Somewhere, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is licking her chops. Not so fast, Hillary.

In an interview that few would have foreseen when the Berlin Wall fell, the first black, er, first Asian, president told CNN in China (homeland of his beloved Chairman Mao) that:

“You know, if - if I feel like I’ve made the very best decisions for the American people and three years from now I look at it and, you know, my poll numbers are in the tank and because we’ve gone through these wrenching changes, you know, politically, I’m in a tough spot, I’ll - I’ll feel all right about myself.”

Of course, nobody in their right mind believes that the most narcissistic world leader in our lifetime would ever willingly walk away from power, but it is nice to dream. In fact, many of us question whether our fearless “America’s Top Dictator” Winner would even walk away at the end of a second term, what with all of the covering up of voter fraud in the 2008 election by the Holder Justice Department, and the gaggle of Czars hell-bent on destroying free speech and a free press.

Still, how nice would it be to hear the president announce that he would not seek a second term? Hillary would instantly resign from the State Department and begin working on her campaign, and the nation could breathe a collective sigh of relief that the disciple of Alinsky, Ayers and Wright was leaving the building.

What caused this?

Maybe Sarah Palin? Perhaps the massive throngs of folks greeting her every move on her book tour were enough to frighten the great scripted one?

Sure, she’s unelectable. Even though her overall approval rating in the latest Rasmussen Poll is HIGHER than Obama’s, (51% to 47%) and her appeal among independents now pretty much matches Obama’s (50-49 in favor of Obama.) Perhaps the AP will now assign 11 reporters to debunk Obama’s two books (which many believe were written entirely by Bill Ayers) while placing a photo of Obama in shorts on NEWSWEEK under the title of “what to do about a problem like Obama?” Perhaps they will start telling us how he is irrelevant and can’t get re-elected? Perhaps they will begin assaulting the fact that he has less elected political experience than Palin and no previous executive experience at all? Perhaps they will begin assaulting his education career insofar as his records are completely sealed and his tenure as president of the Harvard Law Review yielded an unprecedented lack of even a single article by Obama, who, by all accounts remained a largely figure-head Law Review president as he was frequently absent and hands-off?

Yeah right. And if they did cover Obama with even one tenth of the venom directed at Palin on an given day, one would imagine that Obama would begin crying hysterically and asking Michelle to take some photo op time out of “her garden” to defend him.

No, America, even if Obama’s chances for re-election in 2012 were severely diminished, in the hands of the lamestream media, that fact will remain hidden from view and most Americans will believe that Obama’s re-election is all but certain.

So again, nobody really believes that the world’s largest ego, who has never met a moment in history that he can’t warp into but a trivial prelude of his arrival in which “few would have foreseen” his glory, would ever walk away willingly from power.

So why say it?

Well, from a political standpoint, it is certainly likely that the most transparent(ly narcissistic) president in our nation’s history is doing a little slight of hand designed to encourage wayward democrats to join him in the socialist destruction of America. Those Democrats who have been whining to the great promoter of death panels and federally funded abortion that their political careers will be over if they vote for this 2,000 page monstrosity.

To that, Obama falsely implies that he just might be willing to sacrifice his own political career to advance the political agenda of Karl Marx.

Now, to be fair, Obama is an ardent disciple of socialist ideology, and his ideology comes first. This is evident in everything the man has done since entering the White House. The war decisions keep getting put off (the latest deadline is “sometime after Thanksgiving”) as war and standing up to radical Islam are not priorities for Obama. His foreign policy is largely designed to undermine America (while simultaneously promote himself) and promote global socialism and utopia. While national security remains an afterthought, healthcare and cap and trade are pursued with a relentless passion. Obama was elected to pursue a radical socialist “fundamental change” of America. He was groomed for this his entire career. So, that he would put his socialist agenda before his political career is not in question. If it came to that, Obama would indeed sacrifice his career for the greater cause of socialist utopia in America. The disagreement is with the assertion that Obama actually thinks his career is in jeopardy.

Everything this administration has done and said during their entire tenure reeks of arrogance. To believe that suddenly Obama realizes that he is merely mortal is laughable. Obama implies he may not run for a second term if his numbers are in the toilet to strengthen the resolve of his fellow democrats and not because of any personal fear that this might end his presidency. He truly believes that he will be loved, obeyed, and ultimately, re-elected. In his self-adulating mind, he is “the one we’ve been waiting for.”

Obama’s hope and stated intention has been to bring “fundamental change” to America. His own Chief of Staff rambles on and on about not wanting “a good crisis to go to waste.” These folks have seized their moment in history to do what decades of socialists and communist sympathizers have failed to do. It is to this end that many are arguing that Obama’s economic policy mirrors that of the Cloward/Piven ecnomic strategy. In short, the strategy proposed by a couple of anti-free market socialist professors from Obama’s stomping grounds of Columbia University, seeks to create such a dependency among the American public and private industry on government largesse, that the entire capitalist system collapses and full across-the-board socialism can fill the void. For more detail on this rather frightening strategy, read this insightful article from the American Thinker.

Think that’s a nutty conspiracy theory? The New York Times has reported Obama as stating that the government stimulus was not given to private companies with the intention of regaining profitability. He intends to have tax cheat Tim Geithner to convey that message to said companies. In the jargon of the Soup Nazi “no profits for you!” If then, the plan in bailing out company after company was not to regain their own solvency and eventual profitability, what was the reason behind such massive government spending?

Obama’s implying that he might not seek a second term, while appealing, shouldn’t be taken literally. This man is a power junky. He cannot and will not leave power without kicking and screaming. This is yet another political gamble set to strong-arm wayward Democrats into throwing away their political careers to advance his beloved socialist “change.” It’s time for grassroots conservatives and fair-minded independents to hold these folks accountable. We need to recruit courageous and unapologetic free market capitalists who will seek to reassert America’s economic and Jeffersonian greatness. In many cases, we need to do so against the wishes of the party bosses. A prime example of which is Florida, where grassroots folks should coalesce behind Marco Rubio instead of the party approved Obama sycophant Charlie Crist. Against so devoted a bunch of Alinsky disciples, we will need the very strongest common sense conservative citizen-legislators. We need folks willing to “go rogue” and defend capitalism, individual liberty and our national security from Obama and his merry band of Mao enthusiasts no matter the cost.

If successful, 2010 could really be the beginning to change we can all believe in, a change that will be Obama’s worst nightmare–a renewed free market capitalist America standing strong in the face of the socialism being thrust upon her by her wayward governing elites.

South Park was once nominated for an academy award for their song “Blame Canada!”

President Barack Hussein Obama and his fellow Jihad apologist Attorney General Eric Holder are hoping to repeat on that success with their newest smash hit “Blame America” starring 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, a plethora of top secret national security documents, Dick Cheney, waterboarding, and the glory of Jihad.

Their smash hit, however, has the potential to kill more than just “Kenny.”

The world’s preeminent community organizer and his CAIR (see also sponsor of terrorists like Hamas) loving Attorney General have decided that trying the mastermind of the 9/11 terrorist attacks in the criminal justice system is the best way to move forward and defend the nation. Absolutely. Giving an insane Muslim terrorist a pulpit from which to preach to the world about the glory of Jihad and the “religion of peace” while slamming America is a great idea. Perhaps Khalid will get his own reality show. Keeping up with the Jihadists, sounds great. One can almost imagine the hilarity that will ensue as the sleeper cells scramble around America plotting her demise, while acting like victims of “anti-Islamites.”

It is really a masterful stroke of cost-cutting. The Obama White House will be able to cut down on their communications budget as KSM will be doing all of the trash-talking about America for them. (Not to be outdone in that arena, Mr. Obama is currently bowing to the Emperor of Japan and apologizing for the United States winning World War II, while allowing a bunch of third world nations to beat up America on “green” standards that they have no intention of imposing upon themselves.) Come to think of it, Communications Director and Mao enthusiast Anita Dunn is leaving the administration this month, perhaps the anti-American propaganda production has already been outsourced to our peace-loving KSM?

The move will also save money on al Qaeda’s recruiting and public relations budget. Both the public trial of this peace-loving follower of Allah, and the scores of terrorists that they will be importing from Guantanamo Bay to places like Illinois will help with the recruiting of new sleeper cells. Despite pleas from the governor of Illinois, Obama’s clear-thinking common sense folks think that importing 200 terrorists to a prison in northern Illinois is the way to go. (That’s one way to get around immigration Barry!) No word yet on whether or not they will be enrolling them in flight school.

In this sense, the Obama administration could actually begin collecting a small fee for their work as the public relations wing of al Qaeda (to help offset the cost of universal healthcare, of course!)

Following in the wisdom of crazed kept man and narcissistic Vietnam war “hero,” (if he does say so himself) John Kerry, Obama prefers to see terrorism as a mere law-enforcement issue. He’s already ditched the term “War on Terror” in favor of the ever-menacing and impressive “overseas contingency operations” (that will scare the poop out of the Muslim filth plotting the violent demise of Western civilization!)

He’s also done his best to pick up the spirits of the Taliban in Afghanistan by dithering about whether or not to actually send more troops to their country. Once banished to the mountains, these savages are already licking their chops at the women and children they will get to slaughter thanks to Comrade Obama’s cowardice and ineptitude. Obama also continues to undercut the government of Afghanistan by pondering aloud whether or not they are worth defending, while undermining troop morale by refusing the repeated requests of their generals for the tools to finish the job. In fact, the only face time he’s even given his commanding general is when he stopped sharing his life story during his European trip (and failed bid for) the 2016 Olympics for about 30 minutes, and then only to chastise him for speaking out publicly about the lack of support from our Commander-in-Chief.

Moving the trial to NYC will only make matters worse for America’s safety. As the editors of the National Review put it:

“It is difficult to quantify how dangerously foolish this course is. As they demonstrated in offering to plead guilty while bragging about their atrocities, KSM and his cohorts don’t want a trial so much as they want a soapbox to press their grievances against the United States and the West. With no real defense to the charges, they will endeavor to put America on trial, pressing the court for expansive discovery of government intelligence files. Having gratuitously exposed classified information on interrogation tactics and other sensitive matters in order to pander to Obama’s base, the Justice Department will be in a poor position to argue against broad disclosure, even if it were so inclined. As the court orders more and more revelations, potential intelligence sources and foreign spy services will develop even graver doubts about our capacity to keep secrets. They will reduce their intelligence cooperation accordingly, and the nation will be dramatically more vulnerable.”

So peace-loving follower of Allah, KSM, will not so much defend himself as he will attack us. It will be the proverbial rapist taking the stand to trash the victim for being such a “slut.” We’ll hear about water-boarding, the evil of Dick Cheney, the evils of America, some more about water-boarding, and some revealing of confidential information and sources, all under the guise of a fair trial for the man who willingly boasts to all who will listen about his role of “mastermind” in the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

For all his faults, President Bush at least kept this nation safe after the horrific events of September 11, 2001. By putting this nation on a war footing, President Bush rightly understood the stakes and the ongoing threat to our nation’s security.

It would be nice to have a president that defended America and viewed al Qaeda as a bigger threat to America than personal liberty and the free market. At least Attorney General Holder will have something to boast about to CAIR the next time he gets all warm and fuzzy with them.

So while this might be a win-win for the Obama administration and al Qaeda, it is certainly a disaster for the United States of America. Having our intelligence sources and information flapping in the breeze for all to see while providing a pulpit for KSM and our new neighbors from Gitmo will only further promote Jihad on our soil and abroad. (Although Obama’s fear will be anti-Islamic persecution and not further indoctrination of future home-grown terrorists.)

What a wonderful place for our president to put us as a nation. He has already done his best to destroy the free market system and the concept of personal liberty in favor of European-style socialism, and now he promises to do the same for national security.

This latest decision by the Obama/Mao administration is a travesty and an affront to all of those folks who lost their lives on September 11, 2001 at the hands of the religion of peace and its mouthpiece Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. It’s enough to make, as the wise sage Toby Keith sings, the Statue of Liberty start “shaking her fist.”

First, a bit of a rarity around these parts. A compliment to the President. His words at today’s Fort Hood ceremony were appropriate and compassionate. He actually found a way to talk about someone other than himself. Good for him.

Unfortunately, he failed to mention the crazed Islamic Jihad that clearly fueled “religion of peace” adherent Major Nadal Malik Hasan to slaughter 13 folks (actually 14 as the one woman was pregnant) in cold-blood while screaming praises to Allah. The failure to identify the real and growing threat of militant Islam underscores why Mr. Obama is not equipped to keep this nation safe in a time of worldwide Jihad.

When asked by ABC’s Jake Tapper, the president refused to call the Jihad of Fort Hood an act of terrorism. Instead, he stuttered his way through the following drivel:

“In a country of 300 million people, uh, there are going to be acts of violence that are inexplicable, even within the extraordinary m-military that we have.  Uh, and, uh, I think everybody understands how outstanding the young men and women in uniform are under the most severe stress.  There are going to instances, uh, in which, uh, an individual cracks.”

An individual cracks? Really, is that the best conclusion you can make after looking at the totality of the evidence that suggests he was a crazed Islamic Jihadist doing his best to promote the “religion of peace” by slaughtering infidels?

Mr. Obama would caution us to “not jump to conclusions” regarding Hasan’s motivation.
We must be cautious and slow to anger, just like he was in the case of the Cambridge police. (Perhaps he will have a future beer summit with Major Hasan.) While immediately “shocked” and “horrified” by the senseless murder of late-term abortion provider Dr.Tiller, his rhetoric on the Fort Hood tragedy has been much more reserved and his sense of clarity and outrage much more subdued. While his administration began immediately cautioning folks to be on the look out for crazed right-wing extremists who are a grave and growing threat to the nation because of the murder of one abortion provider, the same folks are now weeping and rocking back and forth in the public square lamenting the future “persecution” of Muslims by the hands of those crazed blood-thirsty Americans instead of cautioning about sleeper cells and Jihad.

And rightfully so. After all, Americans fly planes filled with innocent people in them into buildings filled with innocent people. They also strap bombs to their chests and blow up malls, night clubs, and restaurants. The also make plans to blow up Fort Dix in New Jersey. They also blow up trains in Spain and England. Oh, wait, those were all Muslims. Sorry.

Of course, how could we possibly know what motivated Hasan? Sure, in what should be a red flag, Hasan was pen pals with an al Qaeda-associated Imam who was banished from the U.S. and sent to Yemen. Sure, as ABC reports today, the U.S. was well aware that the saintly peace-loving follower of Islam was trying to establish contact with al Qaeda. Sure, there is a very well documented history of proselytizing his patients, and of making various public and private rants and power point presentations making the case for Jihad and calling for the military to excuse Muslims from the horror of fighting against other Muslims. That’s just not enough to make his enigmatic thinking clear, we need a real smoking gun (like the one in his hands as he screamed praises to “Allah” while killing people in cold blood.)

What should be painfully obvious to anyone, is all murky and confusing to the Obama administration. So murky, in fact, that at the same time, our clear-headed Attorney General is speaking to a militant Islamic (see also Jihad apologist) group named CAIR. CAIR, of course, is banned by the FBI for it’s very real and very clear-cut connections to the terrorist group Hamas. Attorney General Eric Holder, however, feels that Jihad is at best not threatening to America and at worst, something worth lending credibility to as he reaches out to this wonderful organization of peace.

Obama and the host of Mao enthusiasts that surround him in the White House, don’t see a world with good and evil. Everything is murky. Want to wage Jihad and slaughter women and children? That’s not necessarily bad. After all, those Israelis won’t give up more of their land to those peace-loving (see also homicidal) Palestinians, while America is greedy and “downright mean.” So let al Qaeda and Hamas thrive, let the Muslim pirates continue their profitable racket by kidnapping folks, and let no man criticize them or risk being labeled an “anti-Islamite” hate-monger.

As the many comments to my previous column regarding Fort Hood would suggest, people feel an immense need to point out the wonders of Islam. Don’t criticize Islam because a thousand years ago Christians (who are all now dead) waged a Crusade and once every decade or so a misguided pro-life activist goes crazy and guns down an abortion doctor (with plenty of very vocal condemnation from Christian leaders.) And those Jews, well, they have the nerve to defend themselves against their blood-thirsty neighbors.

Islam, however, remains strangely silent as their fellow Muslims attack the Western world to slaughter as many “infidels” as possible. Either because of fear or because of a passive agreement to the thrill of Jihad, the folks in Islam who claim that terrorists don’t represent them do a very poor job of speaking out against it. They take more offense at people pointing out the facts over their very bloody religion than at the folks within their religion who are using Allah as a code name for “savage bloodbath.” Perhaps if they spent their time attacking their Jihadic cousins instead of chastising alleged “anti-Islamites,” (see also people who don’t like terrorism) we could rid ourselves of Jihad.

