« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Hey! I’ll Trade You your Santorum Vote on Super Tuesday for My Gingrich Vote here in Michigan!

Anyone?

Hey, how ’bout you, down there in Ohio? Any takers over there in Massachusetts? Anyone in the Super Tuesday delegation?

I’ll vote for Santorum on Tuesday, if you promise to cast my vote for Newt when you go to the polling place on March 6th.

You see, I’d pretty  much decided to vote here in Michigan on Tuesday for Speaker Gingrich– especially after listening to a half-hour speech he gave about energy policy, which he delivered seemingly extemporaneously. Good Lord, the man sounds like a leader. Among those left in the race, he’s the fellow who seems the most likely to overturn the federal apple-cart, and do it with zeal and aplomb.

For example, Gingrich is calling for the new Congress, once it is seated on January 3rd, 2013, to prepare repeal legislation for Obamacare, ALL of the regulatory regime passed under Obama, as well as a lifting of all moratorium on domestic oil exploration and drilling on federal lands so that when he is sworn in on the 23rd, he can sign them immediately.

Gingrich has been left for dead in this campaign about a dozen times since announcing his candidacy late last spring. I was among those truly flummoxed by this “right-wing social engineering” broadside against Paul Ryan’s Medicare proposal, but the Newtster crawled his way back into the fight by (more or less) apologizing for the statement, and giving solid speeches and debate performances in a slow and methodical manner.

I’d remained a Michele Bachmann supporter, right until she withdrew from the race in January. At times, Representative Bachmann seemed to have more conservative huevos in her little finger than most of her primary opponents combined (a common malady I note amongst the masculine set, here in Obama’s America). The only time I winced is when she joined in the Gardasil-mandate attacks on Rick Perry, as if it were germane to the price of tea in China. But, she was –is– the most unapologetic conservative on the national scene at the moment, and it would have been an honor to vote for her.

I’d briefly given thought to Hermann Cain, too, but the thought of a national sales tax scares the jeepers out of me if we haven’t first abolished the 16th Amendment. Plus, Cain is such a, a, well– such a jolly guy that I think watching him be president for four years would be a joy. Same thing goes for Governor Perry, to whom I took a shine briefly, as well, after he announced his tax plan.

Then, from out of the weeds of the Iowa cornfields came Rick Santorum, a Senator whom I’d long admired as an important conservative pro-life voice, but seemed to have about as much chance of winning the Republican Nomination as Harold Stassen. Now, mind you, I’d vote a hundred times for Rick Santorum before I would ever cast a primary vote for Mitt “Money Bomb” Romney, but, he’s not clicked with me yet. I can’t explain it much beyond my sinking feeling that he lacks a certain depth that many College Republicans lack. It’s hard to put my finger on it, really, except that he lapses a bit too often into reflexive, defensive  conservative lyrics. I thinks his instincts are fairly solid, but, as his most recent debate performance showed, he’s a True Believer in the game of Washington Realpolitik. And now is not the time for political games.

Mind you, I understand the value of political horse-trading, having lived through two extremely successful terms of Governor John Engler. Yes, that John Engler,  the poster-boy for Wheeler-Dealer Governance (–Engler was the Majority Leader of the Michigan Senate  for many years before he became Governor, and I was certain he would just be a toady for the Status Quo, but he turned into a kick-butt leader, and proved me entirely wrong). Sadly, Engler served for three terms, and that third term was a rudderless as the SS Minnow when it ran aground on Gilligan’s Island. But, no matter. The first two Engler terms made up for the third, and perhaps Santorum is an Engler cum lately.

But, here in Michigan, some polls are showing Santorum in a dead heat with ol’ Money Bomney. So, as a man that will do whatever I can to deny the nomination to Mitt Romney, I will pull the lever here in Michigan for Rick Santorum, if someone in a Super Tuesday state will promise me they will abandoned their Santorum vote for a Gingrich vote in March.

Any takers?

COMMENTS

  • quill67

    I like Santorum or Gingrich. I agree that Santorum might be more electable. I think his 0% tax on manufacturers will sell very well. But I worry that Santorum does not know how to use rhetoric to attack…to move votes–I know Gingrich does.

