William Jefferson (D-LA) Shatters Corruption Records: Democrat Possibly The Most Corrupt Congressman Ever.
By MajorityAP Posted in Congress | Spotlight Blogs — Comments (39) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
Embattled Louisiana Congressman Gave Thousands To DCCC, Three Democrat Freshmen
While Democrats were swept into power in Congress by making corruption a political issue, it is one of their own, U.S. Representative William Jefferson, D-LA, who could set a record for the most corrupt acts carried out by a member of Congress.
Jefferson’s 16-count, 94 page indictment, for which he could serve more than 200 years in prison if convicted, eclipses the legal troubles of former Republican Congressmen Randy "Duke" Cunningham, R-CA, Bob Ney, R-OH, and former Democrat Representative James Traficant, D-OH.
Cunningham pleaded guilty to four counts and was sentenced to eight years in prison. Ney pleaded guilty to two, and received a 30 month sentence. If convicted, Jefferson would face sentencing on as many counts as Cunningham, Ney and Traficant combined.
Read on ...
Traficant, a flamboyant Democrat Congressman, was found guilty in 2002 of 10 counts racketeering, bribery and fraud. While both Cunningham and Ney resigned their seats in Congress, Traficant refused to leave, and was expelled. Despite reports that Jefferson is seen on videotape accepting $100,000 in cash from an informant - $90,000 of which was later found in Jefferson’s freezer – he has indicated he will not resign from Congress.
Earlier this year, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi attempted to place Jefferson on the sensitive Homeland Security Committee.
Now that Jefferson has been indicted, House Democrats, who pledged "to lead the most honest, most open, and most ethical Congress in history," will need to decided what to do about the thousands of dollars in campaign contributions Jefferson has made to his colleagues and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC).
Following U.S. Representative Tom DeLay’s indictment at the hands of a local district attorney, the DCCC called on GOP candidates to return contributions they received from the then-House Majority Leader.
Jefferson donated nearly $140,000 to the Democrats’ campaign committee. Jefferson also gave thousands to Democrat House members and candidates, including freshmen Nick Lampson, D-TX, Heath Shuler, D-NC, and Ciro Rodriguez, D-TX.
Lampson and Shuler received contributions from Jefferson’s re-election committee, while Rodriguez received $1,000 from Jefferson’s political action committee, the Future PAC. Only Lampson is reported to have returned Jefferson’s contribution.
Other Democrats who received financial support from Jefferson are:
- Sanford Bishop, $1000;
- Corrine Brown, $2000;
- Lois Capps, $500;
- Julia Carson, $1000;
- Donna Christensen, $1000;
- Emanuel Cleaver, $2000;
- Chet Edwards, $1000;
- Al Green, $2000;
- Alcee Hastings, $1000;
- Barbara Lee, $1000;
- John Lewis, $500;
- Carolyn McCarthy, $1000;
- Charlie Melancon, $2000;
- Gwendolynne Moore, $1000;
- Brad Sherman, $1000; and
- Mel Watt, $1000.
Jefferson also contributed a total of $5,680 to the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) PAC. Jefferson’s Future PAC gave $1,000 each to Democrat Representatives Corrine Brown, Julia Carson, Eddie Bernice Johnson, Carloyn McCarthy, Kendrick Meek, Mike Ross, and Linda Sanchez.
Read this story and more at the Majority Accountability Project, www.majorityap.com.
...is the only other D in the LA delegation. He shows what a joke the "Blue Dog" designation is. His votes have been in lockstep with Pelosi/Murtha et al. Plus, he enjoys Bill Jefferson's support.
His was one of the "purchased" votes on the defund-the-war bill; he declared support of the troops but was bringing home the bacon in the form of hurricane relief $.
It hardly matters how corrupt they are if people don't know about it. Ask the average person on the street and they'll only know about Rep scandal thanks to the drive by media.
Just because you have the right, doesn't mean you should.
You ask the average person on the street who Bob Ney, or Duke Cunningham is and they will have no idea.
As for this diary. Most corrupt politician ever? This guy isn't even in the top 10.