Mr. Obama, however, doesn’t view Jihad as something threatening. His rather laid-back approach to the War in Afghanistan bears that out. (Rumor has it that he’s about to finally agree to sending more troops, if that is true, he is to be commended and supported on this.) Of course to listen to the wise Communist sage (and Environmentalist Movement leader) Mikhail Gorbachev, America should just turn and run in the War on Terror (see also Overseas Contingency Operations) as we can’t win. Gorbachev, you’ll remember, famously attempted to stare down Ronald Reagan during the Cold War and went down to humiliating ruin and defeat as Reagan brought down the glorious Communist regime of the USSR. So, while he is personally intimately familiar with failure, he probably shouldn’t be trusted for foreign policy advice.

It’s not just Jihad, however, that Obama is fuzzy on. He seems to lack an understanding of history and the realities of the worldwide struggle between freedom and oppression. Nowhere is this more evident, than his failure to attend the 20th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall. President Ronald Reagan famously chided the previously mentioned failed Commie Dictator Gorbachev while standing in the shadow of the “iron curtain” to “Tear down this wall!” Shortly thereafter, freedom won over tyranny and the wall came down. It was a tremendous victory for freedom and a devastating blow to the evil of Communism. It had been a goal of American presidents, Democrat and Republican for decades, and it marked a dramatic turning of the wheel of history thanks to a little prodding by Reagan and Thatcher.

Being surrounded by Mao enthusiasts, however, Mr. Obama doesn’t understand this. Communism to him is not evil, nor is the fall of the Berlin wall anything important. In fact, in a brief videotaped statement played at the ceremony, Mr. Obama spoke of himself rather than the unification and liberation of Germany as the highlight of the occasion. He narcissistically remarked that “ Few would have foreseen…that their American ally would be led by a man of African descent. But human destiny is what human beings make of it.”

Right. The fall of the Berlin Wall was but a prelude to the glorious arrival of Barack Hussein Obama (mmm mmm mmm).

Noticeably absent from both the videotaped self-worship of Obama and the speech by the woefully underused Secretary of State Clinton, was any reference to Ronald Reagan or Margaret Thatcher. You know, the folks that actually had a hand in causing the wall to fall? No, no, this is a time to speak metaphorically about the “walls” that Mr. Obama’s election brought down. Yes, because everyone in the world judges their history by Mr. Obama’s achievements, as all other living beings pale in comparison to the wonder of Obama.

President Obama should have been at the wall. Admittedly, it is difficult for him to make time for events that are not all about him, but sometimes a president needs to make sacrifices. His absence further underscores how painfully blind America is to the reality of our global situation.

The world according to President Obama is one where there is no good and evil, and America is just another “average” nation among the multitudes. In his world, there is no “shining city on a hill” and no threat of terrorism. The world according to Obama is a world devoid of common sense and moral clarity. It is a world that our founders wouldn’t recognize. It is a world desperately in need of another bold defender of freedom like the late great Ronald Reagan. May God see fit to send us another such happy warrior to re-light the beacon of freedom for a world in need.

Watching the coverage of the national tragedy in Fort Hood, one is forced into one of two conclusions regarding the media–either they are absolute idiots or they are politically correct cowards. Either way this nation is in for a world of hurt.

The much-maligned 43rd president of the United States for the most part, rightly understood that America is at war with radical Islam. For some reason, the talking heads in the media and the Obama administration have yet to figure that out.

The media was beside itself yesterday and much of the morning today trying to wonder why this Major would gun down his colleagues in cold blood. Had he been listening to Rush Limbaugh, reading the Bible or attending Bob Jones University, however, the entire media narrative would be about how dangerous, bloodthirsty and radical Christians are. Rachel Maddow would be weeping and shaking in fear. Keith Olbermann would freak out and poop his pants in a fit of anti-Christian rage. The Huffington Post and the Daily Kos would be filled with blogs urging readers to kill their Christian infidel neighbors in order to restore peace to the nation.

Of course, we can’t get so hasty with the “religion of peace.” Sure Islam has been at war with the United States since our very first war on terror conducted by President Thomas Jefferson against the Muslim pirates who spent their time capturing our merchant ships, selling our Christian white folks into slavery, taking our stuff and attempting to blackmail our country, but it isn’t politically correct to say so. (It also doesn’t fit the narrative that only white folks are racist slave-traders.) So ignorant is the American public on our rather bloody history with the radical Islamic “Jihadists” that our very own President, Barack Hussein Obama, spent much of his Cairo speech this spring praising Islam and declaring America “not a Christian nation” but in a way one of “the largest Muslim nations.” Sharia Law here we come!

Of course, in the text of his speech, Mr. Obama praised Tripoli for their Treaty with America dating back to 1796 as a positive contribution to our nation’s history as it was one of the first nations to recognize the new American republic. That was the same treaty that established a mutually agreed upon blackmailing of the United States where President John Adams, not interested in going to war, agreed to pay millions of dollars to the Muslim pirates of Tripoli so that they would leave our folks alone and stop selling us Christian folk into slavery. The honorable adherents to the “religion of peace” in Tripoli signed on the dotted line, collected the fee, and continued their mayhem for years until President Thomas Jefferson chose to stand up to them.

Radical Islam also bombed our embassy in Kenya, the U.S.S. Cole, and the World Trade Center. That was of course, prior to smashing planes into the side of the World Trade Center, a field in Pennsylvania, and the Pentagon on September 11, 2001.

Of course, so radical is our Jihad-apologist administration, that they probably agree with their former “Green Jobs Czar” (also known as the man White House Top Advisor Valerie Jarrett beamed about “following for some time” and being “thrilled” to recruit him for the White House) in the belief that George W. Bush and “them Jews” blew up the World Trade Center in some conspiracy theory that makes no sense to anyone other than socialist propagandists like Michael Moore.

So, when a mad-man named Nadal Malik Hasan blows some 12 people away and injures some 30 or more while shouting “Allahu Akbar” the media is completely perplexed as to why this America-loving peaceful gem of a man would do such a thing.

Why, to listen to those folks in the mainstream media, you’d have to conclude that it was George W. Bush’s fault that this all went down. It was his evil war in Iraq which the sane and peace-loving Nadal Malik Hasan was going to be headed to. It was this unjust war that sent the rational future recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize into blinding rage.

Sure, let’s ignore blindingly obvious clue number one: he’s a Muslim. Perhaps that’s why the man’s name was under wraps for so long yesterday. Don’t want to let those evil racist hate-monger Americans know that in a shocking twist this terrorist act was committed by a Muslim. Islam, after all, is the “religion of peace.” (Except for their ongoing bloody Jihad against the western world and “them Jews.”)

Sure, there’s the fact that he apparently had a history of going on and on about how Muslims should stand up and “fight the aggressor” and speaking in general Jihadist terms, but that can’t have anything to do with it. He even apparently posted some of his anti-American Jihadist hatred on the internet. That certainly doesn’t mean anything. It must have been stress. The stress caused by that evil madman George W. Bush.

It just has to be that evil war perpetrated on us by the war-mongering George W. Bush that caused him to snap. He’s just a peace-loving anti-war hero. His Islamic Jihadist worldview is completely irrelevant here. Now if he was Christian or pro-life…

Of course, to make his case against violence and war, Allah’s martyr of “peace” gunned down people in cold blood while screaming the name of Allah in terms that are often associated with Jihadists. Still, we can’t really blame Islam can we? We don’t want to offend any Muslims now do we? Isn’t there just some way to spin it that he was a Christian? Surely he meant something more peaceful by shouting “Allah Akbar.” A loving prayer for those being savagely slaughtered, perhaps?

It’s absolutely frightening how long it took the media to realize that–gasp!–his being a Muslim might be behind the attack. As if to convince themselves, they repeated over and over that “we can’t yet know” why this clown did what he did, while hypothesizing that it might be related to his opposition to the war. It never dawned on these hardcore journalists that the reason he was opposed to the war might be that he was rooting for the other side. The Jihadist rants, the Muslim background, none of that even seems relevant to today’s tough-as-nails journalists. So frightened that they might be “racial profiling” the poor chap is our media that they can’t even acknowledge what is painfully obvious to even a five year old.
Perhaps if the Muslims of the world would like to stop being “racially profiled” they could maybe stop being the ones blowing everyone up. If terrorism was committed anywhere in the world right now by anyone other than Muslims, we might be able to throw them a bone and have rational grounds to suspect someone else. So successful is Allah’s crusade to slaughter the infidels, however, that they have completely locked up the terrorism market. (Somewhere a bleeding heart moral relativist liberal is screaming about the atrocities of America and Israel in defending themselves and lamenting the once every thirty years bombing of an abortion clinic.)

Even the president showed an extremely frightening lack of sensitivity to the subject. No doubt trying to minimize the situation while making radical Muslims feel comfortable, our glorious leader promised to address the situation around 5 P.M. Of course, imagine the surprise of viewers who were treated not to solemn words of sympathy and a calm reassurance to the nation, they were treated to a jovial president giving “shout-outs” to some of his guests at a previously scheduled event. After joking around for some time, it finally dawned on the president that maybe to most of America this sort of blood-shed isn’t funny. Imagine if George Bush had done this. Just imagine the wringing of hands and feigning of horror on the part of the media.

George Bush, you’ll remember, was deemed insensitive and racist (in the words of wise sage Kanye West “George Bush doesn’t care about black people”) because he didn’t have Air Force One drop him into the surging flood waters of Hurricane Katrina the second it hit the coast. President Obama, who still has yet to bother visiting or to even act concerned in the least over this year’s flood victims in Georgia, said through his esteemed spokesman Mr. Gibbs, that his schedule is “so in flux” that he probably won’t get to visit Fort Hood until next week, if at all. (Keep in mind that his schedule’s “flux” did not keep him from visiting New Jersey & Virginia for those “unimportant” elections nearly 10 times in the last month. If he was able to take that many trips for something that was unimportant, how far below “unimportant” does the Fort Hood incident fall?)

Of course, given his tone deaf handling of the Fort Hood situation, one can almost see the Obama administration “not wanting to let any crisis go to waste” and pulling out of Afghanistan under the justification that even our troops are against it now,because peace-loving proud American Muslim Nadal Malik Hasan’s only motivation was to stop the blood-thirsty American war machine and not at all a desire to “slaughter infidels” as his precious Mohammed commands.

The sad reality is that America remains at war with a very violent and blood-thirsty radical Islam. The Jihad continues while America sleeps. As sad as the tragedy in Fort Hood is, the lack of clarity regarding the very real threat of radical Islam is equally jarring. Until the west mans up enough to confront the evil of radical Islam, it will remain the losing side of a blood-thirsty war for civilization. It is a war that admittedly isn’t as important as health care for all or cap and trade initiatives that will send utility bills for the average American “through the roof,” but nonetheless one that the president should maybe make some time to consider.

In the meantime, let’s bury our dead, care for our wounded and vow to bring them justice. For though Obama is too busy making jokes to notice, Allah is responsible for the Fort Hood tragedy, not George W. Bush. It’s time for us to pray that those slain in Texas this week will not die in vain and that America’s leaders will finally get it. Our whole way of life depends on it.

New Jersey elected Republican Chris Christie on Tuesday in the largest statewide victory for a Republican in decades. Come to think of it, it was a margin of 5 points. Someone predicted in a previous column that the margin of victory for Christie would be 5-6 points. Interesting.

So, exactly how and why did this incumbent Democratic governor in perhaps one of the bluest states in the nation go down to defeat? There are many reasons for the befuddled governor’s defeat. After examining the entrails of the Corzine political corpse, however, it appears that there are 3 main reasons that point to Corzine’s defeat. And yes, Obama does factor into the political death of Jon Corzine, despite his laughable attempts to say otherwise.

So, the first reason that Jon Corzine was defeated was President Barack Obama. Of course, he has no idea who Jon Corzine is, and has never EVER been to this state to campaign for him. (Also predicted in a previous column.) Those 5 or so rallies that he held for Corzine and the other 2 that Joe Biden held for him didn’t happen. They are a mean-spirited attack by the vast right-wing conspiracy. He wasn’t campaigning for Corzine, He was just here for a date with Michelle in Newark. People come from miles away to go on dates in Newark.

Who doesn’t choose to travel all the way to Newark for a date? If you said you, then you are racist. You represent, as Reverend Wright calls it, “Land of the greed and the home of the slave.”

So Obama had no idea who Jon Corzine was or that he was running for re-election. Then, on the night of the election, even before the results were known, the esteemed social reject and White House Press Secretary, Mr. Gibbs, announced that Obama had no interest in what happened in Virginia and New Jersey. It wasn’t important. He wasn’t going to watch the returns. He had more pressing matters. No, you war-monger, not getting around to making a decision on Afghanistan, it was the Chicago Bulls game.

This, of course, was in stark contrast to Obama’s previous pronouncements regarding the New Jersey election. While in the Garden State during the ancient time period of November 1, 2009, Obama unknowingly happened upon a Corzine rally. Clearly unaware of who Jon Corzine was and wholly indifferent to whether he won or not, Obama had the following to say, “He’s one of the best partners I have in the White House. We work together. We know our work is far from over.” This was in addition to Joe Biden’s previous pronouncement that if we liked the government stimulus we should thank Jon Corzine, because it was his idea.

Now, to be fair, Obama was just there for a date and accidentally stumbled into the rally and found himself in front of a TelePrompter. We know from experience that Obama feels compelled to read whatever those little panes of glass scroll for him. Perhaps he just read the line without thinking a la his lying to a graduating class of Russian economists about how he met his wife, his thanking himself in a speech before realizing that the speech was someone else’s, and the deer-caught-in-the-headlights stare that resulted from his TelePrompter crashing to its death during one of his hum-dingers of a speech.

As Save Jersey blogger-in-chief Matt Rooney notes about the leader of the free (soon to be socialist) world:

“You visited New Jersey, held rallies, blasted out emails of support and recorded radio ads to buoy Jon Corzine’s floundering reelection campaign. You locked arms — ideologically and literally — with a failed governing experiment sporting a sweater vest. You told us that this bearded hippie in a bad tie was a necessary “partner” in the battle to fulfill your agenda. Unhesitatingly, you campaigned with him on health care reform, the economy, jobs, and other hotly-debated topics with profound statewide and national implications.”

So, despite Mr. Gibbs and Mr. Axelrod’s best efforts to white-wash the past, it should be clear to any rational observer that Obama was a big player in this campaign. In fact, as we noted earlier, there were billboards all over the New Jersey landscape featuring Obama and Corzine. Obama’s name and image were more prominent. The tag line called for New Jersey voters to “keep it going.” Obama (and Corzine largely under duress from Obama’s political operatives who had usurped control of his campaign–in the most disinterested and unknowing way of course) did everything in their power to link the two liberal icons.

To then turn around and say that Corzine’s defeat by 5 points in New Jersey, the state which voted for Mr. Obama just last year by 15 points, is irrelevant to the Obama agenda is foolish. Obama wasn’t the only reason, but he sure did everything he could to make this state’s election a referendum on himself–and Corzine still lost badly.

To be fair, another main reason for Corzine’s demise is that he was an unbelievably terrible governor. Early in his tenure, he even alienated many of the unions by trying to raid their pensions. Sure, since then these lovebirds got back together, but a number of union folks felt betrayed and chose not to back the disheveled mess of a governor. Corzine couldn’t campaign on one single thing. In every way success or failure can be measured for a state, his administration failed spectacularly. There wasn’t a single area, even after getting “creative” that Corzine could point to with pride. The people of New Jersey are a communist bunch, but even they have their limits. Without a single area of positive accomplishment to highlight, Corzine’s Obama-run campaign was then reduced to campaigning on Christie’s waistline. As a result, the people of NJ finally saw fit to break free from the chains of the failed Obama-Corzine socialism.

The third and final reason behind Corzine’s massive loss was his opponent. Chris Christie may not have been the best statewide candidate ever (that was Bret Schundler) but he was solid. A solid conservative agenda was promoted as opposed to the “winning” and often sought-after moderate agenda of New Jersey Republicans. Christie offered a real alternative to the liberal Democratic agenda, as opposed to the cheap rip-off that the New Jersey GOP usually serves up. He also has a long career of “going rogue” and fighting corruption in both parties. He is the man we need for a time such as this.

