The Downside For Dodd In Outraising His Opponents By $1 Million


Promoted from diaries – Moe Lane.

Campaign fundraising numbers for the first quarter of 2009 were release a few days ago, and Chris Dodd came in with a $1.05 million haul, well ahead of his challengers (Caligiuri at about $45k and Simmons not reporting any significant fundraising). Generally when a three decade incumbent out-raises his potential challengers by a million dollars in a quarter, even if his challengers got in the race late in the reporting period, it is considered positive news and a good sign.

Not so for Chris Dodd. Even after reading this account in the Connecticut Post and follow-up from other news outlets, I though it must be a typo or some sort of misunderstanding, but I was wrong. Of his million dollars raised from nearly 400 donors, a mere $4,250 from only 5 individual donors came from Connecticut voters. That is right…only 0.4% of Dodd’s cash raised came from the individuals he represents.

Rob Simmons took immediate advantage, sending out this letter to supporters and reportedly getting more in-state individual donation within minutes that Dodd managed to drum up in the first quarter.

So if it didn’t come form the people Dodd represents, where did the other 99.6% of his money come from? Let’s see.

  • $610,000 was from individuals, $440,000 from PACs.
  • Eighteen states and the District of Columbia yielded more cash for Dodd than his home state, including approximately $90k from individuals in Massachusetts (maybe Barney Frank is expecting reciprocation from Connecticut donors!).
  • $299,000 came from executives and PACs representing banks, financial services companies and real estate brokerages, $48,000 from insurers and the heath care industry, and $62,800 from lobbyists (H/T Mother Jones).
  • $44,000 came from pawnshops and other companies that make high-interest loans to those with poor credit (H/T Hartford Courant).

Why is it that only out-of-staters and financial types, yet none of his constituents, want to see Chris Dodd re-elected in Connecticut? Probably because they want something from him and won’t have to live in his state themselves. As you can see, huge chunks of money came from those Dodd is supposed to be regulating rather than those he is representing. And why not? It worked for the folks in the mortgage industry for years, and it worked for the AIG executives. They all got what they wanted after making sizeable donations to previous Dodd campaigns. Just a cost of doing business in the banking industry.

Additional coverage at Hot Air, FoxNews, Heath at CT Local Politics, Ironman at The Next Right, and RadioVice Online.

Cross-posted at The Artful Doddger.


Category: ,

RSS feed

7 Comments Leave a comment

The problem is definitely WHO is donating for Dodd...

JadedByPolitics (Diary) Sunday, April 19th at 5:03PM EST (link)

I hope the divide in the poll numbers continue this is definitely ONE that NEEDS TO GO HOME!!!! I am so counting on the people of CT to DO THE RIGHT THING!

 

I'm wondering how much money incumbants could raise

mbecker908 (Diary) Sunday, April 19th at 7:22PM EST (link)

if they could only accept donations from their state (for Senators) and their district (for Reps).

That's an Interesting Question...

IJB Sunday, April 19th at 7:28PM EST (link)

…And it’s probably the one form of “election finance reform” that should be seriously looked at.

I’d normally be against restricting donations to only in-state/in-district donors on a whole host of grounds (chief among them is that I fear such a system would inevitably serve to become nothing more than “incumbent protection”).

But Dodd’s case presents a interesting rebuttal to that line of thinking…

I'm absolutely opposed to what I suggested. :-0

mbecker908 (Diary) Sunday, April 19th at 7:56PM EST (link)

On the general subject of campaign finance, I would allow unlimited cash contributions from all sources with a requirement for 48 reporting in an online database that is searchable. And I’d make it a felony with a 10 year mandatory for not reporting.

 
 
 

How about Harry Reid?

harlan Sunday, April 19th at 10:51PM EST (link)

2.2 mil in the first quarter. I wonder where all that came from? Hmmmm?

Reid is an embarrassment to the state of Nevada, and as duplicitous and compromised a character as they come.

So I ask again. Where is all that money coming from?

 

Why do you insist on a logical discussion?

USNJIMRET (Diary) Monday, April 20th at 1:08AM EST (link)

“Why is it that only out-of-staters and financial types, yet none of his constituents, want to see Chris Dodd re-elected in Connecticut?”
Obviously you actually still believe that a Senator, or Representative for that matter, is supposed to be accountable to and working for, the people in his/her State/District.
When there is ample evidence to the contrary.
At lest the Mafia was honest about ‘buying’ off government officials.

Call me old fashioned.

CTVoter2010 (Diary) Monday, April 20th at 9:39AM EST (link)

But the scary part is that those doing the buying off are honest about it. Remember the email from Dodd’s fundraising exec at AIG who pressured his co-workers and subordinates to donate because Dodd was about to become chair of the Senate Banking Committee? It pretty clearly said we are going to donate because it will likely help us in the near future.

Dodd is the only one who is being dishonest about it. I don’t blame the donors as much as I do Dodd. He’s the one taking their money then pandering to their wishes.

“…among his intimate friends he was better known by the sobriquet of ‘The Artful Dodger,’ [and] Oliver concluded that, being of a dissipated and careless turn, the moral precepts of his benefactor had hitherto been thrown away upon him.” – Oliver Twist

www.theartfuldoddger.blogspot.com