« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Apathy is not an option…

With calls for gun control becoming more numerous and more strident, it is increasingly clear that the Obama administration is intent on using “any means necessary” to restrict the average citizen’s rights to own and carry firearms. At the local level, anti-gun governors and state legislators are jumping on board, promising (threatening?) “serious” changes in gun laws.

However, what is at least as disturbing, especially to gun owners, is President Obama’s recent signing of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2013. Why? Because a significant passage (one that would have protected American citizens from “indefinite detention”) was suspiciously removed from the bill.

http://rt.com/usa/news/obama-ndaa-detention-president-288/

Ironically, human rights activists find themselves aligned with gun owners in their fear of what such a change in the law could mean to the average American:

Although the significance to gun owners might not be immediately understood, an action such as this is merely an indicator of the intentions of the Obama administration – and they are very unsettling. If you are still so naive (or more likely, in denial) that you think YOU have nothing to worry about, then it is long past time for a reality check. Hint: what happens when your “arsenal” of guns and “thousands of rounds of ammunition” make you a “potential terrorist threat” in the eyes of the BATF…or worse, Homeland Security?

Ask your friends in Illinois or California what happened when gun owners failed to fight ever-increasing restrictions on guns. I recall a particularly obtuse California “hunter” who admitted voting for the very politicians who wrote the California “assault weapons” ban (on just 12 “bad” guns, you see – nothing to worry about here). He was then shocked when his Benelli shotgun appeared on the “updated” list of “prohibited” weapons.

Unfortunately, too few gun owners will pay attention to NDAA2013, or they’ll just yawn and turn the channel, unable or unwilling to confront the threat that may soon be knocking at their front (or more likely, their back) door.

Apathy is never a winning strategy, yet a significant number of gun owners actually FAILED TO VOTE in the last election. Seriously? Are they out of their minds? This is not a Republican versus Democrat issue – I honestly don’t care what you thought of Mitt Romney (and I am no fan of his either), but the alternative was electing Barak Obama, the most anti-gun president in history.

Unfortunately, such folks delude themselves that by not voting at all, they are somehow relieved of responsibility for the outcome. Yet nothing could be further from the truth – Barak Obama got reelected with fewer votes than he got in 2008. Face it – Obama won in 2012 because too many of YOU who would have voted against him stayed home.

Sometimes I get the feeling that gun owners are just as self-destructive as many of the other single-issue voting groups (Pro-Life, Immigration Reform, Gay Marriage – whatever). They get so hung up on finding the “perfect” candidate that they end up putting into office someone much, much worse.

No more. As gun owners, “we must all hang together, or surely we will all hang separately” as the famous Ben Franklin quote goes. Staying home is simply not an option. And now that the election is over, and we have at least two years before anything changes in the Congress, we have no viable option other than to join the fight. And that means we must ALL get involved.

Surprisingly, it doesn’t take all that much work to make a difference. Here in Minnesota, one of the most liberal states in the nation, we finally got a “shall-issue” handgun carry permit law passed in 2003. We did it by getting involved, by getting friends involved, and by pounding on legislators until they got sick of running into us at every turn.

It is time to make your views known. Loudly. Clearly. Relentlessly. Email, call, and most importantly, FAX your U.S. Congressman and Senator (emails get deleted – FAXes land on their desks!). Then find your state legislators and do the same. Contact them all.

Or prepare to kiss your rights (and the rights of your fellow gun owners) goodbye…

COMMENTS

  • kowalski

    Here’s a hint: Touting Alex Jones as our spokesperson (and I’m not saying you are) isn’t a good idea. Alex Jones is another consummate manipulator who cares mostly about Alex Jones. It’s a very bad idea, and Piers Morgan knows that, which is why Alex Jones was brought on – so Morgan could unleash him with all his screaming and conspiracy theories and his apocalyptic phantasms – and showcase him as the “Voice of Gun Owners in America.” A borderline crazy voice. A very angry, unhinged man, full of conspiracy theories and overflowing with rage.

