COMMENTS

  • thisisme7

    SHOCKED if she didn’t endorse Perry. He’s the male her… or she’s the female him… or uh, anyway, she MUST endorse him!!

    • constitutional

      I have never seen her go off and do something without information.. so surely she knows about Gingrich and Cain and their support for liberal policies–I’d say they’re out. There might be a slight chance she endorses Bachmann, though.

    • texasroots

      She will probably endorse Romney because Faux News “we report you decide” is pushing for Romney. I heard her once say she would be okay with either Perry or Romney, then later made a snide remark about Perry’s “crony capitalism.”

      • constitutional

        I doubt it.

        • superpatriot

          If Sarah Palin, Mrs. TEA party, endorses Romney or Cain, she is a total sell-out.

          • constitutional

            I think in reality the only two people she can endorse and still be a TEA party gal, is Perry or Bachmann.

            And realistically, Bachmann is a stretch.

        • onenationundrgod

          To the top nor was his name mentioned. Is this our answer?

      • avagreen

        http://www.alaskawtf.com/2011/09/16/frank-bailey/
        http://www.grist.org/article/the-secret-life-of-sarah-palin
        http://www.alaskadispatch.com/article/corp…panels?page=0,1
        http://www.andrewhalcro.com/palins_cronyism

  • conservativeparrothead

    Made some comments on Greta following one of the debates about Newt clobbering Obama in a debate, also made comments in the same interview about Perry giving in-state tuition rates to illegals.

    The fact she is coming out now as he has surged to at or near the top of many polls may be the reason for the timing. If I had a few bucks to bet on which way she would go, I would say Newt, but I can see Perry as well and to be honest they are the only 2.

    • constitutional

      If she does go with Newt, then we can certainly thank her for endorsing a guy who endorsed TARP and the individual mandate.

      I mean, come on.

      • kdubs

        didn’t stop her from endorsing Fiorina for CA Senate, when there was a candidate in the race who was a rock solid conservative (Devore). I like Sarah, but I think endorsing as someone is on the ascendancy and then taking credit for the victory is her typical play. I think she’s endorsing Newt, which will be fatal to Cain’s campaign I believe (I think most of her supporters went there). It might also be the final blow for Perry, I’m afraid, especially since they were so close the last few years. We’ll see!

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    .nt.

  • williamjameson

    I predicted it during Shep Smiths show. Expect her to stump speeches and keep other people guessing, I’m not playing since she danced too long with the decision to run for potus. She made the right decision there considering how pathetic the media coverage is of the current candidates. Sure the candidates are lame at times but media discrimination is making things appear far worse just to hoodwink voters.

    • conservativeparrothead

      She will want to jump on a bandwagon, not lead the parade. But I think how you value what she say is whether or not you have a candidate you feel strongly about and whether or not she endorses that candidate.

      If she endorses someone you feel strongly about, then I think you find it more relevant than if she endorsed someone else.

  • sticktotheconstitution

    don’t base your opinion on anything but what you think. I don’t like celebrity endorsements changing people’s minds

  • constitutional

    But surely you know people will be swayed by her opinion.

  • georges

    I am astonished Sarah’s FORCED into a decision. But if she feels she must at this stage, she will definitely endorse Dr. Ron Paul as President of the United States and Commander in Chief of the U.S, Armed Forces.

    The reason is simple: Sarah thrives on being the coronation queen of the outragous. And whereas Dr. Paul is the only rational candidate on the issues to me, he’s denounced by the neoconservatives as a loon.

    Endorsing “loons” usually kills pundits and activists, but in Sarah’s case, its quite the opposite: it upholds the air of being that rogue maverick, and lend credibility to whomever receives her blessing.

    Her next book is coming due. Doubtless she’d want to reserve a chapter or two to the firestorm from the war-hawk neoconservatives.

    I see a win/win situation with Sarah Palin’s endorsment of Ron Paul.

  • Scope

    makes me think of Palin’s claims of getting rid of the good ole’ boys network in AK.

  • Scope

    LOL Have you auditioned lately for Comedy Central?