There are those who look at things the way they are, and ask why ... I dream of things that never were and ask why not. - Robert Kennedy
Are you going on record saying that Reps and Dems corruption are equally covered by the media?
That was really my point when I used the ave person on the street.
Just because you have the right, doesn't mean you should.
Since there is no way to quantify this sort of thing I don't feel too concerned about going on the record about it.
There are those who look at things the way they are, and ask why ... I dream of things that never were and ask why not. - Robert Kennedy
I'm using the metric of "Jefferson’s 16-count, 94 page indictment, for which he could serve more than 200 years in prison if convicted" ... what're you using?
Or do you want me to change the title to Most Corrupt Congressman Ever?
George W. Bush: He's A Folder ... Not A Fighter.
We could start off with Dirty Dan Rostenkowski who was indicted on 17 counts.
And none of these guys compare to the politicians of the early part of the last century who made corruption an art form. Warren Harding and the Tea Pot boys?
But when people remember someone 130 years later solely because of your corruption, well you have really hit the high water mark for corruption.
And this doesn't even address the countless Congresscritters who have been busted for all sorts of really nasty stuff.
Just because they are lopping on more and more indictments to make sure you actually get someone convicted these days doesn't make them MORE corrupted.
There are those who look at things the way they are, and ask why ... I dream of things that never were and ask why not. - Robert Kennedy
... Congressman ever. Happy?
Besides, it's just a blog post title and it doesn't make much of a difference anyway.
George W. Bush: He's A Folder ... Not A Fighter.
Lincoln's Secretary of War, that he would steal a hot stove if he could find a way to get his arms around it. The word "shoddy" remains in our vocabulary because of the cheap wool, called shoddy and made from floor sweepings, that went into corrupt contracts to provide uniforms for the Union Army. Even burial of the war dead was not immune; the contractors got paid for each body buried, so anything that resembled a bone was just lumped together in a grave and the contractor got his money. The more things change, the more they stay the same.
In Vino Veritas
Or do you want me to change the title to Most Corrupt Congressman Ever?
or even most corrupt American politician. But most corrupt politician? You have to be joking. Ferdinand Marcos stole 10% of his country's GDP - and it is not even a poor country, close to the median, by global standards. Sani Abacha - mostly famed these days in the e-mails purporting to be from his widow - really did steal billions. One reason people still fall for that scam is that the money really is still out there.
Quentin Langley
Editor of http://www.quentinlangley.net
George W. Bush: He's A Folder ... Not A Fighter.
I bet they SURE know Tom Delay is -- and not for his years in the role as Majority Leader and Whip, but for the phony charges by ding-dong Ronnie Earle, and a completely media-fueled swirl of corruption.
I'm betting they also know who Mark Foley is too -- and I'm VERY doubtful your average person knows who Gerry Studds is, much less who Mel Reynolds is (2 guys who actually committed sex crimes, where Foley evidently did not).
And it's outside congressional scope here, but I'm betting the name recognition of Scooter Libby is about 20-1 compared to Sandy Berger.
There's no debate here. The press is shamelessly leftist, and dirty with it.
It's war -- so when can we start shooting back at the enemy Democrats?
And all we do is blast our own and then accuse them of not standing up for themselves. Too sad.
___________
As long as Democrats keep getting elected, conservatives will never get what they want.
HI Sandy, not sure what you mean. If you are referring to several of us not feeling the warm-fuzzies over flyerhawk's suggestion that the lefty media is not as lefty as some of us think, well....
Flyerhawk's not really 'one of our own' (and I mean no disrespect, FH, pretty sure you agree with that). He's kinda one of our resident lefties who actually makes a case and states it well, often causing all of us to think alot harder about our arguments. So, yeah, the fur often flies.
It's war -- so when can we start shooting back at the enemy Democrats?
Did you really just say that the reason that people know who Tom Delay is because of his indictment and not because he was Majority Whip and Leader for 10 years?
Mark Foley's story was salacious. Gerry Studds happened 15 years when the Internet wasn't around. Reynolds happened right as the Internet was starting to become popular but well before the current standards of news delivery. They are simply not comparable.
