« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Especially Now, I will Never Purchase a Kindle. Not After THAT Ad…

One of the interesting things about watching cable TV is discerning which demographic slices tune in to which channels.

It isn’t difficult to figure out, really; For example, judging by the number of “Scooter Store” and blood glucose meter,  Polident, and Colonial Penn Life Insurance ads on Fox News, it would seem that it’s core audience is senior citizens that have eaten their teeth down to the nub on rock-candy and can’t move around the house any longer and are about to die. Likewise, judging by the commercials,  ESPN is funded by beer drinkers, those in search of “male enhancement” and DISH network consumers. History Channel seems to appeal to people that need all sorts of insurance and drive pickup trucks.

And, now, evidently my favorite cable channel –Food Network (of all things)– is the destination for male homosexual of the techie persuasion. Or, techies of the male homosexual persuasion. Whatever.

There I was, innocently watching Restaurant Impossible, when what appeared to be a standard-issue bromide for the e-reader Kindle glared out from my TV screen. You know the sort of Madison Avenue pablum: Hunk of a man sitting next to a smokin’ hot chick on the beach– trying to read their little tablets; She can read hers, because it’s a Kindle; he can’t read his because it’s Brand X. Blah, blah, blah.

The twist comes at the end, when the smokin’ hot chick makes allusion to her husband at the tiki bar– but then the Hunk does the same thing. HIS “husband” is at the bar, too.

I’ve never had the sort of visceral reaction to an advertizement (– and I’ve been in a lot of truck stop bathrooms, too). I was (and I remain) furious. I will never buy a Kindle. Never, ever: Not after this ad. Nope.

I get it: Our culture gets a kick out of Gay Chic, and it has my whole life. I remember watching an episode of All in the Family back in the early 1970′s when Archie Bunker finds out that one of the guys down at the bar, one of his old time pals, is a male homosexual. We’ve been plowing these cultural furrows a very long time now. There is nothing avante garde about male homosexuality. It’s a big yawn-a-roo.

It is one thing, though, to grudgingly tolerate homosexuality in our cultural midst. It is quite another to normalize it to the point of changing the definition of the English language, and worse yet, to promote it. And nothing screams “promotion” more than advertizement on main-stream cable television.

We ignore in wholesale the tawdry, foul underbelly of male homosexuality in this sort of banal, material treatment. Selling Kindle’s with hunky homosexuals? Really? Really? Anal sex (and its close cousins domination and humiliation) fits in this equation where, exactly?

The founders of Exodus International estimate that probably 90% of all male homosexuals are first exposed to male homosexuality at a young age by way of assault from other male homosexuals. Does Amazon really want to discuss this as it regards the selling of their electronic gizmos?

Of course not. It wants us to consume Male Homosexuality as glibly as we consume, say, baseball. And that is as sick as it gets.

The very fact that most male homosexuals become homosexually-oriented only after degrading or brutal assault is something that our culture –despite it’s flirtation with all things Gay– refuses to tackle. It is a subject that remains taboo; and yet, it is the very reason that for so many centuries, Western civilization frowned on public exhortations of gay sex: It protected its children to keep it closeted.

There is nothing open-minded about assault. There is nothing compassionate about normalizing sexual humiliation of children. And yet these are basic elements of male homosexuality. And certainly a commercial enterprise like Amazon wouldn’t want to be connected to such depravities if the broader culture was sickened by it.

But, we’re not.

Now, with a culture that treats its dogs better than it treats its children, with a culture that impugns traditional family life with back-of-the-hand arrogance, our children are societal petri-dishes swirling about to see what ultimately kills them. And, even as the cultural tsunami threatens to engulf my family, I will do what I can to protect them.

And I will start by not allowing a Kindle into my house.

 

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • Grant

    Bravo. Barnes & Nobles’ offering (and main Kindle competitor), the Nook, is looking that much more attractive right now.

    • metrication

      The HRC puts out corporate ratings for how pro-LGBT a company is; Amazon (Kindle) is rated 90%. Barnes & Nobles is more pro-LGBT with 100%.

  • lineholder

    Welcome back, ‘curmudgeon. Love the diary.

    I piddle around on different blogs, one in particular that lets every Tom, Dick, and Harry of various sexual persuasions post comments. And just about every comment they post derides those of us who seek to protect and preserve traditional values. On the basis of their comments, they obviously believe traditional values to be “evil” rather than considering the genuine possibility that their own behaviors are suspect (and that’s being “nice” about it, too).

    You’re right. We should be evaluating the sponsors of products who support behaviors that undermine the moral fabric of the family unit. Thanks for pointing out that Kindle has chosen this path.

    • conservativecurmudgeon

      The Kindle ad was jaw-dropping. Just jaw-dropping.

