<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/ctpsb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 16:53:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Who are the name callers?</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/ctpsb/2012/03/07/who-are-the-name-callers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.redstate.com/ctpsb/2012/03/07/who-are-the-name-callers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 16:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><a href="/users/ctpsb/">ctpsb</a> (<a href="/ctpsb/">Diary</a>)</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/ctpsb/?p=4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The war on conservative women &#60;a type=&#34;button_count&#34; name=&#34;fb_share&#34; href=&#34;http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fmichellemalkin.com%2F2012%2F03%2F07%2Fthe-war-on-conservative-women%2F&#38;t=The war on conservative women&#8221;&#62; By Michelle Malkin  •  March 7, 2012 09:13 AM The war on conservative women by Michelle Malkin Creators Syndicate Copyright 2012 I’m sorry Rush Limbaugh called 30-year-old Georgetown law student Sandra Fluke a “slut.” She’s really just another professional femme-a-gogue helping to manufacture a false narrative about the GOP “war on women.” I’m sorry &#124; <a class="moretext" href="http://www.redstate.com/ctpsb/2012/03/07/who-are-the-name-callers/">Read More &#187;</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>The war on <em>conservative</em> women</h2>
<div>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>&lt;a type=&quot;button_count&quot; name=&quot;fb_share&quot; href=&quot;http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fmichellemalkin.com%2F2012%2F03%2F07%2Fthe-war-on-conservative-women%2F&amp;t=The war on <em>conservative</em> women&#8221;&gt;</a><img src="http://s.michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-content/themes/mm/images/fb_share.png" alt="Share" /></td>
<td><iframe src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets/tweet_button.1331069346.html#_=1331139038208&amp;count=none&amp;id=twitter-widget-0&amp;lang=en&amp;original_referer=http%3A%2F%2Fmichellemalkin.com%2F2012%2F03%2F07%2Fthe-war-on-conservative-women%2F&amp;size=m&amp;text=Michelle%20Malkin%20%C2%BB%20The%20war%20on%20conservative%20women&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fmichellemalkin.com%2F2012%2F03%2F07%2Fthe-war-on-conservative-women%2F&amp;via=michellemalkin" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" width="320" height="240"></iframe></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<div>By Michelle Malkin  •  March 7, 2012 09:13 AM</div>
<div>
<p>The war on <em>conservative</em> women<br />
by Michelle Malkin<br />
<a href="http://www.creators.com/">Creators Syndicate<br />
</a>Copyright 2012</p>
<p>I’m sorry Rush Limbaugh called 30-year-old Georgetown law student Sandra Fluke a “slut.” She’s really just another professional <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2012/03/02/sandra-fluke-is-not-a-slut-shes-a-femme-agogue-tool/">femme-a-gogue</a> helping to manufacture a false narrative about the GOP “war on women.” I’m sorry the civility police now have an opening to <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2012/03/05/the-anti-rush-revival-revived-and-barack-obamas-petty-presidency/">demonize</a> the entire right based on one radio comment — because it’s the progressive left in this country that has viciously and systematically slimed female conservatives for their beliefs.</p>
<p>We have the well-worn battle scars to prove it. And no, we don’t need coddling phone calls from the pandering president of the United States to convince us to stand up and fight.</p>
<p>At his first press conference of the year on Tuesday, the Nation’s Concern Troll explained that he phoned Fluke to send a message to his <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/obama-i-thinking-sasha-malia-i-called-sandra-fluke-article-1.1034100?localLinksEnabled=false">daughters</a> and all women that they shouldn’t be “attacked or called horrible names because they are being good citizens.” After inserting himself into the fray and dragging Sasha and Malia into the debate, Obama then told a reporter he “didn’t want to get into the business of arbitrating” language and civility. Too late, pal.</p>
