« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

An Eeensy-Weensy Diary about The Polls and Florida…

Iowa seems a generation ago, doesn’t?

Remember? Gingrich was toast, Ron Paul was “fading”, and Rick Santorum was “coming on strong” in the final polls before the actual voting began….

And these final Polling Prognostications?

Romney, 22.1%, Paul, 19.5%, Santorum 17%, Gingrich, 12%

Of course, this was all it took to officially proclaim the Inevitable Romney as the Crown Prince of Frontrunnerdom. The final poll mattered more than the actual results, which had Santorum a scosh north of 24%, Romney 34 votes behind him, and Ron Paul checking in with 18%.

Ah, yes, the margin of error.

What I would give to outlaw polling, and allow candidates to rise and fall on their merit….  Now, because of the endless polling, sampling and focus-grouping, we are treated to this Romney-Ignited vicious, vile, disgusting, foul cock-fight of a campaign that is primarily about poll-jockeying, and destroying whoever is in front of the Mittster. Romney can’t run on his political philosophy –at best, he’s a social-climbing technocrat of no particular political stripe, at worst a mealy-mouthed East-Coast patrician good-government liberal– and thus, he must catastrophically smear and destroy his closest poll-buddy. If Mother Theresa herself was leading Mitt Romney in the Florida Poll, he’d spend the Queen’s Dowry to electorally butcher her.

What an asinine way to choose the person that will save this country from the abyss. Thanks, Mitt.

Just remember what the final poll was before Iowa, too…

 

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • johnconradarens

    Someone can be a complete dunderhead, but, if they are shown “moving up in the Polls”, then, suddenly, they are a genius, and are taken with the utmost seriousness.

    Just look at Ron Paul. As Mark Levin says, he’s a crackpot, and, because there are 12% of Republican voters that are evidently crackpots, too, that support him, we’re supposed to listen intently to what the guy has to say.

    By the way, where are all the calls for Ron Paul to get the hell out? He’s never, ever, going to be President, and he keeps siphoning off resources.

  • daveoconnor

    We are in trouble.
    Let’s see, we have conservatives who would like to see free speech, political free speech at that, outlawed.
    Mitt Romney is in all ways demonic and about one-eigth of Republican voters are crackpots and Mark Levin is a head shirinker–long-range at that.
    So Mitt Romney is responsible for my favorite Jon Huntsman not catching on? Also for the woefully ill prepared Perry campaign? And Newt’s baggage would never have surfaced if Mitt hadn’t drawn attention to it? No, no and no. Mitch Daniels could have run, but he didn’t. Ditto Paul Ryan. Ditto Sarah Palin. I wish they had, but they didn’t. If you think Romney won’t be a lot and I mean a lot better than 44 I respectfully disagree.

  • sulmak

    Many of the reputable polling firms will call back people who don’t pick up, or whose call is dropped.

    Before the 2010 elections I strung one along(don’t even know which one) from July or August until after the election through a mixture of call screening and listening for a while then hanging up to simulate a dropped call. The eventually stopped calling after the election.

  • ptamom

    I am deeply concerned about what I believe to be the misrepresentation of Romney as a conservative and as a moderate Republican in the current presidential race.

    The stark difference between Romney’s views now and his record as Governor of Massachusetts should give us pause.

    As a PTA mom from Maryland and a Republican volunteer in our county, I have followed Massachusetts politics via email news from www.MassResistance.org since the 2003 court redefinition of marriage in Massachusetts. Living in a “blue” state with 2 children in public schools, I have been concerned about the impact of the redefinition of marriage on public schools.

    In their comprehensive report of Romney