« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Our Mission: Repeal It.

The passage of this phony healthcare “reform” is a tremendous blow to the cause of fiscal restraint, limited government, Constitutional principles, and free enterprise. In short, it strikes directly at America’s core principles. This is shameful moment in the history of our country — and especially the Democratic Party, which has apparently come unmoored from whatever remaining attachment it had to the ideals of our Founders. In place of a dedication to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness,” there is only a rapacious impulse to ever-expanded state control, and an avaricious imperative to seize ever-more of your rightful possessions.

The Democrats are beyond reason. They are beyond appeals to common sense and patriotism. The corrupt milieu that produced President Barack Obama has metastasized and seated itself in Washington, D.C. — and we saw it on full display in the razor-thin passage of this healthcare “reform.” Every trick, every pressure, every shameless deal was done. Down to perverting the rules of the American Congress, the Democrats stopped at nothing.

Perhaps most pathetic was the spectacle of Michigan Congressman Bart Stupak, who exchanged his pro-life principles for a hollow promise from the most pro-abortion President in American history. That executive order won’t stand up to judicial scrutiny — the President cannot override the law by fiat — and pro-life organizations like National Right to Life and the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops understand that it’s a worthless scrap of paper. Yet Rep. Stupak’s desperation for thin cover to do the wrong thing is useful in one way: it illustrates the union of moral vacuum and maneuvering deception at the core of the Democratic effort for Obamacare.

That’s why the American people will throw them out of office this November.

When Americans vote this fall, they’ll vote for candidates who stood strong against Obamacare from the start — and who will overturn it once in office. In California, I am the only U.S. Senate candidate of either party who fits that bill. I’ve been speaking out against the government takeover of American healthcare since the President first mentioned it. There are so many simple steps we could take to make healthcare more affordable, more accessible, and more efficient — without expanding the reach and control of the federal government. They include, but are not limited to:

  • Allowing interstate competition between health care plans.
  • Revising the tax code to reward and encourage purchases of coverage and healthcare saving.
  • Curtailing junk lawsuits that drive up healthcare costs — and not coincidentally, line the pockets of Democratic contributors.
  • Attack fraud in medical billing.
  • Encouraging a restructuring of American health insurance toward an individual-policy market rather than an employer-mandate system.
  • Obamacare accomplishes none of these goals. One of my first priorities in the United States Senate will be to repeal it and start over. The American people are profoundly unsettled by today’s vote, and they deserve no less.

    The movement to turn back the Democrats’ takeover of American healthcare has already begun: but it will only happen if Republicans select the right candidates for the job. In the U.S Senate race in California, I am that candidate. I’m the only one who signed the Club for Growth’s “Repeal It” pledge that commits its signatories to “sponsor and support legislation to repeal any federal health care takeover passed in 2010, and replace it with real reforms that lower health care costs without growing government.”

    Neither Tom Campbell nor Carly Fiorina joined me in this. Worse, Carly Fiorina has been telling audiences that though she opposes this particular bill, she agrees with President Obama’s “goals” for healthcare reform. As recently as late October, she said she had no opinion on Obamacare — surely the only public figure in America to have remained ignorant of this signal issue.

    Well, I do not agree with President Obama’s “goals.” I am pledged to overturn what he’s done today. I’m the only person in this race who can say that. And if I am sent to the United States Senate — it will be job one.

    Chuck DeVore is a California State Assemblyman, a Lieutenant Colonel in the United States Army Reserve, and a Republican candidate for United States Senate from California.

    Get Alerts

    COMMENTS

    • iraqisfree

      **** these people.

      • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

        It’s a site rule.

        Mgmt.

        • ThunderHook

          how about obamas hiroshima.

    • Born Again Capitalist

      And we’ll march with you all the way. If I may mix my metaphors: Obama and his Democrat cronies have just crossed the Rubicon, but the Battle of Waterloo is only now beginning.

    • earthmover

      You have my vote!

      • ex_scientia_vires

        TL/DR: We blew it & let Obamacare pass, so now we have to repeal it.

        We can’t blame ourselves entirely, but let’s not forget how we ended up with the most liberal President ever: We took the post-Clinton and 2002 victories, and squandered them by pandering to the center-left. A Republican majority in congress spent like liberals, spent way too much time trying to “get along with our friends” on the other side of the aisle, and lost our way.
        If there is any silver lining, it is that BHO and his minions (masters?) in congress have acted so foolishly that they have virtually guaranteed GOP takeover(s) in November. Let’s win, and then govern accordingly. Repeal, repeal, repeal!

