« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The VA Redstate Perry Contingent: Were you there for him? Keyboards vs. Pens, Papers & Clipboards

Over the last few days many here at Redstate have written much about the Rick Perry campaign’s failure to achieve the necessary number of nomination form signatures to gain a spot on the Virginia Republican Party primary ballot.

I wonder how many of the Redstate contributors who reside in Virginia either signed a nominating petition on behalf of Rick Perry or gathered signatures for him in their precinct or elsewhere? Based on this web site

http://www.sbe.state.va.us/cms/Statistics_Polling_Places/Registration_Statistics/2004/Senate_Districts/Number_of_Precincts_Registered_Voters_by_County_City_within_Senate_Districts_-_April_1,_2004.html

I totaled the number of precincts in the state.

I didn’t, and won’t, double-check my math (as the hour was late while writing this and I was tired), but I came up with Virginia having a total of 2,318 precincts. So, assuming that each precinct has just one Republican Party precinct committeeman (bad assumption, but assumed for this hypothetical), and that all of the precinct committeeman slots are filled (another bad assumption), if only about one-third (800) of the precinct committeemen went out to get signatures for Perry in their precincts to obtain a total of 15,000 signatures, each of them would have had to obtain only 19 signatures. Nineteen.

But, some precincts have more than one precinct committeeman. And, if Virginia is like the national average, probably about half of the precinct committeeman slots are vacant. And about one-third of the precincts have not even one Republican precinct committeeman.

Any Redstaters who are precinct committeemen in Virginia want to weigh in here with what things are like inside the Party where you reside?

Regardless, my original question stands:

I wonder how many of the Redstate Perry supporters who reside in Virginia either signed a nominating petition on behalf of Rick Perry or gathered signatures for him in their precinct? I wonder how many Virginia Redstaters picked up the phone and called the Rick Perry campaign to ask, “How can I help?” Or at least visited the Perry campaign web site to fill out an online volunteer form?

As I have mentioned before, a friend of mine here in AZ whom I admire for his principles and hard political work, David Fitzgerald (he’s run for our state legislature and is an elected Republican Party Legislative District Committee Chairman), says, “You cannot call yourself a ‘political activist’ unless you have actually, physically gathered signatures for someone or something that will appear on an election ballot.” That’s his opinion. Not everyone can do it, of course. Some perhaps are home-bound due to disability. But for those of us who are able, if we all do a little, we can achieve much.

Again, I wonder how many Virginia Redstaters who are complaining about Perry’s failure to achieve the necessary number of valid signatures to get on the Virginia Republican Party primary election ballot actually either signed a Perry ballot petition or gathered signatures in their precinct for Rick Perry?

Party politics is played in what Ron Robinson calls the “meat space.” I wonder if anything that was written at Redstate about Rick Perry can be proven to have actually helped get him the signatures he needed to get his name on the Virginia Republican Party primary election ballot. By contrast, if he had had just 800 committed Virginia precinct committeemen going door-to-door in their precincts, in the “meat space,” and each gathering just 19 signatures from qualified voters (using Voter Vault 3 walking sheets), he would have had 15,200 valid signatures.

Lady Penguin wrote a very good Diary here a while back about how easy it is, in Virginia, to become a precinct committeeman:

http://www.redstate.com/penguin2/2010/04/16/saturday-morning-breakfasts-evening-meetings-joining-your-local-gop/

Again, for the umpteenth time, the only way to change the Republican Party “establishment” is to get “inside” the Party by becoming a “voting member” of it. And the best way to get involved in things like mundane signature-gathering for nominating petitions, which can actually get constitutional conservatives onto ballots, is by becoming a Republican Party precinct committeeman. Period.

With over half of these slots still going begging in our Republican Party, can you find a way to become one? Please see the links in my signature below for more information.

Richard Winger at Ballot Access News reported something that sheds some light on why, perhaps, the Republican Party of Virginia more closely checked the nomination form signatures:

But what has not been reported is that in the only other presidential primaries in which Virginia required 10,000 signatures (2000, 2004, and 2008) the signatures were not checked. Any candidate who submitted at least 10,000 raw signatures was put on the ballot. In 2000, five Republicans qualified: George Bush, John McCain, Alan Keyes, Gary Bauer, and Steve Forbes. In 2004 there was no Republican primary in Virginia. In 2008, seven Republicans qualified: John McCain, Mike Huckabee, Mitt Romney, Ron Paul, Rudy Giuliani, Fred Thompson, and Alan Keyes.