  • mikeymike143

    ron paul is to the conservative movement what fred phelps is to christianity.

  • constitutional

    Clearly. Either him or Huntsman.

  • mcclarinj

    Rand Paul for GOP nomination, US Senate
    Rick Perry for GOP nomination, Texas Governor

    Palin and Perry are friends from the US Governors’ Association but she has always had a fascination for Ron Paul, Paul supporters ASKED her for her endorsement, and no doubt Rand Paul has bent her ear on this. She has a definite history of sticking it to the “good ole boy” network and the two who fill that bill best are Paul and Bachmann. I’d say Paul has a 50-50 shot at her endorsement, especially right now with his ascendant status from the Bloomberg poll.

  • chbroussard

    nt

  • mcclarinj

    Rand Paul for GOP nomination, US Senate
    Rick Perry for GOP nomination, Texas Governor

    Palin and Perry are friends from the US Governors’ Association but she has always had a fascination for Ron Paul, Paul supporters ASKED for her endorsement, and no doubt Rand Paul has bent her ear on this. She has a definite history of sticking it to the “good ole boy” network and the two who fill that bill best are Paul and Bachmann. I’d say Paul has a 50-50 shot at her endorsement, especially right now with his ascendant status from the Bloomberg Iowa poll.

  • JSobieski

    What precisely is a neoconservative?

  • sticktotheconstitution

    Ron Paul is a constitutional conservative. Calling him a “left wing nutjob” is simply inaccurate and makes you look like a fool mikeymike143. As for JSobiesky: a neoconservative is a Republican who is OK with the government going into debt by spending billions we don’t have on wars that we started and can’t finish. I’m not on the Obama side who want to apologize for America. I just want to live completely WITHIN our means.

  • changeforrickperry

    I was chillin’, I was coastin’, and then Sarah Palin comes along and wrecks my
    relaxing evening!!! Now I’ll be on pins and needles. Don’t you find the timing suspicious and in Perry’s favor, since he released this big anti-insider-corruption establishment plan? I’d place my bet on Sarah endorsing him–but I’m nervous all the same.

  • superpatriot

    I’m with you. And, I really don’t see her endorsing Romney, who is her is her political opposite.

    Although she likes Gingrich, I don’t see her putting all her support behind a an older man with good ideas-again!!

    And although she may like Cain, I really don’t see a governor being the first big one to endorse a nonpolitician.

    Cheers.

  • onemovoter

    The announcement said that she will say who she thinks has the best chance of beating Obama next fall. This isn’t an outright endorsement, although some will be saying so after she says something. Palin always makes waves when she announces something.

  • superpatriot

    All due respect to you, onemovoter.

    But if Sarah Palin makes her pick of a candidate who can beat Obama and then endorses someone else, she would’nt look very presidential, pardon the pun.

    And, did you guys catch the Hannity interview with Perry today?? Is Fox beginning to warm up to Rick Perry?

  • changeforrickperry

    (*talks to self*) Because even if it isn’t an outright endorsement, it would be HUGE if Sarah said, right there on Fox News, “Rick Perry can beat Barack Obama.” Talk about sucking the oxygen out of the room–we wouldn’t be hearing anything about the Newt or Cain for at least 24 hours.

    So I’ll stay on pins and needles. Greta’s show is at 10 eastern, right? That’s 9 my time.

    P.S. Was the Hannity interview good? I’m afraid I missed it.

  • superpatriot

    At www.rickperry.org.

    Enjoy Greta tonight!!

  • Scope

    Everyone puts so much importance on every word that is uttered by Palin. From what I read, Palin will not be endorsing anyone, but will say who she thinks is the most likely to beat Obama. Sure that is an endorsement, but as much as we don’t want the media picking our candidate, do we want Palin picking our candidate? I can’t wait until this lady is marginalized and her word is as important as nothing. If she supports Perry great. If she doesn’t support Perry, who cares. We will still be with him.

