« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Revisionist History: why DO people react so angrily?

Robert Higgs of the Independent Institute asked this question yesterday in regard to the push back he receives when he attempts to correct the historical record of widespread inconsistencies. The short answer is that people are skeptical of accounts that contradict a prevailing view, even if true. Of course I can’t really say why, when confronted with what certainly could be the truth, some people attack the messenger rather than engage in internal reasoning and studying of the facts.

From a personal perspective, I was once as much in the dark about our history as every other person whose education is the product of the public school system where each pupil receives only a smattering of American history, enough to have a rough idea of where we came from, but leaves complete gray areas about why or how, or the purpose. The moments at which we realize the rather thick haze surrounding what we think to be true come at different points for each person, if they ever notice it.

I realized the thick haze surrounding what I thought to be true shortly after 9/11. Being confronted with the extreme incompetence and ineffectiveness of the many (perhaps too many) agencies within our Federal government that were established in the name of safety and security, I acquired an insatiable curiosity about how government can be so expensive and fail so miserably at its most basic of duties. It was the day I lost a rather innocent and naïve trust in government to do the right things for the right reasons, and embarked on a years-long course of study, although rather meandering at first, to find those answers.

Finding the truth about what our government is when one is well into adulthood isn’t such an easy task, and for me it was especially so when pop culture throughout my lifetime supported and reinforced the innocent trust in government. No one, at least as far as I could tell, was questioning the very basic foundation of government, calling out the incompetence and failure as a symptom of that it was – lack of focus.

I started out studying modern history looking for something, anything that could be a clue to what was wrong. Surely, whatever it was to have gone wrong happened within the last few decades, I thought.  I found myself enclosed in a pile of books from covering topics from J. Edgar Hoover, to Nixon, Carter, Reagan, and onward. I spent days and weeks sifting through them trying to find some logical golden thread that would lead me straight to the problem. I found nothing. Frustrated to the point of nearly giving up, I thought of something that never occurred to me before.  Perhaps it would be easier to find out what our government was intended to be and then work my way from there. I cracked open a copy of “The Federalist” someone had given me as a gift several years prior, that I had never read.  I was shocked and amazed at the differences between what Hamilton, Jay, and Madison had told the founding generation the Federal Government would be versus what it is today.

Since I had to squeeze my studies into free time, I had been reading during breaks at work. One of my colleagues inquired about the book I was reading, and I remember remaking to him that “The government is doing an awful lot of things it was never intended to do.” The next day, he had a copy of “The Federalist” and was reading during break too!

I have to admit, though, my response to Mr. Higgs was rather pointed and emotional, and he did not deserve it.  It was that way because my self-directed journey has been very long and arduous, and is far from complete. It has taken me from the Revolutionary era, through the 19th century and into the 20th where I have decided to take a breather. I have a difficult time studying the last 2/3rds of the 20th century; picking up and forcing myself to read the works of Woodrow Wilson and others from the same line of reasoning disturbs me. Even though I am reluctant, I can say without a doubt, that is where we went wrong. It has everything to do with the dangers and battles we face in the present. In addition to that, Mr. Higgs’ complaint only highlights the immense amount of work we have in front of us in order to take that knowledge of the truth about history and transform it from being just documents and books sitting on a shelf collecting dust into the salvation of great nation.

COMMENTS

  • revivalrebel

    Read the ANTI-federalists and you’ll be shocked. These men predicted many of the failings of the federal government that we are living today.
    Just take a look and be amazed. Men like Patrick Henry,.. YES, THAT Patrick Henry, opposed the government that was being implemented. He, as well as the others, felt that too much power was being focused into the central federal government.The list of opponents, so called Anti-Federalists, is incredible. Some of the days biggest and best “Patriots” are there. IF perhaps more had listened then perhaps things might be different now. One thing that amazes me is that from the beginning there was a DEEP divide into the governance and direction that the people wanted this country to go. Also from the beggining the “More government, BIGGER government crowd has been at work implementing its web throughout this land. Unfortunately, from the beggining they seem to be winning

    • dajeeps

      I have read those, and yes, some are very predictive of the predicament in which we find ourselves. Although, I think there has been breakdown in many of barriers set up to prevent these things from happening, not only at the Federal level, but also on the part of the states.

      I look at the situation back in the 1780s, and after reading multiple accounts, it’s strewn through the papers of various framers, it really was untenable. The majority of the folks participating in Shays’ Rebellion, for example, were members of the militia and those who did not participate weren’t interested in helping the state government maintain control. Civil society there was coming apart at the seams. The almost coup against congress was due to promises of pay not being honored, not because congress didn’t want to, but because they didn’t have the money – states were not paying. And there were other things going on with rivalries and lopsided pacts between the states, not to mention everyone was executing a different foreign policy. I think I agree that something needed to be done at that point to keep the whole country from dissolving into chaos and arriving at a hard tyranny much faster than we have.

      It’s sort of nuanced in my diary that pop culture and the public school system feed a public trust in government that certainly has never been warranted nor earned. Freedom isn’t something we get to keep by just going to the voting booth once every two years, if that often, and then not paying attention to what happens afterward. I did it because I wasn’t raised to be on top of government or taught that freedom is the responsibility of each generation afterward to defend and fight for, not just in a military sense. That is part of the breakdown, We the People, ourselves.

      I support the Spirit of ’98 – Nullification. I support states standing up for their constitutionally granted powers. When it comes right down to it, it really does not matter what SCOTUS says, it’s what the states think and what individuals think, because whether the Feds agree or not, we have inalienable rights. I don’t understand why we sit there and take it, but I have been doing everything I can to get the word out about the 10th Amendment and what we can do to blunt the tyranny coming out of DC. It’s tough here though, I live in NY, but I muddle through with whatever support I can get.

  • valrobex

    of history. And like you, I found that many “history” books are simply not true history.

    Can’t remember when I made this decision but I seldom read any history books copyrighted after the 1980′s. (By the way, it’s quite enlightening to read a modern translation of the Koran along side an English translation 50 or more years older. There is no doubt that the Islamic terrorists are providing a sanitized translation for us to read today.)

    Here’s another example. I became a psychologist late in life and in my studies I kept reading about Carl Rogers. What was in the text was crap! How could Rogers have had such an impact on the field?

    So, being foolish, I picked up Rogers’ actual works and dropped my brains out on the floor. Now, I understood why Rogers had the impact he had on my new profession.

    I too, have gone back to the original Founding Fathers and their writings even if it is sometimes difficult (archaic language) – but it is a big eye opener.

    We have a big job ahead of us to get the word out. Thankfully, we have modern technology and ideas that might have taken years to get out can now take weeks or even days.

    I am also very heartened that it is the Conservatives who have dominated the new media.