If Scooter Libby were convicted AFTER the Bush Administration had left office it would have been a minor story.
You guys seem to just want to pretend that context is meaningless.
There are those who look at things the way they are, and ask why ... I dream of things that never were and ask why not. - Robert Kennedy
No googling.
______________________________
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
-Thomas Paine: The American Crisis, No. 4, 1777
He was nixon. BtwI had to look him up.
______________________________
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
-Thomas Paine: The American Crisis, No. 4, 1777
Man on the street and Tom Delay? Yes, I did. Don't know of a useful poll out on 'what do you know most about Tom Delay', but I'll make my bets on that.
But as for the rest, oh, just WOW. WOW!!! The press ABSOLUTELY pounded the Foley barely-a-story (salacious compared to what? That was unbelievably TAME, LAME, from the beginning known to not involve a crime) for months upon months, and the reason had NOTHING to do with the internet and EVERYTHING to do with election season. (similar to the WaPo's daily 'macaca' thing for months that successfully got George Allen defeated)
'Election season' is the context. You can blow that 'you guys want to ignore context' meme out that exhaust pipe.
Scooter -- BS. If there were a congressional commission raised in say 2011, and one of GWB's cronies goes to the Archives and steals some (relevant and original) documents shortly before testifying, and gets caught -- That's 3-inch headlines for days and weeks. King-size BS, dude. Great big bull-bisquits.
Press = left. All day, every day.
It's war -- so when can we start shooting back at the enemy Democrats?
please compare apples to apples. I'm sure Trafficant, Cunningham, and Ney would have served significantly more time if they had been convicted of everything with which they could have been charged.
Jefferson is as dirty as they come. The facts are bad enough. We don't need to hype how much theoretical time he could serve. Just focus on the facts:
1) Jefferson was caught on tape accepting a bribe.
2) Almost the exact same amount of cash was found by the FBI in his freezer.
3) Everybody knew the indictment was coming down, it was only a matter of when.
4) Dems who ran on a platform of running "the most ethical Congress in history" still allowed him to continue in their high leadership and pushed to have him chair a sensitive committee that would have given him access to even more valuable information.
5) When they were rebuffed for the sensitive position, IIRC they still put him on the 2nd most powerful House committee, that is, the Appropriations committee, which is the last place a known money filcher should be.
6) Lots and lots of Dems owe Jefferson for his campaign donations to their election committees.
The only thing I don't remember is whether or not there was a Dem Attorney General protecting him before the election.
indictment, makes me wonder if the prosecutors in this case were trying to get every duck lined up before actually bringing the indictments down.
Either way, this one isn't a surprise to the politically aware-I do wonder though about all those voters that not only voted for him in a primary, but in a general and then in a run off-you would thihnk they would have known about the eventual indictments.
Makes you wonder just who is voting, how informed they are, and whether they actually want congress members that aren't corrupt.
What I heard from friends in NO was that his main opponent was such a loser that people figured they were better off electing him, expecting him to get thrown out in short order. They were willing to take their chances with whoever Kathleen um Babineaux um Blanco would name as a replacement, figuring it couldn't be any worse than those two clowns.
of that explaination. Maybe when it got to the run off point, but you can't convince me there wasn't anyone running in the primary that wasn't better suited or that the democrats could have tried to field a stronger candidate against him.
But then the GOP pretty much sucked at recruitment this last go around, but you would think a bright, young democrat from that area would have seized on the chance to beat Jefferson, a strong candidate with a well run campaign prominantly featuring photos of freezers should have done the trick.
The Dem Party backed State Sen. Karen Carter to replace Jefferson. About 14 candidates ran in the open primary; Jefferson made the runoff on name recognition, Carter thanks to party backing & the funding that followed.
Although it is a black majority district, it includes a portion of Jefferson Parish where strong law & order Sheriff Harry Lee is the key kingmaker.
Carter had accused Jefferson Parish officials of racism after Katrina for not welcoming Orleans Parish evacuaees with open arms. Lee let it be known that he did not favor a vote for Carter, so many loyal Lee supporters either stayed home or voted for Jefferson. It was a big enough effect to swing the election.
