« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Go Big on Tax Reform

The ads are running, the printing presses have been working since last night, and the Obama campaign staffers have not slept a wink for three days. After the President’s speech yesterday, the Obama campaign and the mainstream media are hard at work to push their latest talking points- Mitt Romney not only pays a lower rate than the average taxpayer and wants to cut taxes for millionaires, he even wants to raise taxes on each family by $2000.

Now, of course, the non-partisan source Obama cited turned out to be… partisan. But, voters are not going to care about that. They are going to care about how Mitt Romney’s tax plan will impact their wallets, and at this point, Obama is the only person telling them that. Team Obama’s strategy is clear- to discredit Romney’s policies by discrediting Romney’s personal record on those issues. On jobs, it was Bain. For ethics, it was Romney’s personal records and investments.

Romney now holds a small lead over Obama on the issue of taxation, but it may be lost if Obama manages to discredit his policies. Republicans have always held this advantage with the promise of tax cuts, but it has been whittled down under Bush, and now, most Americans actually think they pay “about right” in taxes to Washington.

Mitt Romney is said to be planning a policy rollout in the next few weeks. He should use that opportunity to make the economic and moral case for lower taxes. He should talk about the complexity of the tax code, the time it wastes, and the chances it presents to tax cheats like those running amok in the White House, as well as well-connected special interests. He should talk about how high, uncompetitive tax rates (the highest corporate tax rate in the world, for one) stifle free enterprise and hinder job creation, while discouraging hard work and hitting responsible Americans. He should talk about how he will reform the tax code to clean out loopholes that disproportionately benefit higher-income taxpayers, whose success should be lauded but who do not need to be coddled by the nanny state, outlining specific examples while pledging to protect and strengthen vital incentives for charitable giving, saving, homeownership, education, and healthcare. He should talk about how small businesses will benefit and create more, better-paying jobs under his plan, how he will give millions of middle-class Americans the chance to invest and save, and how we can create jobs by making America open for business again.

But above all, Romney needs to tell us how America’s working families will stand to gain from a simpler and flatter tax code, and why his plan is actually the fairer alternative for the millions of strivers. People who work hard and want to succeed in life, so that they and their children can do better and live better, simply should not be discouraged and punished, and a punitive and unfair tax system only does that. Governor Romney is the only candidate in this election who stands for equal opportunity and a truly fair shot for everyone. Americans just don’t know that yet.

Governor Romney must not shy away from defending his tax plan on his own terms. Rather, he must learn to show Americans that it is the only chance of achieving a simpler, fairer, and flatter code that works for them.

(And if Romney wants a more developed tax reform plan, Simpson-Bowles, Sen. Coburn’s Back in Black, and the Bush-era President Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform all offer a good start.)

COMMENTS

  • commonsenseobserver

    A key test for Team Romney.

    http://www.barackobama.com/tax-calculator?source=OM2012_LB_YT_20120802_CutterTaxCalc_vid_desc&subsource=youtube&utm_medium=video&utm_source=youtube&utm_campaign=20120802_CutterTaxCalc_vid_desc

    • APA Guy

      Romney will (and should) simply TRIPLE DOWN on his winning argument that lower taxes and less government intrusion is best for the economy…then provide examples (ahem…Reagan) of how lowering taxes resulted in both more economic growth and higher revenues into the treasury.

      • commonsenseobserver

        Which is the claim they’re spreading and could actually hold some water.

        You just don’t want Romney to be bold or specific, do you?

      • dragan

        does cut taxes but, to be fair, also raises taxes on the lower middle class. Obama’s team has now started to focus on the tax increase on this segment with of course the class warfare stuff of tax cuts for the rich.

        Romney campaign, by being silent, is NOT going to win this argument. They have to make the case as to why a small hit to the lower middle class will result in prosperity for all. The strategy of “No Specifics”/ “No response” is NOT a winning strategy. At the most Romney will get the Republican base.

        • teaforme2012

          Romney said he was going to raise taxes on wind farms. He’s finally getting some nerve!! I think even Grover Norquist has a clause in his pledge that says you can raise some taxes, like on stupid liberal ideas like wind farms, stem cell research, and whatever else liberals like to do. Health food, I guess.

      • pauld408

        Bush left with the economy shedding jobs at depression rates ,,this graph is formulated in a way to make it seem as GW was a “job creator” by giving GW credit for the employment rate he inherited and dumping the GW depression job losses on Obespierre ,Nice try,,Tho I`m sure your buddies will buy it..(and hey,,thats what matters ,right ?) No informed person could..

        • tnfriendofcoal101368

          and it is at 15% now (when you add in those unemployed people that got moved to SS disability and quit trying to look for work) but keep trying – I am sure you’ll come up with another excuse soon enough. Obama has given you so many to work with…headwinds, tsunami’s, droughts, earthquakes, Europe, ATM machines,aliens, and strangely Leave It to Beaver.