        • garbear

          Sorry, not I. But sadly the majority of America voted for it. During the past several election cycles when conservative voters in conservative states voted for Democrats (e.g., AR, SD, ND, NC) they delivered what we got tonight. If they voted for Democrats because they felt Republicans “spent like liberals” (no they didn’t, by the way) then what did they think Democrats would do? Exhibit fiscal responsibility??

          If all that happens in Nov is that America gets mad and votes in Republicans then we won’t accomplish much. The Rep party must spend money not just promoting candidates but instead focus on educating people as to what a vote for a Democrat means–what does it result it.

          • Bill S

            The only “we” who “let Obamacare pass” were the nitwit “true conservatives” who thought it was a good idea to “teach the RINOs a lesson”. Those are the “we” who you should be aiming at here.

            The real blame goes to the fascist Democrites who voted this in.

            • itrytobenice

              but I’m a supporter and contributor.

              I hope you win and hope your ideas are made law.

            • eastbaylarry

              And you definitely have my vote.

              I’ll be at your next rally in the SF bay area.

            • audax

              AND good riddance to the RINO’s! If the RINO’s were still there the vote would have been even greater for this new government monstrosity. As is, NOT ONE Republican voted for it. The “bi-partisonship” was all on the Demo side. Now “THE Consequences” of state tyranny (i.e. jail time and fines for not buying a state sponsored product) will focus the minds of voters who even THINK about voting for a RINO or Democrat. Elections have consequences. With some of the RINO’s gone that is even clearer, lets replace the rest of them in November 2010 and 2012.

            • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

              NT

            • audax

              hmmm.

            • Charles Cianfrocca

              It means that he filled out the title bar but not the text box.

            • audax

              NT! (LOL)

            • audax

              keep rereading my post to check for some profanity I might have let slip in and can’t find it….and RINO’s can go do exactly that! OH RINO is the “four” letter word?!?!?! Is that it?

              RINO RINO RINO RINO RINO RINO RINO RINO RINO!

            • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens
            • Brian Hibbert

              We need the “RINOs” almost as much as they need us.

              Unless you enjoy being in the minority and what’s the socialists triumph…

              Split electorates only insure that the person you LEAST like win. Like you say, elections have consequences and if you stay home or vote libertarain to “teach the Republicans a lesson” you end up with a congress full of socialists who push the very tyranny that you claim to oppose.

            • audax

              NT

            • Bill S

              Are you that dense that you miss the point that having Obama in office is the primary reason we have this problem? The idiots who threw a fit and stayed home and didn’t vote for John McCain are as responsible as the Democrats for this disaster.

              Vote conservative in the primary. Vote GOP in the general. Even you should be able to understand that simple rule of thumb.

            • Jack_Savage

              Strong statement. Please provide some examples.

              I am very, very interested in the theory that “true conservatives” are responsible for this.

            • Bill S

              to refer to the imbeciles who thought it was a good idea to “teach the RINOs a lesson”. There are obviously conservatives who don’t fall into that category.

        • Adjoran

          with the whole NCLB and Medicare D stuff – BUT remember that Nixon created the EPA to avoid an even more draconian Democratic version. The same tactic applied here. Democrats were favored by voters on the issues of education and health care, and would have forced much worse plans through. The preemptive strikes by Bush deflated the political issues and saved money in the long run opposed to what would have been forced on him.

          There is a cycle to this stuff, but it is a tightening spiral, not a circle. Republicans set the stage for growth, which gets taken for granted and Democrats take power, spending a good portion of the new wealth on giveaway programs to their favored voting blocs, ensuring their continued loyalty, until the bills come due and Republicans must be returned to power to straighten things out again until Democrats regain the reins.

          The big issue for conservatives going forward shouldn’t be taxes (although the Bush cuts ought to be restored), but deregulation. The Registry has exploded since Reagan made the only reductions in history, and it is truly the bigger drag on economic growth now.