In the end, Jon Corzine failed because he was the sleazy kept man of the corrupt New Jersey political machine of George Norcross, and the sidekick to Obama-style socialism. He failed because conservatism triumphed. He failed because the people of New Jersey pushed back and told the menacing liberal overlords currently threatening our way of life to “keep the change.”

Thus the elected political career of Jon “Speedy” Corzine comes to an end, having been done in by an over-eager (and complete stranger) president pushing an unpopular socialist revolution, a personal record of complete failure, and an actual conservative opponent. Perhaps now would be a good time to introduce himself to complete stranger Barack Obama, as there are surely several un-elected and unaccountable socialist “czarships” open.

It seems like an eternity ago that Democratic leaders were at least leaders. That is to say, they were more often than not wrong on the issues, but they at least led people and understood the responsibility of having a leadership role. Today’s Democrats (and indeed many Republicans) seem more interested in celebrity and their own snarky entitlement delusions of grandeur than any actual responsible leadership.

In fact, the oft-quoted “the buck stops here” originated with DEMOCRATIC president Harry S. Truman. America knew Harry Truman. Harry Truman was a friend of hers. Barack Obama and Jon Corzine are no Harry Truman.

President Obama, the man so dedicated to his job that he’s begun skipping meals and turning into a manorexic waif, made another stop to New Jersey to try to prop up the political corpse of Corzine. Lucky us. Sure, there’s a war in Afghanistan that he is still dithering about. Nothing is more important in this moment, however, than preserving Jon Corzine’s job. Of course, 24 hours from now, when Governor Corzine calls Governor-elect Christie to concede, the Obama propagandists will be falling all over themselves to get to the nearest mic to tell you that the election was not important and that Obama was merely sight-seeing in the inner cities of New Jersey.

Ah, but for now, New Jersey remains a priority for Obama. He can’t help himself. He gets all emotional and weak in the knees when he sees epic failure on the monumental scale of New Jersey government. He needs to be close to it. To cherish it. To just roll around in it like a pig in slop. In fact, other than his own administration, in order to see such inept, corruption-soaked socialism, Obama would have to wait until his next book club meeting with his close personal friend, Hugo Chavez, the Dictator for life of Venezuela. (Even he, however, is no Chairman Mao!)

So, once again Barack Hussein Obama has torn himself from the golf course and the endless A-list filled house parties at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue to try to, in his words, “put lipstick on a pig.”

What do you say when you are campaigning for someone like Jon Corzine? One has to imagine that you would find yourself fumbling for just the right phrase to capture the glory that is Corzine. What with record unemployment, the nation’s highest tax burden, yearly budget deficits, residents fleeing to other states, and corruption as far as the eye can see, you certainly have a lot to choose from.

Well, the first thing you would do is have your audience scripted to cheer “Yes we can! Yes we can! Yes we can!” long enough to fill in the dead air. You probably would also stutter up a storm and litter your speech with a lot of ill-positioned dramatic pauses loosely connected by the many “uh” and “ah” sounds that smack of the eloquence that always eluded that Bush character. (If really in need of time, you could also read a portion of someone else’s speech and wait until AFTER you thank yourself before realizing it. That’s always a good ice-breaker.) If that doesn’t work, you can launch into another tiring rendition of “Are you fired up?” “Ready to go?” until the cows come home.

Once that authentic ululation dies down, however, you are going to need something to say. This weekend in New Jersey, President Obama found just the right message for our glorious leader: the buck stops with someone else. Perfecting the adolescent whine he’s so famous for, Obama launched into a woe-is-me rant worthy of Holden Caulfield:

“Listening to Jon’s opponent, you’d think New Jersey was the only state going through a tough time right now. I have something to report: We had the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. By the way, that didn’t start under Jon’s watch. That didn’t start under my watch. I wasn’t — I wasn’t sworn in yet.”

Sorry, wasn’t he brought in to talk about Jon Corzine? Why is he talking about himself?

So, Obama chooses to “fire up” the crowd with more crying about George Bush. More crying about how hard it is for him. No other president has ever governed under such a harsh scenario. Governing was a cake-walk for Washington, Lincoln, Jefferson, and the gang. He sure must be tired. If only John McCain spent 2008 campaigning by blaming everything on Jimmy Carter, perhaps the outcome would have been different.

The great Eeyore-in-chief continued, “You know, you got a little bit of revisionist history, a little selective memory going on, a little amnesia about how we got into this mess. This crisis that we are digging ourselves out of came about because of the same theories, the same lax regulation, the same trickle-down economics that the other guy’s party has been peddling for years.”

Perhaps he meant to say, “Now, for a little revisionist history…” The economic crisis had nothing to do with tax policy. Corrupt credit lending policies largely forced upon the private sector by liberal Democratic politicians in Washington? You betcha! Excessive government spending? Absolutely! However, none of the economic problems confronting America are due to people retaining too much of their own income.

In reality, the Bush tax cuts spurred economic growth. It wasn’t until Bush went over the cliff with the liberals on all the stimulus and over-spending euphoria gripping the menacing liberal overlords in Washington that things went all kinds of crazy. And President Bush tried repeatedly to stop the congress’ “risky schemes” where credit lending was concerned. And truthfully, the Obama fiscal policy is a continuation of the congress’ “risky schemes” plus the Bush fiscal policy on crack, minus the tax cuts.

Our esteemed leader went on further about how hard his life is: “Essentially, we don’t mind cleaning up after somebody else’s mess. Now, the one thing I’d say, though, is, if I’ve got the mop and I’m cleaning up after that mess, and Jon’s got the mop and he’s cleaning up after somebody else’s mess, the least these other folks can do is not stand there and say, ‘You’re not holding the mop the right way. You’re not mopping fast enough. You’re using a socialist mop.’”

Oh, so funny. Socialist mop! What a hoot. Of course, those accusing him of using a socialist mop, do so because he is singing songs of praise to Chavez and Mao as he works.

So, Obama and Corzine boldly declare that “the buck stops with someone else.”

That’s leadership, Obama style. What an inspiration! If only the Founding Fathers dithered in the face of British oppression and spent their days blaming the pilgrims for their problems instead of leading!

Leaders inspire. They accept challenges and meet them head on. Most of all, however, leaders don’t whine and they most certainly don’t blame all of their problems on someone else. Americans throughout our history have been inspired by people who show courage in the face of challenge and resolution in the face of adversity. Sniveling cry-babies don’t usually inspire folks (although they have been known to give them “thrills” up their legs as an objective assessment.)

At some point our president is going to have to man up and take responsibility. Yes, we get it, George Bush was a horrible monster that sought to kill us all. Even if, however, the wily cowboy from Texas burned the entire nation to the ground, it wouldn’t warrant the constant self-pity and school-girl like whining that emits from the mouth of the great scripted one every time he stutters, er, speaks.

His argument in defense of his own ineptitude and nefarious socialist dealings is weak enough. When you use it to defend a four year incumbent governor, who succeeded another four year Democratic governor, you then have to ignore 8 years of Democratic governance in order to blame the mess on someone else. Try that next time you get into trouble at work. Blame it on the person who held your job 8 years prior to you and see how that goes.

It’s absolute lunacy and cowardice for Corzine and Obama to suggest that they are not responsible for their own governing idiocy. Corzine’s inability to accept responsibility for running the state into the ground is just another fundamental reason to elect Chris Christie. Obama may be fired up and ready to go, but Corzine’s just going to be fired.

Fittingly, our epic failure of a govenor choose to close out his re-election campaign with the gritty image of the child-like Corzine clutching nervously to Obama’s hand as they cross the street. Manly toughness at its finest.

As New Jersey voters head to the polls tomorrow, they have a choice between the tough-as-nails and indeed “hefty” corruption-fighting Christie and the pathetic “blame everyone else for my problems” epic failure of Jon Corzine. The contrast is stark. The stakes are high. Tomorrow, New Jersey residents have a rendezvous with destiny. Let’s hope they keep it.

My latest column for Examiner.com. The original can be found here.

In a previous column, it was revealed that Obama political operatives had hijacked the Corzine campaign in a desperate move to save the befuddled New Jersey Governor from himself. This week, it has become increasingly clear that Obama’s henchmen have indeed re-programmed Jon Corzine successfully. David Axelrod must be so proud!

First this week, we had the thrilling glimpse of our future under the governance of Corzine Version 2.0 when Mr. Corzine made like Joe Biden and produced a gaffe that would end the career of any other politician. In the tradition of Joe Biden’s description of higher taxes as “patriotic” and Mr. Obama’s off-the-cuff remark to Joe the plumber that he wants to “spread the wealth around” a la Karl Marx, comes Corzine’s resurrection of a NJ toll hike. In an interview with the New York “Obama” Times, our esteemed governor admitted a willingness to bring back a proposal that would raise tolls by some 800%.

To quote the Times, “The Democratic governor, Jon S. Corzine, says he may revisit his plan to lease the New Jersey Turnpike to raise cash — a proposal that he abandoned last year in the face of intense opposition from lawmakers and voters.”

The people of New Jersey stopped Corzine’s tax hike fantasy last time. With his re-programming by the good folks at the Obama/Mao administration, however, he will soon be demonizing all of those folks who stand in opposition to his plan as “racist” “angry mobs” who are somehow “inauthentic” while charging ahead with the radical plans anyway (it’s the Obama way after all!)

So, like Obama, Corzine just can’t help himself when it comes to getting his grubby paws on your money. He knows he shouldn’t admit it, but somehow he gets all caught up in the moment of reaching into your wallet that he has occasional bouts of verbal diarrhea. Of course, once the great “wizard of Wall Street” realized that his internal monologue was accidentally verbalized, he quickly recanted in hopes of duping the over-taxed folks of New Jersey who aren’t making plans to re-locate to North Dakota.

In another Obama-like move, the hapless Corzine campaign had to deny one of its own this week as he was arrested for possession of ecstasy. Imagine the panic in the Corzine-Weinberg Campaign HQ as they got the call:

POLICE: “Um, we have your Deputy Assistant Campaign Director Jason Shih here, and he’s not going to make the rally with President Obama.”

OBAMA/CORZINE OPERATIVE: “Oh man, why? That Jason is such a good man! We’re all big fans of his work. We were thrilled to recruit him for the Corzine campaign as we have been following his work for some time.”

POLICE: “Well, he is in possession of ecstasy. It was right next to his pass for the Obama rally.”

OBAMA/CORZINE OPERATIVE: “Wait, who are we talking about?”

POLICE: “Campaign Assistant Deputy Director Jason Shih, it says so right on his credentials that we found in this Corzine-Weinberg rented vehicle that he was driving. “

OBAMA/CORZINE OPERATIVE: “I’m sorry, we’ve never heard of anyone named Jason Shih. He’s certainly no official with this campaign (inaudible whispering in the background says something like, “quick, remove him from the payroll and the website, let’s put a burn notice on him.”) I am afraid you must be mistaken.”

POLICE: “He’s been emphatically telling us who he is in an attempt to get out of the ticket, sir, and he has all the credentials to prove it.”

OBAMA/CORZINE OPERATIVE: “Well, I can assure you, even if we did know a Jason Shih, this is certainly not the Jason Shih we knew. Good day sir.”

Now, if many of the lines sounded like a repeat to you, it is because they were. The Corzine campaign’s sudden amnesia where their former aide is concerned is eerily similar to the plethora of similar reactions uttered by Obama each time one of his close associates/aides/spiritual mentors/political benefactors/appointees turns out to be racist/terrorist/anti-semitic/socialist/communist/anti-American/a tax evader. Obama couldn’t remember his association with ACORN or Van Jones. He also had no idea that Geithner and Daschle didn’t pay taxes. He had no clue that Rev. Wright hated America, “them Jews” or white people in general. He had no idea Ayers was a terrorist. He had no idea that Valerie Jarrett, Van Jones, Mark Lloyd, Anita Dunn, Cass Sunstein, Carol Browner, the good folks at NEA, et al were socialists and/or admired dictators.

So, ever the good soldier, Corzine has taken the same approach. His campaign aide is arrested with drugs, and the only rational way to deal with it is to pretend you have no idea who the lad is. Doing their part, the lapdog media then removes any reference to the story and pulls a Charlie Gibson in pretending to have no idea what you speak of when you bring up the story.

The events of the past week have shown Corzine to be quite the apprentice of Obama type governance. What a fun four years await us if our esteemed governor is re-elected. We don’t have the luxury of pretending that we don’t know him when he embarrasses us further on the national stage. All we will be able to do is shrug and apologize to the nation for our imbecilic choice.

Of course, this can all be avoided by voting Christie on Tuesday.

Talk radio personality and MSNBC pundit Michael Smerconish argued in the Philadelphia Inquirer this week that the GOP needs a new primary process that allows moderates a better shot at the nod. Only by nominating moderates can the GOP hope to survive. He couldn’t be more wrong.

Smerconish warns the GOP against nominating the likes of Sarah Palin, Mike Huckabee or Mitt Romney, as each can “excite the base” but would lose the general election to President Obama. History and current polling trends suggest otherwise.

Of course, before even getting to the bulk of Smerconish’s argument, one has to only look back as far as last year to point out that the “moderate” Smerconish, a veteran of George H.W. Bush’s administration, endorsed Barack Obama for president. So naturally, one has to question the motives of Barack’s favorite talk radio host when he begins prescribing the remedy to oust his anointed candidate of just one year ago.

Has Smerconish been so disillusioned with Obama already? Less than a year later, is Smerconish really against a second Obama term? Surely, he has disagreements with the president on policy, but those disagreements existed before the election and Smerconish was able to look past them and endorse the political heir of Ayers and Alinsky nonetheless. Smerconish’s recent sit down love-fest with the president on his radio show speaks the loudest as to his street cred in all things Republican.

It has been made abundantly clear that only Obama sycophants, supporters, and propagandists will be given any access to the White House. The daily invective hurled at anyone even remotely critical of the White House by the esteemed White House Press Secretary (the befuddled Mr. Gibbs) and Obama Communications Director (and Mao enthusiast) Anita Dunn have more than made their point. With the Obama administration, you only get access if you are “friendly” to the White House. Fox News and all others are systematically cut off from any real access for fear a little truth will sneak out. That the president willingly sat down with Smerconish speaks of his good standing with this White House and should put up red flags for those who oppose the Obama administration.

Indeed, Republicans would be foolish to take the advice of someone who publicly supported their opponent as recently as last year.

Moving from the motivation to the actual argument, Smerconish bases his perceived sad state of the GOP on a poll, arguing, “That there has been an exodus from the GOP cannot be denied. A Washington Post/ABC News poll released last week found that just 20 percent of respondents identified themselves as Republican - the lowest figure since 1983.”

This is true. Of course, in that same poll, only 33% identified themselves as Democrat, while 42% identified themselves as independents. Perhaps by that token, one would be better off running as an independent? Smerconish’s argument for moderation as the only way to save the GOP misses the part in the poll where the highest ideological group is conservative. In this same poll, 38% identify themselves as conservative, 36% as moderate and 23% as liberal.

These numbers are similar to a recent Gallup Poll that found that the percentage of self-identified conservatives has actually increased to 40%, with moderates claiming 36% and liberals claiming 20%. Previous Gallup polling had conservatives tied with moderates, but the trend seems to be an uptick in the conservative alignment. The internals of the poll also reveal that many Americans have become more conservative on core issues facing the nation. In addition, Gallup even found that among Independents, there was a 6 point increase (29-35%) of those claiming to be conservative. So, while the percentage of self-identified Republicans has dropped, the percentage of conservatives is on the rise. This speaks more to a dissatisfaction with the Republican party than of conservative ideology.

Smerconish ignores this conservative growth by charting a moderate path for the GOP in order to win. Where exactly is the logic in moving away from the largest (and currently growing) political ideology? It’s notable that no such calls are ever made by Smerconish or others for the Democratic party to become less liberal, despite abysmal showings for liberals in both of these polls. This also despite the fact that poll after poll has been showing that Americans are increasingly at odds with the Democratic agenda as the president’s polling numbers continue to plummet.

Smerconish claims that more moderate candidates that win in New Hampshire are better suited to a 270 electoral vote victory in 2012. Let the Specter 2012 campaign begin! (Oh that’s right, he’s a Democrat now.) Start printing those Olympia Snowe for President signs now folks!