          • pauld408

            Again,,twisting #s,,those you cite as undercounting existed during GW`s tenure,,Look at any economic graph you want,,GDP ,employment,,etc GW and obies are mirror images Gw`s plummets down ,,Obies goes up,To be fair the deficit graph is not in Obies` favor,Hey,,I cant stand Obie,Or the corrupt congress ,but facts are facts whether we like em or not,,There`s plenty to criticize Obie for.You can do better

          • tnfriendofcoal101368

            No one believes you…and the 15% is calculated with the denominator of people needing a job at Bush levels – but again it’s a nice try. How about Obie’s 5.7 million people unemployed 6 months or more or the 5.4 million people added to social security disability or 45 million people on food stamps…I know there is an excuse for all of them somewhere.

            Obama’s plan worked – he bulit that. A welfare state that is…

            But again, try harder…google more.

    • pauld408

      Why would mittster want to simplify the tax code ? Obviously he`s an expert on avoiding tax liability and does`nt want any voters to see his expertise first hand,, How did we pick this chickenhawk to be our nominee? He`s phonier than Joe the “plumber”( sic).He gives more to the Morms than he does to the US treasury which provides for our defense and so much more

      • emptybucket

        just wondering. Multi millionaire, paid no taxes by using all the loopholes and rules and regulations. Oh, it’s okay for him, but not a Republican. Not Mitt, oh no, there must be something wrong.

        • http://libertynews.com/ mbecker908

          Great point but wasted.

          He’s here to flog his, uh, talking points. His little talking points.

          Don’t waste your time.

        • pauld408

          No it`s not OK for him..It`s legal treason ,,bought by lobbyists,,He`s also an outsourcer extroadinaire

          • http://libertynews.com/ mbecker908

      • teaforme2012

        a president who knows now to make and keep money for himself? If the government no longer allows wealthy Americans to shelter money in the Cayman Islands or in Swiss accounts, and stops allowing Americans to dump millions into tax free IRAs, and stops allowing carried interest and raises capital gains tax rates higher than 15%, don’t you think he’ll have accountants stop that practice? Of course! He’s too smart to not play by the rules.

        Let’s face it, there have to be winners and losers in capitalism. Think about how many people benefit from Romney’s wealth. There are horse trainers, gardeners, maids, butlers, and dozens of working class service people who would have to look elsewhere for work. He still employs people to manage his funds and his estate. Those are good jobs. He’s created wealth for probably hundreds of past employees, and he’s given millions to the LDS.

        You can make a case that he doesn’t really believe in much beyond his own ambition to win and become president, and he’s willing to change course on many issues. That’s documented. But you have no evidence that Romney has done anything illegal. Even if you assume the worst, it’s still legal.

        • commonsenseobserver

          Romney did not avoid taxes using tax shelters. He complied fully with the complex tax code.

          Read the Romney website to find out more about his financial information. His most recent tax returns, and other financial disclosure forms, can be found there.

          If anything, it’s evidence of the need for comprehensive tax reform and simplification.

          • teaforme2012

            he can put as much of his own personal money as he wants in the Cayman Islands. My point is that he has very sophisticated people working on his finances who know the best options for someone with his wealth to hold onto as much money as possible, BY LAW. If they see advantages to using Swiss Banks and Caribbean shelters, there’s a reason. But Mitt is not going to risk going to jail. They are legal.

  • Craigpennsylvania

    From Romney’s website, rates are reduced by 20 percent for everyone, and those under $200K will not pay taxes on dividends, interest nor cap gains. How is this a “tax increase on the middle class” ?

    The copy/paste from Romney’s site:

    America

    • dragan

      but the 20% cut is essentially paid for by “closing tax loopholes” aka tax deductions. Now nobody knows how Romney is going to be revenue neutral but a reasonable guess would be that Romney might take out mortgage interest deduction. So by reducing income tax rates from 25% to 20% ( a 20% cut), Romney is financing the cut by eliminating the mortgage interest deduction which could be (highly likely) more than the 5% cut.

      Thus in essence, viewed as a whole, it is a tax hike atleast on the lower middle class. Again I may be wrong here by assuming that Romney would take out the mortgage interest deduction. But that is the current “guess” with respect to achieving the revenue neutral tax cut

      • Craigpennsylvania

        There is nothing about removing the mortgage deduction in Romney’s plan.

        There is something about not charging those under $200K for income on dividends, interest and cap gains.

        As the left loves to hammer people who are investing money which has already been taxed at normal rates for getting “preferential tax treatment” when this money is put at risk in the market, taking these rates to zero for the bottom 97-98 percent of income earners is a winning argument for Romney.

        Senior citizens would benefit.

        Parents saving for their children’s college would benefit.

        Any middle class income earner who understands the value of saving money and trying to build a portfolio would benefit.

        You are dismissing all these tax savings for the middle class under Romney’s plan because you “guess” he will eliminate the mortgage deduction. That is not analysis. That is a guess based on … nothing.