      I do believe, though, line, that somewhere down the road, in some far-off distant future, the moral descent which The West has engendered will be exposed, and some sort of traditionalist rebirth will be (to borrow a phrase) “kindled”. It has happened in the past: The Enlightenment, and the first Great Awakening are but two examples of this.

      In order for such things to happen, though, we need our Wilberforces to stand up– and we encourage them when we say “enough is enough”– and I am happy and humbled to stand shoulder to shoulder with folks like you…

      The fact is: I cannot force myself to go on some of the other blogs, even if all I do there is piddle. I have only recently gotten my blood pressure under control…

      • lineholder

        Ahh, hypertension. Wise choice to avoid some of the sites, then.

        I think development of human character and strong moral fiber will be revived, ‘curmudgeon. I genuinely do. I have contact with quite a few young people (mostly college aged) and I’m constantly hearing them express a desire for MORE…except they don’t seem to know what the more is that they desire. But it’s amazing, because if you get into a conversations with them about human character and moral strengths…a lot of them don’t know what that is until you start explaining it to them, and when they do start realizing what it is, they love the idea of it.

        Talk about being humbled, ‘curmudgeon. Just watching their faces as the truth sets in is a pretty amazing experience.

        I wish sometimes that we could go full-tilt societal outreach with a message on this topic. But then again, human character development is one of my favorite topics in the world, something I’m passionate about through and through. So I’m definitely biased on the matter.

      • westcoastpatriette

        Just like abortion, homosexuality — and the pseudo attempts to make those who practice it a protected class — are incompatible with Judeo-Christian values. If the Supremes “exalt themselves above the knowledge of God” when they hear the Prop. 8 case this year and deem homosexual marriage a right, they will trigger another unending civil war.

        But, oppose it we must.

        • conservativecurmudgeon

          Yep. We conservatives sit home, mind our own business, hurt no one– and then the authoritarian/hedonist left pokes our cage (homosexual “marriage”, abortion, etc..) and we fight back… Only to be denounced for promoting “wedge issues”.

          They are a damnable lot, really. If I had told my mom back in the day that I would have children that would have access to high-definition, high-flow hardest-core pornography right in their local school library, or on their “smart” phone, or on the family computer, she would have fainted. You used to have to don your trench-coat and amble to the seediest side of town for such stuff. She once boycotted CBS for the tops some actress wore on the “Smothers Brothers”. The culture has been utterly torched.

          For what? For WHAT? What has it gotten us? Enlightenment? Look around– people are more dismal, unhealthy, and soul-less than ever. Our society now just stares at it’s feet, picks it’s belly-button, no longer gazing upon the stars and yearning for the future….

  • PowerToThePeople

    I do not understand the love of the Kindle and other similar devices. Much cheaper to buy a book that is easier to read than on a device anyways then to buy the device then the book. Considering the ability of my IPhone and most other phones to buy ebooks and/or to buy an ebook via sites like Audible.com where I can buy a book then load it to my computer and other devices, I just can not justify the cost of a Kindle, but each to his own I guess. And now after seeing that commercial, glad I skipped out on the book reading devices all together.

    • funwithknives

      My wife just HAD TO Have One [KindleFire} and her Dad obliged ,Christmas of 2011.
      She was gonna do this, and do that, and..........now, there it sits, unused and alone, while she goes back to reading rendered trees and ink............
      We have a [basically unused] HandSpring that met the same fate……..
      Don’t ask me about the sewing machine that did everything but cook, was going to save us ‘mucho dinero’, and she wound up giving it away….

      • PowerToThePeople

        Your wife’s sewing machine and my wife’s sewing machine carried the same value.

  • rbdwiggins

    Without getting into the immorality of legitimizing deviant sexual behavior, I take a completely different approach to evaluating eBooks: Hard cover first edition prints are not susceptible to an electromagnetic pulse or mass coronal ejection, and they don’t require a continuous primary or supplemental energy source in order to perform their primary function.

    • ceili_dancer

      As long as you’re not Burgess Meredith and your glasses break.

  • Notre Droite

    You’re absolutely right that most male homosexuals become homosexually-oriented only after degrading or brutal assault. It’s a simple FACT and anyone arguing otherwise has clearly been brainwashed by the liberal media and indoctrination centers (ie. public schools).

    We CANNOT tolerate it as a society. This commercial is just one more step further in the US’ eventual demise into another Gomarrah.

    • GremlinJones

      What are you talking about? You’re going to believe phony “statistics” from Exodus International? C’mon, man, use your brain. If that was truly the case, 90% of the homosexual population would be in prison.

  • Ausonius

    It is all part of the Relativist Agenda: we are in Nietzsche’s fantasyland of Beyond Good and Evil.