He even quotes a “Republican operative” named Roger Stone as supporting his hypothesis in a bit of subtle peer pressure. Oh, well if Roger Stone is for it, it must be good! Stone’s career reads like a who’s who among liberal to moderate “Republicans.” He worked for Richard Nixon & George H. W. Bush (both hardly conservatives). He worked for moderate Bob Dole in the senate and the moderate-to-liberal former Governor of New Jersey, Tom Keane. In 1996, he ran the Arlen Specter for President campaign (that should tell you all you need to know about his politics.) In fact, the only true conservative name to come up on his list of clients was Ronald Reagan, and pretty much every Republican operative worked for him. Other than all of that, yeah, let’s listen to his advice.

Smerconish’s advice also ignores the lessons of history. Of course, the ever-helpful political punditry in the media never lacks for opinions on the proper way to save the GOP. Of course the roadmap is always the same. Follow the middle of the road. It’s your only hope. Thus, with all the sincerity of the big bad wolf, the media constantly tries to trick the little GOP piggies into letting them in to the “big tent.” Year after year, the establishment GOP nitwits do just that.

Recent history is clear on Smerconish’s hypothesis. Gerald Ford was a moderate and lost to Jimmy Carter in 1976. Ronald Reagan called the party to offer a bold conservative alternative to the liberal Democrats in the late 1970s and led the party to two electoral landslides in 1980 and 1984. His successor, George H. W. Bush, was elected largely on his coattails in 1988, and lost four years later in 1992 after abandoning the more conservative policies of Reagan and embracing the political middle (no doubt thanks to the wisdom of Roger Stone and Michael Smerconish). Four years later, moderate GOP senator Bob Dole also went down to defeat to the strangely conservative sounding Bill Clinton. George W. Bush learned the lessons of his father and campaigned as a more conservative candidate in 2000 and 2004, before abandoning much of his conservatism in his second term, resulting in an approval rating in the twenties. Finally, last year, the GOP nominated yet another moderate in one last attempt to appease the media. In fact, they nominated the media’s favorite “maverick” John McCain. Suddenly, the media hated his guts with all the fury of a high school girl after being dumped. McCain not only lost the election, but he failed to even get Smerconish’s endorsement despite meeting the “moderate” qualification.

History and recent polling seem to be colluding together to disprove the thesis of Mr. Smerconish. Not to be left out, even recent events disprove his theory.

Sarah Palin, the hated and unelectable woman that the media keeps telling the GOP to stay away from, has a bestselling book weeks before it even comes out. So unelectable and loathed by the American people is she, that within a day of her endorsement, Conservative Party congressional candidate Doug Hoffman found himself with an additional $116,000 in campaign cash. Less than a week later, he went from third to first place in public opinion polling, while the “moderate” Republican has fallen to last place.

That sure doesn’t sound like an unelectable and much-loathed woman to me.

The GOP needs to reclaim the mantle of Reagan or risk becoming extinct. Only when the party boldly proclaims conservatism is victory possible. There is a very clear roadmap to a GOP victory in 2012 and it has nothing to do with moderation. The GOP needs to offer a stark difference to Obama or guarantee him a second term. This remains a center-right nation. With 40% of Americans calling themselves conservatives, the GOP would do well to head in their direction.

The following appears on my Examiner.com page.  You can find the original here.

Jon “Speedy” Corzine, the failed governor of New Jersey, in a last ditch move to hold on to power, is trying to fool New Jersey voters into thinking Obama is on the ballot. Of course, it’s unclear as to why that would even be a good thing. President Obama has experienced the largest approval rating drop in 50 years and is far from the captivating candidate of 2008. In the latest Rasmussen poll, his approval is down to a mere 49%.  He now stands as one of the most polarizing figures in the nation, and one, who on most issues, is completely at odds with the majority of the American people.

That should tell you how pathetic Corzine is. Billboards cover the NJ landscape urging us to “Keep it going” and listing OBAMA / Corzine as the candidates. Someone better tell Joe Biden that he’s been replaced as the Vice President. Either Corzine is moving up in the world, or someone better stop looking for Obama’s birth certificate and verify that he’s a resident of New Jersey before he gets elected as our state’s governor by accident!

Never has a statewide candidate for office (particularly an incumbent) worked so hard to hide himself behind one of his party’s national leaders in order to fool voters into voting for him. Candidates have always tried to tie themselves to popular national leaders in their party while distancing themselves from unpopular or polarizing ones, but not typically to the point that the candidate himself hides from the public. Of course when you run your mouth about raising taxes, fat people, and telling the folks in your state to move out if they don’t like your grubby paws in their wallet, you might want to find a new way to promote yourself.

The president, who lacks the time or energy to come up with and follow-through on a coherent Afghanistan policy, nor apparently the time to screen any of his nominees for their radical beliefs and tax evasion problems, has nonetheless cleared the schedule for Corzine. Corzine shouldn’t feel special, however, as our glorious leader (and closeted Mao enthusiast) has made time for 22 fundraisers so far this year. By comparison, divisive layabout George W. Bush attended a whopping 6 fundraisers in his entire first year. Now admittedly, Bush did view national security as somewhat of a priority, while Obama views it as a nuisance that stands in the way of socialized medicine and the permanent campaign.

Obama’s visits here actually speak more of the fear over a Corzine loss than of any confidence in his inevitable victory on November 3. The Obama/Mao administration has really only two statewide elections this year, and the Democratic candidate for governor in Virginia is currently running about a thousand points behind the Republican. So, with no hope of victory in Virginia (or the state-formerly-known-as-Obama-country) the Obama/Mao administration has chosen to demonize Fox News, ignore national security and go all in in New Jersey, hoping for a last minute surge in dead and repeat voters to put Jon Corzine over the top. That and the glorious third party gun-toting creature known as Daggett, who may or may not have a job offer to join the Corzine administration for his efforts to ensure his re-election, or perhaps a “czarship” under Obama. The “Green Jobs Czar” position should be open.

All the Democrats have been here trying to prop up New Jersey’s own “Weekend At Bernies” corpse of a governor. Even the ever-faithful Bill Clinton has been here. Hillary hasn’t, but then she’s probably busy with all of those trips to the few insignificant countries that Obama doesn’t have special envoys for.

In fact, these days it seems like Chris Christie is running against the entire Democratic party except for Jon Corzine. Voters are not, however, voting for any of these more popular Democrats. They are voting for Corzine (well, that is the 35-40 percent of the folks who actually are voting for him, as opposed to the 60-65 percent casting ballots for someone else.) The sad reality for state Democrats is that this is their “hold your nose and pull the lever” election. Corzine is the crazy old uncle nobody owns up to, but has to sit next to at Thanksgiving dinner just the same.

Don’t read too much into Obama’s frequent stops in the state. The Democrats are anything but confident. On the outside, they have to be. The second the election is over, and Corzine has to start making transition plans with Governor-elect Christie, the Obama/Mao administration will begin their slash and burn strategy. It will make their treatment of Fox News look charitable by comparison.

Today it is all, “I love me some Jon Corzine. Can’t get enough of the guy! Why in the senate we were like two pea in a pod. What a great chief executive you folks have, New Jersey sure is lucky. Do you know how much residents in other states would give to pay the amount of taxes you do?” After November 3, it will be all, “I did my best, but this isn’t a reflection on me because Jon Corzine was a weak candidate. Actually, he’s a dirtbag. I never really liked him anyway. I just happened to live in the same neighborhood with him. He isn’t the Jon Corzine I knew. Also, it’s George Bush’s fault.” Disheveled mess Corzine will then be left for dead in the political wilderness as he waits for Frank Lautenberg to finally meet his maker so that he can re-claim his senate seat.

Speaking of Corzine’s viability as a candidate, the Courier-Post rightly noted that, “Corzine’s record is clear, and as a result he shouldn’t even be in the discussion as a gubernatorial preference. His first term in office has been a total failure. Taxes have continued to skyrocket, and any attempts at spending reforms have been minimal and to negligible effect.”

The Courier-Post went on to endorse Chris Christie for governor, saying that, “If voters genuinely want to change the reckless, unethical culture of Trenton…Chris Christie should be the clear choice as the only candidate exhibiting the courage to meaningfully talk about what the state can’t afford.”

Finally, a note about polling. As a volunteer in the Christie Whitman for Governor campaign of 1993, yours truly had some experience with polls and their inaccuracies. Statewide the public polling right up to the election of 1993 had Florio winning re-election by a comfortable margin, with many polls in double digit leads for the tax-raising clown. A few days before the election as we campaigned with Whitman and the late Jack Kemp in Camden, the then-chairman of the Camden County GOP told me in confidence that the internal campaign polling revealed a 1 point lead for Whitman. No other public poll to my knowledge picked that up. Yet on election day, Whitman stunned the state by winning by about 1 point.

Public polling in New Jersey isn’t always the most accurate. Additionally, they typically favor the Democats. The last minute visits by the Democratic heavy-weights smack more of desperation than confidence. This election is still very much in play. With Daggett’s recent run-in with the law and accusations of a back-room deal between Corzine and Daggett, look for the third party total to diminish. Those anti-Corzine folks are going to return to Christie and this state will have its first real shot at conservative reform in decades.

And if not, you would be wise to start selling “Don’t Blame Me I Voted For Christie” bumper stickers and real estate in North Dakota.

One of my favorite philosophers, Adolph Hitler, used to say that he had to fight his own war. Think about that. Isn’t that neat? You can fight your own wars.

Did the above comment bother you? No, Adolph Hitler is not one of my favorite philosophers. He was a nefarious genocidal mad-man, not one worthy of citing in a speech to students. Rational people understand that you don’t cling to the nuggets of wisdom that come from such folks. Not so in the Obama administration, however.

Obama Communications Director Anita Dunn is the latest Obama aide to be revealed as a communist-loving extremist. Surely, as with all of the previous examples (Van Jones, Cass Sunstein, Carol Browner, Reverend Wright, Bill Ayers, Rashid Khalidi, Louis Farrakhan, Mark Lloyd, Valerie Jarrett, et al) we will find that this Anita Dunn is not the Anita Dunn that Barack Obama knows. He surely had no idea of her school-girl crush on a communist dictator responsible for the deaths of tens of millions of people.

At issue is a speech in which the seemingly unstable Dunn astonishes her crowd by referring to Chinese Communist Dictator, Chairman Mao, as one of her “favorite philosophers.” In fact, here’s the genocide apologist and fan club president in her own words:

“The third lesson and tip actually comes from two of my favorite political philosophers, Mao Tse Tung and Mother Theresa, not often coupled with each other, but the two people that I turn to most to basically deliver a simple point, which is, you’re going to make choices. You’re going to challenge. You’re going to say, ‘Why not?’ You’re going to figure out how to do things that have never been done before. But here’s the deal: These are your choices. They are no one else’s. ??In 1947, when Mao Tse Tung was being challenged within his own party on his plan to basically take China over, Chiang Kai?shek and the Nationalist Chinese held the cities, they had the army, they had the air force, they had everything on their side. And people said, ‘How can you win? How can you do this? How can you do this against all of the odds against you?’ And Mao Tse Tung said, you know, ‘You fight your war, and I’ll fight mine.’ And think about that for a second.

You know, you don’t have to accept the definition of how to do things, and you don’t have to follow other people’s choices and paths, OK? It is about your choices and your path. You fight your own war.”

So you have the Communications Director of the Obama Administration praising the wisdom of a Communist Dictator who “had to fight his own war” to “basically take over China.” She couples him with Mother Theresa to soften the blow, yet then goes on in glowing detail to share how glorious it was that he took over China. Her account is one of awe and wonder. She is making the point that this man “fought his own war” to accomplish something great. As a favorite political philosopher of Dunn’s, she is openly admitting to being smitten with Communist dogma. Just like Ayers. And Van Jones. And Cass Sunstein. And Carol Browner. And Obama’s alcoholic, womanizing and absentee father. And pretty much any influential person in Obama’s life. He’s not though. He just works with those folks and consistently gives them positions of influence and prestige.

Also, keep in mind that Mao Tse Tung’s glorious communist revolution of China led to countless murders, oppression and blatant human rights violations in the decades to follow. In fact, his praiseworthy “Great Leap Forward” campaign intentionally led to the starvation and death of anywhere from 34 to 70 million people depending on what study you look at. What’s a few million when counting mass murder among Communist friends?

So the man directly responsible for killing 34 to 70 million people by “fighting his war” in “taking over China” is one of two political philosophers that Anita Dunn “turns to the most” when making her point, and his “war” is one that Dunn recounts with glee to an unwitting crowd of impressionable students. The students slaughtered in Tiananmen Square in 1989 thanks to the Communist regime installed via Mao’s own “fight” couldn’t be there that day, what with the being dead at the hands of a brutal Communist regime and all. Of course, the students in China today know nothing of that horror in 1989 because they, like Dunn, seek to control what information the public gets to here. Good to know.

Of course, this isn’t a scandal because who among us doesn’t quote maniacal Communist Dictators, murderers and genocidal mad-man to make points?

Dunn’s White House machine has begun to spin the story by claiming that she was making a joke. Of course, to believe that lie, you would have to totally disregard the delivery and content of the speech. Dunn goes on and on about how great he is and gives a thorough history of his life story (minus the whole being responsible for the deaths of millions of people.) Throughout her part on Mao, she grins like a cheshire cat and feverishly licks her lips repeatedly. In short, she appears similar to any teen girl when you mention the Jonas brothers.

Of course Dunn would adorn her walls with posters of Mao. She’s the Obama Communications Director. She wants to “control the media” for Obama. She bragged about their control during the campaign where she boasted that, “very rarely did we communicate through the press anything that we didn’t absolutely control.”

Dunn went on to explain that they would pre-tape statements from their officials to avoid actually being interviewed by the press. This, of course, at the behest of the man who wanted to be the most “transparent” administration in history, who has since decided to be the man hiding behind the TelePrompter, staging and scripting every press conference and appearance down to the last jot and tittle.

Again the ghosts of Tiananmen Square sit staring ominously at us from beyond the grave. Their deaths, and the 34 to 70 million others at the hands of Communist China testify against the current “Communism is cool” dogma flowing from the lips of folks like Dunn.

Dunn, however, as an ardent opponent to free speech and the free press, would look longingly at the accomplishments of Communist Dictators while ignoring their horrific human rights record. Like her colleague over at the FEC, Mark Lloyd, she fancies herself a “revolutionary” like Mao or Hugo Chavez, who might just need to strip away free speech so that you dense Americans can finally be told what’s good for you whether you like it or not.

Supporters would have you think it isn’t a big deal that the White House Communications Director cites a famous Communist Dictator who is responsible for tens of millions of deaths and decades of blatant human rights violations as one of her favorite political philosophers. Maybe to some it isn’t. To those of us who stand for freedom and human rights (and yet do not have a Nobel Peace Prize to show for it) it is a big deal. It becomes even more ominous when seen in the proper context of what Dunn’s job is and the gaggle of similarly minded radicals rounding out the Obama inner circle. Whether Obama finds Dunn’s comments innocuous, will feign ignorance of such views, or agrees with them, it is another painful reminder of just how unfit the leader of the free world is for the office that he holds. 2012 cannot come soon enough.

Two Presidents: One a leader, and one…not so much:

It has now been nearly 3 months that our glorious leader, Nobel Peace Prize Winner Barack Hussein Obama, has been mulling over what to do in Afghanistan. It’s more than past time to put up or shut up.

In the words of Sarah Palin: “Now is not the time for cold feet, second thoughts, or indecision — it is the time to act as commander-in-chief and approve the troops so clearly needed in Afghanistan.”

Of course, this stunning lack of leadership shouldn’t surprise anyone. Instead of serious men and women leading our nation on the very serious issues of the day (including of course, the life or death situation our troops have faced every day of this three month period of indecision) we have children. The childish and dangerously naive folks leading our brave men and women in battle have the courage of overcooked spaghetti and the vision of a 90 year old glaucoma patient.

Of course, last year, perennial candidate Obama was sure of what to do in Afghanistan. In fact, Obama boldly declared that “The Afghan government needs to do more. But we have to understand that the situation is precarious and urgent here in Afghanistan. And I believe this has to be our central focus, the central front, on our battle against terrorism.”

He went on to say that it was for this reason that “for over a year” he had been advocating for additional troops in Afghanistan. Interestingly enough, Obama has now spent over three months indecisively debating something that he once spent “over a year” advocating and saw as a crystal clear truth, It’s probably Bush’s fault.

