  Believe it or not, Reagan was despised by part of the GOP, and won them over by selecting Bush.  Romney needs to pick a vp who will balance him, and thus he must:

  1. Pick a nominee who will help him with social conservatives, and especially with Christian conservatives.  Romney is a Mormon, and must run with a VP who shares the views of many Christians that Mormons are not Chrsitian, and who is viewed as solid in his personal relationship with Jesus Christ.  Romney cannot pick a social moderate, a social liberal, or someone who is not either a Born-again Evangelical or a conservative Catholic
  2. Romney must avoid picking a fiscal conservative.  Romney is conservative enough on taxes and spending.  When running against Obama, Romney has room to move left, and must run left of where he is running now.  He needs to distance himself from the Paul Ryan budget, from Erick Cantor, and from Ron Paul.  If Romney doubles down on fiscal issues he will make the same mistake that Dole made in 1996.  Romney cannot afford a Jack Kemp like pick.
  3. Romney must avoid picking a neocon.  Romney is strong enough on military issues.  If he picks a Rudy or a John McCain he will end up allowing Obama to make Iraq and Afghanistan issues.  Polling shows this is the worst possible area for the GOP to talk about.  Wars cost money, and Romney will lose fiscal and social conservatives if he moves any further right.  Romney gains nothing from moving right on military issues.
  4. Romney must avoid picking someone who is exciting or outshines him.  Romney’s path to election is looking like a viable alternative to Obama.  No drama needed.

Ideally, team Romney will pick a VP from the ranks of folks who have been his strongest critics.  Some good choices are:

  • Mike Huckabee — Huckabe is not my ideal candidate, but is a great complement to Romney.  The news stories would focus on how much Huckabee and Romney hated eachother, which would have the effect of making Romney look above politics, open minded, and would cause folks to re-think their views of him
  • Sam Brownback — Brownback may be a little on the conservative side, but he will win religious and social conservatives easily for Romney.  He doesn’t gafe, is governor and former senator.  Is well respected.
  • Jeb Bush — Bush would win social conservatives over on day one.  He was a conservative pre-tea party, but now is probably best described as a pre-2011 conservative.  He is another strong, safe, pick.

Folks will notice that all these picks are folks who were or are governor.  They all are people who would be an olive leaf between Romney and Christian voters.  They all are people who are unquestionably able and prepared to be president.  They all are conservatives, but they all are very different from Romney.  They all have appeal to moderate voters that Romney lacks.

Some of the types of people to avoid at all costs are:

  • Paul Ryan – The singular worst possible choice.  This is akin to if Obama were to pick Barney Frank.
  • Rubio – Another bad choice.  It looks so political that it will backfire.  Rubio lacks executive experience.
  • Chris Christie – another horrible choie.  Christie would not win NJ and would not help with social conservatives or moderates.  Anyone from New England is a horrible pick for Romney.
  • Erick Cantor — A horrible choice.  First, he is not Christian and this would mean a GOP ticket of 2 nonChristians.  Second he is too fiscally conservative (as he stands now, a couple years back he was too moderate).  Third, he is a flip-flop.  Finally, he has never been strong with social conservatives beyond the strength of the R next to his name and that he is in a district drawn for the GOP to win.
  • Allen West.  A nightmare.  Last thing we need is a tea party GOP to fire up the dem base.  It will look racial to sent a black VP up against Obama.  This would be a massive mistake.
  • Any female or minority — This would look political and backfire.  Obama is the first black president, brining race or similar into this only helps Democrats.

Simply put, Romney should ask himself of who he hates the most, and that should be his VP.  That plan worked for JFK with LBJ, it worked with Reagan with Bush, and likely with Obama and Biden.  Biden, as we recall said Obama was not ready to be president.

COMMENTS

  • APA Guy

    FL is THE state we need to secure if we are to beat Obama…and adding Jeb Bush swings that state into “likely GOP” from the jump.

    Some here will say “but…but…but…George W. Bush…”…blah blah blah…

    One listen to Jeb and the country will know he isn’t his brother…or his father. He’d be a terrific pick.

    • Common_Cents

      and RS’ers are much more informed, what would the general public say?

      How many people look at candidates objectively vs. media caricatures?

      • APA Guy

        They will stupidly say “Bush…der Bush…duh Bush…” and mosey along. Those who actually pay attention will see the difference….especially in FL. I suspect the folks in that state know Jeb a little better than others…as do we here at RedState :)

    • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

      for what he said about the Martin/Zimmerman case.

      My comment about Jeb’s comment is here.

      • mikeymike143

        go with allen west if you want a principled conservative from florida. of course, i am hoping for romney/santorum ticket myself. santorum has shown he can deliver votes

    • conservativerock5

      This country cannot take another Bush. They are big government, PERIOD.

