« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The Approach Team Romney Needs to Take

First of all, I must thank the Romney Campaign for their hard work. They have done an excellent job promoting Mitt and rallying Americans against our failed President. However, I believe that it is time for Team Romney to take a bolder approach to this election, as I am confident they will anyway.

Look at this latest Romney ad:

Yes, it does point out Obama’s failures, and mentions that Romney has a plan for more jobs and take-home pay. That’s what politicians always say, but where’s the beef?

An ideal political ad should be able to build and solidify a clear contrast between the two candidates, and this contrast must be favourable for our candidate. Clearly, the choice in this election is one of two futures, and two very different men with very different visions and records. Team Romney must use this to its advantage. So here’s my take on an ad that Team Romney could make.

“[Pictures from the Obama economy] President Obama has had four years to fix the economy. He promised to cut the deficit in half. He gave us $5 trillion in new debt, more than any President in history. He pledged to hold unemployment below 8%. It’s been above that level for 42 months, and counting. His plan to tax, borrow, spend and regulate our way out of recession has clearly failed. Now he proposes to try it once again.

[Gov. Romney's voice comes in, over images of him and ordinary, hardworking Americans] Unlike President Obama, I have a real plan for a stronger middle class. I will approve the Keystone Pipeline and ensure that America has access to cheap and secure energy. I will ensure that our kids have the skills they need to succeed in life. I will open new markets on terms that work for America, and ensure a level playing field for American businesses. I will get the deficit under control and get America on track to a balanced budget, by making the tough choices we need to make government simpler, smaller, and smarter. And I will champion small businesses by reining in red tape, making taxes simpler and fairer for American families, and replacing Obamacare with common-sense healthcare reforms.

My plan means 12 million more jobs, and more take-home pay for hardworking Americans, with less debt and smaller government. I believe in America, and I believe in Americans, which is why my plan will give them the freedom and opportunity they need to have a better life for themselves and their children. Let’s build America again. With the right leadership and the hard work of millions of Americans, we can do it.

I’m Mitt Romney, and I approve this message.”

COMMENTS

  • littlehouse18

    She was very discouraged. She wants Specifics. She was down on Romney because she felt he just gave her platitudes.

    Romney has to flesh this out more before they succeed in defining him. I know he has more than this to offer. He seems to be taking advice from people like Rove who don’t think much of ordinary people and think this is all they can understand. Maybe Rove has some justification for this considering who is President now, but when people are on hard times, they do pay more attention.

    Ryan as VP can help in this regard.

  • http://libertynews.com/ mbecker908

    She’s dumb as a fricking rock. We’ve had three years of absolutely failed policies, an unprecedented expansion of government and more overt corruption than we’ve seen in 50 years.

    Ryan is absolutely the wrong guy for VP. He’s in a position to keep JB in line and be a major influence for good in the House and that’s a whole lot more important than carrying around a bucket of warm piss. Having Joe Biden hold the office (not to mention Al Gore) should tell you everything you need to know about the office.

    Romney can have Ryan campaign with him and endorse his budget plans.

  • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

    Anyone undecided by now is an idiot. And wanting specifics is all well and good, but it is a two way street, and we never get even the truth much less specifics from the white house.

  • APA Guy

    The differences between Romney and Obama are already so clear:

    Romney = lower taxes, less regulation, private sector growth, 12 million new jobs

    Obama = $6 trillion in new debt, less people employed now than when he took office, raised taxes on the working class…basically broke each and every promise on the economy he made.

    I’m sorry, but someone who is whining about “specifics” at this point doesn’t believe in anything “specific”. That person is waiting to be romanced and/or looking for a bandwagon to jump on. Let your friend know that such a bandwagon will be rolling through her neighborhood just after the Republican National Convention.

  • littlehouse18

    As for Ryan, it all depends on how Romney and he would define the role. If he’s just going to twiddle his thumbs, that would be a terrible waste. But we could see something different this time.

