Looking Behind the Veil at the Lawlessness of Planned Parenthood
Child abuse enablers, beware.
By Leon H Wolf Posted in Liberals | Life Issues | Party of Death — Comments (6) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
Although this is only a relatively small piece of a single lawsuit, this is extraordinarily bad news for Planned Parenthood:
The Ohio Supreme Court has reversed itself and will hold a hearing on a case involving a secret abortion on a 14-year-old girl who was a victim of rape. A Cincinnati couple is upset their daughter had an abortion at a local Planned Parenthood facility without their knowledge or consent as required by state law.
The girl's parents filed a lawsuit against the abortion facility for violating the state's parental notification law by not telling them of her abortion, which may have been coerced.
More below...
The story goes on to note that the specific issue the Supreme Court will hear arguments on is whether the girl's parents are entitled to access to Planned Parenthood records on other underage girls they've performed abortions on. Presumably, the parents are attempting to establish the existence of habit evidence with respect to Planned Parenthood's failure to notify parents, as they are required to do under Ohio Law.
Now, I'm quite sure that if the Ohio Supremes rule in the parents' favor, the information will be released under an appropriate protective order which removes the name of the individual girls in question - and this is as it should be. It might even be that none of this evidence will see the light of day until trial, if it happens. However, I am hopeful that somehow, some way, this evidence will see the light of day. And I can guarantee you that Planned Parenthood wants the exact opposite. Why?
It is one thing to point to anecdotal evidence that Planned Parenthood is violating the law with respect to their legal obligations to report sexual abuse - and such anecdotal evidence abounds. It is another thing to have hard records which establish, within a given territory, exactly how pervasive their illegal derelictions of their reporting duties are.
If you're a defender of Planned Parenthood, you have to be asking yourself an important question: why are they fighting so hard to prevent the release of this information? It's one thing to fight for a protective order preventing the release of the individual names of the girls to the public, but it's another thing altogether to fight to prevent the release of records that would show compliance with the law altogether. The former shows an understandable concern for the privacy of your patients. The latter shows that you have something to hide.
My firm conviction is that Planned Parenthood has quite a bit to hide in this instance. And my hope is that the Supreme Court of Ohio allows some sunlight to shine in the dark corners of Planned Parenthood's practices with respect to reporting suspected (and per se) sexual abuse. The public - and this poor girl's parents - deserve to know exactly how often Planned Parenthood is willing to actively overlook the rape of pre-teen and early teen girls just so they can get their medicare and medicaid payments for performing another abortion.
« They're Not Going to Miss It — Comments (12) | Obama the Show Horse — Comments (16) »
Looking Behind the Veil at the Lawlessness of Planned Parenthood 6 Comments (0 topical, 6 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »
This is just a civil discovery request. I'm not sure what Ohio's notification/consent provides in the way of criminal penalties, but the first thing you need is a district attorney willing to prosecute.
More in a second.
------------
The Red Sox Republican: Burkeanism, Baseball, and Sundries.
I am not entirely sure what sorts of causes of action the parents are bringing here - it is possible that they are suing under a civil suit provision in the Ohio law, in which case the precedent would not have much (if any) value outside Ohio. However, if they are bringing a common law tort suit (for, say, negligence), it would constitute persuasive precedent in other states.
With respect to the criminal stuff, each state will either have their own statute criminalizing this, or it will not.
------------
The Red Sox Republican: Burkeanism, Baseball, and Sundries.
I'm here in the capitol city. One assumes that there will be coverage of this in the local paper. I'll keep you posted.
RICO case anyone? Might at least want to start thinking about it.
"I ain't never votin' fo another Democrat so long as I can draw breath! I'll vote for a dog first!" - Leola Thomas
has to be one of the most sleazy out there. I have no doubt that many underage girls have been coerced into abortions, with the abortion providers covering up the wrongs in legion. I hope this information sees full sunlight.
blog advertising is good for you
Washington Times
Recent comments
this is just stupid
by streiffNice job
by johnCVMissing the point entirely.
by SocratesSpeaker-in-Law never caught on.
by Socratesexodus-international
by mdetlhConservatism
by StephCHow 'bout this...
by smartprimate$10 - n/t
by Oscar98Complainer-In-Chief has a nice ring to it too
by CincoSolas del BronxAll this popcorn
by scotteilandReading this
by MGamoTom Petty - Walls (live)
by St. Louis Conse...honestly,
by MGamo
blog advertising is good for you

get your job site
at simplyhired.com



What sorts of penalties can be assigned to PP if they are found to be in violation of the reporting requirements you mention? Are there criminal penalties and could PP employees go to jail? Would this ruling, assuming it goes against PP, be applicable outside of Ohio (like maybe Kansas) or would it require individual suits in the states based on local state law?
Thanks for any clarification you can provide.
____
CongressCritter™: Never have so few felt like they were owed so much by so many for so little.