Obama the Show Horse
Senators Come in Two Types: The Workhorse and the Obama
By Mark I Posted in 2008 | 2008 Democratic Primary | Barack Obama | Credit Where it's Due | Liberals | Obamafiles | senate — Comments (16) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
The Washington Post has an interesting article today that takes a look at the Senate records of accomplishment of the Democratic candidates for president. While both candidates are given rough treatment by the Post, Sen. Barack Obama, the Senator from H.O.P.E.™, appears to have made a particular reputation for himself in his three plus years in the Senate: Obama is a credit monger.
After weeks of arduous negotiations, on April 6, 2006, a bipartisan group of senators burst out of the "President's Room," just off the Senate chamber, with a deal on new immigration policy.
As the half-dozen senators -- including John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.) -- headed to announce their plan, they met Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.), who made a request common when Capitol Hill news conferences are in the offing: "Hey, guys, can I come along?" And when Obama went before the microphones, he was generous with his list of senators to congratulate -- a list that included himself.
"I want to cite Lindsey Graham, Sam Brownback, Mel Martinez, Ken Salazar, myself, Dick Durbin, Joe Lieberman . . . who've actually had to wake up early to try to hammer this stuff out," he said.
To Senate staff members, who had been arriving for 7 a.m. negotiating sessions for weeks, it was a galling moment. Those morning sessions had attracted just three to four senators a side, Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) recalled, each deeply involved in the issue. Obama was not one of them.
The article goes on to describe two other instances of Sen. Obama swooping in after all the work has been done to sign onto an idea or a piece of legislation, or otherwise coming late to the party.
Read on…
The Post reports that just this past week, Obama tried ungraciously to glom on to Sen. Christopher Dodd’s (D-CT) and Rep. Barney Frank’s (D-MA) misguided proposal to allow the Federal Housing Authority to essentially bailout mortgages about to be in foreclosure and underwrite new mortgage loans to the homeowners who couldn’t pay the original ones.
“We should pass the legislation I put forward with my colleague Chris Dodd to create meaningful incentives for lenders to buy or refinance existing mortgages so that Americans facing foreclosure can keep their homes." (emphasis mine)
Poor Barney Frank didn’t even rate a mention from His Obamaness™. Now, taking credit for someone else’s idea is bad form. But taking credit for someone else’s bad idea and then insisting you were the originator of the bad idea to begin with; well, that’s just Senatorial. Obama supporter Dodd was not amused. “If it happens once or twice, you let it go. If it becomes the mantra, then you go, 'Wait a minute.'"
Wait a minute! It’s not just once Senator Dodd, and it isn’t just you. Sen. Obama has made a habit of jumping in front of his endorsers’ gravy trains. Witness this anecdote that the Post recounts.
Immigration is a case in point for Obama, but not the only one. In 2007, after the first comprehensive immigration bill had died, the senators were back at it, and again, Obama was notably absent, staffers and senators said. At one meeting, three key negotiators recalled, he entered late and raised a number of questions about the bill's employment verification system. Kennedy and Specter both rebuked him, saying that the issue had already been resolved and that he was coming late to the discussion. Kennedy dressed him down, according to witnesses, and Obama left shortly thereafter.
Obama may be a hanger-on, but even the most junior and inexperienced of Senators must know that one does not, under any circumstances, do anything to cause any possibility that Sen. Kennedy might miss happy hour.
These have been a bad two weeks for the Obama campaign. First, he was revealed to be not quite the instrument of racial healing that he has led the country to believe he is; and now he is shown to be an even less accomplished Senator than his rival, Sen. Hillary!™ Clinton says he is. Forget about legislative accomplishments, Obama hasn’t even mastered the art of seeming to be involved in weighty issues, much less actually being involved in them.
There’s a saying in Washington that Senators come in two types, the workhorse and the show horse. Obama is selling himself to the nation as the former. But it turns out that the only thing he has really been working toward in the Senate is being cast as the latter.
« "F. U. Middle America" — Comments (9) | I recognize that the public school educational process... [Edited] — Comments (12) »
Obama the Show Horse 16 Comments (0 topical, 16 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »
I cheated my way to the top.
Fighting for conservatism one day at a time.
I find them to be one of the last great hopes for modern journalism. They are still trying to get it right -- against overwhelming odds. I wish the right appreciated them more.
--
We would also like to know your advice for somebody like my daughter, who's going to graduate in two years, advice that you would give a young person.
SEC. RUMSFELD: Advice for a young person. Study history.
The roles of the Washington Post and the New York Times have been reversed of late.
In my youth (1960s), the NY Times was the true "newspaper of record." The Washington Post was viciously partisan, staunchly liberal Democrat all the way down the line. Remember that under Katherine Graham, they went on their crusade to bring down Nixon and ultimately succeeded.
But as you know, these days, it's become the reverse. With Katherine Graham gone, you can get fair journalism out of the Wash Post these days. Whereas under the new left-wing stewardship of Pinch Sulzberger, the NY Times is becoming indistinguishable from The Nation.
take credit for their work!
"No compromise with the main purpose, no peace till victory, no pact with unrepentant wrong." - Winston Churchill
...if this is the internal conversation they are having right now...
--
We would also like to know your advice for somebody like my daughter, who's going to graduate in two years, advice that you would give a young person.
SEC. RUMSFELD: Advice for a young person. Study history.
By not actually participating in the discussions and negotiation on the legislation, and then by swooping in to take credit, he can have his cake and deny any involvement if it doesn't taste good.
He also like to vote against or for a bill and when called out, he will say that he made a mistake and pushed the wrong button, or pulled the wrong lever. This is something he did back in the state senate. I believe it was the L.A. Times that wrote the article.
What a joke, and a even bigger one that so many see him as the annointed one.