This failure to lead doesn’t stop on the killing fields of Afghanistan, as Moe Lane reports, it carries over to the genocidal mayhem of the Sudan. You may remember that trying to sound brave and strong, the child wonder known as Obama declared during the campaign that he would deal harshly with the genocidal maniacs running the Sudan by imposing tougher sanctions and creating a no-fly zone over the country. How brave of Obama! Of course, as with any number of his campaign “promises” (also known as blatant lies used to trick the American people into thinking him a rational and capable leader) Obama has said one thing and done another.

The new approach? Appeasement. Nothing stops genocide like standing by and politely asking the genocidal madmen conducting the bloody campaign to stop. While this is a wildly popular approach to Obama’s intimates (one can almost see Bill Ayers, Reverend Wright, Louis Farrakhan and Professor Khalidi raising a glass of Allah-blessed bubbly in celebration over this thrilling display of catering to Muslim dictators) most Americans, and indeed, “citizens of the world” should be horrified.

Even Obama himself should be horrified. Presidential candidate and skilled TelePrompter reader Obama boldly stated the following about Sudan’s genocidal regime last year: “We know from past experience that it will take a great deal to get them to do the right thing.” Apparently while it was a universally acknowledged truth declared by Obama in 2008, in 2009 we no longer know from past experience that only force will get Sudan to comply.

You’ll remember that President George W. Bush was chastised for not taking a harder stance against the Sudanese genocide (even while being chastised for taking too hard a stand against Iraq’s genocidal regime). So far, those folks have been largely silent on Obama’s move to get even softer than Bush on the Sudan atrocities. Perhaps the “negotiations” with Iran proved so fertile in their success (what with Iran still defiantly pursuing nuclear weaponry and shooting rockets off into the night sky) that Obama felt (quite rationally) that this approach would also succeed in Sudan.

Perhaps Obama’s next memoir could be proudly titled “Genocides I Have Enabled While Winning Nobel Peace Prizes.”

Getting back to the insanity in Afghanistan, we were reminded this weekend once again of why America didn’t elect John Kerry president. Defending the indefensible new policy on Afghanistan, John “I did vote for the 87 billion before I voted against it” Kerry proclaimed today that Obama is right to tarry on the war. You see, it just isn’t right according to the wise sage and kept man Kerry, to proceed with any plans until we know what kind of government will be in place after the latest election is resolved.

Right, because whatever it is, it will cause us to look longingly back at the good ole’ days of the Taliban. Abandoning a fledgling democracy while the Taliban is re-building and ready to strike sounds like a good idea too. Perhaps by allowing Afghani women and children to suffer again under the brutal Muslim regime of the Taliban, causing terrorist training camps to re-open, and bringing 9/11: the sequel to a city near you, Obama will win another Nobel Peace Prize.

In fact, the cowardly trust fund senator John Kerry also said today that, “The threat of failure of the Afghan government is empowering the Taliban to be able to recruit people because of frustration and distrust.”

Right, and the best way to handle that problem is to pave the way for the Taliban by retreating. That sounds just like what General George Washington said to the Continental Army in August of 1776:

“The time is now near at hand which must probably determine whether Americans are to be freemen or slaves; whether they are to have any property they can call their own; whether their houses and farms are to be pillaged and destroyed, and themselves consigned to a state of wretchedness from which no human efforts will deliver them. The fate of unborn millions will now depend, under God, on the courage and conduct of this army. Our cruel and unrelenting enemy leaves us only the choice of brave resistance, or the most abject submission. We have, therefore, to resolve to conquer or die.”

If only Washington had the keen insight of Obama and basked in cowardice while waiting to see what the result might be before proceeding.

Men and women have died, and are indeed, still dying on a regular basis in Afghanistan. They deserve leadership not cowardice and indecision. Their ultimate sacrifices need not be in vain. General McChrystal has the plan for victory, all Obama has to do is provide the necessary tools, and yet he remains vexed and paralyzed by both a deep-seated hatred of American military might and pressure from the extremist left-wing nutbags that elected him. Great military leaders throughout America’s history have fought bravely for freedom without knowing the future. Obama’s political hero FDR didn’t wait to know what governments would be in place before taking down the brutal regimes of Nazi Germany and Hirohito’s Japan. Obama’s self-proclaimed doppleganger, Abraham Lincoln, had no idea what the federal government would look like post-Civil War, and yet he boldly faced down the challenges of his day.

And of course examples in the valor of American presidents dates back to our first American President, George Washington, who did not cower in fear while prosecuting the Revolutionary War. In fact, his correspondence with John Adams and other folks from the Continental Congress makes clear the level of uncertainty as to what a free America would ultimately look like, and yet Washington didn’t blink in the face of war.  In fact, less than a year before the end of the war, Washington famously stated that “what may be in the womb of fate is very uncertain,” regarding America’s unclear future.

Still, he forged ahead and turned the wheel of history. Washington, unlike Obama, saw evil for what it was and confronted it. Unable to predict the future, Washington nonetheless knew that the oppression at the hands of the British government must be stopped no matter the cost. In fact, it was quite prevalent in the minds of many American colonists that the new American government may become a military dictatorship under General Washington or a monarchy with a King George of their very own. Nonetheless the folks of the revolution, ably led by the man known as General Washington bravely forged ahead.

Waiting to know the outcome before taking a stand isn’t leadership, it’s the worst kind of political opportunism and reveals a stunning lack of vision. And we know all too well that where there is a lack of vision, people perish.

There is an overwhelming void of leadership created in America today by the election of Barack Hussein Obama. His waffling, indecision, and indeed cowardice in Afghanistan are costing countless American lives while simultaneously putting the lives of the newly freed Afghanis at greater risk of future oppression and subjugation by the brutal “peace-loving” Muslims of the Taliban.

His failure to lead is a horrific step backward for human rights and freedom, and totally unbecoming of an American president.

(A clearly not racist cartoon about Condi Rice)

In the post-partisan post-racial America led by former ACORN community organizer and Nobel Peace Prize Winner (those two are one and the same are they not?) Barack Hussein Obama, discrimination has become the law of the land. The man fighting for “social justice” and “fundamental change” of America is doing his best to coordinate efforts on all fronts to institutionalize racism and discrimination of any and all dissidents.

Rush Limbaugh’s treatment in the past week over the now-defunct deal to buy the St. Louis Rams was just one glaring example of the new “acceptable” discrimination.

Limbaugh’s alleged “racist rants” were an invention of Wikipedia. The clowns (see also liberal propagandists) who attributed those quotes to Limbaugh, did so without any evidence or proof whatsoever. It was simply, “Rush is a racist. He wanted to kill Martin Luther King himself. He owns his own slaves. He lynches people. And so on and so forth.”

The blithering idiots in the media simply parroted these blatant lies because they served their ultimate goal, journalistic integrity. Oh that’s right, journalistic integrity was cut out of the curriculum in journalism 101 (and in order to appease dictators, communists and other mind-controlling thugs who would be offended by the term “integrity.”) So the clowns in the media fact-checked this story like Dan Rather and Mary Mapes did for the Bush AWOL story of 2004. No sources? Ah, we all know it’s true because everyone we know thinks it is and hates Limbaugh. Run with it.

Using those standards, the following can now be taken as fact:

Barack Obama is a hermaphrodite.

John Kerry hates Jews.

Hillary Clinton is a Soviet spy.

Nancy Pelosi hates children and puppies.

The reality of the Limbaugh situation is that this is but one example of a larger “scheme” by the menacing liberal overlords to silence the opposition. Limbaugh never said any of the nonsense attributed to him. Many of the journalists (from the Washington Post and CNN among others) have finally admitted that they have no proof about the accusations against Limbaugh. Of course, they knew that before they ran the story. They knew what they were “reporting” was making news, not reporting it, and that’s the way they like it. Their intention all along was to savage and de-humanize Limbaugh in the eyes of America and thus negate anything that the man says. They could print and report
retractions after the fact, knowing full well that the damage would already be done.

If this strategy sounds familiar, it should. The same strategy was and is still employed against Sarah Palin, her husband, her children, her grandson, her extended family, her neighbors, her former employers/employees, her church, her town, her state, her successor, and everyone in between.

The same strategy is used against Fox News and anyone affiliated with it.

The same strategy was used against Senator George Allen of Virginia.

The same strategy was used against Senator Trent Lott.

The same strategy was used against (insert conservative name here.)

And yes, the same strategy was used to great effect against the 43rd President of the United States, (non Nobel Peace Prize Winner) George W. Bush. His anemic 20 something percent favorability (and subsequent “non-racist” booing and taunting (largely by black folks to a white president) at Obama’s inauguration were proof positive of the success of the Alinsky affect.

The great “race” accusations are not actually about race at all. They are about mind-control. They are about destroying your political opponent because you can’t respond coherently to their arguments. It’s about propaganda, censorship, and the death of Jeffersonian governance pure and simple.

If it were about race, would the specters of “Reverend” Al Sharpton and “Reverend” Jesse Jackson really surface as the arbiters of good and evil in the world of racism and discrimination?

“Reverend” Al Sharpton, while funny on SNL, was “not racist” when he intentionally falsely accused a federal prosecutor (white guy) of rape in the 1987 Tawana Brawley (black woman) case. Sharpton was also “not racist” when he appeared in the sequel to that smash hit and sided with the Duke University “rape victim” against her white “assailants.” He even went so far as to decry “racism” in the media for doubting the lying opportunist’s ever-changing story.

Our pal Jackson is famous for threatening to cut the nuts off of Nobel Peace Prize Winner Barack Hussein Obama, but also for anti-semitic rants labeling Jews “hymies” and New York City “hymie town.” Apparently anti-semitism is like the n-word in that it is not racist if a liberal or black person utters it. Only when truly “racist” white or conservative folks say it, does it indeed carry the weight of racism.

The countless racist remarks or cartoons made against Condi Rice, Clarence Thomas and other minority conservatives are overlooked in the quest to eradicate racism. So apparently is lifelong service to the KKK as the celebrated status of Democratic Senator Robert “KKK” Byrd would seem to suggest. In fact, references to conservative blacks as “Uncle Toms” or “Aunt Jemimas” seem to be celebratory appellations hardly worthy of any condemnation:

Liberal radio host John Sylvester called Condoleezza Rice “Aunt Jemima” and Colin Powell “Uncle Tom” on his program Thursday, Nov 18, 2004. No apology was given to either person (although a half-hearted “apology” was offered to listeners who were offended.)

A Daily Kos post by not-racist “Soj” refers to Colin Powell as “Uncle Tom” on April 12, 2004.

Crazed Socialist whack-job Harry Belafonte referred to Colin Powell as a “house slave” on a San Diego radio program on October 17, 2002.

Liberal columnist Carl Rowan on Clarence Thomas: “if you give Thomas a little flour on his face, you’d think you had [former Klansman] David Duke.”

Willie Brown on Thomas: “A man whose views are ‘legitimizing of the Ku Klux Klan…”Thomas should be reduced to talking only to white conservatives,” and “must be shut out by the black community.”

Film director Spike Lee on Clarence Thomas: “biscuit and gravy eating Uncle Tom.”

Columnist Julianne Malveaux told a television audience on November 4, 1994, “I hope [Thomas’s] wife feeds him lots of eggs and butter, and he dies early, like many black men do, of heart disease. . . .He’s an absolutely reprehensible person.”

A simple google search for any prominent conservative will find racist comments against minorities like Rice & Thomas (which are again acceptable if directed by a liberal) and allegations of racism against white conservatives. After all, as the wise sage Kanye West once said “George Bush doesn’t care about black people.” That’s why he tried so hard to keep his blowing up of the levees in New Orleans a secret. His goal to drown as many blacks as possible was to remain as secret as his blowing up of the World Trade Center on 9/11 with the aid of Reverend Wright’s feared nemesis, “them Jews.”

Liberal folks make no attempt to engage in serious policy debate with conservatives because common sense is not on their side. Running a massive deficit? Our solution says to spend more money! Have terrorists at war with you? Our solution says demonize American soldiers, reduce our arsenal, don’t use offensive monickers like “war” and retreat! (After all, we have those oceans to keep us safe!)

So, the tactic for any liberal in politics has to be to destroy your opponent. If you can succeed in dehumanizing your opponent, you can discredit them. Then you don’t have to contend with their argument. If you destroy their reputation, you destroy their credibility. Saul Alinsky has trained these modern radicals very well indeed.

So liberals elevate personal destruction to an art form, even while decrying the politics of personal destruction. The most powerful weapon they have in the arsenal is the “racist” card because people are so fearful of being called a racist that they clam up and apologize for things that aren’t even true in an attempt to curry favor with race-baiting hate-mongers like “Reverends” Jackson and Sharpton.

This summer, the tea party participants were branded as “racists” by eloquent vision of beauty Janeane Garofalo. No evidence was cited, but clearly everyone concerned about higher taxes, is primarily motivated by blind racist fury. Evidence is not needed when charges of racism or racist remarks are uttered by liberals against conservatives. Conservatives are big fat racists. Everyone knows it. Don’t press us for specifics.

Sure, some of the nicer liberals won’t go that far. They’ll just change the subject to one of their other talking points and refuse to answer your question or debate your winning point on any given issue. Thus a discussion on taxes turns with a dismissive “we’re not talking about taxes” (even though they were) and the liberal propagandist launches into a diatribe about the environment or the War in Iraq.

Most, however, are just that vindictive, and as Limbaugh himself stated about this line of attack, “These intimidation tactics are working and spreading, and they are a cancer on our society.” This is a problem, and not just because a few actors and journalists are doing it. It is so widespread that the tactic reaches all the way to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

Make no mistake, the de-humanizing Alinsky-inspired attacks like the faux “racist” charges are ones that the Obama administration pushes, promotes and uses to their advantage. Now doubt learning a great deal from ACORN and his spiritual mentor Reverend Wright, Obama has discovered that being a black liberal, he is doubly immune to charges of racism himself. Therefore, he can send out the character assassination folks with an arrogant sense of impunity. Well, there’s that and the fact that most journalists spend more time fantasizing about him in bed than actually doing their job of objectively reporting the news.

Playing a large part in the Limbaugh “racism” story was the NFL Players’ Association. Did you know, by the way, that the NFL Players‘ Association Executive Director, DeMaurice Smith, was a counselor for Attorney General Eric Holder? (Holder, who inexplicably canned the federal investigation of the black panthers‘ intimidation at a Philadelphia polling place is clearly not a racist.) He also served on the Obama transition team. He is one of the driving forces behind getting Limbaugh out of the NFL team-buying business AND he has some very serious ties to Obama. Surely that is just a coincidence. Obama after all, is the king of coincidence. Nothing is his fault and nothing is as it seems. He can have a thousand communist czars working for him and yet have nothing to do with communism himself. He can attend a racist church and yet not adhere to its tenets (or indeed even know of them.) He can intimately work for ACORN and not have any idea who or what they are. Coincidences abound in Obama’s world and this is clearly just another one of them.

Another such coincidence occurred in the sourcing of the Wikipedia entires claiming that Rush said all kinds of racist things. Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP, a New York law firm, has been confirmed as the source of the “Rush is a racist” entries on Wikipedia. The law firm handles sports disputes and legal proceedings such as those that are common to the NFL Players’ Association. A simple search of the firm’s clients will likely reveal a connection to our Obama pal Smith. Of course, that too will be merely a coincidence. Anyone who would suggest otherwise is a racist.

The NFL “rush” to judgment was nothing more than another victory for liberal propagandists. Their false accusations of racism and Alinsky-inspired character assassinations of successful and effective conservatives will continue so long as the American people allow it to and conservatives bow to the false accusations in hopes of getting along with these scoundrels. Conservatives, and indeed Americans, need more Rush Limbaughs willing to take on the lies and censorship of the hateful and racist left-wing propagandists. Limbaugh, Palin, Beck, Hannity and any other demonized figure of the right does America a service with each hit they return to the other side. Their bold stand against such dishonest propagandists protects our precious American freedom of speech for one more day. It is a fight for the soul of a nation and the ideal of the free speech and expression so vital to our way of life and governance.

It is, however, a fight that needs to be taken up by more than just a brave few. Every American “needs a little skin in the game” so to speak.

For in life, a bully is only really deterred by force. This is, of course, in contrast to Nobel Peace Prize Winner Barack Obama’s fantasy world where bullies begin skipping and holding hands with their victims as soon as they smile at them and hand them their lunch money. Bullies only mend their ways when they are put in their place. Today’s menacing liberal overlords will only be thwarted by a substantial show of conservative bravery. More good folks need to “go rogue” and make these liberal harbingers of socialism abandon the sacred doctrine of Alinsky. Bold conservatives in today’s day and age must truly live out the mantra of our Founding Fathers in pledging their “lives” their “fortunes” and their “sacred honor” to the cause of freedom.