          • audax

            …you may NOT remember but he came to Convention in Miami and told us how CONSERVATIVE he was and as soon as he had nomination….WAGE AND PRICE CONTROLS!!!! It was first National Convention I ever attended. It started us down the road of the misery Index under Ford and the even higher misery index under Carter. He threw free maket principles out the window…just like Bush Jr. did his last few months in office except Bush Jr. realized his error after he had done so but too late….

      • eswan9

        Thank you, Sir.

      • Newshound3161

        to heighten the attack. What if every one of these clowns were being attacked with a Recall effort now as well as the prospect of being voted out in November? It would put some fear in them about voting on the next big issue coming down the pike which is “Immigration Reform”. Let the electorate cut their legs out from under them!

    • partyof1

      and my money.

      But deeds not words. No Surrender, No Compromise. Victory or Death — politically speaking.

      Very few candidates and even fewer incumbents have this type of zeal. But this is what gets my support.

      This is the end of America. If this cause isn’t worth going to the wall for, what is?

    • JX12

      The majorities in both chambers MUST be veto-proof in order to repeal this monstrosity during the next congress. Something tells me – given the outrage that will no-doubt ensue after tonight’s brazen power grab – that this may actually be within the realm of possibility. The GOP needs to specifically tell Americans that this is what must happen in November in order to affect repeal so they’ll be chomping at the bit to go to the polls and do just that.

      Otherwise, I guess they still have options, such as flat refusing to fund this thing or enforce it in any way until January 2013 rolls around.

      In the meantime, there’s still hope that SCOTUS will gut it, provided Justice Kennedy is up for it.

      • kyoufuu

        a vetoproof majority. Obama will veto any repeal without question.

    • tecash

      full use of our rights to bear arms. What is even sadder about this whole mess is it is only the beginning. Obama has potentially another 8 months to force more of his commie agenda down our thoats with the criminal actions we saw over the last few weeks/months. It very well may not be the end of it all. My guess is the next thing he shoves down our throat is some sort of amnesty bill in the attempt to secure million of illegal votes for the demmies. We better act with absolute defiance comes November and change the power or it may boil down to two choices and two choices alone: 1) Take the beating and lay down or 2) raise arms and take this country back. I hope neither becomes our only choices, but I am afraid of what is coming over the next few months and if Obama gets a full scale amnesty bill through, the influx of illegal voters for the dems may make it to where we will no longer have a say at all. When you consider this country is split nearly in two, even taking into account heavy dissatisfaction in the middle to right of the voter block, adding in heavy independant unhappiness, it still pales in comparison when you would add 50 plus million illegal votes that would go dem. Keep an eye on our government, but be prepared to keep that eye looking through a scope!

      • caseoftheblues

        I live in a different state but you have my financial support and my efforts to spread the word to friends in California and wherever and whenever I can! Good Luck

    • jmstuart

      I hate to use Hitler in any way as a positive example, but I can’t forget newsreels of him waving his fist in the air, and shouting, with great anger and commitment. It was effective. I can’t stand seeing people reacting to this, calmly, as just another political event. Let’s see our leaders get angry and aroused as they should be when it concerns the preservation of the American Dream..

    • http://www.carolinapoliticsonline.com Don’t Tase Me Bro

      Anybody who thinks this is going to be repealed is giving them self and others false hope. It’s not going to be repealed. Period.

      The only chance we have is for the Supreme Court to strike it down and that’s a 50/50 shot at best.

      • http://www.hopeychangemas.com VizBiz

        My fear is that moderate republicans will use this as leverage. You know, the old carrot stick … We’ll give you more, fix this or that, you get the picture.

        On Saturday I was at an NC district 2, 4 and 13 Republican primary debate. Bill Randall easily won for district 13 because of his anger and passion. I mentioned the “carrot and stick” theory to him and he just about blew his lid “Not this old Master Sergant”!

        He is running on repeal as are many of the candidates.

        My point to this post is if a candidate is not angry and running on appeal, he/she has no business in our congress.

        • Jack_Savage

          Where was the debate?
          Please tell me more…

          • http://www.hopeychangemas.com VizBiz

            NCFreedom.us hosted the event and the entire debate was recorded. My my guess is by the end of today most of it will be on YouTube.

            Frank Roche did very well. BJ Lawson threw out some red meat, however Roche’s approach to bringing back some fiscal sanity to the US was more level headed and realistic approach. In my opinion he won the debate.