  • changeforrickperry

    Back in August I was really afraid lest any rumor of Palin announcing her candidacy proved true. Seeing this diary made me freak out all over again, but in a completely different way. I like some things about her, don’t like other things, and I know that in some ways she has a lot of clout, especially with the Tea Party. But I think it was here on RedState that I saw someone comment, “Sarah Palin is about as relevant as Ann Coulter–which is to say, not much.” All that to say, I’m still interested to see what she says tonight, but I’ve taken a long, deep, calming breath.
    ____________________________________________________________
    “Success is not final, failure is not fatal; it is the courage to continue that counts.”–Winston Churchill

    www.changeforrickperry.org

  • onenationundrgod

    That Rick Perry is the only real choice. Anything less is not credible! I have thought she would indorse him all along because she has before in 2010 and because he is the obvious candidate to take our country back PERIOD!

  • buckedup

    In the next half hour please tell other RS if you now like or support Sarah Palin. The 2nd question is – if Sarah does NOT choose the Governor — will you continue to support Palin? No cheating. I can go first. Yes on both 1 and 2.

  • onenationundrgod

    Endorses Romney/Cain wow how credible is she again???

  • changeforrickperry

    Do you mean “continue to like her personally?” Or “if she ran for President in 2016 would you support her?” Clarify, if you would–this is an honest question.
    ______________________________________________________________
    “Success is not final, failure is not fatal; it is the courage to continue that counts.”–Winston Churchill

    www.changeforrickperry.org

  • nathanalbright

    I like Sarah in the sense that one likes a slightly crazy but very entertaining aunt. I don’t hang on her every word, though. Whoever she supports in 2012, if she supports anyone, I’ll still think her wacky, but if she endorses someone like Romney or Huntsman I’d probably respect her less as a conservative.

  • pttx333

    for President and still wouldn’t. I liked her far better in the beginning than I do now. For me, she has evolved into a rock star type that is not a viable candidate. What topped if off was when she began that teasing routine of “I’ll run, maybe” “No, I’m not running” “I’m thinking about running” – it just seemed too much like a strip tease in some joint. Then she ran around all over the country in her bus repeating the same teases, leaving the crowds either in despair or with high hopes. Why? I’m not knocking her in a moral sense, that isn’t it at all. It was embarrassing to me as a female that she would use her tough Mama Grizzly image then turn around and pull the teasing routine. Selling books maybe? I don’t know, but it did not and will not ever appeal to me from anyone.

  • buckedup

    Change, great question. I meant “personally” — like, do you generally like her?

  • Scope

    I wanted to post a big long post about how the biggest mouths are getting the most attention, but, I decided it doesn’t matter. Palin’s comments mean as much to me as Justin Beiber’s. Even if she comes down for Perry, I want her voice to be inconsequential to everyone. She’s an American Idol person, and nothing more.

  • center77

    listen to her, but I think she may have overdone it somewhat. I think people beat her up so much she felt she had to do something to stay relevant. I respected her for not running, but wish she did not wait so long to tell us. I did post a link in my response to our last talk, sorry it took so long to get back to you. School always come first, and I blog and comment when I have time, mostly between classes and stuff.

  • circlegranch

    The only benefit to be gained from an endorsement or even a kind word from Sarah Palin is of benefit to Mrs. Palin. She is a paid contributor on Fox and anytime she shows up to bless us with her infinite wisdom regarding conservative politics, she is well paid. Thus, she makes statements consistent with the Fox programming mandates because if she veers too far from that agenda, her services will no longer be required. The anticipation of whether or not she was going to endorse last hight reminds us of the limelight she perpetually captured as Chair of the Tease Party: will she run or won’t she? She quit her job as governor and she opted out of running in ’12 so her views in the conversation seem irrelevant at this point. It’s one thing to be in the fight and willing to put everything on the line and quite another to sit in the stands and be a critic.

    The opinions of elite, celebrity Republicans are only as valuable as the uninformed, fairweather voter allows them to be.

