Protecting the Military vote
It's the right thing to do. That's why the Democrats probably won't
By Soren Dayton Posted in 2008 | Democrats | Electoral Corruption | Military voting — Comments (4) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
There was an important article over in the Weekly Standard by Hans A. von Spakovsky and Roman Buhler about military voting:
A survey by the Election Assistance Commission shows that of almost 1 million ballots requested in the last election by overseas and military voters, only about one third were successfully cast and counted.
Some of it is illegal and deliberate. For example in 2004, Pennsylvania Governor ("Fast Eddy") Rendell tried to deliberately disenfranchise military voters while running a GOTV drive in prisons. But much is accidental, logistical, and structural:
The most common reasons for this failure were that the requested ballots sent to voters were returned as "undeliverable" and that marked ballots were received too late to be counted.
This is a tremendously important issue both morally--making sure that our soldiers have their basic rights--and politically. Undoubtedly, the Democrats, ACORN, and their allies will continue to commit election crime while Congressional Democrats will try to find ways to undermine military voting. Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-CA-22) has introduced legislation on this and von Spakovsky and Buhler have their own suggestions about other options.
Over the next 6 months, we are going to watch the Democrats make promises that help their corrupt allies, like Barack Obama's promise to stop oversight of the Teamsters, those pillars of ethical management. Here's a simple thing that they could do for America's heroes. Somehow I doubt they will move on that.
« Did anybody... *talk* to anybody else before they decided on this Obama stadium thing? — Comments (9) | It’s Not You, It’s Us — Comments (9) »
Protecting the Military vote 4 Comments (0 topical, 4 editorial, 0 hidden) Post a comment »
from Democrats about the Republicans during the 2000 and 2004 elections. As to Governor Rendell trying to disenfranchise military voters, the Pennsylvania governmental website seems to say otherwise, but who knows. http://www.state.pa.us/papower/cwp/view.asp?A=11&Q=438896
Your recollection reversed the parties.
Both times, especially 2000, Democratic poll watchers tried their damndest to ensure as many military ballots were thrown out as possible.
DS has had a difficult time voting, even when not deployed. I believe in 2004, he actually had to cast a provisional ballot by fax, which the county elections department worked to get to him just in the nick of time on election day, because the absentee ballot they sent him SEVERAL weeks earlier had gotten lost in the military mail system. Time is the biggest enemy.
Perhaps they need to have each of the main bases in Iraq and Afghanistan actually BE election preparation/polling places where they gather ballots, instead of each soldier mailing their ballots back individually. They could set up months in advance and assist deployed military in registering AND requesting their ballots.
One thing is for sure, SOMETHING needs to be done.
blog advertising is good for you
Human Events
Recent comments
I don't get it; why not hit him with this as well?
by Martin A. KnightYou have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. [n/t]
by Martin A. KnightI speak English ONLY. Period.
by SanDiego92108General, Forgive Us for Our Lack of Resolve
by Rod PatrickDone
by smagarSpecific Program for the Aged
by Rod PatrickSquandering People's Money
by Rod PatrickLIES OF THE DEVIL
by Rod PatrickMaybe not a Typical Politician
by MikeOYou haven't made your case, I'm afraid
by civil truthObama, c'est un poseur!
by streetwiseGore does claim the earth will be destroyed if
by streetwiseI appreciate it though
by Darin HNow that's a definition of genius. What an ear. n/t
by bantamwaitYes, but McCain's war, while genuinely heroic,
by bantamwaitA shorter way
by simpson316Good point, boychik!
by bantamwaitMass produced thin film
by moderichGotcha. Thanks.
by simpson316
blog advertising is good for you

get your job site
at simplyhired.com



the big problem is that every soldier must take the time to contact the city or town where they are registered and request that ballot. Then that physical ballot has to get to the GI in question and get mailed back to, hopefully, arrive in time to actually be counted.
I would recommend an electronic ballot sent through military channels and verified by such. If a hard paper ballot is really required they could be printed out at the soldier's unit HQ and distributed to him immediately and then sent through the mail system. This would save time in at least one direction.
As to the Democrats wanting to squelch the military vote. I wouldn't be surprised.
si vis pacem para bellum