« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The Conservative Grievance Industry almost gets it right.

I have written here a few times about what a good friend of mine has called “The Conservative Grievance Industry.” Laura Ingraham, Mark Levin, Sean Hannity, even Sen. Jim DeMint, and others, have written books ostensibly for the purpose of “saving America.” Indeed, that was the title of DeMint’s book. I’ve scoured those books, looking for concrete “how to” guides relating to the actual internal workings of the Republican Party. None of those books explain how to become a Republican Party precinct committeeman nor why that might be important. (Why is that important? Hmmm, let’s see. Half the precinct committeemen slots in the Party were vacant after the 2008 elections. The half that were filled were split about 50-50 between conservatives and moderates. Precinct committeemen, and only precinct committeemen, get to vote in the internal Party leadership elections. (If conservatives invaded the Party and occupied all the empty precinct committeemen slots, the Party would go to FULL STRENGTH and have a 75 per cent majority of conservatives in its grass roots ranks — and the conservative majority could then elect conservatives to ALL of the leadership positions, including at the RNC level.) And, precinct committeemen who attend their monthly committee meetings will meet all of the Republican primary candidates in person, to evaluate them face-to-face, eyeball-to-eyeball, and then be in a position to help the BEST conservative candidates win the primary election, which, traditionally, has very low turnout.)

I purchased Dick Morris and Eileen McGann’s latest addition to the long list of books the Conservative Grievance Industry (“CGI”) has penned for the public. It has some good things in it, but it is contradictory and leaves out all of what I explained above. Rather than encourage conservatives to actually attend their local Republican Party committee meetings to become precinct committeemen for the reasons I’ve outlined above, instead, “2010, Take Back America: A Battle Plan” inexplicably tells conservatives to become “electronic precinct committeemen” only and that they can do everything that’s needed from the comfort of their homes.

Morris and McGann give some great advice regarding how to be an “electronic precinct committeeman,” but they end their book on the last page with this fundamentally wrong-headed (in my opinion) bit of advice: “It’s tough to transform oneself from political couch potato to activist. But you don’t have to leave home to do it.” (Bolding added.) Wrong, if you want to actually vote for the leadership of the Republican Party. Wrong, if you want to meet and evaluate the Republican candidates eyeball-to-eyeball. Wrong, if you want to run, yourself, for a Party leadership position. Wrong, if you want to volunteer as a poll watcher, a polling place worker, or volunteer for any of the myriad traditional campaign tasks (get-out-the-vote phone calls and door-to-door work, voter registration activites, putting up campaign signs, etc.) To be the BEST kind of political activist, in my opinion, one needs to, if at all possible, physically attend one’s local Republican Party committee monthly meetings, because that is where the real ball game of politics — party politics — is played.

Most of the CGI books follow the following format (and the Morris and McGann book is no exception):

The Democrats are bad for America.

The Republicans are better.

You need to “get involved” and here are some ways to do that: write a letter to the editor, send money to the Party and the candidates you like, write a blog, talk to your friends and family, etc. (leaving out any specifics about actually getting INSIDE the Republican Party itself).

I only skimmed the first three parts of the book, looking for actual advice on HOW to CHANGE the Republican Party itself. I did not see a word about that subject. Here’s an overview of their chapters:

“Part One: The Stakes” describes how Obama and the Democrats are bad.

“Part Two: The Targets” lists in great detail all of the bad Democrats, state-by-state, in both the Senate and the House.

“Part Three: The Strategy” lays out examples of hypothetical TV ads that could be used to attack the Democrats and describes arguments Republicans could make on various issues against Obama and the Democrats in the upcoming elections.

I did read every word of “Part Four, The Electronic Precinct, How You Can Help Beat Obama and the Democrats,” which begins, “Politics is no longer a spectator sport.” Actually, politics still is a spectator sport. But only for those who choose to remain spectators. Who choose not to become “card carrying members” of a political party or a volunteer in some other capacity at the monthly party committee meetings.

Morris and McGann go on:

“Those in the grandstands must leave their seats and come down on the playing field to help their side score. That is the key lesson of the Obama campaign. He didn’t just have supporters. He had campaign workers — millions of them.

“Every caller who dialed Obama’s headquarters in 2008 was greeted with a question: ‘What can you do for us?’”

However, as already mentioned, the authors then later explain that getting out of their grandstand seats and coming down onto the playing field does not mean actually getting out of their chairs and leaving their homes, as everything the authors believe ought to be done by conservatives can be done at home with their computer and an internet connection. I agree with the authors that “if we’re to win the elections of 2010, we need to have hundreds of thousands of electronic precincts throughout the country, all of them worked by dedicated activists who are willing to put in the time and creativity necessary to make their work count.” (Page 308.) That will certainly be a plus. They explain, at page 298, “If you want to make a difference in 2010, now’s the time to start reaching out to all those people [one's friends and family] to spread the word. They are your constituents — your electronic precinct.” They explain HOW one could use the internet to influence others whom you know. And they hit the nail on the head with this statement: “Underlying all our efforts is one fundamental conviction: Conservatism is too important a cause to leave to the establishment of the Republican Party.” Unfortunately, the authors do not explain HOW to CHANGE the Republican Party.

Changing the Republican Party cannot be achieved merely through the creation of “electronic precincts;” rather, the ONLY way to change the Republican Party is for conservatives to become ACTUAL precinct committeemen so they may vote in better, more conservative Party leaders. Precinct committeemen ARE the Party. We conservatives could take over the Party if we UNITED within it as precinct committeemen. The Party leadership elections will take place right after the 2010 general election, and if you’re not a Republican precinct committeeman by then you won’t be participating. Sorry.