America will thank them for it.

The following is from my Examiner.com page. The original can be found here.

Author’s note: The deadline for submissions for the Nobel Peace Prize was February 1, 2009. Barack Hussein Obama (Mmm Mmm Mmm) took office January 20, 2009.

The Nobel Peace Prize soiled itself today. Sure, for years this award has been a laughing stock fraud of a prize given to the loudest self-promoter. Obama’s pathetic selection today for doing absolutely nothing, however, still stinks like rotten meat.

First, a history of Nobel is in order. In the past, such luminaries as repeat winner “The United Nations” have demonstrated that your stated intentions are valued quite highly in the selection process. Far above, say, your actual intentions or your results. For this reason, the trusty anti-semitic and corrupt gaggle of international super-villains known as the United Nations has been a repeat winner. The UN’s first brush with Nobel glory came at the hands of Cordell Hull’s victory in 1945, Hull was one of the initiators of the glorious organization. The United Nations, or various off-shoots & leaders of the organization won the award in 1954, 1957,1961,1965,1974,1982,1984, 1988, and 2001.

Of course, many of those awards are laughable at best. Desmond Tutu, future United Nations poster boy, won the award in 1984, and has been on the record repeatedly chastising Israel for defending itself against the deranged Palestinian terrorists. Likening the Israeli government to apartheid, Tutu has often criticized Israel in statements and speeches that reek of anti-semitism and have brought criticism and protest from many Jewish organizations including the ADL. He has supported the “divestment from Israel” movement and countless other political boycotts of Israel so that they will give the people trying to blow them up some more of their land from which to launch their maniacal suicide bombings.

Good choice there Nobel!

The United Nations 2001 shared prize with then-chairman Kofi Annan is another glorious celebration of, at best ineptitude, and at worst, corruption and state-sponsored mass genocide. Annan presided over the oil-for-food scandal at the United Nations, where Iraq was given money for “food” in exchange for their oil. The money, of course, was used to starve the Kurds and build more palaces for Saddam. The program and those running it also allowed Saddam to violate countless of the United Nations’ own regulations and use a good deal of the money from the program to bribe leaders of France, Russia and China to name a few (you know, folks on the UN committees with the power to veto any real action against Saddam’s brutal genocidal regime.)

When Annan wasn’t busy helping his son and fellow dirtbags skim off the top of the oil-for-food scandal (also known as making money off of genocide) Annan was busy with another glorious peace-loving project. Under his watch, widespread rape of African women by the UN “peace-keeping forces” occurred. When accusations reached Annan, he did everything he could to sweep them under the rug and enable the rapists to get away with and continue their affront to women everywhere.
This genocidal, oppressive dirtbag won the Peace Prize for his efforts in such programs.

In addition to the United Nations, we have Communist Dictator Mikhail Gorbachev winning the award in 1990 (after being crushed to humiliating defeat in the Cold War by United States’ President Ronald Reagan.) After spending years oppressing Christians and political dissidents via imprisonment, brutal torture and worse, Gorbachev traded his Communism for environmental concerns a few years back as he pushes for a “New World Order” as the latest vehicle to continue his Communist fantasies. The very peace-loving Gorbachev even said in 1989 as the Berlin Wall fell that:

“Gentlemen, comrades, do not be concerned about all you hear about glasnost and perestroika and democracy in the coming years. These are primarily for outward consumption. There will be no significant change within the Soviet Union, other than for cosmetic purposes. Our aim is to disarm the Americans and let them fall asleep. I am a convinced Communist. For some this may be a fantasy but for me it is my main goal.”

Certainly deserving of a Nobel Peace Prize. Absolutely. Who would dispute that enslaving people, denying them fundamental human rights and seeking to impose that system of persecution on a wide global scale through the farce of the “Green movement” was peaceful and truly noteworthy?

Former United States President Jimmy Carter won the accolade in 2002 for his efforts in trashing Israel and championing the rights of the terrorist bombers in Palestine. His increasingly anti-semitic tirades have recently also won him the honor of being officially on Osama bin Laden’s required reading list. That should tell you all you need to know about Carter’s true ambitions and view for “peace.” He also has spent a good deal of his time trashing America and praising folks like Chavez and the Castro brothers. So, again, not for his truly praiseworthy work with Habitat for Humanity does he win, but when he ratchets up the anti-Israel rhetoric, he gets high fives all around.

Notice a pattern yet?

If not, you’ll remember that “peace-seeking statesman” Yassir Arafat shared the prize in 1994. This was due, no doubt to his active support of terrorism, promotion of anti-semitic speeches and propaganda, and the countless young men and women who strapped bombs to their chests to kill some of the Israelis at the behest of this “peace-loving” genocidal mad-man of the PLO. Just because for a few moments Arafat’s “stated” goal was peace, while behind the scenes he continued to methodically plot the widespread murder of Jewish folks, he won a peace prize.

Freak show participant Al Gore even won the award in 2007 for his profitable exploits in the “Green” movement. Should he be raking in millions while living as a complete hypocrite to his stated views in any other field, he would be subject to government intervention and investigation. For blatantly pushing an agenda for his own personal financial gain, he is given a Nobel prize.

So, in 2009, when Barack Hussein Obama wins the Nobel Peace Prize simply for showing up, we shouldn’t really be surprised. Obama’s victory is the ultimate celebration of style over substance. He cares. He emotes while reading from the TelePrompter. He doesn’t do a thing, but people faint anyway. He apparently had the Nobel selection committee at hello.

Among his accomplishments for world peace:

Obama’s victory illustrates now more clearly than ever that the Nobel Peace Prize is a sham and disgrace to supporters of peace world-wide. The award has nothing to do with actual peace. It is a celebration of anti-Israel and anti-American policies that drives the organization to dispense with the accolades. The peace they celebrate is a false peace based on ignoring real threats and allowing genocidal mad man to flourish.

Notice that Winston Churchill, FDR and Harry Truman are missing from the list, although they are the three men most responsible for saving the world from the Nazi and Japanese-led assault on the world in World War II. Truthfully, it is surprising that the committee didn’t find a way to give the prize to Hitler himself (after all he did kill himself at the end of the war thus creating peace.)
Noticeably absent from the list is also Ronald Reagan Margaret Thatcher, and Pope John Paul II, who bravely faced down Communism and brought about a successful end to the decades old Cold War without an actual war. Instead, they gave the award to the clown they defeated.

Also missing from the list: the Bush family. President George H.W. Bush liberated the tiny nation of Kuwait from the brutal oppression of Saddam Hussein, yet no award.

Even George W. Bush should have been given serious consideration for the top prize after liberating countless millions from brutal regimes in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Giving the awards to people who do nothing in the face of evil is an affront to the good folks throughout the years who have won the prize by actually doing something for peace. Martin Luther King’s selection in 1964, Mother Theresa’s selection in 1979 or Elie Wiesel’s selection in 1986 stand in stark contrast to the unaccomplished international celebrity of Obama in 2009.

Elie Wiesel, in particular, has honorably dedicated his life to stopping genocide. A survivor of the holocaust, Wiesel’s haunting memoir Night serves as a reminder to all people of the need to speak out AND take action against genocidal atrocities worldwide.

Wiesel advocates an aggressive stand against genocidal acts around the globe and calls for action more than just words:

“Sometimes we must interfere. When human lives are endangered. When human dignity is in jeopardy, national borders and sensitivities become irrelevant. Whether men or women are persecuted because of their race, religion or political views, that place must–at that moment–become the center of the universe.”

The Nobel Peace Prize is a joke and mocks the important work of folks like Wiesel by celebrating a new President without any major accomplishment to speak of. It mocks true lovers of peace by rewarding those who turn a blind eye to terrorists and genocidal mad-men in the name of a false peace that offers no protection and insults those suffering from these atrocities. As Wiesel himself noted in his 1986 acceptance speech for the Nobel Prize, “I swore never to be silent whenever wherever human beings endure suffering and humiliation. We must take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.”

We owe the oppressed of the world both our words and our actions. They have benefited greatly from the leadership of folks like Wiesel, Reagan, Churchill, Truman, FDR, and yes, even George W. Bush. Aside from the folks at ACORN, some out-of-work socialists and Bill Ayers, the same cannot be said of Obama.

Obama’s selection is a slap in the face to true peace and human rights around the globe and serves as a inappropriate celebration of the ill-fated approach of that famous quote: “the only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing.”

Of course, after today, we now also know that those do-nothings will win a Nobel Peace Prize for “doing nothing” as well.

This week’s complete rejection of the deity of Obama by the world was just the icing on the cake. It has been a rough first year for the man who was supposed to heal the nation and fix all of our problems just by reading a TelePrompter well.

It seems an eternity ago that the deranged community organizer slash politician took to the stage at the DNC complete with the Greek pillars to be worshipped by the world as our god. Obama has sought nothing else, and continues to bask in the worship of his faithful–the media.

“Red & Yellow Black and White he said we’re all equal in his sight.”

Indeed. Obama’s legacy thus far is to boldly proclaim to the world that the nation he leads is, in fact, nothing special. We have brought more harm to the world than good, and the only way the world can function is by not giving us too much power.

Obama’s world tour has had two major themes thus far: that the world should be offering burnt sacrifices to him as their sovereign deity, and that America is, in the words of his beloved “a downright mean” country worthy of scorn. Everywhere Obama goes, he is sure to too his own horn while trashing America.

At the Summit of the Americas in April:

“While the United States has done much to promote peace and prosperity in the hemisphere, we have at times been disengaged, and at times we sought to dictate our terms. But I pledge to you that we seek an equal partnership. There is no senior partner and junior partner in our relations; there is simply engagement based on mutual respect and common interests and shared values.”

Among those we apparently have “shared values” and equal status with: Hugo Chavez (Communist dictator & lunatic), Daniel Ortega (communist dictator and lunatic) and the Castro brothers (patron saints of healthcare.) Of course, Obama sat through speeches by many of the dictators (in between their bear hugs, gift-giving and guffawing with Obama) attacking the United States unmercifully. As a response to Ortega’s anti-American rant, Obama was careful to make important distinctions:

“ To move forward, we cannot let ourselves be prisoners of past disagreements. I am very grateful that President Ortega — (applause) — I’m grateful that President Ortega did not blame me for things that happened when I was three months old.”

Don’t blame me, I’m not Bush. I hate America too. America sucks, but I’m a great man. In other words, “Mmm Mmm Mmm Barack Hussein Obama.”

In Cairo in June, the anointed one continued the “America is nothing special, but I am” theme:

“Given our interdependence, any world order that elevates one nation or group of people over another will inevitably fail.”

Sounds innocent enough, right? Well, of course, in the same speech designed to downplay America’s role in the world, Barry also made note of the tremendous contributions of Muslims while quoting extensively from the Koran. Among the highlights in Obama’s mind is the Treaty of Tripoli in 1796 because it was “one of the first treaties to recognize” the new nation of America. Of course, lost on his sense of awe was the fact that said treaty was enacted in order to blackmail the United States. Muslim pirates (the same folks who bested Obama for several days early this year) were keen on attacking our ships, kidnapping our “Christian infidels” and selling them into slavery, while also stealing our stuff. This was an act worthy of praise to Obama.

Obama also bashed America while praising himself at the United Nations. In fact, it almost seemed as if he was giving a stump speech on his new campaign to be world potentate. Obama’s speech barely spoke of America, except to criticize it or highlight what others have said critically about it. Instead, it was all Obama all the time:

“I have been in office for just nine months — though some days it seems a lot longer. I am well aware of the expectations that accompany my presidency around the world. These expectations are not about me.”

The same “Obama as the center of the universe” theme permeated his Olympic presentation just days ago. In a presentation completely about himself, Obama gave the new moment by which time should be measured, the moment of his election:

“Nearly one year ago, on a clear November night, people from every corner of the world gathered in the city of Chicago or in front of their televisions to watch the results of the U.S. Presidential election.”

It was the colossal failure of Obama’s life story to win an Olympic bid for Chicago that brought to light what an utter failure Obama’s foreign policy has been.

Yes, the masses worldwide like Obama because he trashes America. They just don’t like him as much as he likes himself.

His “me first, America last” policy to foreign policy has worsened the situation in Afghanistan, strained relations with Germany, England, France, Poland, the Czech Republic, Israel and Georgia–the country and the state. The latter Georgia (the state) is due to the complete inaction and lack of attention given the state that suffered massive flooding in recent weeks. If I were a rapper, I would take to the microphone to tell America that Barack Obama “doesn’t care about black people” or “any people who live in Georgia” based on his total indifference to the people of Georgia (many of which, in the affected areas, are black.) Perhaps a new documentary will be made to show that Obama hates blacks so much that he “blew up the levees” in Georgia to drown as many as possible.

So sure, we are as thick as thieves with Cuba, Venezuela, Russia, and some other dictatorships and thugacracies around the world, but we have alienated most of the free democratic nations of the world. What has this new Obamamania approach yielded? All of the following major accomplishments can be traced to the Obamamania foreign policy:

People fainting in Germany when he spoke there last summer.

Iran getting nuclear weapons, thumbing its nose at the international community, and firing rockets into the air with impunity.

North Korea firing rockets into the air with the intent to hit Alaska or Hawaii without impunity.

Muslim pirates attacking our ships for several days before finally (and reluctantly) being dealt with by Obama.

Afghanistan getting worse (where admittedly the Obama goal is not “victory.”) Indeed, this is such a failure that Obama is being torn asunder by his left-wing lunatic soul mates and rational Americans. So upset was Obama that he actually (again reluctantly) met with his general for a whole 25 minutes. Sure it was largely to tell him off for daring to ask for the troops he needs to succeed and admitting in an interview that Obama has blown him off for 70 days, but at least they got some face time! See what a serious Commander-In-Chief Obama is!

Releasing terrorists into the world’s finest resorts and someday, into the communities of America.

Demoralizing, and investigating the CIA, while turning the other cheek to actual terrorists.

Meanwhile, domestically, our “savior” has failed miserably as well. His buddies in congress are now on the endangered species list for next fall, and his major initiatives have still not been accomplished. Sure, he usurped major portions of the economy in a big win for socialism, but he lost the following:

Cap and Trade (also known as Cap and Tax) is dangerously close to failing.

Despite his love of stimulus packages, it doesn’t appear likely that his cronies in the congress will be able to hook him up for another fix any time soon.

The economy and unemployment remain in the toilet.

Healthcare, healthcare healthcare. Brought to a screeching halt by best-selling author Sarah Palin via a plethora of Facebook notes and scores of “angry mobs” arriving at town hall meetings and in rallies around the nation.

Van Jones had to resign. Tom Daschle and Bill Richardson didn’t even make it to the confirmation hearings. Other radicals, including but not limited to, Valerie Jarrett, Cass Sunstein, Carol Browner, Mark Lloyd, and NAMBLA supported and “Safe School Czar” Kevin Jennings, are all under some degree of scrutiny thanks largely to Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh.

ACORN has fallen apart.

In fact, it is pretty difficult to actually name one thing that has gone right for Obama. His best contribution to the nation may, in fact, be that Jimmy Carter suddenly doesn’t look too bad in comparison. Obama’s failures are not just mediocre, they are glorious. Glorious in their ineptitude, their vanity and their sheer volume and magnitude.

Mmm. Mmm. Mmm. Barack Hussein Obama. Thank you Mr. President! We salute you for your ineffective narcissism.

Somewhere, admiring the total failure and ineptitude of his successor, a laid-back Texan is asking with a smile, “Do you miss me yet?”

Mmm. Mmm. Mmm. Barack Hussein Obama. As school children in my own state of New Jersey worship Obama in song and chants during the school day, his emminence has taken his rightful place among the dictators, thugs, and terrorists at the United Nation. Beaming with pride as he speaks of a “global” vision (one that doesn’t want America to have any position of prominence) Barry has been living out a school-boy fantasy of his while rubbing elbows with the leaders of Iran, Libya and Venezuela among others. He has no doubt cried tears of socialist joy as Libya’s Khaddafi called for a new Taliban-led nation in place of Afghanistan. As that adorable love-muffin Hugo Chavez joked that the “stench of sulfur” was gone and prayed a blessing over Obama to protect him from an assassin’s bullet as he seeks to impose socialism over America, he probably felt the close bonds of brotherhood.

