« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Top VP Choices for Romney

There is an 80% chance that this election will be close; a 10% chance Romney will win in a landslide, and a 10% chance that Obama will win with a solid victory.  At this point, it is impossible for Obama to win a landslide due to a number of states where Obama would lose an election against a dead tree stump.  The VP choice Romney makes could very well determine the race, and here are his top picks:

First, the top Tier:

1.  Joe Manchin.  The best possible pick for Romney is Joe Manchin.  Joe Manchin is a conservative Democrat who has been outspoken in opposition to Obama.  2 years ago he campaigned by shooting a hole in the cap and trade bill.  Since then he has opposed Obama’s repeal of don’t ask, don’t tell; opposed Obamacare, and has a record in West Virginia of cutting taxes.  Manchin is pro-life, pro-family, pro-gun, and more conservative than some Republicans.  His selection would help Romney relate with working class whites and would win Romney PA, MI, OH, and would seal an election win.  In 2004, Kerry would have won if McCain accepted his VP slot.  This year, if Manchin is Romney’s VP, it is game over, GOP victory.

2.  Sam Brownback.  Brownback is probably the most conservative pick Romney can make this year.  Brownback spent 2 terms in the Senate, and is now governor of Kansas.  He is unquestionably qualified for President, and would be viewed by all as the exact opposit of Palin (except that he is conservative).  Brownback will not upstage Romney, and will compare well to Biden.  A good, solid, choice.

3.  Jeb Bush.  Jeb Bush is qualified, safe, conservative, and he wins Florida.  Unlike Rubio, Bush will not upstage Romney and will not face a real risk of being Palined (painted as unqualified).

Second, the mid-tier:

4.  Senator Tom Coburn.  If Romney wants to make the budget and fiscal issues his top priority, Tom Coburn is the man.  Unlike Paul Ryan, who’s budget doesn’t balance for a generation, Coburn has been a real, long-term fiscal conservative with plans that actually balance the budget.  Coburn has been the Senate’s leading supporter to cut waste, fraud, abuse, and big government spending.  Unlike Ryan, Walker, and Christie, Coburn has been tested, tried, and true and won state-wide re-election.  Coburn is a the best choice for making a statement that Romney is serious about cutting wastefull spending.  He is also safer than the above, and far safer than Rand Paul.

5.  Bobby Jindal.  Jindal is the closest to safe diverse pick avalible for Romney.  Jindal is also somewhat rare in that he is a currently serving GOP governor who has been re-elected, is popular, and who is clearly ready to be President if needed.  Jindal would be a great contrast to Obama on energy issues and is another solid pick.  Jindal is also Southern, and thus a good Romney Balance.

What Romney Needs in a Candidate:

1.  Most importaintly, Romney needs a VP choice to balances his 3 main weaknesses (1) his inability to relate to the common, working class man, (2) his inability to attract practicing Christians, and (3) his challenge in reaching out to independents and Democrats. 

2.  Romney needs a choice who is safe and cannot be used as a lightning rod against him.  Romney already looks too political and like someone who just says whatever is popular.  He needs to pick a solid VP choice who is capable of being president.  He cannot afford picking a Palin.

3.  Rove says that a VP pick only adds .6 – 3% to a canidates support in the home state of that candidate.  For Florida, that could be the difference in the election.  The same is true for a number of states.  Home state is not the only importaint factor, but it does matter.

4.  Romney needs a VP pick that will help define him.  Romney is an etch-a-sketch candidate and needs a VP choice that defines him.  If he picks a contraversial VP, it will destory him.

5.  Romney will be sending a message of either confidence or fear in his pick.  If he picks a minority, a woman, or a polerizing ficture that is a pick of fear.  It will give the impression that Romney feels he needs to take a risk and thinks he will lose.  A conservative, safe pick gives the impression that Romney thinks he will win and wants a safe pick.  The message is very importaint.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • http://nextgenerationvoters.com Bethany

    Jim DeMint and Santorum are tied for my first choice. DeMint has been in the Senate since 2004 and has fought the status quo at every turn; his book “An American Awakening” shows that clearly. He would be great; he’s from SC and can relate well to working class folks, in my opinion. I think Romney’s VP choice will hold a lot more weight than most choices have/do, because a majority of people are still unhappy with him as our nominee (including myself, frankly). I’m waiting to see who his VP choice is before I decide whether I can fully support him or not; only because of his flip-flops on so many issues that are so important to me. If he picks a DeMint, Santorum, McDonnell, or West, he’s got me all the way.

    • Xasteius

      he is on his last Senate term (and the OK gov. can pick another conservative for his spot), but that’s my opinion

      • conservativerock5

        Will be leaving with Dr, Coburn

        • Xasteius

          no text

  • http://www.tooncesthecat.wordpress.com tooncesthecat

    You left off the four most prominently mentioned choices: Marco Rubio, Paul Ryan, Rob Portman, and Bob McDonnell.

    Also missing are the RedState favorites: Jim DeMint, Allen West and Rick Santorum and Sarah Palin.

    Good for you.

    Oh, and I agree with everyone on your list. Manchin would be a “game changer”, but I doubt Romney would go there or Manchin would accept. Jeb Bush is a little risky, because he’s a Bush, but Romney can’t win without Florida and a higher % of Hispanic votes than McCain got. Jeb would ensure both of those, but would probably further enrage the base.

  • J. Leg

    Here:

    “He needs to pick a solid VP choice who is capable of being president. He cannot afford picking a Palin.”

    How, exactly, was Palin not capable of being president?

    What we can not afford is buying into leftist memes about our people.

  • Viet71

    I don’t know much about the individuals mentioned.