    The reason I say Ryan is that I can see that the press and Obama are going to make it about him anyway – the articles are already starting to line up. I think when Grandma in Florida and others see him in the limelight they will realize he’s not the Bogeyman after all. If Ryan just campaigns with Romney, he will be invisible to the general public and will remain The Bogeyman. There is no avoiding this, and maybe it’s Ryan’s own ‘fault’, but it is what it is.

    People like this woman will get the specifics from Ryan that they are not hearing now. He is one politician who projects confidence, intelligence, knowledge, and honesty. I think people will begin to see a way forward if they listen to him. That’s what they want, a ‘Roadmap’.

  • http://libertynews.com/ mbecker908

    as a part of the ticket that he can’t do off the ticket. Actually, he can probably be positioned better off the ticket. He’s not going to have to do much campaigning at home, so there’s nothing keeping him off the road in support of Romney and they can certainly coordinate the budget discussion by simply noting that Ryan is going to be the point man for Romney on budget and fiscal issues in the Congress.

  • checkmate2012

    mbecker, I mentioned this last night that he is due to be term-limited at the end of this session after 6 years as the Chairman of the House Budget Committee. Waivers are rarely granted and Rep. Mica wants one too and it dominoes from there.

    I too think it would be a bad mistake for Romney to pick Ryan as the Left will make mince meat out of him & then the whole race is on the Ryan budget, instead of O’s failures.

    If Romney wins, he can make him Treasury Sec. or some other Cabinet position.

    From Roll Call, http://www.rollcall.com/issues/57_130/Paul_Ryan_Presents_GOP_Term_Limits_Dilemma-214265-1.html

    “But Republicans have been stingy about issuing waivers for chairmanship term limits since the rule was implemented in 1995. And a waiver for Ryan could roil other GOP chairmen who would like to stay on. A spokesman for Ryan did not return a request for comment.”

  • http://libertynews.com/ mbecker908

    text only if it’s properly formatted.

  • littlehouse18

    This is the sense I got from her. I don’t know her, I was canvassing and she wanted to vent her frustration. I tried to persuade her to give Romney a chance. Maybe it was just a waste of time.

  • JSobieski

    Waiting to hear something other than the raw assertion that the Romney plan will create 12 million jobs.

    What is the purpose of a campaign if not build “buy in” from the public on certain challenging issues.

  • commonsenseobserver

    It’s always been a matter of time, and it’s not like Team Romney doesn’t have specifics- it’s just that not enough people know that it has and bother to check his website.

    Now, one of the reasons why I like Ryan is because the Obamedia will attack the Ryan Budget anyway, and Ryan is the best person to defend the entire Republican economic vision of balanced budgets and free enterprise, and make our case, and in so doing, shift the conversation back to the contrast between Romney’s record and plan of success and Obama’s litany of failures.

    It won’t be pretty, it’ll be tough on Congressman Ryan and Governor Romney, but it was tough on Gov. Palin, Secretary Cheney, Sen. Quayle, President Bush, Sen. Dole, Rep. Kemp, and probably every modern VP pick as well. What matters is that they will be able to fight back and stay on their feet, and I have faith that if Ryan’s the pick, he’ll be able to do so, and help President Romney do so as well.

  • commonsenseobserver

    He’d be the best compromise between the exciting ones like Ryan, Jindal and Rubio on one hand, and people like Portman and Pawlenty on the other. Solid credentials like the former, while being rather safe (and boring) like the latter.

  • PowerToThePeople

    on who will be VP. Buy in is 20 dollars and 50% of the funds go to a worthy candidate with the rest going to those who choose the right person.

  • JSobieski

    Frankly, I believe that winning the election isn’t enough. We need Romney to build a rather specific mandate for change. Otherwise, Romney can win, and the country still goes off the cliff. Without some of specific action plan, the big things won’t get done. Remember SS reform under Bush in 2005? It didn’t even get out of committee.

    There won’t political support for entitlement reform (in the legislature or amongst the public) if entitlement reform isn’t a campaign issue.

    The best thing about Paul Ryan is that he probably the best communicator on entitlement reform–in terms of both style and substance.

    I agree that Ryan as VP doesn’t help Romney get elected, but Ryan as VP almost certainly means that the campaign will be more substantive (which is why I presume Romney won’t pick him)