    It was interesting to hear Greta make the statement of “the media writes off candidates.” I will be at GretaWire here in a bit to remind her that she, too, along with her network, have failed to be consistent and fair in their coverage of candidates. After checking several times during the night, Fox did not run any info about Gov. Perry’s new policy proposals as a crawler. It will not come up. Granted, the president does not have Constitutional power to change the format of Congress or the SCOTUS as far as length of terms served, salaries, etc., but after hearing in the last few days that members of Congress are exempt from law regarding insider trading and that our Republicans are apparently not going to hold the line on raising taxes, its a conversation worth having. It appears, however, Fox doesn’t find such nuances as worthy of their time.

    As expected, Rush came out yesterday in defense of Cain’s inability to articulate on Libya. Cain reminds me more and more of the gentleman that ran in ’08 on the “The rent is too damn high” ticket. The answer to every question is 999. He has no depth of knowledge and apparently little understanding of most important issues. He glosses over all his shortcomings with tiresome humor and of course, 999. One trick pony. Somewhere in the mix of yesterday’s news Cain referred to Bachmann as ‘tutti fruiti’. A throwback to his comparison of himself being ‘black walnut’? MSNBC is running this comment as a crawler. I haven’t bothered as yet to investigate what its all about. In a normal world, a man facing accusations of sexual harassment might have ‘paused to collect his thoughts’ before making such a insulting comment. Oh well, let Herman be Herman.

    Also in the news yesterday was a video of Romney talking about RomneyCare and lauding his accomplishments therein, yet ends his statement by saying if Obama had called him, he’d have told him not to go ahead with a similar national healthcare plan. He’s becoming quite adept at serving up his flip flop popsicles: one side of the treat is one flavor and the other side offers the exact opposite. If you don’t like the sound of his first statement, simply wait and enjoy the next because it’ll be entirely different. He went on to say that one big difference between RomneyCare and ObamaCare is that his didn’t cost a trillion dollars. One would gather that without his prompting given the size of Massachusetts vs the entire country.

    Newt comes out yesterday in defense of his cozy relationship with Freddie Mac. When questioned about the $1.6 million he received from FM as a ‘consultant’ he says he told them not to give loans to people that may not be able to pay them back. I venture the guess any of us could have told FM the same and would have done so for a far smaller sum. Common sense comes at a high price these days.

    Huntsman noted yesterday he ‘doesn’t care’ about states other than NH, then walked it back saying he was referring to polls in other states.

    Seems to this commenter that there was ONE candidate that made news yesterday that is worthwhile to the middle class voter: Gov. Rick Perry. He proposed a major overhaul to Washington, D.C., and how our government works (and doesn’t work). At some point, average American voters–tea party patriots–whatever we tend to call ourselves, have to determine if we’re simply going to keep railing on Washington and how much we want change or are we going to get serious about doing something. We can continue to pound on our kitchen tables about waste, fraud, lies, cover-up’s, scams and the like or we can actually take this election seriously and DO SOMETHING ABOUT OUR DIRE CIRCUMSTANCE.

    We are simply wasting our time on the likes of Herman Cain, thanks in large part to a Right media that is lovesick over the guy. As long as he continues his “in your face” attitude toward the Left media, he holds their hearts in his hand. He’s stickin’ it to the Arch Enemy and in return he gets coverage and excuses for every gaffe imaginable. The same folks sitting at home listening to talk radio are also answering their phones when pollsters call and they respond according to the hype put on the radio that day. We’re getting played by the hypocrisy and here’s a case in point. Yesterday, Rush railed on Chelsea Clinton’s new job at NBC. He was livid that she has no prior experience and yet, went straight to the top. What about Herman? He, too, is arrogant and audacious enough to assume that with no prior political or govt. experience other than being a registered lobbyist, is qualified to be president! This election process has provided shocking revelations about inconsistencies in the media from ‘our side’. Remember the days when it was so refreshing to hear Rush on Monday morning after a weekend of Left media bias? Remember when we wouldn’t dream of watching a few minutes of MSNBC or CNN? There was a time when we knew we could count on our friends on the Right to be fair and reasonable.

    Mrs. Palin commented last night that we need to make “demands” on the media about whom they report on and how they do it.