    I do think (a) Jeb Bush MIGHT be good, and (b) a woman (don’t know who) could help with female voters.

    The Dems have done a good job of painting the GOP as an old white guys’ party. Romney will need to counter this portrayal.

    • tnguy

      Romney just needs to pick the person he thinks is best as his running mate, and gender/race should be a secondary concern if at all. McCain picked a woman and that did absolutely nothing to change the day to day message of the media or either party. Trying to combat the media message is a losing battle. You win people with the truth, not trying to defy the media’s talking points. Romney shouldn’t even play the leftist game. The most effective moments in any of the debates would be if Romney had a hard-hitting conservative answer to one of the non-sensical questions (like the war on women or some such). Those type of moments resurrected Newt Gingrich’s dead campaign a couple of different times.

      Were I the nominee, I’d go to Rubio first, and it has nothing to do with his ethnicity. I’d also consider Jindal (again, not because of his ethnicity) or Demint. I almost would hate for anything to take Demint out of the senate , as he’s been one of the few people in either house we could count on the last decade.

  • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

    Yea, so was Bart Stupak. It’s just not a believable combination,

    This latest diary complements your entire body of work, chrysostom.

  • acat

    Manchin? Brownback? Are you *kidding* me?

    The best answer I’ve seen so far is Gov. Martinez (R-NM).

    Conservative, blue-state cred, governor cred, pro-life, anti-illegal-immigration, compelling narrative, latin american roots*, and female.

    Mew

    * Hispanics are not a bloc – they’re a meta-bloc of Mexican-Americans, Cuban-Americans, Guatemalan-Americans, etc. etc. and there’s a few more Mexican-Americans around than Cuban-Americans these days….

    • http://www.unifiedpatriots.com/ pilgrim

      Can you explain to me how the DC insiders really want Brownback any more than they really wanted Quayle? Socons are an embarrassment to the DC insiders who they would just as soon have STFU and simply vote straight Republican in November. I have not seen Brownback suggested by any of the DC insiders.

      • acat

        Further, Brownback plays right into the “party of old white guys” meme.

        What makes him a *better* choice than, say, Rubio or Gov. Martinez or Gov. Jindal?

        Mew

        • http://www.unifiedpatriots.com/ pilgrim

          Quayle knew before 1996 that the establishment DC insiders were never going to support him for president.

          How does a 55 year old play right into the old guy? He is 10 years younger than Mitt.

          I’m not arguing that Brownback is a better choice. I’m saying that he is NOT the DC insiders’ choice.

          • acat

            Quayle was there to buy off the conservatives, to keep us quiet while the insiders keep sucking at the trough.

            Tell me how Brownback isn’t the same.

            Mew

          • http://www.unifiedpatriots.com/ pilgrim

            Brownback is no longer “there” to keep us quiet while the insiders keep sucking. He is in Kansas, and he has already found the veto pen quite early in his time in the Governor’s office.

          • acat

            You’re not cynical enough. They’re hoping Brownback brings the Values Voters and SoCons out in November .. after that, he’ll be muzzled and sent off to some undisclosed location.

            Mew

          • http://www.unifiedpatriots.com/ pilgrim

            I want to know proof that the DC insiders are really wanting Brownback for VP. I have heard some names from the DC insiders, and Brownback ain’t one of them. Now if you can provide a link that proves that the DC insiders really want Brownback I’ll listen to you. Until you do I’ll just assume you don’t know what you’re talking about.

          • acat

            I’ve read (and commented on) many of chrysostom’s diaries. Chrys does not represent conservatism.

            You may be right, though… Chrys could be a Dem.

            Mew

          • http://www.unifiedpatriots.com/ pilgrim

            I do agree with you about chrysostom not representing conservatism. More likely a Dem than a mouthpiece for DC insiders.

          • acat

            I do not, by the way, accept that the GOP insiders would have anything to fear from Brownback. The veep slot would leave him neutered and carrying water for Romney in exchange for, at best, the chance to run in 2016 as “the next in line guy”.

            (he can’t run in 2016 if Romney wins, have to wait until 2020.. and by then who knows?)

            Mew

    • windwaker24

      Along with Govs. Haley, Jindal and Perry. A few weeks ago, some people were floating Gov. Fallin of OK on Twitter. Don’t know how she feels about VP.

  • http://www.rightspeak.net/search/label/-Right%20Wingnut rightwingnut2

    …on this topic this month, and BOTH times you went out of your way to slam Sarah Palin.

    BS. Even Palin hater, Steve Schmidt admitted that McCain would have lost by a bigger margin without her on the ticket.

  • zachv

    I just about threw up in my mouth. Not all business practices are inherently good, Governor. It was so downright gross, I can’t …. urrrgh. I have never been able to see him the same. [/shudder]

    * Pink slime: they take the fat, sinew and connective tissue and then heat it and centrifugal it to separate the paste from the fat. Then they soak it in ammonia gas to kill the E coli and salmonella, and then put it in fast food burgers.

  • APA Guy

    Good Lord.

    • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

      with his entire body of work here at redstate which indicates that chrysostom is not a conservative.

  • http://masonconservative.typepad.com fairfaxchris

    He’s conservative, experienced, serious, a true reformer, and won’t be ignored by the Boston mafia surrounding Mittens. I love Rubio, but I think we may run into the similar problem we had with Palin – the perception that she was not ready to be president. She IS, for sure. But a lot of people who aren’t us don’t believe that.

    Coburn would bring a breadth of seriousness to this race that it has lacked thus far from Romney, Obama, and Biden. Coburn covers all of Romney’s weaknesses.

    Romney-Coburn