    I also know that stopping Romney in Michigan would be devastating to his campaign. So if I were in Michigan, I would vote for Santorum. With Romney’s momentum stopped, I believe the race would be back on for Gingrich V. Santorum.

    My plan in Tennessee is to wait until I see who has best chance to beat Romney and vote for them.

  • texastaxpayer

    ;)
    That’s the best I can offer….

  • sulmak

    I’ll probably vote Newt anyway, and don’t vote super tuesday, so I can’t help, but I have to say this is a great idea.

    I’ve been hoping Michigan Gingrichers would vote Santorum because I think a Romney loss there would make Gingrich more likely to win even if Gingrich doesn’t win himself, just because it takes wind out of Romney’s sails.

    • circlegranch

      now its AZ and MI that supposedly hold all the cards. The media hypes it that all things hinge on these two states as far as who stays in, who surges, who falters. Same old story. In MI, anybody can vote so what relevance does that outcome actually have? If Independents and Democrats can cast votes in the GOP primary, there’s all kinds of opportunity for false outcome. Until the GOP figures out that their primary system is basically useless and tightens up voting requirements, we will never have a purified system of picking a nominee. “Operation Chaos” will continue to pick our candidates.

      In Iowa, the state GOPchair has quietly stepped down after entire precincts ‘lost’ ballots. NH allowed dead people to vote. Fl was ‘winner take all’ as far as delegates until they moved up their primary. Michael Steele fought hard to penalize them for doing so. Look where that got him. He was forced out of the national chair position and makes a living these days as an contributor on MSNBC. The Establishment was so furious with him, even Fox didn’t want him on their network anymore. He wasn’t in lock step with the It’s-Romney’s-Turn agenda so he got swift-boated out in a hurry. Haven’t heard him on Hannity either and at one time, they were good buddies. Don’t fight the GOP Establishment system, or live to regret it.

      Any inside info available on whom Gov Jan Brewer will tap today with her endorsement? Does it matter? Will she be the next tea party, grassroots champion to break out and go w/ Romney? The only endorsement that counts is votes at the ballot box. Hers is just another vote and counts no more than anybody else’s in AZ. She is coming out today to endorse for a specific reason–she’s hoping to sway the outcome. Nikki Haley did the same, to her own remorse.

      This is an intriguing diary post. The primary is a horse race, indeed, so horse trading is a natural component. If Newt supporters in AZ and MI voted Santorum and bumped out Romney, Newt and Rick stay alive in the race, at least till Super Tuesday. Romney was supposed to be lock in Colorado and got routed instead by those dastardly Christian conservatives and blue collar folks all across the state that are victims of the current policy of, “Don’t Drill, Don’t Mine, Don’t Frack”. Romney laid his groundwork in CO early on, meeting with ‘bigs’ in the state GOP, but caucus straw poll voters have minds of their own. Romney’s weird speech last week in MI where he starts with his usual, “I love America” followed by, “I should love Michigan” and then rolled out the “trees are the right size here” line may have hurt him. What’s that all about anyway–the tree thing? Romney supporters, can you enlighten us on that?

      • sulmak

        just ask all the former Perry and Thompson supporters here at redstate.

    • SoFiMil

      Each of the three candidates get a few wins, and following Super Tuesday no one has clear momentum.

    • tngal

      But when we run a true conservative we win. Go for brokered and take Fred out of mothballs. He doesn’t need fire in the belly. Just the fire from conservatives pushing him on. (Course, I’d take Cain too.)

      • sulmak

        I’d take Fred, Cain, or Perry.

        Not sure everyone else would at a brokered especially.

        Delegates tend to be establishment types, as soon as they are unbound if the first round doesn’t show a majority, most will vote Romney.

        • red_oakster

          But I guess it depends on how close Romney is to 50% plus one. If he’s close, he might be able to cajole a few stragglers. But if he’s well short of a majority, he’ll be seen as a loser. Then my money would be on a “field bet” of Jeb, Ryan, Rubio, and Jindal.

  • geoph

    With this crowd of candidates. Each has an appeal to draw us into their camp, but not enough to necessarily hold us there. Is it any wonder, the plight of Conservatism in American politics? We’ve abandoned adherence to our principles for so long, that it now takes, what…. 3, 4…10? Republican politicians to embody the “Conservative” platform!

