THE 4TH OF JULY IN SAMARRA, IRAQ


Just a Company of American paratroopers, a guitar plugged
into the outpost's PA system, and a whole lot of demolitions.

Senate Outlook 2008

By Mason Conservative Comments (7) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »

POSSIBLE PICKUPS:
South Dakota: Tim Johnson
MIKE ROUNDS

Arkansas: Mark Pryor
MIKE HUCKABEE

Louisiana: Mary Landrieu
BOBBY JINDAL/CHARLES BOUSTANY

Rhode Island: Jack Reed
DON CARCIERI

Michigan: Carl Levin (SurveyUSA had him at 48%
CANDICE MILLER

TOSS-UPS:
Colorado, New Hampshire, Minnesota

Coleman has flipped on several issues (like ANWAR, when running he was against it, but then voted both for an against), and will probably have to run against Al Franken. I am pretty sure that the left will not allow the face of liberal media to lose, and Michael Moore/George Soros money will flowing into our state like water.

Evil prevails only when good men do nothing.

If Franken runs... by Mason617

I predict a pickup for the DFL.

_Evil prevails only when good men do nothing._

Wait a minute .. . by Mason Conservative

You all think AL FRANKEN can beat Norm Coleman?

-------------------------------------
"As nations can not be rewarded or punished in the next world they must be in this."
- George Mason

and all of the money that will be used to distort the election will make him win.

Hell, we just elected Amy Klobo in a landslide, despite the fact that she refused to stake out positions on anything (inlcuding Iraq) and nearly elected joke Mike Hatch to Gov.

Oh yea, we just elected someone who supports cop-killers (ellison in MN-05) to congress.

_Evil prevails only when good men do nothing._

Michigan by Y2JMatrix94

While I'd love to see Candice Miller win, Carl Levin is our Ted Kennedy. He's been in congress forever, and could have an approval rating of -50 and still win in a landslide.

Also, this state is only getting bluer as we Conservatives continue to leave this state in droves.

Boy are you optimistic by PolicyShift

Do you realize that the GOP has 21 races up and the DEMS have only 12.

We need to get the person that is going to replace Liddy Dole like yesterday. We will need SOOOOOOOOOOOOO much more money than the Dems to even hold our seats let alone pickup som of thiers.

I see Dems picking up the Colorado Seat (Wayne Allard)

Will Stevens run again he will be 85? Alaska
Will Dominici run again he will be 76? New Mexico
Will John Sununu servive? New Hampshire now has a DEM house AND Senate ...first time in over 100 years.

I live in Michigan since 1958 we have sent exactly 1 GOP Senator to Washington and his name was Spencer Abraham who lasted 1 term and STABINAW beat him.

One positive note is that Senator Levin's son moved back into Michigan (from Washington where he is a lobbyist) to try to win a State Senate seat in Oakland county. He lost but just barely. At any rate I see that as a VERY GOOD THING. The Levin name has been tainted (a bit) but I think he will run for his dad's seat and probably win.

Yes, we have 21 seats up. But most of them are in red states and are being contested in a year that will have a presidential election that could very well lead to a bump for those candidates. In a neutral year (meaning no distinct advantage for either party), there would probably be 3 vulnerable (Coleman in MN, Smith in OR, Sununu in NH). Allard is only vulnerable if there's a top flight challenger, and last time he faced one he beat him. Collins in ME looks about as beatable as Olympia Snowe was this time around.

Possible retirements could lead to open seats in AK (Stevens), NM (Domenici) and VA (Warner). And in AK the seat would likely lean our way even so. So we're talking probably 7 seats to watch at this point.

But the Dems have their own problems. They are defending 5 seats in red states (Baucus in MT, Johnson in SD, Landrieu in LA, Pryor in AR, Rockefeller in WV). They too have "retirement watch" candidates in Carl Levin (MI), Tom Harkin (IA) and Lautenberg (NJ).

And finally, as we've seen this year, recruitment makes all the difference - good recruitment could make otherwise "safe" seats interesting, and bad rercruitment could put a winnable seat out-of-reach. That's true of both sides. Most of the air for 2008 will be sucked out of the room by the presidential race, so I don't know that anybody will be making any committments to run until they have a better idea of what the top of the ticket will look like (and hence what kind of coattails they might get from it).


blog advertising is good for you



blog advertising is good for you


 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password? new user?)


Image

image

Get RedState by E-mail



Delivered by FeedBurner

©2008 Eagle Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service