<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>RedState</title><link>https://redstate.com/curt_levey/2011/10/31/cain_allegations/feed/</link><description>Conservative News &amp; Politics</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 06:32:25 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Cain Allegations: No There There</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[In light of last night’s Politico story about allegations against Herman Cain, it is important to clarify the legal meaning of the term “sexual harassment.” Specifically, Politico reports allegations that Herman Cain made an “an unwanted sexual advance” and engaged in &amp;#8220;innuendo or personal questions of a sexually suggestive nature.&amp;#8221; Politico suggests that this amounts to sexual harassment, using the term at least six times.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 09:01:56 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Curt Levey]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://redstate.com/curt_levey/2011/10/31/cain_allegations-n40954</link></item></channel></rss>