Given that the indictment (finally) came down, it was probably a savvy move.
Lee would rather see Derrick Shepherd in office. Shepherd ran 3rd IIRC in the primary. Lee has been diagnosed with leukemia, so it remains to be seen how effective his machine can be in a special election. (I'm operating from memory, so please forgive mistakes.)
It will be interesting, I ga-ron-tee...
Thatnks for the addl info. The always quatable Lee apparently had some real colorful comments about Carter. Let me dig around and see if I can find some.
This clip is pretty funny. Lee gets going about 40% of the way in. His problem with Carter is over her comments in Spike Lee's film about Katrina. He did an anti-Carter mailing, and of course reporters were more interested in things like who paid for it.
People could learn a lot about the complex politics in LA just by watching this 7 min video.
It ain't Kansas, Toto.
Reading this on the air now....
___________________________________
The CIA has better politicians than it has spies - Fred Thompson
so I'll be looking forward to hearing this...
It's war -- so when can we start shooting back at the enemy Democrats?
Waiting in the wings for some Democrat with a sliver of honesty to out them are Senators Feinstein and Reid.
One Senator puts in all sorts of stuff, pork, earmarks and good words that helps companies owned, controlled or significant to her husband. Many of her husbands companies do military work while she tends to bash the military. Talk about a credible Senator, but she is rich.
Harry Reid, is the chief rainmaker for his four sons as they lobby, lobby and lobby some more for various companies that know how to buy legislation. In the little town of Searchlight, Nv. they know how the little poor boy got rich.
Harry, just happened to have had a bridge built over the Colorado River and the road leading to the bridge just happens to go by some - use to be - worthless property that the Senator forgot he owned. Senator Harry can make green appear on the most worthless desert properties - all with federal funding or variances.
I don't want to ignore the Honorable Representative Murtha who can stuff pork into anything to get campaign contributions.
Yes, the Kulture of Korruption thrives in Washington, DC and elsewhere on yours, mine and their's taxes. And we, along with the help of the various "Ethics" departments allow it to happen.
At least the bridge to nowhere was imploded.
Corrupt monies from the Jefferson pipeline funnels into the DCCC. that taints a great deal of the DNC.
I wonder how Reid and Feinstein's money machines benefit the DNC as well?
It's not the scale of Jefferson's corruption that is the tragedy here.
Flyerhawk's right, there have been other more brazenly corrupt politicians in the past.
The tragedy of Bill Jefferson is that he could have been a hero to thousands, could have been the guy who made a difference. He had a seat on Ways and Means, for pity's sake, and all that he could think to do with it is milk the system.
It's not just this Nigeria/Ghana scandal, it's the whole extended-family deal he's got going on in New Orleans with shady, unauditable publicly funded "community service" "businesses" whose sole aim in life is to ensure Jefferson and his clan a more hoggish share of the community teat.
It's the way he focused his legislative efforts on things like funding dialysis clinics with government $$, while getting his clan into the dialysis business.
During the friggin' storm, the a**hole commandeered a humvee and had a helicopter circling overhead while he secured personal articles (evidence?) from his Uptown New Orleans home. Their were still people waiting to be rescued from their attics and rooftops at the time.
Some of the biggest political crooks of all time at least took care of their constituents, if only out of self interest and reelection. At least their trains ran on time; they saw to it that their folks had levees that worked.
Jefferson's constituents foolishly put their trust in this pathetic, selfish loser, even to the point of reelecting him after his sins were obvious. The scandal here is his betrayal of them.
... to hearing Fred Barne's comment on this on FNC's Special Report this evening. He has a classy way of saying nasty things. And all that can be said about Jefferson is nasty.
Well done is better than well said. —Benjamin Franklin
Let's see Hastert, Newt and the rest of the cast of characters in congress that stood tall in defense of Jefferson's "right's" as a member of congress hang their heads in shame, OK well that's not going to happen, but it should.
Among those to file an Amicus Curiae (friend of the court) brief...