The only reason the Virginia Republican Party checked the signatures for validity for the current primary is that in October 2011, an independent candidate for the legislature, Michael Osborne, sued the Virginia Republican Party because it did not check petitions for its own members, when they submitted primary petitions. Osborne had no trouble getting the needed 125 valid signatures for his own independent candidacy, but he charged that his Republican opponent’s primary petition had never been checked, and that if it had been, that opponent would not have qualified. The lawsuit, Osborne v Boyles, cl 11-520-00, was filed in Bristol County Circuit Court. It was filed too late to be heard before the election, but is still pending. The effect of the lawsuit was to persuade the Republican Party to start checking petitions. If the Republican Party had not changed that policy, Newt Gingrich and Rick Perry would be on the 2012 ballot.

For Liberty,

ColdWarrior
——————-

Will YOU help make 2011 “The Year of the Precinct Committeeman?”

Where it all started. Twitter @kaltkrieger
Learn how to GOTV at The Concord Project and at Procinct and Unified Patriots.

COMMENTS

  • Bill S

    Go get self-righteous somewhere else. Your project isn’t the only thing that counts.

    Jeez, I can’t stand broken records.

    • http://erickbrockway.wordpress.com/ Erick Brockway

      Others are down below strategizing and comparing notes, so it seems to be doing some good.

      CW’s operation is the only viable long-term solution I know of, while getting info to the troops (as you do) is the necessary short-term strategy.

      You both need to realize that both operations are necessary to the cause, even IF one is tired of hearing the other, and the other is tired of not seeing direct action on the ground.

      • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

        no–text

      • lineholder

        After all, you’re ultimately united in a common cause, right?

        Then the little spats along the way are just love pats, baby!!!

        • http://erickbrockway.wordpress.com/ Erick Brockway

          …each other’s posterior and say; “Great game!”

          • lineholder

            I took Night Twister’s comment as being sincere and didn’t pick up on the fact that it was snark. No one’s fault but my own, but I wanted to set the record straight on that.

            If I’d picked up on the snark, I’d have come to CW’s defense, because what he is doing is very important in ultimately changing the direction that our nation is going in.

        • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

          I was agreeing with Bill that this one trick pony got tired a long time ago. It’s actually the arrogance that accompanies it that is most bothersome.

          • tailfins1959

            Not being good at snark is something to be proud of. Life is more enjoyable when you can visit someplace and not get snarkbitten!

          • audax

            …or choose NOT to read! But for many first time Red State readers CW’s “shtick” may be the first time they’ve had to learn you can CHANGE the GOP from the inside! And now let CW explain HOW!

          • audax

            NT……

          • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

            You can actually hurt your message with grandstanding and self-righteousness. Every one of these diaries say the same thing: “Hey, look at me! I’m important!! You have to do exactly what I say or your efforts are worthless, and so are you!!!”

            I had to learn this lesson myself a while back. I was on the “local/state” bandwagon and thought everyone else should be too. I had to come to the realization that not everyone is going to see things exactly the way I do. It’s better that we all have different specialties anyway, it makes us more effective as a group. We can learn from each other, but we have to be humble while we’re doing it and realize not everyone has our priorities and abilities.

            Honestly I don’t know what CW is doing wasting time here anyway. He’s always telling us it’s a waste of time to write diaries. Shouldn’t he be at a committeeman meeting or something?

            And finally, you’re saying I shouldn’t read stuff I don’t agree with? Wouldn’t that put me in an echo chamber inside an echo chamber? Oh…wait…we can already see that around here with some people…

          • audax

            …that expouse your proposols to get more Red Staters involved in developing the GOP as a more Conservative-noun party? Then maybe I can throw some ?snark? out there about CW and his methodology. What I do read from CW is a careful, planned, methodology to effect positive Conservative-noun principles and develop Conservative-noun leadership within the GOP at the grass roots level. That?s worth some PRAISE, EVERYTIME he brings it up! It?s not worth any ?snark?, ever. What does that say to new RS readers? That CW?s ?shtick? isn?t worth pursuing? If you dislike CW’s approach, just dont read him! There are some name callers on here I haven’t read in over a year, just tuned them out because I didn’t like their approach.

          • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

            I’m not telling people they’re worthless because they aren’t doing things my way.