Barack Hussein Obama (which only recently became okay to say) has been having a blast at the United Nations. While dictator after dictator has slammed the United States and spent hours lying, making up stories, and rambling incoherently, Barry has been spellbound. Among the highlights of Barry’s speech to the UN, largely designed to apologize for America and make nice with the thugs of the world playground:

“In Moscow, the United States and Russia announced that we would pursue substantial reductions in our strategic warheads and launchers. At the Conference on Disarmament, we agreed on a work plan to negotiate an end to the production of fissile materials for nuclear weapons. And this week, my Secretary of State will become the first senior American representative to the annual Members Conference of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty.”

Nice point Barry. Show those terrorists around the world hellbent on destroying us that we will defeat them by scrapping our own weapons. We will fight with our bare hands when they attack us with chemical, nuclear or biological weaponry. It’s better for the environment. North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, and Al Queda bring it on! We have a knuckle sandwich waiting for you after you blow us up.

Further proving why a socialist community organizer shouldn’t be president, Barry also stated:

“The time has come — the time has come to re-launch negotiations without preconditions that address the permanent status issues: security for Israelis and Palestinians, borders, refugees, and Jerusalem. And the goal is clear: Two states living side by side in peace and security — a Jewish state of Israel, with true security for all Israelis; and a viable, independent Palestinian state with contiguous territory that ends the occupation that began in 1967, and realizes the potential of the Palestinian people.”

So the community organizer can’t interfere into the workings of Iran because that isn’t our business, but we sure as heck can tell Israel to shove it. That massive country is really too large anyway, so they should give up more land to the “peace-loving” Palestinians. Of course, after giving this land and dividing Jerusalem, the Palestinians will still hate them and want them dead, but at least they will have usurped more land from, as Reverend Wright calls them, “them Jews.”

Barry also spent a large amount of his speech praising the United Nations; it sure would be nice if he even once spoke as highly of America. Of course, to a liberal, a useless organization that accomplishes nothing but feels good about their intentions is worth talking about until the cows come home. Who cares if the food and humanitarian aide is confiscated by dictators while the “peace-keepers” spend their time raping the natives? They mean well.

Obama also spent time with the wise sage David Letterman to tell him that we need more regulation in our lives to avoid further economic collapse. Of course, it was government regulation in the first place that sent the market into a tailspin via the ridiculous regulations on the nation’s lenders regarding high-risk loans to folks who couldn’t pay them. But, sure let’s do more of that. Maybe this time it will work. Mmm. Mmm. Mmm. Barack Hussein Obama. Of course, Hussein’s friends at ACORN were the folks who pushed that legislation that caused the collapse of the market, but again, let’s defer to the wisdom of the great Chicago Hope on that one (after all despite working for ACORN for years, he has now barely any idea of who they are!)

Of course, Barry’s time hasn’t been all business. In the first 9 months of his presidency, “Mmm. Mmm. Mmm.” Barack Hussein Obama has given over 120 interviews, while predecessors Bush and Clinton each did about 40-45 during the same stretch of time. Perhaps that is why the Commander-in-Chief of the United States has only had ONE meeting with his commander in Afghanistan in over 70 days. Who needs to deal with a small matter of war when you can yuck it up with a stooge like Letterman?

Another reason Barry can’t do anything serious on the international stage is that he is all booked up. Fresh off the success of his international hit of denying a missile defense for Poland and the Czech Republic, his “American Apology” tour will again take to Europe to promote holding the 2016 Olympics in Chicago, where no doubt Reverend Wright and Bill Ayers will have a field day commiserating with the visiting dignitaries (at least the socialist/communist ones!)

Yet another reason may be that he was too busy filming promos for the sure-fire late night hit starring the funny-as-a-dead-puppy George Lopez.

Yet never let it be said that Barry is all fluff and no backbone.

In response to an insurance company sending out information to their clients on what Obamacare meant for their company, Obama’s response is to threaten an investigation. In response to ordinary Americans asking questions and resisting one-stop socialism, his response is to attack the folks as “racist” “angry mobs” or claim that they are somehow not authentic. (Apparently not as gritty and realistic as a former community organizer boldly standing before styrofoam “Greek columns” in an attempt to portray himself as some mythical god come to deliver America in their darkest hour during a national political convention complete with a court jester running mate and fireworks!)

In response to Sarah Palin or any other prominent leader raising serious questions about his plan, Obama calls them liars, then on cue resumes reading his same speech from the TelePrompter for the 1,000th time. Since sequels are never as good as the first one, someone is bound to shout “YOU LIE!” in the middle of the speech, sending Obama caterwauling about how mean the big bad “racists” are.

In response to media critics, Obama simply cuts Fox News out of any interviews, and has his crazed Hugo Chavez Fan Club President Mark Lloyd attempt to use the F.E.C. to silence all opposition via government control of the media. In part two of this plan, Obama offers to bail out newspapers (so that he can own them and cause them to become “non-profits” which they pretty much are now anyway) and seeks to indiscriminately cut off internet access to folks like me who write things online that don’t sound like: “Mmm. Mmmm. Mmm. Barack Hussein Obama. Red and yellow black and white he said we are all equal in his sight.”

Yet, for all of his maniacal boldness regarding opposition within his country (or people who actually believe in individual liberty, capitalism and the freedom to speech) he refuses to bat an eye when Iran starts shooting off rockets into the sky like it’s “Shock and Awe” in Baghdad again. His response is to say Russia will help us. Then, of course, they back out or start hemming and hawing and he changes the subject to health care (again) and mumbles something about being “fired up” and “ready to go” for “hope” and “change” while a chorus of paid actors sitting behind him chant “yes we can.”

He is remarkably consistent, however. Healthcare needs to be passed right now without debate or even the slightest perusal of the bill, meanwhile Obama refuses to meet with or listen to the military leaders engaged in a war. He needs healthcare reform as a matter of life or death, but needs a few more weeks to consider what to do about those soldiers dying in Afghanistan.

He has no problem emphatically telling Israel over and over again to calm down, but begins reading Code Pink’s talking points when dealing with Iran, Venezuela, North Korea, etc. Thank God we have Benjamin Netanyahu to stand up to the world’s dictators, albeit virtually alone. Word on the street is that crazy conservative tax-cutter Angela Merkel in Germany was just re-elected in a surprise landslide, so maybe he will ironically have an ally in Germany.

The most revealing contrast to Obama’s “leadership” this past week came when a former governor of Alaska took to the stage in Hong Kong and gave a wide-ranging and largely foreign policy oriented speech which caused even the New York Times to praise it. Never has Obama’s lacking leadership in the face of a very real and growing international threat been more painfully obvious. On one side of the world, Sarah Palin, a military mom, spoke passionately about defending America from a position of strength and talked about freedom and pride in America in a speech that could have been delivered by Ronald Reagan. On this side, however, we have the know-it-all narcissist reading his talking points, throwing temper tantrums and appeasing dictator after dictator with such sniveling, elitist anti-American panache that even Jane Fonda blushes.

America needs a leader who likes, respects, and is willing to fight for the greatness and liberty that this shining city on a hill has boldly stood for since our founding. We need a leader who is a disciple of Jefferson, Adams, and Washington who understands that the great thing about America is not our government, but the freedom we preserve for our people. We need a tough as nails guardian of our American liberties.

The woman from Alaska looked an awful lot like that guardian as she spoke in Hong Kong, and in comparison, our own leader looked like the corrupt slumlord that he has always been. ACORN must be so proud.

UPDATE: This is what I get for saying something nice about Barack Obama! Never again! I single him out because of his “brave” stand on Afghanistan and he immediately begins bowing to pressure from the left to abandon it.

The following is from my Examiner.com site. You can view the original here.

Barack Obama continues to view the world through naive rose-colored glasses when it comes to foreign policy. The only bright spot at the moment, of course, being Afghanistan. President Obama currently supports a surge strategy similar to the one used in Iraq to bring things under control in Afghanistan. On that issue, he has the full support of the conservative movement. Not so much on the statement that “victory is not the goal” in Afghanistan, but in the actual tangible policy, he has our support.

Of course, with the lunatic fringe on his left wetting their pants in fear over the war in Afghanistan, he is going to be getting a significant amount of pressure to “cut and run” from Afghanistan before the job is done under the false pretense that running away from terrorists hellbent on killing us will make us safer. As a result, conservatives should continue to support the President on this issue because he is right.

You would think that the left-wing radicals would be happy overall with the way things are going. Obama’s approach to the North Korea missle launches has been to ignore him. His response to the psychotic anti-semitic loon running Iran’s plans to bring about the Islamic Messiah via nuclear war against Israel and America has been a standing invitation for tea and crumpets at the White House. To be fair, Reverend Wright probably didn’t ever teach Obama on the portion in Proverbs that cautions against “arguing with a fool” as he had so much ground to cover in hating/dehumanizing white folks, America and “them Jews” that he never got around to any actual scripture, so perhaps Obama’s Muslim, er, Christian faith never embraced that teaching.

Determined not to fight a “stupid war” like the one with Iraq, Obama has taken the opposite approach of George W. “It’s okay to interrupt my state of the union speech via boos and call me a liar without an apology” Bush by choosing to ignore intelligence reports that suggest Satan’s little brother, Mahmoud, has the capacity to make nukes and is close on the whole rocket thing. We can’t act, what if those reports are wrong? We might accidentally free millions of people from oppression and remove a genocidal mad-man from power BEFORE he conquers half the world! That would be horrifying!

Everyone knows the only way to deal with a genocidal mad-man is to coddle him and legitimize his regime by planning meetings and allowing him nuclear technology “for power purposes.” So enamored of the Democratic leadership are our enemies that Osama Bin Laden (remember him?) has Jimmy Carter’s anti-semitic tear-jerker about the plight of the compassionate Palestinians, who after all, just want to kill as many Jews as they can, on his must-read list. That should tell you all that you need to know about the teachings of James “everyone who criticizes Obama is racist” Carter. It is truly baffling that this man won only one term before losing in a massive landslide to Ronald Reagan.

Even though Iran speaks of nuking Israel and America, we can rest assured that those statements are just crazy and to be discounted. The statements made by that same genocidal mad-man where he claims that he needs nuclear technology only for power purposes are the God’s honest truth, however. Why would a man hellbent on world domination via Shariah Law and nuclear war lie about his true intention for nuclear technology? Certainly a man who has said the following wouldn’t try to deceive America about his plans:

“Anybody who recognizes Israel will burn in the Islamic nation’s fury.”

“The Holocaust is a false claim, a fairy tale, used as a pretext for crimes against humanity.”

“Israel has no future.”

“[Israel] must be wiped off the map.”

“Those who think they can revive the stinking corpse of the usurping and fake Israeli regime by throwing a birthday party are seriously mistaken. Today the reason for the Zionist regime’s existence is questioned, and this regime is on its way to annihilation.”

“Them Jews aren’t going to let me speak to him.”

Okay, so the last one was from Barack Obama’s spiritual mentor Reverend Wright, but you get the idea.

Indeed, Obama told the world in June, while giving a speech in Prague that he “supports Iran’s right to peaceful nuclear energy with rigorous inspections.” Of course, if Iran, were to say agree to this policy and then cut off inspections completely and violate in excess of 16 United Nations resolutions on the matter, we know with certainty that Obama and his peace-loving pals would pursue a false peace by ignoring the problem. They call this Operation Ostrich. That was made abundantly clear with the Iraq situation. Since Iran’s leader is deranged, and since inspections would fail due to his maniacal plan to bring about the end of the world via nuclear destruction, it is important to realize that this plan would easily allow Iran nuclear weaponry without consequence from the Obama administration. With America largely abandoning Israel in her time of need, thank God they have Benjamin Netanyahu to stand (albeit alone) against the anti-semitism of the Middle Eastern state sponsors of terrorism.

The glory of Operation Ostrich could be seen earlier this year when Muslim Pirates were ignored for days before finally being engaged by the Obama administration. Of course, that may have been because Obama was confused about the Muslim pirates’ true intent, as his speech in Cairo hailed the 1796 Treaty of Tripoli as a positive recognition of our country by the forward-thinking and peace-loving Muslim world. That delightful treaty, of course, was nothing more than an agreement of blackmail whereby America would pay millions of dollars to Muslim pirates so that they wouldn’t attack our ships, sell us into slavery and take our stuff. To Obama, however, that was a moment of Muslim contribution to America worth celebrating.

Under Operation Ostrich, North Korea was also free to launch its missiles at will, and Russia continued to form secret alliances with Iran. This week, Operation Ostrich has re-surfaced as Obama threw former Soviet states Poland and the Czech Republic under the bus by announcing that America would scrap our plans for a missile defense system. Sure, Russia is licking its chops right next door about re-taking it’s former conquests, but we don’t want to offend Putin by defending those folks. This should be no surprise after Russia’s attempt to re-conquer Georgia last year elicited a confused “both sides should back down” position from Obama after several days of his on the international crisis (to be fair, he was on vacation and had only broken his silence during that time to show off shirtless photos of himself on the beach and to discuss his love for SPAM.)

Again, Obama continues to want to see the best in folks. By refusing to see the terrorist side of pals Bill Ayers and Jeff Jones, the communist side of Mark Lloyd, Carol Browner, Cass Sunstein & Van Jones, the racist side of Reverend Wright & Rashid Khalidi, and the non-tax-paying side of Tim Geithner, the great Bamster continues to only see the good in folks. So like Kim Jong Il in North Korea and our pal Mahmoud in Iran, Barry refuses to see the bad in former KGB agent Vladimir Putin. It’s nice to try to see the good in folks, but the leader of the free world can’t afford that luxury. Universal healthcare doesn’t much matter when you have the pre-existing condition of having been nuked to death by your enemies.

So, those of us sane enough to reject the policy of sticking our head in the ground when facing real and growing threats to our country must support Obama where we agree and prod him to action where we don’t. On the issue of Afghanistan, he deserves our support, on the issue of everything else, we need to remind him of the lessons of history.

According to the absolute loons in the “Congressional Black Caucus” or as it is more properly known, “The Lying Racists’ Caucus” the following are now acts of racism:

1. Shouting, “You lie!” to a politician who happens to be an African-American, and who also happens to be at that moment, lying.

2. Considering voting against an African-American candidate for office for any of the following reasons: that you don’t agree with him on any of the issues, that you think he lacks the type of experience to be a good leader, or that you question his very integrity because of the aforementioned propensity for verbal diarrhea in the form of non-stop lying. (Apparently, voting against someone solely based on the color of their skin is acceptable, so long as that person is white (just ask Reverend Wright, he’ll tell you why to hate the white folks and “them Jews.”)

3. Indicting a congressman on bribery when the fruit of his excellence in bribe-taking can easily be found behind the peas in his freezer, unless of course, he is white, in which case you don’t even need evidence to convict him. Just call him a racist pig and send him to jail.

4. Pointing out very real connections between a candidate for President and a white terrorist that is his close personal friend, mentor, and political supporter.

5. Having the “audacity of hope” to stand against an African-American candidate for public office at any time for any reason and for any public office.

6. As a “racist” candidate running against an African-American candidate, any criticism leveled at your African-American opponent is “racist.”

7. Having a problem with armed Blank Panther thugs intimidating folks at a polling place on Election Day.

However, it should be noted that any manner of vile baseless accusations against white folks, or anti-Semitic language uttered by a liberal does not count as “racism.”

Congressman Joe Wilson’s outburst during the President’s angry tirade against any and all dissenters was inappropriate. Congressman Wilson apologized for it. It is really time to move on. Several years ago, the “not racist” liberals in Congress loudly booed President Bush during a State of the Union speech. Not racist. Senate Majority Leader Harry “The War Is Lost” Reid also denounced President Bush as “a liar” and issued no apology. In fact, in the very speech where Wilson had his outburst, Obama called Sarah Palin, Rush Limbaugh, town hall attendees, the few GOP standing up to him, and Fox News all liars. Again, not racist, and apparently even respectful when coming from the honey-tinged lips of Obama.

The deranged lunatics who serve in the “Congressional Black Caucus” are doing a massive disservice to their constituents and to the real issue of race relations in America. Particularly heinous is the pompous lying racist, Representative Hank Johnston, a Democrat from Georgia. Johnston, speaking on behalf of his club of lying racists in Congress, claims that if Wilson isn’t censured, “people will put on white hoods and ride through the countryside.” This vile over-generalization is of course, not racism but a shrewd observation on the part of Johnston.

That’s right. How did you figure out our secret plans? It is the goal of every white person in the country to elect a black man president and then oppose socialism for purely racist reasons, while waiting for the signal of “You Lie!” to don our white hoods and ride around the country on horses that would I guess be supplied to the vast majority of us who don’t have them.