    That’s not going to help us, folks.

    Less than 12 hours later, Gabrielle Giffords is starting her own anti-gun organization to help “counter the NRA’s influence.” Who do we have at the top of the Drudge Report? Nutcase Unca’ Jones, blasting through Piers Morgan’s interview like the loosest of loose cannons.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/gabrielle-giffords-and-husband-launch-anti-gun-violence-group/2013/01/08/a6f3ffb4-599b-11e2-9fa9-5fbdc9530eb9_story.html?hpid=z3

    This combined with the NRA’s brain-dead press conference and the absolute inability of anyone on our side to stand up as an articulate alternative has done a lot more harm than good. 80 to 100 million people are going to have their rights restricted because this side of the argument has absolutely lost the ability to communicate effectively. None of the proposals that will be passed will have anything to do (or would have done anything) to prevent the crimes we’ve seen. They’re going to be a big wish list of the gun grabbers going back 30 years.

    But we don’t have a nation of civic-minded people who can digest an argument longer than a single paragraph, or at least we don’t treat it like it can. I warned about this in an earlier post about “emotionalism” – that it would degenerate into a shouting match that did nothing but harden opinion. And that’s what’s happening when guys like Alex Jones get cherry picked by Piers Morgan on the evening of Gabrielle Gifford’s announcement of her new gun control group.

    Now all that’s left for him to do is run an advertisement with Gabby Giffords and her new organization on one side of the split screen and Crazy Alex Jones on the other and then fade out and say: “Who do you think is rational?”

    Case Closed.

    No brains. We have a nation of Mongers – fear mongers, tax mongers, conspiracy theory mongers, hate mongers, legislation mongers, and what we’re going to get from it is a lot worse than most of us deserve. This is how societies die, really: they can’t communicate with themselves effectively any longer.

    • http://havegunwillvote.blogtownhall.com/ cmndr45

      Can’t disagree – my business is teaching communications, and I’ve been endlessly frustrated trying to teach “our side” how to frame the debate, and how to avoid letting the anti-gun fanatics set the terms of discussion…

      • kowalski

        By the way I completely agree with your call for people to be very dedicated in the next two weeks contacting their Representatives and Senators. If we let Alex Jones become our poster child, we can pretty much hang it up.

        • http://havegunwillvote.blogtownhall.com/ cmndr45

          Exactly – same way that “journalists” at any pro-gun event always seek out the one guy with a beard, a camo vest, and an NRA hat, preferably with a Southern accent….

          • kowalski

            It’s hard to know what’s sadder: Piers Morgan (who admits his only lifelong experience firing guns was at a “stag party” in Prague) as a “bonafide journalist” or Alex Jones as a “bonafide interview subject.”

            And somehow people like this have become the ones providing the subject matter for the debate upon which our rights and liberties depend.

            It’s really a symptom of a society that’s gone around the bend in a lot of ways – like the Trillion Dollar Coin idea. The legislation allowing the Treasury to mint Platinum coins without specifiying the exact denominations, etc., was conceived as a very modest, small thing to allow them to mint some platinum for collectors. Now in 2012-2013 there are people seriously looking at it as the answer to our national debt problems. So far removed from any kind of reality, the debasement and level of doppler shift is almost too far to measure.

            And like in any extreme time, where extreme views and hyperbolic ideas are doing their best to out-compete each other, what usually happens is bad. Bad policy, bad ideas, bad “debates” and bad outcomes – and the good people being drowned out by the lunatics, the fakes, and the criminally vain. Not good days for the Republic, these.

          • kowalski

            By the way I don’t mind the guys with the beards, the vests, the hat or the guys with a Southern accent. I’m a big fan of Jeff Quinn. I wish I had his accent and his shooting skills. But the laws are not being made by those guys right now. BosWash Megalopolis is in charge right now, mostly MA. And I expect to announce here very soon that it’s going to get much tougher in MA than it already is. The ropes are going to tighten here FIRST and then, if our people in the House cave in, on the rest of the country.