          • audax

            I didn’t see that anywhere….

          • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister
    • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

      However, CW’s work, and his occasional encouraging diaries to get others involved in about the only thing that any conservative can do to really make an impact on their local and state parties are far from a broken record. They’re more like, since you used an audio analogy, FLAC. That would be Free Lossless Audio Codec.

      Sourceforge.com has a great explanation of FLAC, and I think it describes Cold Warrior’s efforts.

      FLAC stands for Free Lossless Audio Codec, an audio format similar to MP3, but lossless, meaning that audio is compressed in FLAC without any loss in quality.

      FLAC stands out as the fastest and most widely supported lossless audio codec, and the only one that at once is non-proprietary, is unencumbered by patents, has an open-source reference implementation, has a well documented format and API, and has several other independent implementations.

      Substitute “Cold Warrior” for “FLAC” and you’ve got a good model for CW’s work. CW has given us what is undoubtedly the “fastest” way to make a serious impact on Republican politics because of the huge number of open PC seats everywhere. It’s becoming “widely supported”, thanks in large part to CW’s relentless work, pushing a simple and effective way to have a huge impact. That which CW is preaching is certainly “non-proprietary, unencumbered [by anything but a lack of individual effort], has open-source implementation [thanks to CW's rigorous work documenting what needs to be done], has a well documented format [again, thanks to CW]… and has several other independent implementations.”

      Not at all a “broken record”. More like the cutting edge of technology.

      Thank you Cold Warrior. You’re a hero. And don’t let ANYBODY tell you any different.

    • audax

      How many new RS readers decided to become precinct delegates/committeemen because of CW’s info? Many have read CW and some have become active to change the party because of the info CW provides. Many new readers haven’t a clue. Can usually tell if someone doesn’t know the CW shtick because they claim they will “leave the party”, “vote a third party”, “won’t change their registration to GOP until the party changes” blah, blah, blah. Obviously they haven’t read CW and don’t yet realize that you change the party from within and HOW you affect that change within the party. So KUDOS! CW! Keep at it until EVERY Red Stater is involved within the GOP for constructive Conservative-noun change! Would expect better “support” for CW and his infomercials from an RS moderator. After all, We ALL are on the same side here! Aren’t we?

    • Common_Cents

      The lesson we are continually learning is that we get the government we deserve and not much will change unless we take a more direct part in re-formulating the party and those we choose to represent.

      It’s great that someone like CW to focus on such a critical component that is part of the solution.

      This is a grass roots conservative activist site. How does this not fit perfectly?

      • Common_Cents

        with a diary on Obama’s facade. Which one will do more good?

      • Bill S

        the non-stop implication that this is THE ONE AND ONLY WAY to win. CW needs a lesson in how to win friends and influence people.

        This:

        the only way to change the Republican Party ?establishment? is to get ?inside? the Party by becoming a ?voting member? of it.

        is simply baloney.

        I have ZERO problem with the concept of the “program”. I have a LOT of problem with the implication that it’s the only way and those who don’t participate are doing no good. To continue to make that contention is counterproductive, to be kind.

        And I find the irony of making this contention on a freaking blog to be rich.

        • Common_Cents

          I think it’s a little petty to focus on the “only way” part and recognize it is a critically important component. Maybe some RS’ers can offer some suggestions to better promote this component.

          Some people cannot, or do not want to do the local party stuff, fine. No real need to get offended by it, however.

          It’s the only way in CW’s mind probably meaning it has the most bang for the buck. But I guess he can answer that. I see it as being his part to focus on and help promote. I’m glad he has took this upon himself to champion. It’s rubbing off on other people all over.

    • audax

      I’ve only been around a short time (2+ years) and you have been around since the beginning of RS, haven’t you Bill S? So I haven’t had the pleasure of reading any of your proposols to get more Red Staters involved in developing the GOP as a more Conservative-noun party in that short two year+ period. Can you provide me with some links so I can read the proposals for myself? Then maybe I can throw some “snark” out there like you and Nighttwister do about CW and his methodology. What I do read from CW is a careful, planned, methodology to effect positive Conservative-noun principles and develop Conservative-noun leadership within the GOP at the grass roots level. That’s worth some PRAISE, EVERYTIME he brings it up! It’s not worth any “snark”, ever. What does that say to new RS readers? That CW’s “shtick” isn’t worth pursuing?

      • Bill S

        And I am done.