          • http://www.hopeychangemas.com VizBiz

            The debates were held at the Lighthouse Convention Center in Raleigh. Attenendance was very low because of the rallies being held in DC.

            If you live in disctrict 4, then you know your congressman is David Price (D) who of course voted for socialism yesterday.

            • Jack_Savage

              I am tending toward Roche. For some reason, I think the R has a chance in District 4 this year. Price’s “press conference” announcing his vote was tepid, and the only thing he lacked on the stage were the Greek columns.

              The district is filled with University libs, but it is also filled with Blue Cross employees, pharma companies and doctors, nurses and hospitals. I think this is a real opportunity to take down one of the most liberal people in Congress, David Price. We need the right guy, and Roche seems like the one.

              How was he on social issues?

            • http://www.hopeychangemas.com VizBiz

              Roche is strongly pro-life, against gay marriage and thoroughly understands the dangers of entitlements. Social issues seem to be secondary to fiscal responsibility and fighting illegal immigation. As a disclaimer, I have posted my preference for Frank Roche and Bill Randall (13) in RedState diaries in the past.

              Frank is an expert in finance. You can find a montage of him on Fox Business here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cayMddVxIiE

              I like him best because he sounds reasonable in efforts to systematically dismantle the socalist agenda. BJ Lawson, although a nice guy, throws out statements like “End the Fed”, almost Ron Paul’ish. Which will never happen and running on that is foolish. What we need is transparency of the Federal Reserve. Fact is America’s prosperity has grown 10 fold since thier creation, but they have too much power now.

              Go to his website to see more on the issues: http://www.rocheforcongress.com/?page_id=44

            • Jack_Savage

              That confirms my impression. He is my man in the primary.

            • skorrent1

              Yes, American prosperity has increased 10-fold since the Fed. (Isn’t that about what it did the century before?) But the dollar has lost 97% of its value over the same period. I give the Fed passing marks for stabilizing the banking industry, but a big fat F for “maintaining the value of the currency”. That should be up to Congress anyway, per the Constitution.

          • axiom

            Not sure how many of you actually live in the 4th district, but you may not realize it is > 50% democratic.
            Everything Frank Roche said in the debate was out of the playbook from 2 years ago. We all know how well the Republican party did 2 years ago.
            Even without Obama coattails and a strong push to “throw the bums out” Frank has absolutely NO plan to win democratic votes.
            In all honesty, he is incapable of winning democratic votes, and that ultimately means he is incapable of winning.

            BJ Lawson has proven he can win Democratic crossover votes, and has a message that clearly resonates with all parties. *Follow the Constitution.*
            I know it sounds trivial, but literally all the problems we have with government today would be solved if our elected officials all followed the charter that our founding fathers seemed to think was so important.

            His message of small government, local control, individual liberty and responsibility shone like a beacon of clarity for most of the people in the room.
            BJ is the only candidate in the race that can win n the crossover votes needed to put David Price out of the politics business.

            Roche’s insubstantial responses on the economic problem reflect his roots: He made his living as part of the problem we are all suffering under today. He is indoctrinated and educated in the way of thinking that created these problems and is (apparently) incapable of thinking in any way different (which is ultimately what we need to do to lessen the negative impact of this financial crisis.) You can’t fix problems caused by printing too much money by printing even more money. But, that is Frank’s approach God bless him. To call Frank an expert in finance may be accurate, but he is an expert in doing it the wrong way.

            On the economy, BJ understands what it takes to actually produce goods and create jobs. Frank never did that trading paper on Wall Street. He also knows what a giant burden government intervention in business can have and the impact it has on productivity. BJ is also an accomplished student of history and economics. His constitutional approach to the larger economic problems caused by the Federal Reserve cannot be dismissed by those who say they are too big to be dealt with or too complex to be solved. The unconstitutional money system we use today is the machine that enables the government to do all of the other unconstitutional things that we don’t want them doing. Without the ability to create money (and tax us) through inflation, they would have to come to the people again to approve their involvement in things they wanted to do. Can you imagine that?
            Frank and other people reading this should not be embarrassed that they don’t understand the issue. Our schools have not taught the competing view of economics for nearly a hundred years (basically, since the Fed was created).

            On health care, you cannot discount the fact that BJ is absolutely an expert on the matter and his insight and counsel on the issue will be a great asset in trying to repair the damage our congressmen have foisted on us this weekend.