    I like Newt. I’ve liked Newt since the 90′s. I don’t like what I heard from him as he was selling books, I question his love seat lecture done with Pelosi, and I shake my head at his loony, lunar colony statement. But I LIKE NEWT. He is the guy who will spit in the Liberal’s eye, he is the guy who will poke his finger in the chest of Boehner and McConnell, and he is the guy who – when the LMSM attack – can say, “been there, done that.”

    I’d like nothing more than to pull the lever for Newt in November, and THAT is why I’ll be pulling the lever for Santorum on Tuesday in Michigan. I do believe if Romney loses MI, he can not recover by Super Tuesday and the Republican Leadership will then have to attempt the brokered convention.
    THAT’s another potential poison, but just as it has been this whole primary season – the more imminent danger is Romney succeeding in acquiring 1144 delegate votes.

  • lineholder

    For those who haven’t seen it, go take a look at the timeline for O-care that is posted at the Gingrich Group website. Here’s the site address for it:

    http://www.healthtransformation.net/galleries/wallcharts/GG_6ft_chart_HR_OPT.pdf

    Use the “viewer” icon in the lower right hand corner to zoom in on the bottom section that displays what will be happening in 2012 and 2013. It’s broken down into categories, i.e. Medicare, Medicaid, Public Health, Insurance, Taxes, etc.

    Some of the things identified in that chart are moving as scheduled, and some of them are moving ahead of schedule. The “Secretary” has discretionary power where scheduling of implementation is concerned. If the Secretary chooses to do so, rulings that are scheduled for 2013 could be pulled forward into 2012. Keep this in mind as you look at the chart.

    Some of the things we will be able to roll back via repeal of O-care. Some of them we won’t. Once the “balling is rolling” so to speak, there’s a causal relationship that won’t let us reverse course.

    The things we can’t roll back, we have to succeed in finding a way to cover the costs. And the best way of doing this is to free up the private sector so that we might see an increase in revenues. This is a much better choice than allowing massive tax increases on individuals that would consume even more expendable income and push us even deeper into a demand-side crisis!

    No one in the realm of politics seems to want to be genuinely honest with the American people and say “here’s what lies ahead”. I’m guessing that they reason they don’t is because they know it would scare the dickens out of people and probably generate even greater economic uncertainty that what we’ve been facing the past three years.

    Newt and Romney both know what lies ahead. Obviously Newt knows since it was CHT (his own group) that established the timeline. Romney knows in a very practical sense, because the implementation path that O-care is following is very similar to the path that Romneycare followed. I’m not sure how deep Santorum’s knowledge of O-care goes, so I can’t say much on that point.

    Of Newt and Romney, Newt’s economic plan is a bold plan. It does incorporate mechanisms that could quickly stimulate growth and development in the private sector. This directly correlates to generating revenues that would allow us to avoid higher tax levels placed on individual consumers.

    Romney’s economic plan…what can I say except that it’s milquetoast. It might be adequate…maybe. But that’s about it. In some ways, that really rots my socks in my opinion about Romney, because the man does know what the truth is on this point! He knows what lies ahead, and seems to me that of all the candidates in this race, he’d been the one most adamant and proactive about preparing and planning for it, too. I don’t get that kind of ‘vibe” from Romney at all.

    Like I said, I’m not sure how deep Santorum’s knowledge on this subject goes. Correlations can drawn for Newt and Romney. For Santorum…I haven’t found any. If someone else has, please put them up so we all have a chance to evaluate it.

    Newt IS the one taking on a strong, positive leadership role in this, ‘curmudgeon, by planning for what lies ahead. I don’t know how to make this point plain to people, but it is the case!!!

  • http://www.timothy-bladel.com/ center77

    but I am afraid that Mitt Romney has already proven he cannot beat Obama. Romney has not spent anything near what Obama will, and each time it has happen, Gingrich has taken a div ein that state. As much as I want the speaker to be the nominee, it seems like others just do not trust it. It is starting to look like for good reason.

    You post does make sense though, and if I had not already voted for Perry, I would likely still vote for Perry.

    I am just not happy with any of these candidates.