    I suggest we all pay a visit to blogs, Facebook pages, send Tweets and emails to Greta and our other pals on Fox that talk out of both sides of their mouths when it comes to giving equal time, media write-off’s and false reporting. Conversely, I’m going to contact Sam Brownback today and thank him for his email yesterday on behalf of Gov. Perry. I’m going to ask him to make some media appearances, Fox included, doing interviews. Gov. Perry seems some muscle and star power within the party and he needs it quickly. He needs it from people in the fight, willing everyday to work hard for their country and not from sell-out’s that are quitters.

  • Common_Cents

    She is going to wait. IMHO, Her two choices are Gingrich and Perry.

    She’ll wait to see if Newt can survive his oncoming slime tsunami and see if Perry can get back on track.

    Most people want to endorse a likely winner, and don’t endorse strictly on policy affinity.

    My guess is she’ll end up endorsing Gingrich.

  • Scope

    This is so gross it’s not even believable. Fox puts out yet again nothing more that a come on to give them ratings. Palin yet again dances, swerves, and keeps her celebrity alive. Why is everyone so intent on this piece of celebrity that never had the first serious intention other than makin money? I can’t believe I was suckered agin to tune in to Greta’s celebrity show. No more.

  • constitutional

    I was goaded into watching Fox News.

    SON OF A

  • avagreen

    didn’t even bother to watch. Fox or Paline….who?

  • gekster

    Palin never said she would.
    Fox built it up, I saw it earlier today.
    All Palin had was a sceduled appearence.
    I can’t find anywhere she had said she was going to endorse anyone.
    It’s not Palins fault Fox is playing these games.

  • texasroots

    Breaking news, breaking news , Fox has joined the rest of the “infotainment” channels. Now that Roger Ailes has come out saying he only hired Sarah because she is “hot”, American Idol Palin can endorse Ron Paul for all I care. I saw her on CSpan in her last public speech/ appearance, and I knew right then she would not be running for president, but yet again she kept the circus going.

  • Scope

    on their website that Palin was going to talk about who she thinks will be the 2012 strongest candidate to beat Obama. Ha, everyone, including me, tuned into Greta’s show, and we gave them ratings they never should have had. If it wasn’t for Greta, we would have forgotten who Palin ever was. After all, Ailes said that he hired Palin because she was “hot.”

  • Common_Cents

    like her Presidential race decision. No big deal.

    Saw the Trump interview, looks like he’ll either endorse Gingrich or Romney.

  • Common_Cents

    That’s what they do! Create some cliffhanger excitement.

    I’ve heard 25 times that Brad Pitt is retiring! Big effen deal. when you see the interview its a casual comment from him oh maybe in the next few years…and the media runs with it. BARF.

  • gekster

    she has stayed out of the spotlight.
    She comes on the show to give an opinion, and people are going nuts on her.
    She said she would wait before endorsing anyone, and gave her opinion of what she sees in the current field.
    Not unlike the majority of posters hear have said and done.
    I see no need for her to be trashed here like some have, for doing what many here have done.
    Get over it.

    I say this to no one in particular, while saying it to all.

  • Scope

    Fox posted an article somewhere today saying that Palin was going to reveal who she thinks can beat Obama tonight on Greta’s. Fox has been about as devious as they can get, just for the ratings. I will never be fooled by them again. Hey, Ailes said he hired Palin because she was “hot.” Palin has gloried in that role.

  • superpatriot

    Rick Perry was’nt even mentioned tonight with Sarah Palin or Trump.

    I mean, how can they discuss Ron Paul, with no chance of winning, and not discuss Perry??

    Anyway, I stiil have faith. After what Palin said, very unlikely she’ll endorse Mitt.

  • center77

    and he corrected someone who said Rick was now trying to be anti-establishment, he said Perry’s new plan is consistent with his book. Erik has been hard on Perry at times, but he has been very fair, and I think that is very cool. Fox News is just unbelievable. I had convinced my girl who used to be a anarchist of sorts, not in action, but not knowing beliefs, that Fox was fair & Balanced, but then she watched them do this and she now wonder if all media is this way. She is very conservative now, because all she really ever felt was the government was to big and powerful. Thanks a lot Fox.

  • constitutional

    Tell her that SHE has to also be responsible for her media. Cannot trust people to spoonfeed you the truth.