Newt Gingrich, Thomas Foley, Robert Michel, Stanley M. Brand, Christopher Bryant, Steven F. Huefner, Thomas E. Mann, Norman J. Ornstein, Steven R. Ross, Thomas J.Suplak, Charles Tiefer, Abner J. Mikva, Scott Palmer, Elliot Berke, and Reid Stuntz.
..meaning that they believe congress is above the law in this case, well that's not their intent but from a bottom line it means hands off.
It was a major concern that if the FBI became aware of crimes not within the scope of the investigation being conducted, what would happen with that information?
"As a former Deputy Attorney General in the Reagan Administration testified before the House Judiciary Committee:"
"Search warrants for documentary evidence in legislative offices are irreconcilable with the Speech or Debate Clause.... The Clause is offended the moment the F.B.I. peruses a constitutionally protected legislative document. Even if the document is not seized, memory of its political contents remains in the Executive Branch for use in thwarting congressional opposition or leaking embarrassing political information. Documentary searches are further intimidating to Congress because the “plain view” doctrine of the Fourth Amendment would entitle the F.B.I. to seize any material in the course of reading office files concerning crimes unconnected to the search warrant. The knowledge by a Member that the F.B.I. can make an unannounced raid on his legislative office to read and rummage through every document or email is bound to discourage Congress from the muscular check against the Executive that the Speech or Debate Clause was calculated to foster."
Newt Gingrich and his outrage..
"There is no excuse for the FBI for the first time in history searching a congressional office and apparently doing so in total regard of due process as it relates to the Legislative Branch. ... The protection of the legislative branch from the executive branch's policing powers is a fundamental principle which goes all the way back to the English Civil War," said former House Speaker Newt Gingrich in an e-mail sent to about 50 lawmakers.
"The president should respond accordingly and should discipline (probably fire) whoever exhibited this extraordinary violation. ... As a former Speaker of the House I am shaken by this abuse of power," Gingrich said
Let's not forget Dennis Hastert and Nancy Pelosi also raised objections to the raid in court filings.
Congress, for the people? I think not, congress seems to be about things other than the peoples work but perhaps I'm being a little cynical.
I personally hope Dollar Bill Jefferson spends a long time in jail and takes a lot of friends (congresscritters) with him!
Well done is better than well said. —Benjamin Franklin
The dhimmies totally used the Republicans to do their dirtywork in protecting Jefferson.
It is as if the Congress thinks they are the only branch that has the right to investigate. I will bet that if the Republican leadership had actually led on the issue that they would not have lost both Houses. The dismay felt by Republicans had to have depressed the vote. It surrendered the corruption issue to the dhimmies completely, making our guys look uniquely corrupt.
While Newt is clearly one of the smartest guys in politics today, he is still human and completely capable of stupid stuff. Defending the indefensible idea of a law-proof Congress is one of them.
What ever happened to being ashamed of your inappropite actions? Just admit your mistake, take your medicine, and continue with your life as you choose to; as a loser, but a stand-up loser nonetheless.
...the left became when it came to defending Clinton?
"It is just about sex"
I remember the reporters openly marveling how good of a lier he was in the news casts.
"Wubbies World" - MSgt, U.S. Air Force (Retired): "Call to Me and I will answer you, and I will tell you great and mighty things, which you do not know." -Jer 33:3-
blog advertising is good for you
Washington Times
Recent comments
$10 - n/t
by Oscar98Complainer-In-Chief has a nice ring to it too
by CincoSolas del BronxAll this popcorn
by scotteilandReading this
by MGamoTom Petty - Walls (live)
by St. Louis Conse...honestly,
by MGamoNothing against your Spurs ace-but they're boring
by BlackRepubPulling a kawalski
by aceintxHornets? are you nuts?
by aceintxTalk about pathetic aye?
by aceintxThanks GC and ace-I gotta take apart the computer now
by BlackRepubOh good grief, W had a
by RandomGuyWhat did you play on the jukebox? <nt>
by jonlester
blog advertising is good for you

get your job site
at simplyhired.com




I have no idea what Dollar Bill's name id is like right now, but this information could look pretty good in an ad. Of course the endangered Dems would probably defuse the issue by giving the money to a charity or something like that, but if they didn't, this could be really useful stuff.