        In short: my problem is with the arrogance and delivery, not the program.

        End of responses. This thread now goes on ignore.

        • http://erickbrockway.wordpress.com/ Erick Brockway

          Many people are often tuning in for the first time. Some have heard the commercials a hundred times and are sick of it. Don’t like the perceived arrogance, tired of the repetition, so skip it. Unlike a radio station you don’t have to sit through the whole message.

          I happen to disagree with CW in that you aren’t useless if not a PC. I do think you’d be more effective as one if you can work it into your life. Myself, still working 7X7 so I can’t. Others popping in today may feel they can. Good on them.

          Loren is a PC with a message and a different delivery than CW, and both message types seem to be netting positive results.

          • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

            It’s the presentation of the message that we have a problem with.

          • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

            and I mean that sincerely and not in a snarky way. In an earlier comment you made, you said you intended it to be snarky, yet it was perceived by lineholder as sincere. So I ask, how do you and others know that CW is posting with an attitude of arrogance, self-righteousness or grand-standing? How do you see that through the net? Because all I see is a sincere, zealous, information-sharing warrior trying to do what he can to move the GOP toward conservatism and urge others to do the same. The answer may be somewhere in the middle, but who cares if you consider the goal and his efforts to achieve that goal?

            Perhaps CW should acknowledge that not everyone can be a PC, and that everyone should just get involved in whatever way they can (or not). However, if that’s true, then certainly, those who aren’t PC’s should acknowledge that CW and those of us who have taken the opportunity to get more involved in the party are engaging in a worthwhile endeavor.

            Personally, I can tell you that the guilt I started to feel after reading my 3rd or 4th diary by CW is what prompted me to go to my first local GOP meeting. Less than a year later, I was named to the Steering Committee (which is similar to a PC). Since then, I’ve had friends ask me how they can get more involved, and I invite them to GOP & tea party meetings, point them toward redstate and other blogs, urge them to educate themselves – to no avail. Perhaps if I were more like CW, I’d have better luck getting them off the couch because the softer approach sure ain’t working.

          • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

            Condescending
            Presumptuous
            Arrogant
            Self-Righteous

            I could go on, but quite frankly don’t really want to spend another moment on this. I respect your involvement here, so I thought this was worth it.

          • audax

            Cause upon reflection it sounds just like you….

          • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

            Not sure where you’re getting that from, but feel free to show me where I have.

          • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

            We’ll just have to agree to disagree on this one. Good news is we’re definitely on the same side, regardless of how we choose to battle!

          • lineholder

            It wasn’t until I caught your comment above that I realized I’d taken Night Twister’s comment too literally. I’ve gone back and tried to set it straight, because I do have a tremendous amount of respect for what CW is doing.

            But what you’ve said above pertaining to those who can versus those who can’t needs to be acknowledged. I often wish that I was in a position to be involved, but I don’t have a car of my own, so getting to and from things, including work, requires being dependent on other people. I greatly appreciate their generosity, but I’d rather not impose on it any more than necessary. So I have to find other ways to try to be involved instead.

            Glad to say, that through sites like RS, I’ve found opportunities to do this. As a matter of fact, I’ll be working with the team that is fighting to prevent Gov. Walker’s recall in January. It may not be acting as a PC, but it’s better than doing nothing.

          • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

            And much more than most people do. Keep doing what you can, that’s all anyone can ask.

  • heraklios

    but when you sign new enthusiastic people up to serve on the local committees, they quickly become frustrated and disillusioned because they can’t get anywhere. You go to district or state committee meetings and the Establishment, partly through the slots they hold as office holders, former office holders, etc., controls the agenda. The GOP is, unfortunately, a largely top-down organization and it’s difficult to change from the grass roots level. The only, in my opinion, to effect real change is to elect people at the top (Governors and a President) sympathetic to us and let them, through appointments and support for like-minded candidates for lower office, build a strong conservative base. Since the party is top-down, our takeover of it has to be top-down as well.

    • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

      I know every state’s Party has a unique way of doing things, but at least here in AZ, the AZ GOP is definitely not a “top down” organization. And that’s because since the spring of 2009, thousands of conservatives have filled up the vacant precinct committeeman slots. And, thereby, elected greater numbers of conservatives to the officer slots at the legislative district, county and state committees. For example, this past January, the McCain and “McKyl” favored candidates for chairman of the Maricopa County Republican Party committee and the Arizona Republican Party were defeated and, instead, constitutional conservatives were elected.