For reference, here are links to some of the other things I’ve written here about the CGI:

www.redstate.com/coldwarrior/2009/12/13/beware-the-%E2%80%9Cconservative-grievance-complex%E2%80%9D-%E2%80%93-good-for-selling-books-not-for-fixing-things/

www.redstate.com/erick/2010/02/21/the-leader/#comment-57436

Thank you.
ColdWarrior, PC
Conservatives, UNITE! CHANGE the Republican Party and the world by becoming precinct committeemen. NOW!
————
American first, conservative second and Republican precinct committeeman BY NECESSITY!

www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com, so you can say, “I became a precinct committeeman before it was cool.”

“[Primary e]lections have consequences, my friends.” — John McCain

COMMENTS

  • ebone

    By not being IN the party, we were beaten by NAMBLA, Kill the Baby Movement, There is NO God Crowd. Animals over People Group,Al Gore and Mickael Moore for Earth Presidents dot org. and any and every wacko group out there. And why, because they were in THEIR party. They walked the precincts, made the phone calls, showed up at every meeting possible. They were ACTIVE.,INVOLVED AND VOTED,on the precinct level, for any wacko of their choice.
    While we were, commenting, writing letters and pontificating that we are heading to hell in a hand basket, none of the RINO’s we’ve elected, did anything to protect us.
    Well, if you are sick and tired of it and not gonna take it any more, you will become a PC, walk the precincts, make the calls, meet the people telling you they are the best candidate for you and the country. Ask them to explain HOW they will work for you. What experience do they have in the private sector that makes them think they can change the direction we are headed. Vette them yourself. And encumbents, hold them to task. If you were a coach, would you put them back in the game? If they are loosers, RINO’s, you loose, if you loose, we all loose. Isn’t it WE THE PEOPLE? So, if we the people ARE NOT PC’s, we get what WE DIDN’T vote for, because we weren’t IN the party.

    Ebone PC.

    Questions, how many calls did you make this week?

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    party. Quite simple.

  • Achance

    for preparing for the last, lost war. The general conception among the consultant/pundit/officeholder/staffer cadre is that the Republicans were out-organized in the email/website/econtribution world and that is the proximate cause of defeat in ’06 and ’08. Of course that relieves them of the blame for lousy positions, lousy strategy, and lots of bad personal behavior.

    To the extent that all the emphasis on electronic methods works at all, it works best on children; they like the groupthink of the Democrats as it gets expressed in blogs and social sites. The Republicans are the party of adults, not children and especially not of twenty-somethings aggrieved by their student loans and staying at home or in school until they’re 26 living as mommy and daddy’s dependent while texting each other and posting on Facebook about how rough their life is. Frankly, the Republican Party should do nothing to try to attract this segment of Democrat support; we can’t compromise our principles enough to get to them.

    We simply need to go back to old-fashioned politics of the sort the Democrats once excelled at; door to door local organization based on the precincts and on precinct committeemen and women who know everything about their neighbors and neighborhoods, who are known by their neighbors, and who are known to be able to make the government work for their neighbors. Sure the modern precinct leader is going to use email or twitter and all the other tools in the kit, but they are tools, not methods.

    • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine
    • AceInTX
  • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior
  • klondike

    Cold Warrior, I know I have had some fun lately giving you a hard time for your “incessant nagging” that finally prompted me to get involved. You are a good warrior in your sportsmanship and easily recognized that it was my conscience nagging me.

    Previously, I thought my civic duty was to place educated votes. I didn’t know until I took the leap just how UNeducated I was.

    I, too, had perused various books (even purchased Jim DeMint’s book rather than check it out at the library), but I still did not find any direction. That, coupled with a fear of not being knowledgeable enough, prevented me from acting.

    I read your site so many times I could probably quote certain parts almost verbatim. Still, I didn’t think I was politically educated enough to offer anything. Everything was peripheral – cloaking myself in “principle” – if you will.

    I took the leap and discovered that I learn more at committee and party meetings that I could ever learn on the web. As penguin pointed out, we are meeting with the candidates directly. I am thrilled to be able to cast my vote based on what I KNOW of a candidate, not on whatever campaign speech I may have heard. And by attending these meetings, I am exposed to direct encounters with the candidates – so it is very easy to discern whether the person really believes in the principles he/she espouses, whether the person has a commanding demeanor and could actually not only make a convincing argument but convince people it is the RIGHT path, whether the person is genuine, whether the person has a different affection with one type of person over another … it goes on and on.

    I really identified with FJG’s fabulous “Politics is Personal” thread and the topics hit by Morton Blackwell’s “Life of the Party.” It IS personal, and Blackwell reiterates the points you have been making. What he says is so true – you get your education during the involvement. It is an education that cannot be found on the internet or in discussions with others who are like-minded but, like myself previously, got their information from sources other than directly from the candidates.

    I may be new at this precinct stuff, but I am thoroughly enjoying the education and the energy, and on this part you and penguin are right:

    The candidates know who the delegates are, and accordingly they will make time for you.

    Love it!

    I would totally suck as a candidate because so far I have not been able to convince family or friend to get involved. Like FJG, my family and friends are looking to me to keep them informed. Still, that’s infinitely better than trading news links with commentary.