« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Cruz-ing to Victory! How the Ted Cruz Win Spells Disaster for Obama and the Existing Political Order…

Some 800,000 additional Texans than expected went to the polls today to cast ballots in what might normally have been a sleepy cakewalk for the ho-hum Establishment Flabby Middle.

Yep. Another Kay Baily Hutchison, another Bob Krueger, that’s all folks in Texas really wanted, right, Mr. Dewhurst? Someone with french-cuff shirts and collar stays, someone that enjoys the Silent Auction at the Country Club to benefit the United Fund, who speaks in smooth and dulcet tones, and never, ever threatens to actually read the Constitution –let alone abide by it.

Well, gee whiz, guess what happened on the way to the Lowell Wiecker Memorial Big Tent?

The American People happened, that’s what.

And Ted Cruz absolutely crushed David Dewhurst, by nearly 12 percentage points. Ted didn’t merely eke out a victory, or fall over the finish line by a whisper. No. He filleted the Lieutenant Governor, basted him with a spicy sauce of righteous American anger at our current political class, and served him up with a bow to all the establishment types –who, by the way, will now poo-poo the notion they weren’t with Cruz from the get-go.

Does anyone these days queue up hours in advance to listen to a speech by Charlie Crist? Anybody? Bob Bennet?

The truly remarkable thing about Mr. Cruz’s victory is the massive, massive fortune that his opponent sank into the race, and how slathering all the money around by Dewhurst had the exact opposite effect of it’s intent: People are sick of the relentless personal, bizarre, irrelevant attacks in concert with the complete absence of philosophical and political substance. Personal attacks are fine, as far as they go: But, they must be paired with solid, substantive, strongly articulated debate. Ted Cruz offered this in spades.

And in this election, Mr. Obama can see the future, if he cares to look into the glass:

It is a grim and brutish future for the man who is President for the next 159 days, electorally speaking. Just as in Texas, the otherwise somnolent folks that tend to eschew politics in this nation will have been stirred to wrath –fury!– by a President and a political class that is utterly, utterly disconnected from, and uninterested in, them.

How in the name of a loving God could a President so obnoxiously rule against the known, (-and knowable) will of the American People for four years expect anything other than a good, old-fashioned drubbing? All Barack has done for four years is attack his opponents with the most adolescent blather, accuse them of being lazy, racist, good-for-nothings that don’t appreciate his genius– and then sign into law bill upon bill that the American People manifestly despise and reject? How? Has Mr. Obama ever actually acted Presidential for more than a couple of speechifying afternoons? Has he ever been the President of the entire nation –rather than the chief antagonist for the Democrat Party?

The American People are fed up. They are tired of being ignored, tormented, and ripped off. We are a kind and loving people. We are tolerant to a fault.

But, Mr. Obama, pace Admiral Yamamoto: You have awakened a sleeping giant.

Just ask David Dewhurst.

COMMENTS

  • baldbarian

    Exactly so. Locally in NC, sensing the same thing. The TeaParty here is not publicly supported with overwhelming love. However, over a breakfast or a drink .. the seething anger, the desire to make a change in both the Whitehouse and with most any demo in office AND with Pub leadership.. is strong enough to make one smile.

    I AM NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANYMORE! might the slogan of this decade going forward.

  • APA Guy

    Obama and his media chums keep railing on about “extremism” and try to demonize the Tea Party for a reason. They desperately need a squishy middle that caves to put their agenda into place.

    But the worm has turned in America…and it’s not just conservatives. Isn’t it interesting that the more Romney runs to the right, the more Independents flock to his banner?

    The writing is on the wall, Republicans. Read it or weep.

    • blujay83

      This is a great article. I am so glad that Ted Cruz won. While I love Marco Rubio as VP this year, I wonder if Ted Cruz’s Canadian birth would disqualify him from a VP spot in the future. Any takers? Hopefully, his parents were U.S. citizens by the time of his birth.

    • http://www.TerriersOfTheRight.blogspot.com Flagstaff

      I want to believe that you are right about this, because I feel the same way. My only hesitation is that the folks who voted for Cruz did so in a Republican primary run off. Still, it’s hard to think now that the same result will not follow in the general election.

      The writing IS on the wall in Texas, and there are oh-so-many other authors writing the same message in every Chick-fil-A in the country today.

      Finally, I also believe that we are seeing a mirror image of the summer of 2008 on Wall Street these days. My unsupported opinion is that the market started to tank in 2008 when it became apparent that Obama was probably going to win in November. The market is now at a four-year high, maybe five years, I don’t know, rising even with the economy still in terrible shape and sure to be worse if Obama wins. Why? Wall Street is betting on a Romney Presidency. Every day, it now looks more likely that Romney will win in November, 2012.

      Normally, the market is not a reliable forecaster of elections, and this year may be no exception, but it’s an eerie coincidence of contrasting index levels and trends.

      • honestjohn

        Flagstaff, you are exactly right; I noticed the same thing with the timing.

        Just as the political momentum shifted from McCain to Obama in September 2008 is when the markets began to tank…they saw Obama’s election coming and took shelter. Millions of brains made those decisions just as they do today.
        Nobody else every seems to have noticed this…except you and I, thanks for the vindication!