<p>The fact is, “slut” is one of the nicer things I’ve been called over 20 years of public life. In college during the late 1980s, it was “race traitor,” “<a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/23/the-old-coconut-smear-another-white-liberal-bigmouth-with-race-issues/">coconut</a>” (brown on the outside white on the inside) and <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2005/11/19/just-a-yellow-woman-doing-a-white-mans-job/">“white man’s puppet.” </a>After my first book, “Invasion,” came out in 2001, it was “immigrant-hater,” the “Radical Right’s Asian Pitbull,” “Tokyo Rose” and “Aunt Tomasina.” In my third book, 2005?s “Unhinged,” I published entire chapters of hate mail rife with <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2005/02/08/comments-trolls-and-the-lefts-continued-whore-fixation/">degrading, unprintable sexual epithets and mockery of my Filipino heritage.</a></p>
<p>If I had a dollar for every time libs have called me a <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=yBVQBhSn0AEC&amp;pg=PA114&amp;lpg=PA114&amp;dq=lbfm+michelle+malkin&amp;source=bl&amp;ots=Brt8aXHiy4&amp;sig=eMgZfwltGYfiMM4a2Tzr68Ozjoo&amp;hl=en&amp;sa=X&amp;ei=HXZXT7zgJYK3twfSrdzfDg&amp;ved=0CD0Q6AEwBA#v=onepage&amp;q=lbfm%20michelle%20malkin&amp;f=false">“Manila whore” and “Subic Bay bar girl,”</a> I’d be able to pay for a ticket to a Hollywood-for-Obama fundraiser. To the HuffPo left, <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/22/whore-for-the-far-right/">whore is my middle name.</a></p>
<p>Self-serving opponents argue that such attacks do not represent “respectable,” “mainstream” liberal opinion about their conservative female counterparts. But it was feminist godmother Gloria Steinem who called Texas Republican Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison a <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/03/the-four-stages-of-conservative-female-abuse/">“female impersonator.”</a> It was NOW leader Patricia Ireland who commanded her flock to only vote for “<a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/14/who-needs-maureen-dowd/">authentic</a>” female political candidates. It was Al Gore consultant Naomi Wolf who accused the late Jeane Kirkpatrick of being “uninflected by the experiences of the female body.”</p>
<p>It was Matt Taibbi, now of Rolling Stone magazine, who mocked my early championing of the tea party movement by jibing: <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/04/16/what-is-the-difference-between-anderson-cooper-and-matt-taibbi/">“Now when I read her stuff, I imagine her narrating her text, book-on-tape style, with a big, hairy set of (redacted) in her mouth. It vastly improves her prose.”</a></p>
<p>It was Keith Olbermann, then at MSNBC and now at Al Gore’s Current TV, who wrote on Twitter that columnist S.E. Cupp was “a <a href="http://dailycaller.com/2011/04/14/olbermann-says-s-e-cupp-demonstrates-the-necessity-of-planned-parenthood/">perfect demonstration of the necessity of the work Planned Parenthood does</a>” and who called me a <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/14/this-is-what-a-big-mashed-up-bag-of-meat-with-lipstick-looks-like/">“mashed up bag of meat with lipstick on it.”</a> He stands by those remarks. Olbermann has been a special guest at the White House.</p>
<p>Some of us have not forgotten when liberal Wisconsin radio host John “Sly” Sylvester outrageously accused GOP Lt. Gov. Rebecca Kleefisch of performing “<a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2011/01/20/lib-radio-talker-attacks-gop-lt-gov-of-wi-she-performed-fellatio-on-all-the-talk-show-hosts-in-milwaukee-and-pulled-a-train/">fellatio on all the talk-show hosts in Milwaukee</a>” and sneered that she had “pulled a train” (a crude phrase for gang sex). (Earlier, he called former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice a “black trophy” and “Aunt Jemima.”)</p>
<p>Or when MSNBC misogynist Ed Schultz called talk show host Laura Ingraham a “talk slut” for criticizing Obama’s petty beer summit. Or when <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/06/05/playboy-hatefk-list-fallout-aol-did-what/">Playboy</a> published a list of the top 10 conservative women who deserved to be “hate-f**ked.” The article, which was <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/06/01/moron-of-the-day/">promoted by Anne Schroeder Mullins at Politico.com</a>, included Ingraham, “The View’s” Elisabeth Hasselbeck, former Bush spokeswoman Dana Perino, GOP Rep. Michele Bachmann and others. Yours truly topped the list with the following description: a “highly f**kable Filipina” and “a regular on Fox News, where her tight body and get-off-my-lawn stare just scream, ‘Do me!’”</p>