  • sticktotheconstitution

    when she said that Christie was the one-and-only hope to win. I would vote for him but there’s plenty of talent in the conservative field

  • texasroots

    what else is there to say?

  • pttx333

    c

  • williamjameson

    are as fake as Romney. Coulter is another flip flopping liar whose just shrank her credibility.

    Any surprise Coulter bends over not long after Gov. Christie endorses Romney? I do remember Chris Christie was too enthused the day he endorsed Romney, seemed like he was coached to say things he wasn’t comfortable with.

    NYC has way too much influence on politics. God knows too many liberals influence media.

  • irishgirl

    Too smug and too wrapped up in trying to be funny. Totally lost me when she tried to shove Christie down everyone’s throat.

  • changeforrickperry

    I think Sarah is a very intelligent, patriotic woman and I respect her for that. If she endorses Romney in the future I’ll fear she’s been snookered by Fox, but I won’t HATE her. So yes, I like her, will “like” her if she doesn’t endorse Perry, but won’t consider her the die-hard Tea Partier I’ve always considered her to be.

  • texasroots

    I see a pattern emerging by all the networks to blackout anything pertaining to Perry. It’s coordinated and deliberate. It’s a given that every time Perry comes out with some good campaign news, the media goes to work against him.

    I have to say I am not surprised by Fox, I always thought they were deceptive.

  • avagreen

    There are about four.

  • texasroots

    What was I thinking when I voted for her and McCain?
    Sarah is right at home on Fox with the teasing routines, the bleached blondes, selling books, etc. etc.,

  • pttx333

    Sure wasn’t gonna be b.o.! I remember election day that year – held my nose very tightly and voted Repub but was sick to my stomach. I knew we were going to lose, and we did. Then it was blue funk time for me for a long, long while – then I decided I was going to fight the powers-that-be one way or the other. Yeah, right, my itty bitty voice – but it is the only one that I have, and I’ll use it in righteous indignation at what has been done to this country. I rail and rant, but there isn’t much else I can do except vote, which I do. It takes many, many voices, and I sure do hope that someone hears us on RS. It is so nice to have a place to come for comfort – yes, comfort for me, even though it can get wild and wooly, it is comforting to know that I am not alone.

  • texasroots

    No one. I like the reaction I get when people complain to me about B.O., and I tell them I did not vote for him. That’s it, nothing else has to be said; they go away with a despair look on their faces. If it’s not Perry, I will gladly sit this one out, and won’t feel bad, not one iota.

  • changeforrickperry

    If Perry doesn’t win the nom it’ll be 1976 all over again, with the Republicans realizing at the last minute that they nominated the wrong guy. Oh well. I’m holding out hope this will be a 1980 repeat.

    (And by the way, I’m just as irritated as everyone else that Sarah Palin and Fox let us down last night. Until she actually appears ON STAGE with Perry I’ll just let Sarah be Sarah. I still “like” her and what she stands for, but I’m VERY disappointed in her actions; now I remember why I was so irritated with her this summer.)
    ____________________________________________________________
    “Success is not final, failure is not fatal; it is the courage to continue that counts.”–Winston Churchill

    www.changeforrickperry.org

  • texasroots

    Regardless, II consider her a “sell-out”.

  • texasroots

    Regardless, I consider her a “sell-out”.

  • texasroots

    tried to correct my typo, but the website is getting very slow–it showed I cancelled this one that’s why I wrote the second time. Oh brother, RS is getting bad for me to get on site, even worse to sign on and post. I hope I don’t have to stop RS like Drudge and Newsmax.

  • irishgirl

    n/t

  • conservativeparrothead

    Neo means “new”, my interpretation of the term Neo-Conservative, kind of goes to what others are saying which is the original conservatives were very much isolationists, limited govt, limited involvement around the world.

    My view is that Neo-Conservative was the term to seperate from that old line of thinking, thus you have “new” Conservatism, which includes being much more Hawkish than previous incarnations of conservatism.

    Could be way off, but thats how I have always taken the term.

  • Bill S

    He meant “right wing nutjob”