    Nothing is abnormal or wrong except for saying that something is abnormal or wrong. The arrogant, uppity, high-minded Leftists will attack you for being intolerant and a bigot and narrow-minded for believing in one Truth alone! Don’t you realize that there is more than one Truth?!

    Fact: homosexuality is not normal. If it were, then fission would be the only way for a species to reproduce.

    There is a difference between “natural” and “normal.” Homosexuality may be “natural” in that it occurs in Nature. However, Nature is full of errors, among them homosexuality. If homosexuality were normal – as the ad so desperately tries to let us know – then obviously few of us would be around!

  • metrication

    Here’s a list of company’s that have publicly endorsed gay marriage that you should boycott if you support traditional marriage:

    Ambercrombie & Fitch, Adobe Systems, Alcoa, Allstate Insurance, Amazon, American Apparel, American Airlines, Apple, Applebee’s, Barnes & Noble, Ben & Jerry’s, Best Buy, Boeing, Cisco Systems, Clorox, Coke-Cola, Costco, Delta Airlines, eBay, EA Games, Expedia, Facebook, Ford, GAP, General Mills, Goldman Sachs, Google, Groupon, Hewlett-Packard, Hilton Hotels, Home Depot, IBM, Intel, Intuit, JC Penny, Jim Henson (Muppets), Kraft, Levi’s, LinkedIn, Marriott, McDonald’s, Microsoft, Morgan Stanley, Nationwide Insurance, Nike, Nordstorm, Olive Garden, Office Depot, Oracle, Orbitz, Panasonic, PepsiCo, PG&E, Proctor and Gamble, Qualcomm, Red Lobster, REI, Rite Aid, Sears, Southwest Airlines, Sun Life Financial, Starbucks, State Farm Insurance, Target, T-Mobil, United Airlines, Verizon, Vulcan, Walgreens, Walt Disney, Wells Fargo, Xerox and Zynga.

    BTW – Here’s the Kindle ad: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-7IA54-tmE

    • exitsfunnel

      Even if they wanted to, how could someone possibly keep track of all of those companies to boycott?

  • GremlinJones

    I like how you write! Very entertaining. You went off the rails here a bit: “Anal sex (and its close cousins domination and humiliation) fits in this equation where, exactly?”, and citing Exodus International was a mistake, I’d love to see that “study” where they got that “statistic”.

    It’s a bit jarring to me as well to see two men intimate (somehow not jarring to see two women, but there it is), but you know what – gays being happy doesn’t impact my marriage or my life in the slightest, and I’m all for allowing consensual adults to do whatever they like in the privacy of their own home.

    • conservativecurmudgeon

      So, the standard of what the broader culture devolves into is based solely on whether or not it impacts your marriage? By that standard, then, you have no issue with an eighteen-year-old girl marrying her eighteen-year-old twin brother, or even her 85-year-old Grandmother, right? They are consenting adults, correct? They love each other, and are “happy”, correct?

      And, of course, consenting adults can do what they want in their own homes, correct? Can they cheat on their taxes in their own homes? Can they be prostitutes in their own homes? Hell, can we even install 100-watt lightbulbs or 3-gallon flush toilets in our own homes? C’mon– we’re all consenting adults here, right?

      I hope this demonstrates the corrosive nature of your position. I will also point out that the 9-11 terror attacks likely didn’t impact your marriage either, to any real degree, (and if it really DID, I apologize in advance) so why should we get all a-twist over THAT little incident? It didn’t impact your marriage, unless your husband or wife was on one of the planes, or in one of the buildings.

      Actually, my exact point, despite the scorn of those who smear Exodus International, is that the overwhelming majority of male homosexuals have had their first homosexual encounter before the age of consent, at the hands of a predatory older male abuser, which then becomes the taproot of their sexual identity. Period. That makes it, by definition in almost all states, “assault”. Further, the more we normalize this sort of behavior, the more it is LIKELY to impact your marriage.

      I never quoted a “study” from Exodus International. I referenced the claim of several of their earliest members who were self-identified denizens of the San Fransisco bath-house scene in the late 1970′s, and who knew literally hundreds of other male homosexuals who participated in some of the most foul sex acts with scores of dozens of partners over a days-long periods. What they found striking was the fact that so many of their compatriots had been assaulted as children by an uncle, a scout master, a priest or what-have-you before they had even reached puberty.

      Let’s say, for the sake of argument, that the figure isn’t 90%. Lets say it is 50%. Does that make the case for homosexual marriage, or for re-stigmatizing male homosexuality?

  • gmat

    You started off with a pretty astute assessment of why you see certain commercials on certain channels. When you got to the ad with the homosexual in it, you changed direction sharply.

    Rather than seeing the Kindle commercial as pitching the Kindle to a certain demographic that watches the Food Channel, you saw it as a pitch for homosexuality.