<p>And then there’s the <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/?s=sarah+palin+derangement+syndrome">left’s war on Sarah Palin</a>, which would require an entire national forest of trees to publish.</p>
<p>A reporter asked Obama to comment on examples of liberal hate speech at Tuesday’s press conference. He <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/03/asked-about-distasteful-language-from-liberal-commentators-president-obama-says-he-aims-to-lead-by-example/">whiffed</a>, of course. This is, after all, the brave leader who sat on his hands while his street thugs attacked tea party mothers and grandmothers as <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2011/02/25/hate-a-rama-the-vulgar-racist-sexist-homophobic-rage-of-the-left/">“Koch whores”</a> during the fight over union reform in Wisconsin. (As I reported last week, his re-election campaign is now targeting the Koch brothers’ private foundation donors in a parallel effort to chill conservative speech and activism.) He’s leading by example.</p>
<p>So no, we won’t get any phone calls from Mr. Civility. Acknowledging the war on conservative women would obliterate The Narrative. Enjoy the silence.</p>
<p>***</p>
<p>Related: Nick Gillespie – <a href="http://reason.com/blog/2012/03/06/its-like-totally-different-when-a-libera">It’s Like Totally Different When a Liberal Blowhard Guy Calls a Conservative Woman a Twat!</a></p>
<p>And all you need to know in one handy primer: <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2011/01/10/the-progressive-climate-of-hate-an-illustrated-primer-2000-2010/">The progressive “climate of hate:” An illustrated primer, 2000-2010</a></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.redstate.com/ctpsb/2012/03/07/who-are-the-name-callers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keep working. Don&#8217;t get overconfident.</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/ctpsb/2010/09/08/keep-working-dont-get-overconfident/</link>
		<comments>http://www.redstate.com/ctpsb/2010/09/08/keep-working-dont-get-overconfident/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 16:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><a href="/users/ctpsb/">ctpsb</a> (<a href="/ctpsb/">Diary</a>)</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/ctpsb/?p=1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m not being the contrarian here. The linked post below regarding the Colorado Senate race shows be careful out there, this is not in the bag yet. Demorats will do all they can to win every race (negative, third party candidates, etc).  There are many factors in individual races. http://www.nationalreview.com/battle10/245855/libertarian-could-decide-colo-senate-race-michael-sandoval And this is before the Dems&#8217; / State-run media&#8217;s soon-to-come October surprises/artificially-generated Republican &#8220;scandals&#8221; / Dems momentum &#124; <a class="moretext" href="http://www.redstate.com/ctpsb/2010/09/08/keep-working-dont-get-overconfident/">Read More &#187;</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not being the contrarian here. The linked post below regarding the Colorado Senate race shows be careful out there, this is not in the bag yet. Demorats will do all they can to win every race (negative, third party candidates, etc).  There are many factors in individual races.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/battle10/245855/libertarian-could-decide-colo-senate-race-michael-sandoval">http://www.nationalreview.com/battle10/245855/libertarian-could-decide-colo-senate-race-michael-sandoval</a></p>
<p>And this is before the Dems&#8217; / State-run media&#8217;s soon-to-come October surprises/artificially-generated Republican &#8220;scandals&#8221; / Dems momentum is turning at the last minute stories.</p>
<p>Bottom line we need to keep working hard, don&#8217;t assume anything and get the word out on dirty tricks, last-minute surprises, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.redstate.com/ctpsb/2010/09/08/keep-working-dont-get-overconfident/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