      And, we hope to additional conservative officers at our upcoming state committee annual meeting and, at our nominating convention later this year, elect “more conservative” RNC delegates. The greater number of conservatives we have in the precinct committeeman ranks, the greater number of state committeemen we will elect, and that will translate into greater numbers of conservative officers and delegates.

      You are correct it’s not easy to change things at the grass roots level but we must try, no?

      Thank you,
      CW

      • heraklios

        Mitch runs the state party with an iron fist with Hal Rogers as his trusted lieutenant

        • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

          pulled together by a fellow I know and that I have linked on my little blog:

          http://www.takeovergop.com/KYrules.php

          I hope you will take a close look at it and, thereafter, I would be interested in hearing your thoughts.

          Thank you.

          ColdWarrior

          • heraklios

            I always attend the county convention (we never have precinct elections where I live; all precinct officers are chosen at the county convention) and will definitely get more information about this group. Funny that I haven’t heard about it until now.

            Thanks.

        • http://redmerrimack.blogspot.com/ charliebravoNH

          or local party officer etc is access to Voter Vault. If you have access to thousands of voters through their addresses and phone numbers and are experienced in GOTV you become a player in the game of politics.

          If Perry had a bunch of PCs in VA working the neighborhoods gathering signatures he would be on the ballot.

          • Danielle Davis (ocleverone)

            or the Executive Committees in Virginia.

            PCs are not allowed access.

            Additionally, Voter Vault – shall we say – is not 100% accurate.

          • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

            The rule that only candidates, party chairs and Executive Committees in VA have access to the Voter Vault seems to run counter to the goal of the Republican Party of VA to elect as many Republicans as possible.

            Each state is different not only with respect to Voter Vault, but virtually everything else.

            Keep in mind that, ultimately, those Voter Vault rules, and everything else relating to Party governance, are the province and responsibility of those who show up to the Party meetings and become voting members of the Party. If there?s a problem with how the Party is operating, the only way to change it is to get a majority of like-minded people to agree to change it. From the ?bottom up.?

            Two quick examples. Back in 2008 and early 2009, neither the AZ GOP or the Maricopa County GOP web sites had even one word on them about why someone ought to consider becoming a voting member of the Party, what that meant, and how to go about doing so. The words ?precinct committeemen? did not exist on the web sites.

            I asked the county and state chairmen why this was so. They were conservatives, and it became clear that, in both cases, it had more to do with lack of initiative and resources than anything else. Before the 2008 election, growing the precinct committeeman ranks was not a high priority and the web sites, also, were not viewed as high-priority resources. The Maricopa County committee did not even have a webmaster ? the guy who had been volunteering to manage the site had moved to another state.

            So a couple of us sought to change all that. We found volunteers to help out from among the new precinct committeemen we had recruited. We wrote content for the web sites and offered it to the county and state committees. We pestered them and pestered them and pestered them to make the changes. (Along the way, we were assured by the state chairman that all would be fixed, because Michael Steele was going to roll out this great new web platform that would allow all the PCs to have all these great GOTV tools and social networking tools, and the AZ GOP was going to be a beta site for it, and blah, blah, blah ? all of which never happened, of course, because Steele had squandered all the RNC money on whatever, but that?s another subject.

            As for Steele, where does the blame lie for who elected Steele? Well, the RNC delegates elected Steele.

            Who elected the RNC delegates? The state delegates in the respective states elected the RNC delegates.

            Who elected the state delegates? It wasn?t the registered Republicans in the states. It was those registered Republicans who became voting members of the Party.

            And with over half of those voting slots having been vacant in years past, if all those vacant voting slots had been filled by conservative registered Republicans, maybe, just maybe, we?d have had a greater number of conservative state delegates who would have elected a greater number of conservative RNC delegates who would have in turn elected someone like Ken Blackwell rather than Michael Steele.)

            Now, some of us are working on getting Voter Vault replaced with a much better tool: rVotes. You may want to take a look at it at www.rvotes.com.

            We conservative PCs need to continue to recruit more conservatives Republicans into the PC ranks.