      And the voters would agree with me. He is poison to a ticket.

      For Florida, I suggest Allen West.

      • APA Guy

        Sorry…after 2008-2012, executive experience MATTERS. Jeb has it.

        • conservativerock5

          But he is the best choice of people in Florida.

          I will never vote for Jeb Bush. The Bush family is connected with the one government groups and Jeb is no different.

          • APA Guy

            Holy smokes…

      • dbkohl

        … you added that last line. Did you not read the original poster’s submission? Allen West, not a good idea at all.

  • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

    There’s literally so many things wrong with this diary, that I don’t have time to address them now because I’m off to my local GOP meeting. No doubt others will be responding, but if not, I’ll get back to you.

    • APA Guy

      Adding Ryan to the ticket immediately energizes the conservative base and gives us a solid player relative to the top issue of this election: the economy. He has been fighting to close budget deficits and understands the impact of Obama’s fiscal and monetary policies as well as anyone.

      Oh, and he also puts a swing state (WI) closer to our column. That consideration is not to be taken lightly.

      • damianvincent

        agreed Paul Ryan could very well save Romney’s ticket, giving us Conservatives something else to focus on and fight for, Ryan’s budget. Romney’s going to have to defend it either way, he might as well get the boost from the base with the pick.

        • littlehouse18

          To me Paul Ryan actually holds many similar positions to Santorum, though they’re not talked about much. He has good charisma and is very likable. People just don’t really know him yet outside those of us who follow politics. Once they hear him explain what our fiscal situation is, they might finally understand what needs to be done to save this country.

          Both Paul and Rick speak like ordinary guys, and Romney needs that – he really needs something to give his ticket life! Rick has so much heart and passion that he would also be a great addition to the ticket, and his supporters will feel better about trusting Romney. Mitt would probably be more comfortable with Ryan though because Santorum’s passion comes out a little bit more, and Mitt just doesn’t seem to understand that sort of thing.

          • dbkohl

            Ryan and Santorum are both in swing states that we need to win. They both would have influence in the Working Class Great Lakes areas (minus the state of Chicago). Both are young enough to serve 8 years as VP and run on their own and serve 8 years as POTUS. (Something that killed us with Cheney).

            Would Santorum accept an offer from Mitt? Its an interesting prospect. If timed properly it could turn a bitter convention into a party/rally that could really provide some momentum.

            Santorum would also help in the bible belt where there might be some mistrust about a Mormon President. And he definitely helps the social voters come to the polls. My only concern is would he upstage Mitt? Hard to tell.

    • conservativerock5

      His budget does not balance until 2040. Are you freaking kidding me? Obama is marginally worse.

      And yet, he gets killed for even this budget. Politically volatile. No geo or ethnic advantage at all.

      • APA Guy

        …reveals you p*ssing all over everyone and anything not named Ron Paul. Do you have any motives here that don’t involve trying to discourage people from voting for the GOP nominee or shilling for Ron Paul?

        • conservativerock5

          I for one am fed up with most Republicans.

          16 trillion in debt and counting. Hyperinflation is in the future. We will see either world government martial law or anarchy if we continue our path, depending on our things play out.

          My motive is simple: convert people into Constitutionalists and get good people elected.

          I am not here to promote Ron Paul. I have not started a post about him. I have simply responded to wrong attacks on him.

          And I encourage people to vote for the GOP nominee. Or rather,vote against Obama will checking Romney on the ballot. Romney is bought as well, but he is better.

          • APA Guy

            http://www.redstate.com/hanoverhenry/2012/04/05/why-im-voting-for-rick-santorum-here-in-pa-on-april-24/#comment-233

            Yeah…pretty sure you did.

            But glad to see that you support replacing Obama with Romney…just keep that sentiment in mind when commenting moving forward :)

          • conservativerock5

            I forgot that one post. But yeah, I do not encourage anybody to vote for him. Make your own judgement.

            Going forward we must remove Obama, with whoever the nominee is.

          • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

            He is not a Republican. He is not a conservative. He is not a fiscal hawk by any definition. He has wasted 20+ years in the Congress with absolutely zero accomplishments. Zero.

            Take a look at Paul’s pathetic career compared to, say, Rep. Ryan. Ryan has built coalitions and is well known as the expert on budgeting and fiscal matters and he’s done it in less than half of Paul’s term of office.

            Ron Paul is a man with absolutely no credibility on anything if you can put two rational thoughts together in the same month. He is also without honor having resigned from the Republican Party and then worming his way back in – may the Republican Leadership who let him back in rot in someplace hot for that – and refusing to endorse any Republican Presidential nominee in my memory.

            Thank God he’s leaving after this term, may he never be seen or heard from again.

          • conservativerock5

            Paul is not a leader. That much is clear. Not much of a party guy either.