        • http://www.TerriersOfTheRight.blogspot.com Flagstaff

          But then again, maybe we’re both wrong. I’m not willing to bet my life savings on it.* I suspect that saner folks have discounted the idea because the market is notorious for being inscrutable, to say the least. I also believe that the economy will start to improve as soon as it is positive Obama is a one-term President, and it will start to explode when he is in the process of leaving office.

          *I am going to bet some of it, though.

      • honestjohn

        Flagstaff, you are exactly right; I noticed the same thing with the timing.

        Just as the political momentum shifted from McCain to Obama in September 2008 is when the markets began to tank…they saw Obama’s election coming and took shelter. Millions of brains made those decisions just as they do today.
        Nobody else every seems to have noticed this…except you and I, thanks for the vindication!

  • http://www.firstchevalier.com Mark Malcolm

    Will the establishment types and RINO’s see it and can we keep it moving for more than one election cycle? Sure we got it done in 2010 and might do it again in 2012, but it only has teeth if it has legs, imo. Nicely done by the way.

  • funwithknives

    for that guy from the Great Lakes State.

    “…it’s loonnngg gone…”

    Polling isn’t reflecting what people actually are gonna do.
    The fed-up American Voter is fed-up with distortions from our Sacred SCUM, and a like shock [but bigger] awaits in November.

    ..or so I’d guess……..

    • conservativecurmudgeon

      …near the Land of Delight, so the gaawd-awful heat has moderated a tad. And, thanks so much for the kind words.

      And you are correct about polling: All it is a snapshot of emotional, not cognitive, opinion at a given moment in time. I dare you to tell me what The Big Story will be in October… Iran? Some nut-job blowing something up? Who knows?

      Polling is also destructive in that all it does is give intellectual cover for group-think…

      • tnfriendofcoal101368

        like 24 of the last 28 days…I think Al Gore called “climate rain forest”. #sarcasm

  • westcoastpatriette

    Cruz won by 13.6% points –not just 12%. That’s what the final tabulation shows this morning. It was a rout.

    • conservativecurmudgeon

      When I wrote this Epistle, the Cruz margin was only tickling the 12% barrier. Now it’s nearly 14%– What a magnificent, magnificent victory, eh? Score one for the Good Guys!

  • sulmak

    Being a stickler but by the latest data I could find with 100% of precincts reporting Cruz crushed Dewhurst by roughly 13.6 points.

    http://enr.sos.state.tx.us/enr/results/july31_162_race0.htm?x=0&y=222&id=135

    http://www.khou.com/news/bti-election-results?raceName=U.S.+Senate+%28R%29-Texas&t=35

    • Freiheit (ZachV)

      13.6% is a landslide.

  • msctex

    . . .Ted’s win is as big or possibly bigger than Wisconsin, in terms of making it abundantly clear how doomed the Dems actually are come November. Maybe it is apples and oranges to no small degree. But if I were on the other side, I think I might be more worried about the prospect of evidently losing or having significant erosion of what could qualify as a base of sorts (wishy-washy TX Republicans), as opposed to simply losing a straight-up fight (Wisconsin). They got egg (cartons, granted) on their face in Wisconsin. But they learned something they did not want to know in Texas.

    And, the Tea Party now has a face. An Ivy-educated, whip-smart man of Principle.

    • Freiheit (ZachV)

      I may be biased as a Wisconsinite, but Cruz’s win was over another still rather moderate (compared to New England) Republican in a red state. Democrats didn’t have much to do with it.

      Walker and the two recall rounds happened in a purple state that has gone blue the last 6 Presidential elections, with Walker and the Senate Republicans were going toe to toe with the Democrats and Big Labor’s millions. November’s battle will be waged in the purple states like Wisconsin.

      • msctex

        . . .is that the Republican Party is moving back towards its fundamental principles, through men like Ted Cruz and the Tea Party’s ideals. These principles and ideals WORK. They function when put to practice. The Left’s versions thereof do not function because they are contrary to both reality and human nature. The Left loves to be able to speak of Compromise (with men like Dewhurst) and subsequently the supposed inflexibility and intransigence of anyone who disagrees with them. If the Republicans continue to move away from the Bush family’s influence and back towards the fundamentals of Free Markets and smaller Government, I can think of nothing else which would do more damage to the Left, because what we have to offer simply does the most real good. We will not need to compromise, because it will serve no purpose.

        I’m not downplaying what happened in Wisconsin one iota. It was a watershed moment. I’m just saying than in its way — an entirely different way — what happened with Cruz could easily be on a par with what Gov. Walker accomplished. For the Dems, Wisconsin was like getting beaten badly in a bar fight. Texas was more akin to realizing the ace up your sleeve is actually a deuce.

  • honestjohn

    Brilliant description: “Chief Antagonist for the Democrat Party” :-)

    CAFTDP is the new POTUS!

  • honestjohn

    Brilliant description: “Chief Antagonist for the Democrat Party” :-)

    CAFTDP is the new POTUS!

  • Pingback: look

  • Pingback: Newton Taulman

  • Pingback: Paul Cozzy

  • Pingback: Christina Mcmillon

  • Pingback: Willena Honsberger