            For example, almost half of the PC slots in Arizona generally, and in Maricopa County, and, on average, in each legislative district in Maricopa County, are still vacant. (After the primary elections in 2010, LD 11, which is the wealthy enclave of Paradise Valley, had 91.6% of its PC slots filled; by contrast, LD 14 had only 10.2% filled.) We have plenty of very conservative Republicans here in AZ. The problem is that not enough of them know that they are needed inside the Party and that an opportunity to get involved exists. Some of us have been working on that. We’ve gone from 1,989 elected precinct committeemen in 2008 to almost double that number. From having less than one-third of the slots filled to just over half filled. And almost all of those new people are conservatives recruited from the “tea party-ish” grass roots conservative organizations that sprung up after Osocialist’s election. Our AZ GOP has become “stronger” at the precinct level and “more conservative.”

            Case in point. Our 2010 elections here in AZ for Maricopa County Repub. Party Chairman and AZ GOP Chairman. In both cases, the McCain/McKyl/McFlake forces spent gobs of money on flyers and signs and banners touting all the “Establishment” endorsements of their hand-picked RINO candidate in each contest. But, in the end, in both contests, the real conservative candidate prevailed because we elected precinct committeemen and elected state committeemen made sure we showed up to vote for the real conservative in each contest. We had greatly increased the ranks of the precinct committeemen — the only Republicans eligible to actually vote for the Party officers. All those banners and flyers and endorsements meant nothing — only those eligible to cast votes mattered.

            Much to do.

            Thank you.

            ColdWarrior

  • http://www.800cart.com Ron Robinson

    If we quit our grassroots party work simply because of our perception that a party is governed ‘top down’ as it is here in CA, then I’m afraid we reveal a serious flaw that could kill our efforts: an unwillingness to play the long game required to make party changes.

    A perception that a party is governed from the top calls forth only one requirement – that we do what’s required to change ‘the top’. This means grooming and advancing new leaders over a period of years. It means playing the long game.

    Opportunities do arise – without making a political statement about the merits of the contenders I can say that recently, the GOP County chair here in LA County resigned, and a month later, we had a new GOP chair. LA County may just be ‘a county’ but it’s also larger than 34 of the states in the US. Changes can happen quickly anywhere. But you have to be present in the stadium to spot the game opportunities.

    CharlibravoNH makes a great point about the voter lists – those of us who are new in the GOP (I’m in my first elected term and have to file for my second term month after next) but I would not limit the move to voter lists… what we are really talking about is offering a quiet, indirect threat to existing party officers.

    Being able to talk directly to rank and file voters may help us ‘create a threat’ to the ‘current leadership’ and create in their minds an awareness that they do not want to make an enemy of us – or perhaps even get leadership to support our initiatives that they might not support otherwise.

    An awareness of what ‘threatens’ that top-down leadership can be very useful. In LA for me, it turned out to be alternate voter lists (such as those from rVotes or NationBuilder or Political Gravity) but also email lists, combined with ‘internal’ email lists.

    Yes, once you become a member of the ‘Central Committee’ you will find yourself bombarded with emails containing great ideas, lame ideas, and of course, you will find yourself on the mailing list of those few crazy people who have really, really crazy-crazy ideas.

    You may learn to ignore the emails, but you may want to pay careful attention to the TO: block on those emails. Sometimes, that TO: field will contain 100-500 email addresses you should be carefully saving – the historically busy GOP activists in your area. Over a short period of months, you can develop an email list that will ‘threaten’ your local GOP leadership (you do not have to make the threat explicit, they will notice all on their own). Your infrequent emails offering solid suggestions, an offer to chair a task force, etc.. etc. will be noticed. Try to become known a a voice of wisdom., not a squeaky wheel,

    You may suddenly find yourself invited to those legendary smoke-filled rooms you had wondered about.

    In my own activities, I found it most effective to use those infrequent emails to get known for something specialized – ie: being the (alleged) guru who could help localities with those voter databases that the local party does NOT control such as rVotes, Political Gravity, or NationBuilder. (The CA GOP uses PDI, not VoterVault) Since I am a database guy already, this was a natural for me. It may be something else for you such as social media, volunteer activism, etc.

    Now there is a widespread conversation going on in CA – even in the CA GOP County Chairs’ association – about voter databases that the central party does not control. I work with the established GOP leadership whenever I’m offered the opportunity (which is more and more these days) but remain clear on my own personal mandate to sow true conservative principles wherever I can. That’s how you get traction early in the game, as I see it.