Obamamaniac, "Is it you or should we look for another?"
Obama, "It is I"
The Partisan Report,
www.partisanreport.com
....all votes in the US Senate are by voice. He can't pull the "I hit the wrong button" trick since there are no electronic voting machines. You go to the party secretary, you find out what is up for a vote, you get the clerk's attention and you say "aye" or "no" - and then the clerk repeats it back, so even if he heard wrong you get immediate feedback as to what they've got you on record for.
which correctly went down in flames. This long, nasty Democratic primary has been, if anything, informative.
I have Capitol Hill connections, and I can tell you that Obama rarely takes the lead in negotiating any bills, even when he is to be the primary sponsor.
This is a man who has clearly had his eye on the presidency since day one, even if he denied it.
Finally, Russert tried to pin down Obama on his political future.
First, Russert referred to a quote from Obama's predecessor, former Sen. Peter Fitzgerald (R-Ill.), who said he believes Obama will be on the 2008 presidential ticket in some fashion.
"I can't speculate on those kinds of things," Obama said. "I'm not focused on running for higher office."
Then, Russert tried to reconcile a curious comment Obama made to the Tribune late last year, where he left open the window of possibility by saying: "It's not something I anticipate doing."
"I will serve out my full six-year term," Obama said, trying to explain his varying responses. "If you get asked enough, sooner or later you get weary."
So Russert tried one more time.
Obama finally declared: "I will not run for president or vice president."
And that was the conclusion of this round of the Russert test.
People have swooned over him since the moment he spoke on the floor. So what makes you think he would actually have to work on the stuff? If it succeeds in the long run, he can go back to that footage. If it fails, he can go to those Senators and have them say that he didn't do it. And, he gets his own original ideas (I'm assuming there are some) to keep in the quiver.
In politics, you have your word and your friends; go back on either and you're dead. (Rule #11 of the public policy process)
that is willing to take credit for the hard work of others. Isn't that what white people do? Oppress hardworking people and then reap the benefits of their toil?
Certainly this lapse in his character and willingness to take shortcuts is a result of his being raised by white people.
FWIW - I'm channeling the missing Reverend Wright.
M Penny
Part of me is rather disappointed and sad regarding the glow falling from Obama.
As a conservative I could never stomach Obama's socialist, extreme liberal political policies. However, part of me did want to believe that Obama was the real deal. I hoped that Obama was really the candidate who could transcend race and reach across political parties, and those other issues that divide us.
I believe that Obama's rise in the polls brought about a rise in the spirits of the black community. Over the past several months I sensed a happier attitude with co-workers. One African-American friend optimistically pointed out this change. He was explaining the circumstances of an on-going dispute with a government agency. He declined the invitation to get involved by the usual race baiters such as Al Sharpton. His response was this isn't about race. His complaint was about right and wrong. He told me that the race baiting crowd pushed him that the wrongs perpetrated against him were about race. He told me that he stood his ground and was emphatic that race had nothing to do with his problem and again it is about right and wrong. Then there was a visible physical change in him. His chest expanded in pride and he appeared to increase several inches in height. He proudly exclaimed, "times have changed, the United States is going to elect a black man President." He was proud that so many non-black people would be so supportive of a black candidate.
I am disappointed and sad. I want my friend to continue to swell with pride. I want my friend to continue to see problems as issues of right and wrong and not race. I want my friend to understand that a rejection of Obama is not a rejection of black candidates – it is a rejection of liberalism, it is a rejection of the same old failed socialist solutions to society’s problems, and it is a rejection of race baiting hatred.
Previously, I worried that if Obama was elected POTUS that the unavoidable failure of this administration would be blamed on the color of his skin, instead of the worthless, unworkable socialist policies he would pursue. I worried that it would be too easy to blame his certain failure on race.
M Penny
Ever since the south stopped being solidly Democratic, and in turn the northeastern leftists started becoming solidly Democratic, you can't stand for anything AND reach across party lines.
Because while in the past the parties were more machine-oriented than policy-oriented, now the parties are actually groups of reasonably like-minded people.
Gone are the grand coalitions of rightists or leftists in the Republican and Democratic parties. They just don't exist in enough numbers to matter.
HTML Help for Red Staters
"If we want to take this party back, and I think we can someday, let’s get to work." – Barry Goldwater
have his unsuccessful bid for the democrat nomination blamed on his skin color than an unsuccessful presidency.
I understand what you mean, I too hoped that he was better than he is showing to be. Still wrong on policy, but honest in his beliefs and actions.
blog advertising is good for you
Washington Times
Recent comments
Warning..If you love Hillary...Do not Read this.
by speciallistDelay
by cwilsonNo
by moijeaYou forgot to add that she
by HearMeRoarthe old navy
by zerodivisorwhat
by helveticus5++ -nt
by absenteeYes, it's good, but
by simpson316irrational...
by californiatransplantdeliver?
by simpson316Fair Enough...
by Oscar98Actually, Sen Clinton's political base is NY, not AR.
by streetwiseDeny this goon a VISA.
by YahutiBest.Smackdown.Ever.
by RandomGuyYou should have voted for
by mbecker908joek7610, you are a nitwit.
by Moe LaneDon't forget a lot of people
by Menlo
blog advertising is good for you

get your job site
at simplyhired.com



You really can't blame Obama for taking the credit of others' work I guess. He's been the Potemkin candidate from the start.
As we already knew, his whole reputation in the Illinois State Senate was manufactured by higherups he now owes a debt to, specifically Illinois State Senate Majority Leader Emil Jones:
So after having gotten the affirmative action treatment in his home state, he expects to get the same in the US Senate, in order to get lifted to even higher office.
HTML Help for Red Staters
"If we want to take this party back, and I think we can someday, let’s get to work." – Barry Goldwater