Of course, this imbecile and others like him ignore the fact that they have as Vice President, a man who claimed that Barack Obama was the “first clean and articulate” black man to run for President. (Still awaiting word on whether or not His Holiness of Racism, the most high Reverend Jackson, wants to “cut his nuts off” for the comment.)
They also ignore the fact that insane environmental fraud and windbag Al Gore’s father filibustered against the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and that the former high official of the KKK, Robert “KKK” Byrd is still serving in the senate in a position of prominence.

Escaped mental patient Maureen Dowd also wrote in her column that Wilson and all conservatives are racists: “I’ve been loath to admit that the shrieking lunacy of the summer [also known as stay-at-home moms, hard-working Americans, and retired Veterans expressing their opinions] had much to do with race, but Wilson’s SHOCKING DISRESPECT for the office of the president—no democrat ever shouted ‘liar’ at W.” she then comes to the conclusion that “some people just can’t believe a black man is president and will never accept it.”

Just a year ago it was “patriotic” to challenge the administration “or any administration” or so Hillary screeched. One year later, and any slight disagreement with Obama or his terrorist-supporting, communist-loving, America-hating unelectable czars could have no possible motivation besides racism.

Maureen, are you serious? “Shocking disrespect?” Nobody has “shocking disrespect” for the White House like the liberals do. First of all, you only have to travel back to the ancient time of January 2009 to remember that President Bush was loudly booed and treated to a rendition of “na na na na hey hey hey good-bye” at the inauguration of Barack Obama. Many of the “respectful” nuts in the Democratic party have spent years speculating that President Bush was behind 9/11, questioning his intelligence and literacy, and mocking his former alcohol problem. This, of course was while ignoring Barack Obama & Joe Biden’s countless gaffes and retractions, ignoring Obama’s associations with radical terrorist lunatics, and pretending that Teddy Kennedy and most of his family aren’t raging alcoholics and sex addicts (and in Teddy’s case, a murderer.)

Our opposition to Obama has nothing to do with race. You’ll note that this is unlike his own views about “typical white folks” like his grandmother. Our opposition is to his policies. Give us Michael Steele, Ken Blackwell, Condi Rice, or J.C. Watts for president any day. (Of course, the “Lying Racist Caucus” or Congressional Black Caucus would tell you that those folks are “Uncle Toms” and therefore do not count as black folks.)

This has nothing to do with race and everything to do with the direction of our countries POLICIES. The American people deserve better than to have one side masking their own putrid racism and intolerance while throwing a temper tantrum whenever things don’t go their way. Martin Luther King would be horrified to see those who claim to speak for him trade one form of racism for another. His own words testify against them when he calls for men to be judged by the “content of their character” and not the “color of their skin.” In fact, if King were around to speak to the Congressional Black Caucus, he’d probably say something like, “You lie!”

The following is a vigorous debate from a roundtable discussion between the founding fathers and Obama and his pals:

THOMAS JEFFERSON: “We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry, would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”

BARACK OBAMA: “One of the great strengths of the United States is…we do not consider ourselves a Christian nation…”

THOMAS JEFFERSON: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

BARACK OBAMA: “Can’t I just eat my waffle?”

GEORGE WASHINGTON: “Of all the dispositions and habits, which lead to political prosperity, Religion and Morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute of Patriotism, who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness, these firmest props of the duties of Men and Citizens.”

BARACK OBAMA: “The United States has been enriched by Muslim Americans. Many other Americans have Muslims in their families or have lived in a Muslim-majority country - I know, because I am one of them. I will stand with the Muslims if the political winds should shift in an ugly direction.”

THOMAS JEFFERSON: “The energy, the faith, the devotion which we bring to this endeavor will light this country and all who serve it, and the glow from that fire can truly light this world.”

BARACK OBAMA: “In America, there’s a failure to appreciate Europe’s leading role in the world. ”

OBAMA PAL BILL AYERS: “America still makes me want to puke.”

GEORGE WASHINGTON: “No country upon earth ever had it more in its power to attain these blessings than United America. Wondrously strange, then, and much to be regretted indeed would it be, were we to neglect the means and to depart from the road which Providence has pointed us to so plainly; I cannot believe it will ever come to pass.”

JOHN ADAMS: “I Pray Heaven to Bestow The Best of Blessing on THIS HOUSE, and on ALL that shall hereafter Inhabit it.”

REV. JEREMIAH WRIGHT: “Nah, nah, nah, not God bless America…God damn America!”

BENJAMIN FRANKLIN: “It is a rising and not setting sun.”

MICHELLE OBAMA: “America is just downright mean and guided by fear. This is the first time in my adult life that I am proud of America.”

THOMAS JEFFERSON: “A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned–this is the sum of good government.”

BARACK OBAMA: “I think when you spread the wealth around, it’s good for everybody.”

THOMAS JEFFERSON: “I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.”

BARACK OBAMA: “Everyone needs a little skin in the game.”

JOHN ADAMS: “Human nature itself is evermore an advocate for liberty. Liberty, once lost, is lost forever.”

REV. JEREMIAH WRIGHT: “America’s chickens are coming home to roost!”

GEORGE WASHINGTON: “An innate spirit of freedom first told me that the measures which the Administration hath for sometime been, and now are, most violently pursuing are repugnant…”

BARACK OBAMA: “Well, the time for bickering is over. The time for games has passed.”

THOMAS JEFFERSON: “Delay is preferable to error. All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.”

BARACK OBAMA: “It’s not surprising, then, they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them…to explain their frustrations.”

THOMAS JEFFERSON: “For a people who are free, and who mean to remain so, a well-organized and armed militia is their best security.”

WASHINGTON: “It is important, likewise, that the habits of thinking in a free country should inspire caution, in those intrusted with its administration, to confine themselves within their respective constitutional spheres, avoiding in the exercise of the powers of one department to encroach upon another. The spirit of encroachment tends to consolidate the powers of all the departments in one, and thus to create, whatever the form of government, a real despotism…let there be no change by usurpation; for, though this, in one instance, may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed. The precedent must always greatly overbalance in permanent evil any partial or transient benefit, which the use can at any time yield.”

BARACK OBAMA: “What Washington needs is adult supervision.”

THOMAS JEFFERSON: “It is incumbent on every generation to pay its own debts as it goes. A principle of which if acted on would save one-half the wars of the world.”

JOE BIDEN: “We have to go spend money to keep from going bankrupt!”

BENJAMIN FRANKLIN: “A penny saved is a penny earned.”

BARACK OBAMA: “I won’t stand by while the special interests use the same old tactics to keep things exactly the way they are. If you misrepresent what’s in this plan, we will call you out.”

THOMAS JEFFERSON: “Our country is now taking so steady a course as to show by what road it will pass to destruction, to wit: by consolidation of power first, and then corruption, its necessary consequence.”

BARACK OBAMA: “It’s a lie, plain and simple.”

THOMAS JEFFERSON: “Every government degenerates when trusted to the rulers of the people alone. The people themselves are its only safe depositories.”

BARACK OBAMA: “There are also those who claim that our reform efforts would insure illegal immigrants. This, too, is false.”

JOE WILSON: “You lie!”

ABRAHAM LINCOLN: “If destruction be our lot we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freeman we must live through all time, or die by suicide.”

BARACK OBAMA: “We’re not going to babysit a Civil War. I cannot swallow whole the idea of Lincoln as the Great Emancipator. We are the ones we’ve been waiting for. Everyone in this room knows what will happen if we do nothing…More Americans will lose their coverage when they are sick…and more will die as a result.”

PATRICK HENRY: “Give me liberty or give me death.”

FOUNDERS: “We mutually pledge our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor!”

Several weeks ago, I posted about Rachel Maddow’s shock and horror over the untimely murder of the saintly church-going Dr. Tiller, a late-term abortion doctor, who was gunned down in cold blood. Maddow was concerned about another late-term abortion provider who was being “targeted” by Operation Rescue for “peaceful demonstrations” that weekend, which in Maddow’s mind, meant an all out assault on his office would occur with massive casualties. (Perhaps she was mistaking Operation Rescue with her doppleganger Janet Reno, who bravely charged the Waco compound and blew those folks away before breaking into Elian Gonzalez’s house with guns blazing so as to protect themselves against the menacing threat of a small child.)

Today, we hear news from Owosso, Michigan that a well-known pro-life activist named Lawrence Puillon was gunned down in cold blood in front of a local school. Certainly the man posting signs in support of “Life” was such a menace to whoever shot him that they felt their life was in danger. After all, he was 63 years old, with leg braces and an oxygen tank. The poor abortion-loving crowd must have just been terrified of him.

The police have a suspect in custody, but no motive has yet been released. It could well be that the man was just in the wrong place at the wrong time. It, could also have to do with his beliefs. In the past Puillon was spit upon, screamed at, threatened, and once had fruit thrown at his head.

Don’t worry folks. The local Planned Parenthood has already weighed in and told the local press that they had nothing to do with this. They also snuck in a comment that they would “Certainly we do eveyrthing we can to ensure the safety and security of our clients” but that they would nonetheless cooperate with the investigation if called upon. Planned Parenthood, like our gal Rachel, wants to make sure to remind folks of the “danger” of pro-life activists. They might see a sign or pamphlet that tells them the “mass” they are going to have removed is actually another life! Oh the horror! What terrorists!

Eerily, the man told a friend of his, the President of the Flint Right to Life that he was “prepared to die” in defense of the unborn if need be. It may well be that he spoke prophetically.

Whatever the reason, a good American who simply wanted to stop what he believed to be murder of innocent babies, was murdered in cold blood. This should be a cause for outrage for everyone. One has to wonder how soon Rachel Maddow will be reporting on this with tear-filled eyes and a hysterical report of the rise of pro-choice terrorism.

I’m sure she’ll get right on that.

So, President Obama gave his speech to the school kids. It turned out to be a snooze-fest pep rally speech about staying in school. Of course, in the speech, Obama spoke mainly about himself, referencing himself 56 times (almost as many times as there are states according to his calculations) and trivial subjects such as school only 19 times and education only 10.

Overall, however, the President’s speech was fine and there was no political scandal to it. That, of course, was only because we complained about it. (By we, I mean rational Americans, not lunatic fringe leftists hell-bent on destroying the Constitution in favor of a Big Brother state. Those folks were just fine with propagandizing the youth of America, so long as it served the purpose of “The One” and discouraged independent thought that diverged from that of the TelePrompter.)

Reports suggest that Obama’s initial plan was to promote himself and his political agenda. He was allegedly going to send the wee ones home with marching orders to tell mom and dad to pass healthcare reform.

There was also the study guide that was to be followed-up on by teachers. In the study guide, students were going to be encouraged to write a self-reflective essay on how they could help Obama personally. Thankfully, our noise also scrapped this propaganda from the lesson plans, but it is always fun to ponder what might have been.

In that spirit, I submit to you my own personal “How I Can Help Obama” essay:

So how would I help President Obama? Well, I would probably start by reminding the President that nearly 50 years ago another Democratic president named John F. Kennedy told us to “not ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country!” He also spoke of a “belief that the rights of man come not from the generosity of the state, but from the hand of God.” I would explain to him that this speaks to a belief system that doesn’t see the government as the center of the universe and the answer to all life’s problems. You see, in those days, being a Democrat was not synonymous with “communist” and “anti-American whack-job” and among many in the grass roots Democratic party today it still isn’t. Their leaders, however, are a different story. That is why the revolt against Obamacare and the out of control spending have been so successful. They aren’t just us crazed right-wing wackos out there. Many independents and “not communist” Democrats have decided that enough is enough.

Liberals used to stand for freedom of speech, regardless of who or what did the speaking. To take away the freedom of speech for one, was to destroy that right for all Americans. Liberals such as John F. Kennedy understood this. President Obama has inadvertently studied under Reverend Wright and accidentally worked side by side with Bill Ayers. He didn’t realize that they hated America and loved Communism. This is a pattern that has repeated throughout his career, where the do-gooder community organizer accidentally works with, promotes, studies under, appoints and collaborates with terrorists, communists, racists, and any manner of anti-American nut jobs. After all of the coincidental exposure that the President has had to such folks, it is certainly understandable that his love of America might be dimmed, and his view of freedom and the role of government skewed.

So, maybe one way to help President Obama is to open his eyes to the importance of freedom of speech. His administration has been clear on this one. To his advisors, mentors, collaborators, and administration officials freedom of speech is something that must be destroyed. Maybe that’s why so many of them have spent large parts of their careers as active members of terrorist organizations (the Weather Underground), and various Communist/socialist organizations, while publicly theorizing about various anti-American conspiracy theories, rooting for America to lose wars, or shouting their own personal racism from the rooftops. From the recently resigned Van Jones to Cass Sunstein to Mark Lloyd to Carol Browner to Attorney General Eric Holder, the Obama administration is full of folks who simply want to stifle debate and silence the opposition. Indeed, they even praise communist dictators who usurp the media in order to “control the message.” Truthfully, communists, terrorists, racists, and conspiracy nuts aren’t always fans of the first amendment, but maybe I could help the President by reminding him that free speech is a good thing.

I suppose I could also help the President become a better judge of character. He didn’t know Reverend Wright’s views despite sitting in his church for 20 years, quoting extensively from the man’s sermons for one of his books and calling him his spiritual mentor. He didn’t realize that the man who’s living room was the spring board for Obama’s career was a terrorist. Or wait, he knew he was a terrorist, but figured he repented. Oh wait, well, he was only 4 when the man bombed the Pentagon. He had no idea Van Jones was a Communist/9-11 conspiracy theorist/racist even though anyone with access to google or youtube could figure that one out. He had no idea Timothy Geithner didn’t pay his taxes before appointing him Treasury Secretary. The Obama legacy is littered with grifters, scoundrels and dirtbags that somehow snowed Obama into thinking they were flag-waving normal Americans. Perhaps I could help him understand people better to avoid another 500 melt-downs in the years to come as he continues to nominate extremist radical after extremist radical.

Even in the matter of simply reading a TelePrompter, Obama can be hoodwinked. The TelePrompter tricked the kind-hearted and naive leader of the free world into thanking himself in a speech, lying about how he met his wife and even reading someone else’s speech for some time before noticing the mistake. With my help, President Obama could find his own voice and not let people and inanimate objects such as clear glass screens with scrolling text get the better of him. Standing Together, yes we can!

(Although it should be noted that Obama has fallen all over himself to declare that he did not ask for Van Jones’ resignation. Well, good. At least we know that someone who is a 9-11 conspiracy nut/Communist/racist is still eligible for a position in his administration. So maybe in the case of Van Jones, it isn’t so much being hoodwinked, as it is being titillated by the idea of Communism himself.)

I could also probably help the President by campaigning, donating to, volunteering for and voting for the GOP in the 2010 elections. Having the Republicans re-take the Senate and the House would stop his radical socialist agenda dead in its tracks. Since the vast majority of the American people are against most of it, it would probably be a good thing to stop his dastardly plans to dismantle the Constitution. With his crazed agenda stopped in its tracks, Obama would immediately experience a bounce in the polls as he would no longer appear as such a threat to the American people. After all, when this happened to Bill Clinton, he decided to govern like a moderate after the 1994 elections and it ensured his re-election.

Of course, helping to elect a Republican in 2012, like say, Sarah Palin (this one’s just for you liberals!) would also actually help the President. You see, if he was defeated for re-election, he could go back to the important work of community organizing. We were told by ABC’s Jim Moran, after all, that Obama was “taking a step down” to enter the White House, so why not let him return to his more important work. Indeed, we were chastised repeatedly in the campaign for impugning the integrity and important work that a community organizer working with a corrupt scandal-laden ACORN did. In fact, since Obama’s departure from community organizing, it has indeed fallen back out of favor. Those who organize Tea Party rallies and attend Town Hall Meetings are now “angry mobs” and “racists.” We need Obama back in the trenches to restore the work of community organizers to their previous glory when Black Panther’s carrying nightsticks guarded over Philadelphia polling places to intimidate any opposition voters and ACORN made sure that dead folks and illegal aliens weren’t “disenfranchised” from their right to vote. Freed from the shackles of the lowly Oval Office, Obama would be free to make community organizing cool again.

If I can teach President Obama that communism is bad, while reminding him that free speech is good, I will have done a huge favor the the president. My efforts to defeat his allies in the legislative branch and send him back to the important work of community organizing will also go far to help the President reclaim the important work of his life. In these ways, I believe that I can truly help President Obama.