            Franks typical response to a question is “I study that issue, I am watching it closely, it is a BIG problem. That is why you need to send me to Washington so I can start fixing XXXXX.”
            Somebody explain to me how that is anything but a politician’s NON-ANSWER.

            I am still scratching my head why nobody has asked Frank about what the phrase “family values” means to him. Apparently he is against gay marriage (wow), but is he against marriage all together?
            For me, being a loyal husband and father of 2 wonderful kids has shaped my perspective on the world and my desire to make the world a better place for my family guides my actions. This is an outlook brought about by life changing experiences. Kind of hard to understand unless you’ve done it. You know what I mean, right? Frank doesn’t.
            Maybe Frank just loves the life of a swinging single New York banker too much to focus on the things that most people in my community consider to be the most important thing they have ever done.

            Like many candidates this spring, Frank is very good at throwing out phrases like “constitution” and “liberty” but his respect for them is not reflected in any of his positions (when you can find them). For the most part, Frank is a “stay the course” guy operating in his world of moral and political relativism.
            Recap:
            A vote for Frank is a vote for David Price.
            IF he were somehow magically to win, it would be a vote for the continuation of the policies that have brought our country to the brink of the largest economic crisis in it’s history. No amount of feel good “America is #1″ rhetoric is going to change that, but Frank will be sure to tell you that we are in fact #1 (which we all know).
            A vote for BJ is a vote to hold our elected representatives accountable to the constitution, a vote for smaller federal government, a vote for individual liberty and responsibility, a vote for economic recovery and a vote for family values and a better future for our families.

            Vote for BJ lawson, NC 4th Congressional District.

            • http://www.hopeychangemas.com VizBiz

              I’ve met Lawson several times. He’s a nice guy and is mountains above David Price. If he wins the primary, I will support him.

              However, of the two Frank Roche is the most Conservative.

              May the best man win.

            • get_involved_ask_questions

              Axiom – you hit the nail on the head. BJ Lawson, M.D., has done the most research, is the most well read person on the campain, is well thought out and stands on principles. He makes informed decisions after researching the issues. Even if you don’t agree with everything he says he will have a valid reason for his position. He does not read the party platform and call himself educated for it. Dr. Lawson is a real leader and will be going to DC to fight for what is right, his family’s future as well as ours. He is a firm believer in the Constitution and following it as written.

              In my opinion, after speaking with him a lot, Mr. Roche is only a want-to-be lifetime politician that wants to go to Washington to have a multimillion dollar budget that can finance is playboy lifestyle. Ask yourself, why is Roche going there? What is his motivation? Will he use his Wall Street knowledge to advance his own wealth? Mr. Roche will not even have a debate with the folks on his own website – he DELETES all the posts. Until he was called on the issue he had only the positive love-feast posts there but after the issue was raised he now deletes them all just like he will your emails and voice-mails when he gets to DC. Contrast this with Dr. Lawson’s site that has every comment and will even reply to them! Imagine that a representative that will listen to you!

              I suggest you ask questions of the candidates that are not about talking points but get the the inner person. Here are a few but you can come us with other.
              1- Tell me about why you are running and the research you have done, in detail, about how you came to form your decisions on the issues.
              2- List some books you have read and websites you frequent.
              3- Tell me your passion.

        • http://www.berniereevesforcongress.com dberwyn

          Beware! Candidate Plagiarizing

          Red State readers need know the candidate promoted in the blog above has admitted to twelve acts of plagiarism. He plagiarized his

          • http://www.berniereevesforcongress.com dberwyn

            above post describes Bill Randall for US CD 13-NC. Not BJ.

            • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

              Thank you in advance.

          • gekster
      • Castor

        But remember ,even if RINO Campbell wins the primary, anybody but Barbara Boxer is the watchword. Why my gal friday

    • writeblock

      Mandatory Insurance Is Unconstitutional
      Why an individual mandate could be struck down by the courts.
      By DAVID B. RIVKIN JR. AND LEE A. CASEY

      Federal legislation requiring that every American have health insurance is part of all the major health-care reform plans now being considered in Washington. Such a mandate, however, would expand the federal government

    • rbdwiggins
    • rbdwiggins

      ObamaCare, Repeal. Investigate. Prosecute.

      Until it’s “as dead as a door-nail.”