    It helps if the ‘threat’ that you develop for existing leaders is also an asset they can use to truly enhance the GOP and have a more successful tenure themselves – it’s important to ‘get’ this principle. This is what furthers your presence in the smoke-filled rooms – not that you are willing to sell out, but that you attend those meetings you were invited to solicit your skills (or volunteers, or email list, or other political asset) with your own agenda of deliverables (usually policy) that moves the GOP platform to the right.

    Choose your battles carefully – time will permit you to advance only one or two initiatives, so it should be an initiative the both serves your agenda for re-orienting the party, and one that truly does advance the party itself (or current leaders will see no value in it).

    To summarize making the long game efficient:
    1. Get inside the party
    2. Find an asset you possess (or can develop) that the party truly needs
    3. Become the ‘publicly recognized’ expert around that asset (via your email list)
    4. Resist efforts to co-opt you; have your terms
    5. Conditionally deliver that resource to the party as you are able to achieve conservative change

    • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

      into a Diary.

      Thanks,
      CW

      • http://edgeinducedcohesion.wordpress.com nathanalbright

        This would make a good diary.

      • toothpick

        Please do make this a diary entry. I’d recommend it for sure.

      • audax

        nt

  • http://boldcolor.blogspot.com/ Paula

    I want to remind readers that there are other states still in play. In Ohio, the filing deadline is 12/30. Candidates must declare a list of delegates and alternates representing each congressional district based on the new map. Each delegate has to fill out a delegate candidacy form.

    Though it sounds simple, the fact that there’s been so much confusion with the moving primary and filing dates may have left some of the candidates who have not yet set up operations in Ohio scrambling. When SOS Husted recommended a 12/7 filing date because of a potential challenge to the new congressional map, only Romney, Perry, and Paul made it, and it was reported that only Romney managed to file with delegates in each district. Those applications were thrown out and all the candidates must re-file by 12/30, so if you have a preferred candidate, I would suggest you fill out a volunteer form on their website and offer to be a delegate (or help find delegates) if you’re able.

  • http://www.savejersey.com mattdeluca

    I’ll be honest – I didn’t get ANY emails from the campaign (I’m signed up with my zip code so they could do a CD/Zip match) or see ANY Perry people out trying to get signatures – I saw the Romney team out there but no Newt or Perry.

    • http://redmerrimack.blogspot.com/ charliebravoNH

      I can tell you in NH right now Romney’s organization trumps the other campaigns big time. Perry does have a active org in NH and I know some of the people in it.. I am surprised about VA with Perry and Newt. You would think those campaigns would have southeastern states as part of their electoral victory strategy.

    • Matt Genk

      collecting signatures at the door. It was very well done. I didn’t see any campaigns walking around my precinct gathering signatures, As a precinct activitist, I personally gathered signatures for Newt and Cain.

    • Matt Genk

      collecting signatures at the door. It was very well done. I didn’t see any campaigns walking around my precinct gathering signatures, As a precinct activitist, I personally gathered signatures for Newt and Cain.

  • conservativecurmudgeon

    The Basic truth, as borne out by this Virginia snafu?

    –Americans are perfectly happy as they become more socially isolated. Which is why I find the “Facebook” and “social media” revolution stuff so counter-intuitive. Politics is by definition getting involved with PEOPLE, and yet we confuse the isolation of sitting at a keyboard as doing something “social”, when it is manifestly the opposite. Writing screeds on RedState doesn’t help Rick Perry one iota. Knocking on doors, filling out endless forms, walking neighborhoods in crappy-ass weather DOES.

    And now we have folks getting ticked off that you keep reminding them of this, CW. How odd from a place whose very name and mission is lexicographical of Republican activism.

    At some point, saving this country is going to get really, really inconvenient. Our hands will likely get a lot dirtier than what we experience as we sit hitting the “backspace” and “Caps Lock” keys.

    Thanks, Mr. Warrior, for banging the drum. It may be a single, mono-toned drum– but, so be it.

    • http://edgeinducedcohesion.wordpress.com nathanalbright

      …but for some of us tapping on keyboards is all that we can do at this time. So we do what we can.

  • Common_Cents

    Especially this cycle where several candidates are trying to differentiate themselves.

    • lineholder

      Perhaps I should say “former candidate” because it was Cain. I remember CW posting a diary about it, close to the time that the ‘smoking man” commercial hit youtube.

      But the rest of them….they’re politicians, Common, and they’ve all but lost any sense of getting “we the people” proactively involved in the process.