The SEIU Crackup
By Erick Posted in Liberals — Comments (1) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
I've been meaning to write about this all week, but haven't had the time. Today, though, the pending SEIU crackup has made the New York Times, which forces me to engage.
If you haven't heard, and you probably haven't, the SEIU is cracking up, and that is a good thing.
Here it is a nutshell: Andy Stern is willing to sell out union members to grow the union, the growth of which funds a political war chest to make the union more influential. In the process, though, he has to make so many concessions to businesses that the left union activists who put the workers ahead of the Democratic party are getting the shaft.
I've written before about these SEIU deals (see "Partners in Slime," June 30, 2004, and "Union Disunity," April 11, 2007), where the union agrees to prohibit workers from complaining about conditions in exchange for being able to recruit more members in nursing-home chains. I've also described how this strategy privately angered workers and organizers in California, the union's greatest stronghold.
According to an inside source, this “strategy” would gain for the union 300,000 members, but under the condition of template contracts, and in exchange for continued support of a bad-for-workers national health care bill that could provide a windfall for the hospitals. Plus, though the members would receive representation form the locals, they would be directly signed up to the International to avoid future jurisdictional problems.This is the direction that the SEIU is headed: a streamlined, top-down, lobbying machine with many members with few rights.
So here you have it: Andy Stern and the SEIU are not really interested in workers. They've decided to be open about it. They are, instead, interested in political power. In accumulating that power, they get to grow their membership, take their dues, and fund a political machine. The workers give up their dues and get very little in return.
Now, however, the SEIU base is starting to revolt. They want the political clout, but they don't want to screw union negotiated worker benefits in the process.
We should just sit back and enjoy this.
« Harry Reid Has A Message For Warfighters And Consumers — Comments (35) | If The Dems Make This Obamise, I'll Register And Vote "D" IMMEDIATELY! — Comments (27) »
The SEIU Crackup 1 Comment (0 topical, 1 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »
blog advertising is good for you
Washington Times
Recent comments
I like calling him the Kitten (nt)
by Neil StevensChinese foreign assistance in earthquake
by the mad chemistNo, actually.
by RandomGuyHas anyone tried google quote search?
by KrusauBut comrade, rights don't apply to counterrevolutionaries
by Neil Stevens*Congress* shall make no law, Sparky.
by Moe LaneDoes DHS do anything useful ?
by JoliphantLike Rumsfeld's critics would have approved new spending (nt)
by Neil Stevens:Shrug: We're capricious. <NT>
by Moe LaneWhich "Red state"...?
by Don_JuanCool, I appreciate it
by E Pluribus UnumLet's be charitable then
by Neil StevensI wish I'd used that siggy first
by Andysforsmalgov...That would be funny if he wasn't so right.
by Joliphantrevealing my ignorance
by E Pluribus UnumWhy do
by xavierthisonelastForget John Edwards. A
by MenloIowahawk's take.
by birdmojoI look forward to it n/t
by TomlinsonDouthat
blog advertising is good for you

get your job site
at simplyhired.com



In any bureaucratic organization there are going to be people that want to serve the stated purpose of the organization and then there will be those that see the organization as the purpose. In general the organization people win. Its a lesson that libs never seem to learn.
If I were betting, I'd put my money on Mr. Stern being able to thoroughly screw his members. He seems to have no illusions.
______________________________
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
-Thomas Paine: The American Crisis, No. 4, 1777