            Too bad he won’t stay in Congress though. He actually votes based on whether he views a bill Constitutional or not, unlike Rep. Paul Ryan.

            I respect Paul’s vast knowledge Austrian economics, and while I think he has read some wrong people when it comes to foreign policy, I welcome his voice in the debate.

            Consider that the Federal Reserve is now a national issue, while it previously wasn’t. I will vote for any anti-FED candidate. In previous times it was one of the biggest political issues, but no longer as the media has stayed quiet the last century…but understanding the FED and why it should be done away with is essential to laissez-faire economics.

  • Martin Knight

    Almost every single one of his posts offering analysis is a pure distillation of abject stupidity and crazy. Anyone who takes him seriously really needs to worry that some part of his brain leaked out his ears last night.

    • APA Guy

      They openly admit as much on idiot loony left sites like DK. I wouldn’t put such dishonesty past any of them, but I do hope moderators here have their work boots on because it will get worse as the general draws near.

  • http://masonconservative.typepad.com fairfaxchris

    Tom Coburn.

    Tom Coburn.

    Did I mention Tom Coburn?

    • conservativerock5

      “Dr. No” of the senate. One of the four good Senators(Coburn, Paul, DeMint, Lee) The rest are pure garbage.

      But Coburn has no ambition for this. Also no real advantages to the ticket. Plus it means we lose him in the Senate.

      By the way, I love George Mason. His Virginia Declaration of Rights is fantastic. Very underrated as a founding father.

  • zachv

    I can’t even grasp my head around this diary. WHAT?

    Romney can’t pick:
    - a female.
    - ANY minority.
    — Specifically: blacks, Hispanics or Jews.
    - a Tea Partier.
    - anyone who isn’t a Born-again or conservative Catholic.
    - anyone who he doesn’t hate with a passion.

    That is the stupidest, most asinine baloney I have ever had this misfortune of hearing. We’re looking for the Vice President, who is running a TEAM with Romney to win votes from the entire country (or swing states) and not the votes from some rural Kansas cowpoke town in the 1800s.

    Honest, the first black lesbian Tea Party Jew from the Bronx that I find, I’m going to stick a postage stamp to her forehead an mail her to Romney’s headquarters just so that I may have the pleasure of seeing you lose whatever marbles you still have.

    • zachv

      * Vice President, who is running as a team with Romney …

      Type too fast. Sincerest apologies.

    • Martin Knight

      Go read his other spew.

    • Bill S

      This is one of the dumbest diaries I’ve read in a while. And that’s saying something.

      • acat

        I mostly read it as a sort of “opposition research” … “If Chrys wrote this, then I know the Dems or the DC Insiders are thinking it” …

        Mew

  • txpat

    We need someone with conservative values, has carisma, conviction, executive experience.

    • conservativerock5

      That is why the chances of McDonnell are slimmer than they would be otherwise(well, even before the ultrasound bill)

      • txpat

        I was focus more on personality and conservative principles.
        Both of those are lacking in Romney.
        He needs someone that will bring that to his team.
        I hope he will consider someone that is conservative, but he seems to me to not care for conservatives in the party. I afraid that now he feels he is home free to the nomination he will continue to ignor the conservatives in the party.
        I hope I am wrong, because it will make it really painful for me to vote for him.

        • Kyle-MI

          You could argue about his record, but all his current policy positions are conservative. That screams paying very close attention to conservative to me (whether you believe he is personally conservative or not).

          • txpat

            His past actions shows his true colors.
            I can’t believe what he says is his core convictions.
            To me he a step up from BO.
            I hope his VP pick will give me some peace of mind in November.
            Sorry, but I don’t have warm and fuzzy feelings at the moment about Romney.

          • Kyle-MI

            Ignoring would be supporting non-conservative issues at the present time.

            If he changes positions for the general election, then you can slice and dice him all you want, but I don’t understand why you want to beat him up for supporting the positions that you want.

          • txpat

            he is just giving lip service on what he thinks I want to hear.
            I don’t care if he doesn’t agree with me 100 %, but to change positions on so many different things reeks of plastic.
            Sorry, but these are my feelings. If he wins in November, and proves me wrong, I will post that I am joyfully eatting crow for the next four years.

  • aesthete

    If you wanted to be selected as Romney’s liberal (but Christian!!!!!) VP, all you had to do was ask…

  • CincoSolas_del_Bronx

    1. help him … especially with Christian conservatives.
    ✓ Born-again pro-life Evangelical!

    2.avoid picking a fiscal conservative
    ✓ Malaisery. Sweaters.

    3. avoid picking a neocon
    ✓ Day 400-what?

    4. avoid picking someone who is exciting or outshines him
    ✓ Though a seeming impossible bar to clear, all things are possible!