        • pauld408

          True ,,no mention of the deduction,,but he does`nt name any loophole closings,And the mortgage deduction is one of the largest in toto and to make romneys # work it would hve to be tapped,Unless we go back to the good ol days when “deficits dont matter”The cuts promised increase the deficit until he shows where he gets revenue,,

    • pauld408

      There is no “death tax” its an inheritance tax. Why don`t we emulate Somalia?,Over there only those with a gun to their head pay taxes,,And,,they have a real small gubmint with few regulations.. And some believe Eden is hooey when it can be lived first hand In Africa and hopefully some day here,,

      • http://libertynews.com/ mbecker908

        • pauld408

          And thats the best you can do? lame

          • http://libertynews.com/ mbecker908

            Troll.

      • APA Guy

        Obama’s “American” dream….in the flesh.

  • commonsenseobserver

    Or eliminating, or even just limiting and reforming, anyway. Bowles-Simpson would give him enough political cover. If just to avoid the appearance of a black hole in his plans and re-assure voters about deductions they like. Means-testing would be a good first step for many of those expenditures.

    He should also tackle welfare, both individual handouts and corporate cronyism, including farm and energy subsidies. Lots of money to be saved there. Traditional FFS Medicare itself should be reformed. And then there’s all the different departments, including defense, State, the Interior, Homeland Security, HHS, education etc. There should be no sacred cows, and Romney should make that clear. Obviously he can’t spell out all the cuts now, which is why there will have to be a comprehensive spending review and audit led by OMB and GAO. There hasn’t been one for a long time, which Romney could point to as proof of how out of touch and out of order Washington is.

    That’s the only way to have a credible policy to get our deficit under control while enacting broad-based tax reform with lower rates.

    • commonsenseobserver

      Of debt and taxes. If the Republican nominee loses his advantage on these two issues, he loses his advantage on the economy itself. I am glad to see that Team Romney is working to release a clear view of his plans, and hope they continue to focus on his policy plans and counter Obama’s lies.

      • dragan

        on Romney’s plan. What part of the tax is he going to change to make up for the 20% across the board cut ? I hope he will not eliminate the home mortgage interest deduction. I am a $250K+ household income but that income in the bay area is common. Also I am NOT a business owner and I am just a salaried worker. Right now I am against O’s plan because he has determined to raise about 4% income taxes on incomes above 250K. I am happy that Romney is going to cut 20% across the board. However, if Romney is going to take out mortgage interest deduction, it would be almost a 4-6% increase in taxes overall for my household.

        So I am still waiting for Romney’s deduction elimination specifics.

        • commonsenseobserver

          He does not have to support the CGT hike, and could continue with the bolder tax cuts, but he could shield his tax plan from criticism by embracing certain tax expenditure reforms proposed by Bowles-Simpson, and marketing them as such. It could draw attention to how Obama has ignored it totally.

        • commonsenseobserver

          Both in the corporate and individual areas of the code.

          He must cite examples of preferences to eliminate, reform, or means-test, and others to protect and strengthen. This should be coordinated with bold action on welfare reform.

          Generally, maintaining incentives for charitable giving, saving, investment, and higher education is a must, with certain changes even in those areas. The mortgage interest deduction must be limited and means-tested. The health plan exclusion should be replaced with strengthened HSAs and a means-tested personal health insurance tax credit for those with no existing employer coverage. The child and earned income credits should be combined and capped at income tax and payroll tax liabilities, with a limited refundable portion for low-income families. The personal exemption should be dramatically increased to increase the portion of workers’ salaries that can be saved tax-free, although dependents should be brought under the new combined credit system. And the payroll tax holiday should be reinvested in personal accounts, perhaps based on a new system of Universal Savings Accounts. Tax treatment of social security benefits must be simplified.

          It may turn out to be best to clean out the entire tax code and add in new incentives. I certainly wouldn’t mind if Romney endorsed and adopted such an approach. It’d certainly remove the need for specifying long lists of popular preferences to eliminate and instead allow him to sell a list of popular incentives under a system with low rates. Would give him much more flexibility as well.

  • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

    If there is an unknown vast new tax plan coming out then firms will continue to delay plans for expansion. Uncertainty is a bigger enemy right now than taxes.

    And regulation is certainly a much bigger enemy to job creation and growth right now.

    My recommendation is to delay tax plans except for another extension of the current one. And concentrate on deficit reduction, and elimination of all of the Obama era (and Bush Era) strangling regulations.

    That is much easier to do, and much of it can be done with executive order.

    • commonsenseobserver

      That’d be pretty impossible at this point. He’s already committed to comprehensive tax reform of some kind, and then there’s that initial 20% rate cut. :P

      Certainly, he can’t abandon the plan without facing fire from all sides, but he also can’t avoid specifics without being accused of hiking taxes.

      • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

        he could certainly say, let’s tackle regulations and spending first and next year some tax reform.

  • Pingback: continue